Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape
Models of habitat suitability in postfire landscapes are needed by land managers to make timely decisions regarding postfire timber harvest and other management activities. Many species of cavity-nesting birds are dependent on postfire landscapes for breeding and other aspects of their life history...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2007-11, Vol.71 (8), p.2600-2611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2611 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2600 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | RUSSELL, ROBIN E SAAB, VICTORIA A DUDLEY, JONATHAN G |
description | Models of habitat suitability in postfire landscapes are needed by land managers to make timely decisions regarding postfire timber harvest and other management activities. Many species of cavity-nesting birds are dependent on postfire landscapes for breeding and other aspects of their life history and are responsive to postfire management activities (e.g., timber harvest). In addition, several cavity nesters are designated as species at risk. We compare the ability of 2 types of models to distinguish between nest and non-nest locations of 6 cavity-nesting bird species (Lewis's woodpecker [Melanerpes lewis], black-backed woodpecker [Picoides arcticus], hairy woodpecker [P. villosus], northern flicker [Colaptes auratus], western bluebird [Sialia mexicana], and mountain bluebird [S. currucoides]) in the early postfire years for a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in Idaho, USA. The 2 model sets consisted of 1) models based on readily available remotely sensed data and 2) models containing field-collected data in addition to remotely sensed data (combination models). We evaluated models of nesting habitat by quantifying the model's ability to correctly identify nest and non-nest locations and by determining the percentage of correctly identified nest locations. Additionally, we developed relative habitat-suitability maps for nesting habitat of black-backed and Lewis's woodpeckers from the best models. For all species except Lewis's woodpeckers, model performance improved with the addition of field-collected data. Models containing remotely sensed data adequately distinguished between nest and non-nest locations for black-backed woodpecker and Lewis's woodpecker only, whereas models containing both field-collected and remotely sensed data were adequate for all 6 species. Improvements in the availability of more accurate remote sensing technology would likely lead to improvements in the ability of the models to predict nesting locations. External validation with data from other wildfires is necessary to confirm the general applicability of our habitat-suitability models to other forests. Land managers responsible for maintaining habitat for cavity-nesting birds in postfire landscapes can use these models to identify potential nesting areas for these species and select areas in burned forests where postfire salvage logging is most likely to have minimal impacts on cavity-nesting bird habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2193/2007-034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19493764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4496381</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4496381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4370-7b2ce6d98d681de67d61f02a47880f5eb5b3b173e314dba66f1a27de3636bf9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtrGzEQhUVoIG5ayA8odOlDyYsa3VbSPramsds4aSAXh74IyZKC3M3KldZt_O8rs8GBQp6GmfnmMOcAcITRJ4IbekIQEhBRtgdGpRWQSCxegRFChMCa4bsD8DrnJUIUY8lH4GyqTeh1D6_WpZjQhn5TnUfr2lz5mKqx_lMm8MLlPnT31ZeQbK5CV-nqMubeh-Sqme5sXuiVewP2vW6ze_tUD8HN6dfr8RTOfky-jT_PoGFUICgMWThuG2m5xNZxYTn2iGgmpES-dqY21GBBHcXMGs25x5oI6yin3PjG0kPwcdBdpfh7XT5TDyEvXNvqzsV1VrhhxTlnBfzwH7iM69SV3xShDEuCKSrQ8QAtUsw5Oa9WKTzotFEYqW2kahupKpEWFA7o39C6zYuc-j4_n1C0lX438Mvcx7TjGWs4lfhZLuTePe7WOv1SXFBRq_nFRN3O5Ly5m_5UW7n3A-91VPo-haxurggqJpCkNS03u2RMiLFzLzv5B0vnomk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234182130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>RUSSELL, ROBIN E ; SAAB, VICTORIA A ; DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</creator><creatorcontrib>RUSSELL, ROBIN E ; SAAB, VICTORIA A ; DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</creatorcontrib><description>Models of habitat suitability in postfire landscapes are needed by land managers to make timely decisions regarding postfire timber harvest and other management activities. Many species of cavity-nesting birds are dependent on postfire landscapes for breeding and other aspects of their life history and are responsive to postfire management activities (e.g., timber harvest). In addition, several cavity nesters are designated as species at risk. We compare the ability of 2 types of models to distinguish between nest and non-nest locations of 6 cavity-nesting bird species (Lewis's woodpecker [Melanerpes lewis], black-backed woodpecker [Picoides arcticus], hairy woodpecker [P. villosus], northern flicker [Colaptes auratus], western bluebird [Sialia mexicana], and mountain bluebird [S. currucoides]) in the early postfire years for a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in Idaho, USA. The 2 model sets consisted of 1) models based on readily available remotely sensed data and 2) models containing field-collected data in addition to remotely sensed data (combination models). We evaluated models of nesting habitat by quantifying the model's ability to correctly identify nest and non-nest locations and by determining the percentage of correctly identified nest locations. Additionally, we developed relative habitat-suitability maps for nesting habitat of black-backed and Lewis's woodpeckers from the best models. For all species except Lewis's woodpeckers, model performance improved with the addition of field-collected data. Models containing remotely sensed data adequately distinguished between nest and non-nest locations for black-backed woodpecker and Lewis's woodpecker only, whereas models containing both field-collected and remotely sensed data were adequate for all 6 species. Improvements in the availability of more accurate remote sensing technology would likely lead to improvements in the ability of the models to predict nesting locations. External validation with data from other wildfires is necessary to confirm the general applicability of our habitat-suitability models to other forests. Land managers responsible for maintaining habitat for cavity-nesting birds in postfire landscapes can use these models to identify potential nesting areas for these species and select areas in burned forests where postfire salvage logging is most likely to have minimal impacts on cavity-nesting bird habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2007-034</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal nesting ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; burned coniferous forest ; cavity-nesting birds ; Colaptes auratus ; coniferous forests ; Data collection ; decision support systems ; forest fires ; Forest habitats ; Forest service ; forest trees ; forest-wildlife relations ; habitat suitability ; Habitats ; Harvesting ; Land management ; Life history ; Logging ; Managers ; Melanerpes lewis ; Modeling ; Nesting ; nesting habitat ; Picoides ; Picoides arcticus ; Picoides spp ; Picoides villosus ; Pine trees ; Pinus ponderosa ; Pixels ; receiver operating curves ; Remote sensing ; remotely sensed data ; Research s ; risk assessment ; Sialia ; Sialia currucoides ; Sialia mexicana ; Sialia spp ; tree and stand measurements ; tree cavities ; Vegetation mapping ; wild birds ; Wildfires ; Wildlife habitats ; wildlife management ; Woodpeckers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-11, Vol.71 (8), p.2600-2611</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4370-7b2ce6d98d681de67d61f02a47880f5eb5b3b173e314dba66f1a27de3636bf9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4370-7b2ce6d98d681de67d61f02a47880f5eb5b3b173e314dba66f1a27de3636bf9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4496381$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4496381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>RUSSELL, ROBIN E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAB, VICTORIA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Models of habitat suitability in postfire landscapes are needed by land managers to make timely decisions regarding postfire timber harvest and other management activities. Many species of cavity-nesting birds are dependent on postfire landscapes for breeding and other aspects of their life history and are responsive to postfire management activities (e.g., timber harvest). In addition, several cavity nesters are designated as species at risk. We compare the ability of 2 types of models to distinguish between nest and non-nest locations of 6 cavity-nesting bird species (Lewis's woodpecker [Melanerpes lewis], black-backed woodpecker [Picoides arcticus], hairy woodpecker [P. villosus], northern flicker [Colaptes auratus], western bluebird [Sialia mexicana], and mountain bluebird [S. currucoides]) in the early postfire years for a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in Idaho, USA. The 2 model sets consisted of 1) models based on readily available remotely sensed data and 2) models containing field-collected data in addition to remotely sensed data (combination models). We evaluated models of nesting habitat by quantifying the model's ability to correctly identify nest and non-nest locations and by determining the percentage of correctly identified nest locations. Additionally, we developed relative habitat-suitability maps for nesting habitat of black-backed and Lewis's woodpeckers from the best models. For all species except Lewis's woodpeckers, model performance improved with the addition of field-collected data. Models containing remotely sensed data adequately distinguished between nest and non-nest locations for black-backed woodpecker and Lewis's woodpecker only, whereas models containing both field-collected and remotely sensed data were adequate for all 6 species. Improvements in the availability of more accurate remote sensing technology would likely lead to improvements in the ability of the models to predict nesting locations. External validation with data from other wildfires is necessary to confirm the general applicability of our habitat-suitability models to other forests. Land managers responsible for maintaining habitat for cavity-nesting birds in postfire landscapes can use these models to identify potential nesting areas for these species and select areas in burned forests where postfire salvage logging is most likely to have minimal impacts on cavity-nesting bird habitats.</description><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>burned coniferous forest</subject><subject>cavity-nesting birds</subject><subject>Colaptes auratus</subject><subject>coniferous forests</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>forest fires</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>forest-wildlife relations</subject><subject>habitat suitability</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Melanerpes lewis</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>nesting habitat</subject><subject>Picoides</subject><subject>Picoides arcticus</subject><subject>Picoides spp</subject><subject>Picoides villosus</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus ponderosa</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>receiver operating curves</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>remotely sensed data</subject><subject>Research s</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>Sialia</subject><subject>Sialia currucoides</subject><subject>Sialia mexicana</subject><subject>Sialia spp</subject><subject>tree and stand measurements</subject><subject>tree cavities</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>Woodpeckers</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtrGzEQhUVoIG5ayA8odOlDyYsa3VbSPramsds4aSAXh74IyZKC3M3KldZt_O8rs8GBQp6GmfnmMOcAcITRJ4IbekIQEhBRtgdGpRWQSCxegRFChMCa4bsD8DrnJUIUY8lH4GyqTeh1D6_WpZjQhn5TnUfr2lz5mKqx_lMm8MLlPnT31ZeQbK5CV-nqMubeh-Sqme5sXuiVewP2vW6ze_tUD8HN6dfr8RTOfky-jT_PoGFUICgMWThuG2m5xNZxYTn2iGgmpES-dqY21GBBHcXMGs25x5oI6yin3PjG0kPwcdBdpfh7XT5TDyEvXNvqzsV1VrhhxTlnBfzwH7iM69SV3xShDEuCKSrQ8QAtUsw5Oa9WKTzotFEYqW2kahupKpEWFA7o39C6zYuc-j4_n1C0lX438Mvcx7TjGWs4lfhZLuTePe7WOv1SXFBRq_nFRN3O5Ly5m_5UW7n3A-91VPo-haxurggqJpCkNS03u2RMiLFzLzv5B0vnomk</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>RUSSELL, ROBIN E</creator><creator>SAAB, VICTORIA A</creator><creator>DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape</title><author>RUSSELL, ROBIN E ; SAAB, VICTORIA A ; DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4370-7b2ce6d98d681de67d61f02a47880f5eb5b3b173e314dba66f1a27de3636bf9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>burned coniferous forest</topic><topic>cavity-nesting birds</topic><topic>Colaptes auratus</topic><topic>coniferous forests</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>forest fires</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>forest-wildlife relations</topic><topic>habitat suitability</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Melanerpes lewis</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>nesting habitat</topic><topic>Picoides</topic><topic>Picoides arcticus</topic><topic>Picoides spp</topic><topic>Picoides villosus</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus ponderosa</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>receiver operating curves</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>remotely sensed data</topic><topic>Research s</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>Sialia</topic><topic>Sialia currucoides</topic><topic>Sialia mexicana</topic><topic>Sialia spp</topic><topic>tree and stand measurements</topic><topic>tree cavities</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>Woodpeckers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RUSSELL, ROBIN E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAB, VICTORIA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RUSSELL, ROBIN E</au><au>SAAB, VICTORIA A</au><au>DUDLEY, JONATHAN G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2600</spage><epage>2611</epage><pages>2600-2611</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Models of habitat suitability in postfire landscapes are needed by land managers to make timely decisions regarding postfire timber harvest and other management activities. Many species of cavity-nesting birds are dependent on postfire landscapes for breeding and other aspects of their life history and are responsive to postfire management activities (e.g., timber harvest). In addition, several cavity nesters are designated as species at risk. We compare the ability of 2 types of models to distinguish between nest and non-nest locations of 6 cavity-nesting bird species (Lewis's woodpecker [Melanerpes lewis], black-backed woodpecker [Picoides arcticus], hairy woodpecker [P. villosus], northern flicker [Colaptes auratus], western bluebird [Sialia mexicana], and mountain bluebird [S. currucoides]) in the early postfire years for a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in Idaho, USA. The 2 model sets consisted of 1) models based on readily available remotely sensed data and 2) models containing field-collected data in addition to remotely sensed data (combination models). We evaluated models of nesting habitat by quantifying the model's ability to correctly identify nest and non-nest locations and by determining the percentage of correctly identified nest locations. Additionally, we developed relative habitat-suitability maps for nesting habitat of black-backed and Lewis's woodpeckers from the best models. For all species except Lewis's woodpeckers, model performance improved with the addition of field-collected data. Models containing remotely sensed data adequately distinguished between nest and non-nest locations for black-backed woodpecker and Lewis's woodpecker only, whereas models containing both field-collected and remotely sensed data were adequate for all 6 species. Improvements in the availability of more accurate remote sensing technology would likely lead to improvements in the ability of the models to predict nesting locations. External validation with data from other wildfires is necessary to confirm the general applicability of our habitat-suitability models to other forests. Land managers responsible for maintaining habitat for cavity-nesting birds in postfire landscapes can use these models to identify potential nesting areas for these species and select areas in burned forests where postfire salvage logging is most likely to have minimal impacts on cavity-nesting bird habitats.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2007-034</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-11, Vol.71 (8), p.2600-2611 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19493764 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal nesting Bird nesting Birds burned coniferous forest cavity-nesting birds Colaptes auratus coniferous forests Data collection decision support systems forest fires Forest habitats Forest service forest trees forest-wildlife relations habitat suitability Habitats Harvesting Land management Life history Logging Managers Melanerpes lewis Modeling Nesting nesting habitat Picoides Picoides arcticus Picoides spp Picoides villosus Pine trees Pinus ponderosa Pixels receiver operating curves Remote sensing remotely sensed data Research s risk assessment Sialia Sialia currucoides Sialia mexicana Sialia spp tree and stand measurements tree cavities Vegetation mapping wild birds Wildfires Wildlife habitats wildlife management Woodpeckers |
title | Habitat-Suitability Models for Cavity-Nesting Birds in a Postfire Landscape |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat-Suitability%20Models%20for%20Cavity-Nesting%20Birds%20in%20a%20Postfire%20Landscape&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=RUSSELL,%20ROBIN%20E&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2600&rft.epage=2611&rft.pages=2600-2611&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2007-034&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4496381%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234182130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4496381&rfr_iscdi=true |