Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments

•Large-scale features can be recovered through low-frequency waveform inversion.•Small-scale defects are effectively detected through high-frequency migration.•The procedure succeeds in scenarios where the defect lies in difficult backgrounds.•We provide various error analyses toward the use of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonics 2018-01, Vol.82, p.357-370
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Luan T., Modrak, Ryan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue
container_start_page 357
container_title Ultrasonics
container_volume 82
creator Nguyen, Luan T.
Modrak, Ryan T.
description •Large-scale features can be recovered through low-frequency waveform inversion.•Small-scale defects are effectively detected through high-frequency migration.•The procedure succeeds in scenarios where the defect lies in difficult backgrounds.•We provide various error analyses toward the use of this method in NDT practice. Delaminations, cracks and other defects in engineered structures often lie close to the theoretical resolution limit for ultrasonic waves. While ultrasonic waveform tomography has succeeded in detecting such features, recovery is difficult because it requires computationally expensive high-frequency numerical wave simulations and an accurate understanding of large-scale background variations of the engineered structure. Without such knowledge, small defects may be incorrectly imaged or go undetected altogether. To reduce computational cost and improve detection of small defects, a useful approach is to divide the waveform tomography procedure into two steps: first, a low-frequency model-building step aimed at recovering background structure, and second, a high-frequency imaging step targeting defects. The first is naturally formulated as waveform inversion for wavespeed parameters and the second as time reversal migration for reflectivity. Through synthetic test cases, we show that the two-step workflow appears more promising in most cases than a single-step inversion. In particular, we find that new workflow succeeds in the challenging scenario where the defect lies along preexisting layer interface in a composite bridge deck and in related experiments involving noisy data or inaccurate source parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949087765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041624X17301749</els_id><sourcerecordid>1949087765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7bfa168b1306c0583cd2aef2d6a2ff07885aa0c212a8902355c8b07b85aa08293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi1ERaeFN0DISzYJx87NZoGECgWkSt1QiZ3lOCeDR4k92M5QHqLvjGdSWHblY_s7_7n8hLxmUDJg7btduUwp6FhyYF0JsgTGnpENE11dSNmK52QDULOi5fWPc3IR4w6A1YJVL8g5F1IIVrMNebg7iXhnDf2tDzhanAZq3QFDtN5R7QY6223Q6Xizjho_7ye8pz8xYfBbdOiXSGMKi0lLwPie8k_ULTMGa_RE7ay31m1POs67AVfSHpCmHB-_8H6f4Rldii_J2ainiK8ez0tyd_35-9XX4ub2y7erjzeFqVqeiq4fNWtFzypoDTSiMgPXOPKh1XwcoROi0RoMZ1wLCbxqGiN66PrTs-CyuiRvV9198L-W3IeabTQ4Tfo0jmKyliC6rm0yWq-oCT7GgKPa52Z1-KMYqKMRaqdWI9TRCAVSZSNy2pvHCks_4_A_6d_mM_BhBTDPebAYVDQWncHBBjRJDd4-XeEv0v-gQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949087765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nguyen, Luan T. ; Modrak, Ryan T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Luan T. ; Modrak, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><description>•Large-scale features can be recovered through low-frequency waveform inversion.•Small-scale defects are effectively detected through high-frequency migration.•The procedure succeeds in scenarios where the defect lies in difficult backgrounds.•We provide various error analyses toward the use of this method in NDT practice. Delaminations, cracks and other defects in engineered structures often lie close to the theoretical resolution limit for ultrasonic waves. While ultrasonic waveform tomography has succeeded in detecting such features, recovery is difficult because it requires computationally expensive high-frequency numerical wave simulations and an accurate understanding of large-scale background variations of the engineered structure. Without such knowledge, small defects may be incorrectly imaged or go undetected altogether. To reduce computational cost and improve detection of small defects, a useful approach is to divide the waveform tomography procedure into two steps: first, a low-frequency model-building step aimed at recovering background structure, and second, a high-frequency imaging step targeting defects. The first is naturally formulated as waveform inversion for wavespeed parameters and the second as time reversal migration for reflectivity. Through synthetic test cases, we show that the two-step workflow appears more promising in most cases than a single-step inversion. In particular, we find that new workflow succeeds in the challenging scenario where the defect lies along preexisting layer interface in a composite bridge deck and in related experiments involving noisy data or inaccurate source parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28988141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Full-waveform inversion ; Nondestructive testing ; Reverse-time migration ; Ultrasonics</subject><ispartof>Ultrasonics, 2018-01, Vol.82, p.357-370</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7bfa168b1306c0583cd2aef2d6a2ff07885aa0c212a8902355c8b07b85aa08293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7bfa168b1306c0583cd2aef2d6a2ff07885aa0c212a8902355c8b07b85aa08293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Luan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modrak, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments</title><title>Ultrasonics</title><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><description>•Large-scale features can be recovered through low-frequency waveform inversion.•Small-scale defects are effectively detected through high-frequency migration.•The procedure succeeds in scenarios where the defect lies in difficult backgrounds.•We provide various error analyses toward the use of this method in NDT practice. Delaminations, cracks and other defects in engineered structures often lie close to the theoretical resolution limit for ultrasonic waves. While ultrasonic waveform tomography has succeeded in detecting such features, recovery is difficult because it requires computationally expensive high-frequency numerical wave simulations and an accurate understanding of large-scale background variations of the engineered structure. Without such knowledge, small defects may be incorrectly imaged or go undetected altogether. To reduce computational cost and improve detection of small defects, a useful approach is to divide the waveform tomography procedure into two steps: first, a low-frequency model-building step aimed at recovering background structure, and second, a high-frequency imaging step targeting defects. The first is naturally formulated as waveform inversion for wavespeed parameters and the second as time reversal migration for reflectivity. Through synthetic test cases, we show that the two-step workflow appears more promising in most cases than a single-step inversion. In particular, we find that new workflow succeeds in the challenging scenario where the defect lies along preexisting layer interface in a composite bridge deck and in related experiments involving noisy data or inaccurate source parameters.</description><subject>Full-waveform inversion</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Reverse-time migration</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><issn>0041-624X</issn><issn>1874-9968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi1ERaeFN0DISzYJx87NZoGECgWkSt1QiZ3lOCeDR4k92M5QHqLvjGdSWHblY_s7_7n8hLxmUDJg7btduUwp6FhyYF0JsgTGnpENE11dSNmK52QDULOi5fWPc3IR4w6A1YJVL8g5F1IIVrMNebg7iXhnDf2tDzhanAZq3QFDtN5R7QY6223Q6Xizjho_7ye8pz8xYfBbdOiXSGMKi0lLwPie8k_ULTMGa_RE7ay31m1POs67AVfSHpCmHB-_8H6f4Rldii_J2ainiK8ez0tyd_35-9XX4ub2y7erjzeFqVqeiq4fNWtFzypoDTSiMgPXOPKh1XwcoROi0RoMZ1wLCbxqGiN66PrTs-CyuiRvV9198L-W3IeabTQ4Tfo0jmKyliC6rm0yWq-oCT7GgKPa52Z1-KMYqKMRaqdWI9TRCAVSZSNy2pvHCks_4_A_6d_mM_BhBTDPebAYVDQWncHBBjRJDd4-XeEv0v-gQA</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Luan T.</creator><creator>Modrak, Ryan T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments</title><author>Nguyen, Luan T. ; Modrak, Ryan T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7bfa168b1306c0583cd2aef2d6a2ff07885aa0c212a8902355c8b07b85aa08293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Full-waveform inversion</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Reverse-time migration</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Luan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modrak, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Luan T.</au><au>Modrak, Ryan T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>357</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>357-370</pages><issn>0041-624X</issn><eissn>1874-9968</eissn><abstract>•Large-scale features can be recovered through low-frequency waveform inversion.•Small-scale defects are effectively detected through high-frequency migration.•The procedure succeeds in scenarios where the defect lies in difficult backgrounds.•We provide various error analyses toward the use of this method in NDT practice. Delaminations, cracks and other defects in engineered structures often lie close to the theoretical resolution limit for ultrasonic waves. While ultrasonic waveform tomography has succeeded in detecting such features, recovery is difficult because it requires computationally expensive high-frequency numerical wave simulations and an accurate understanding of large-scale background variations of the engineered structure. Without such knowledge, small defects may be incorrectly imaged or go undetected altogether. To reduce computational cost and improve detection of small defects, a useful approach is to divide the waveform tomography procedure into two steps: first, a low-frequency model-building step aimed at recovering background structure, and second, a high-frequency imaging step targeting defects. The first is naturally formulated as waveform inversion for wavespeed parameters and the second as time reversal migration for reflectivity. Through synthetic test cases, we show that the two-step workflow appears more promising in most cases than a single-step inversion. In particular, we find that new workflow succeeds in the challenging scenario where the defect lies along preexisting layer interface in a composite bridge deck and in related experiments involving noisy data or inaccurate source parameters.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28988141</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-624X
ispartof Ultrasonics, 2018-01, Vol.82, p.357-370
issn 0041-624X
1874-9968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949087765
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Full-waveform inversion
Nondestructive testing
Reverse-time migration
Ultrasonics
title Ultrasonic wavefield inversion and migration in complex heterogeneous structures: 2D numerical imaging and nondestructive testing experiments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonic%20wavefield%20inversion%20and%20migration%20in%20complex%20heterogeneous%20structures:%202D%20numerical%20imaging%20and%20nondestructive%20testing%20experiments&rft.jtitle=Ultrasonics&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Luan%20T.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=357-370&rft.issn=0041-624X&rft.eissn=1874-9968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949087765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949087765&rft_id=info:pmid/28988141&rft_els_id=S0041624X17301749&rfr_iscdi=true