Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube
•We assessed the accuracy of Korean videos about PD on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them.•Only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD provided reliable information.•The videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents. This study aimed to evaluate the a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical neuroscience 2017-12, Vol.46, p.167-170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Journal of clinical neuroscience |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kim, Ryul Park, Hye-Young Kim, Han-Joon Kim, Aryun Jang, Mi-Hee Jeon, Beomseok |
description | •We assessed the accuracy of Korean videos about PD on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them.•Only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD provided reliable information.•The videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease (PD) on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them. YouTube search was performed using the search term “Parkinson disease” in Korean language on March 28, 2017. Two independent neurologists categorized the videos into “reliable”, “misleading” or “patient experiences”. The number of views, days since upload, video length, number of “likes” and “dislikes”, and upload source were collected for each video. A total of 138 videos were included in this study. Of these, 91 videos (65.9%) were reliable; 31 (22.5%) were misleading, and 16 (11.6%) were of patient experiences. The videos with patient experiences had the highest number of mean views with 9710.4±3686.9, followed by misleading videos with 5075.0±1198.6, and reliable videos with 2146.8±353.4 (ANOVA, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949085350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0967586817315205</els_id><sourcerecordid>1949085350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-76581abd2c7cc2cc07c714fbd36030f11629f8b4ac582a48afde493dbd1e85b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL2O1DAUhS0EYoeFF6BALmkS_BM7NqJBy69YCYqloLIc-2blIWPv-iaDpuM1eD2ehIxmoaS6xfnOke5HyFPOWs64frFttyXkVjDet8y2jPF7ZMOVFI3QSt4nG2Z13yijzRl5hLhljNlOsofkTBhrjO7shty-qQc6-jAj9RVoLjP10w9_QJryPs0pX7-knoaSZ8hrlP10wIS0jPRTqeAz3acIBWmFa1_jitMvvn5PGUv-_fMX0pgQPAItmX4ry9UywGPyYPQTwpO7e06-vnt7dfGhufz8_uPF68smSKXnptfKcD9EEfoQRAisDz3vxiFKzSQbOdfCjmbofFBG-M74MUJnZRwiB6MGLs_J89PuTS23C-DsdgkDTJPPUBZ03HaWGSUVW1FxQkMtiBVGd1PTzteD48wdVbutO6p2R9WOWbeqXkvP7vaXYQfxX-Wv2xV4dQJg_XKfoDoMCXKAmCqE2cWS_rf_B8gXkmc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949085350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kim, Ryul ; Park, Hye-Young ; Kim, Han-Joon ; Kim, Aryun ; Jang, Mi-Hee ; Jeon, Beomseok</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ryul ; Park, Hye-Young ; Kim, Han-Joon ; Kim, Aryun ; Jang, Mi-Hee ; Jeon, Beomseok</creatorcontrib><description>•We assessed the accuracy of Korean videos about PD on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them.•Only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD provided reliable information.•The videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease (PD) on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them. YouTube search was performed using the search term “Parkinson disease” in Korean language on March 28, 2017. Two independent neurologists categorized the videos into “reliable”, “misleading” or “patient experiences”. The number of views, days since upload, video length, number of “likes” and “dislikes”, and upload source were collected for each video. A total of 138 videos were included in this study. Of these, 91 videos (65.9%) were reliable; 31 (22.5%) were misleading, and 16 (11.6%) were of patient experiences. The videos with patient experiences had the highest number of mean views with 9710.4±3686.9, followed by misleading videos with 5075.0±1198.6, and reliable videos with 2146.8±353.4 (ANOVA, p<0.001). The number of mean views per day was 4.0±0.6 for the reliable videos, which was significantly lower than the misleading videos (9.7±3.4, p=0.020) and the videos of patient experiences (11.3±4.6, p=0.023). The reliable videos were mostly uploaded by university hospitals (46.2%) and misleading videos by health-related commercial entities (74.2%). The misleading videos as well as the videos of patient experiences advocated “diet” asa treatment of PD. The current study found that only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD on YouTube provide reliable information. More importantly, the videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents. Further efforts are warranted to effectively increase the dissemination of accurate and scientifically proven PD information to YouTube users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28988649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Complementary ; Humans ; Information Dissemination - methods ; Internet - standards ; Korea ; Korean ; Misconception ; Parkinson Disease ; Parkinson’s disease ; Social Media ; YouTube</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.46, p.167-170</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-76581abd2c7cc2cc07c714fbd36030f11629f8b4ac582a48afde493dbd1e85b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-76581abd2c7cc2cc07c714fbd36030f11629f8b4ac582a48afde493dbd1e85b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hye-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han-Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Aryun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Mi-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Beomseok</creatorcontrib><title>Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube</title><title>Journal of clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>•We assessed the accuracy of Korean videos about PD on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them.•Only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD provided reliable information.•The videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease (PD) on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them. YouTube search was performed using the search term “Parkinson disease” in Korean language on March 28, 2017. Two independent neurologists categorized the videos into “reliable”, “misleading” or “patient experiences”. The number of views, days since upload, video length, number of “likes” and “dislikes”, and upload source were collected for each video. A total of 138 videos were included in this study. Of these, 91 videos (65.9%) were reliable; 31 (22.5%) were misleading, and 16 (11.6%) were of patient experiences. The videos with patient experiences had the highest number of mean views with 9710.4±3686.9, followed by misleading videos with 5075.0±1198.6, and reliable videos with 2146.8±353.4 (ANOVA, p<0.001). The number of mean views per day was 4.0±0.6 for the reliable videos, which was significantly lower than the misleading videos (9.7±3.4, p=0.020) and the videos of patient experiences (11.3±4.6, p=0.023). The reliable videos were mostly uploaded by university hospitals (46.2%) and misleading videos by health-related commercial entities (74.2%). The misleading videos as well as the videos of patient experiences advocated “diet” asa treatment of PD. The current study found that only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD on YouTube provide reliable information. More importantly, the videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents. Further efforts are warranted to effectively increase the dissemination of accurate and scientifically proven PD information to YouTube users.</description><subject>Complementary</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - methods</subject><subject>Internet - standards</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Korean</subject><subject>Misconception</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease</subject><subject>Parkinson’s disease</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>YouTube</subject><issn>0967-5868</issn><issn>1532-2653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL2O1DAUhS0EYoeFF6BALmkS_BM7NqJBy69YCYqloLIc-2blIWPv-iaDpuM1eD2ehIxmoaS6xfnOke5HyFPOWs64frFttyXkVjDet8y2jPF7ZMOVFI3QSt4nG2Z13yijzRl5hLhljNlOsofkTBhrjO7shty-qQc6-jAj9RVoLjP10w9_QJryPs0pX7-knoaSZ8hrlP10wIS0jPRTqeAz3acIBWmFa1_jitMvvn5PGUv-_fMX0pgQPAItmX4ry9UywGPyYPQTwpO7e06-vnt7dfGhufz8_uPF68smSKXnptfKcD9EEfoQRAisDz3vxiFKzSQbOdfCjmbofFBG-M74MUJnZRwiB6MGLs_J89PuTS23C-DsdgkDTJPPUBZ03HaWGSUVW1FxQkMtiBVGd1PTzteD48wdVbutO6p2R9WOWbeqXkvP7vaXYQfxX-Wv2xV4dQJg_XKfoDoMCXKAmCqE2cWS_rf_B8gXkmc</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Kim, Ryul</creator><creator>Park, Hye-Young</creator><creator>Kim, Han-Joon</creator><creator>Kim, Aryun</creator><creator>Jang, Mi-Hee</creator><creator>Jeon, Beomseok</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube</title><author>Kim, Ryul ; Park, Hye-Young ; Kim, Han-Joon ; Kim, Aryun ; Jang, Mi-Hee ; Jeon, Beomseok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-76581abd2c7cc2cc07c714fbd36030f11629f8b4ac582a48afde493dbd1e85b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Complementary</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - methods</topic><topic>Internet - standards</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Korean</topic><topic>Misconception</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease</topic><topic>Parkinson’s disease</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>YouTube</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hye-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han-Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Aryun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Mi-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Beomseok</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ryul</au><au>Park, Hye-Young</au><au>Kim, Han-Joon</au><au>Kim, Aryun</au><au>Jang, Mi-Hee</au><au>Jeon, Beomseok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>167</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>167-170</pages><issn>0967-5868</issn><eissn>1532-2653</eissn><abstract>•We assessed the accuracy of Korean videos about PD on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them.•Only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD provided reliable information.•The videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease (PD) on YouTube and viewers’ responses to them. YouTube search was performed using the search term “Parkinson disease” in Korean language on March 28, 2017. Two independent neurologists categorized the videos into “reliable”, “misleading” or “patient experiences”. The number of views, days since upload, video length, number of “likes” and “dislikes”, and upload source were collected for each video. A total of 138 videos were included in this study. Of these, 91 videos (65.9%) were reliable; 31 (22.5%) were misleading, and 16 (11.6%) were of patient experiences. The videos with patient experiences had the highest number of mean views with 9710.4±3686.9, followed by misleading videos with 5075.0±1198.6, and reliable videos with 2146.8±353.4 (ANOVA, p<0.001). The number of mean views per day was 4.0±0.6 for the reliable videos, which was significantly lower than the misleading videos (9.7±3.4, p=0.020) and the videos of patient experiences (11.3±4.6, p=0.023). The reliable videos were mostly uploaded by university hospitals (46.2%) and misleading videos by health-related commercial entities (74.2%). The misleading videos as well as the videos of patient experiences advocated “diet” asa treatment of PD. The current study found that only two-thirds of the Korean videos regarding PD on YouTube provide reliable information. More importantly, the videos with reliable contents were less popular than videos with misleading contents. Further efforts are warranted to effectively increase the dissemination of accurate and scientifically proven PD information to YouTube users.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28988649</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.001</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-5868 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.46, p.167-170 |
issn | 0967-5868 1532-2653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949085350 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Complementary Humans Information Dissemination - methods Internet - standards Korea Korean Misconception Parkinson Disease Parkinson’s disease Social Media YouTube |
title | Dry facts are not always inviting: a content analysis of Korean videos regarding Parkinson’s disease on YouTube |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A40%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20facts%20are%20not%20always%20inviting:%20a%20content%20analysis%20of%20Korean%20videos%20regarding%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20disease%20on%20YouTube&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Kim,%20Ryul&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=167-170&rft.issn=0967-5868&rft.eissn=1532-2653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949085350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949085350&rft_id=info:pmid/28988649&rft_els_id=S0967586817315205&rfr_iscdi=true |