Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is being increasingly performed internationally to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Robotic assistance appears advantageous for this procedure, but literature regarding robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is limited. The primary objective of this study was to as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2017-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1215-1223 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1223 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1215 |
| container_title | Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | van Iersel, Jan J Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A Paulides, Tim J C Verheijen, Paul M Draaisma, Werner A Consten, Esther C J Broeders, Ivo A M J |
| description | Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is being increasingly performed internationally to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Robotic assistance appears advantageous for this procedure, but literature regarding robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is limited.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy in the largest consecutive series of patients to date.
This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data.
The study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.
All of the patients undergoing robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse syndromes between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated.
Preoperative and postoperative (mesh and nonmesh) morbidity and functional outcome were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 258 patients underwent robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (mean ± SD follow-up = 23.5 ± 21.8 mo; range, 0.2 - 65.1 mo). There were no conversions and only 5 intraoperative complications (1.9%). Mortality (0.4%) and major (1.9%) and minor ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949084496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1949084496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-ab919f05869fa29a584479cbaec6ca605089273f0484dc6f9351422b16a32a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0HIjl62TrZ7Fe8lbV-QEUpVfC0ZNMJrmybNUmh_femtoo4l-Ex772ZeYScMxgyEPnVTTkdwt8qRHpA-izlEAFPi0PSB2BxxHPIeuTEuY8AIYb8mPTiQggGRd4n7dTUxkcj5xrncU5fcemtbOkjunc6ReVNh-sN1cZ-ozB5tqaVncNrOqJp9IbS0vG6Q9vgUiGVnko6Q-sbaTdBotFu7cpgi_aUHGnZOjzb9wF5uR3Pyvto8nT3UI4mkeKQ-0jWggkNaZEJLWMh0yJJcqFqiSpTMoM0vBrnXENSJHOVacFTlsRxzTLJY5loPiCXO9_Oms8VOl8tGqewbeUSzcpVTCQCgqnIAjXZUZU1zlnUVWebRbi9YlBtc65CztX_nIPsYr9hVS9w_iv6CZZ_AU9Qd2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949084496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>van Iersel, Jan J ; Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A ; Paulides, Tim J C ; Verheijen, Paul M ; Draaisma, Werner A ; Consten, Esther C J ; Broeders, Ivo A M J</creator><creatorcontrib>van Iersel, Jan J ; Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A ; Paulides, Tim J C ; Verheijen, Paul M ; Draaisma, Werner A ; Consten, Esther C J ; Broeders, Ivo A M J</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is being increasingly performed internationally to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Robotic assistance appears advantageous for this procedure, but literature regarding robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is limited.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy in the largest consecutive series of patients to date.
This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data.
The study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.
All of the patients undergoing robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse syndromes between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated.
Preoperative and postoperative (mesh and nonmesh) morbidity and functional outcome were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 258 patients underwent robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (mean ± SD follow-up = 23.5 ± 21.8 mo; range, 0.2 - 65.1 mo). There were no conversions and only 5 intraoperative complications (1.9%). Mortality (0.4%) and major (1.9%) and minor (<30 d) early morbidity (7.0%) were acceptably low. Only 1 (1.3%) mesh-related complication (asymptomatic vaginal mesh erosion) was observed. A significant improvement in obstructed defecation (78.6%) and fecal incontinence (63.7%) were achieved for patients (both p < 0.0005). At final follow-up, a new onset of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation was induced or worsened in 3.9% and 0.4%. The actuarial 5-year external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse recurrence rates were 12.9% and 10.4%.
This was a retrospective study including patients with minimal follow-up. No validated scores were used to assess function. The study was monocentric, and there was no control group.
Robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective technique to treat rectal prolapse syndromes, providing an acceptable recurrence rate and good symptomatic relief with minimal morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A427.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28991087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - instrumentation ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Prolapse - surgery ; Rectum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgical Mesh ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2017-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1215-1223</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-ab919f05869fa29a584479cbaec6ca605089273f0484dc6f9351422b16a32a4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-ab919f05869fa29a584479cbaec6ca605089273f0484dc6f9351422b16a32a4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28991087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Iersel, Jan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulides, Tim J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheijen, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draaisma, Werner A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consten, Esther C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broeders, Ivo A M J</creatorcontrib><title>Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center</title><title>Diseases of the colon & rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is being increasingly performed internationally to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Robotic assistance appears advantageous for this procedure, but literature regarding robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is limited.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy in the largest consecutive series of patients to date.
This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data.
The study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.
All of the patients undergoing robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse syndromes between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated.
Preoperative and postoperative (mesh and nonmesh) morbidity and functional outcome were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 258 patients underwent robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (mean ± SD follow-up = 23.5 ± 21.8 mo; range, 0.2 - 65.1 mo). There were no conversions and only 5 intraoperative complications (1.9%). Mortality (0.4%) and major (1.9%) and minor (<30 d) early morbidity (7.0%) were acceptably low. Only 1 (1.3%) mesh-related complication (asymptomatic vaginal mesh erosion) was observed. A significant improvement in obstructed defecation (78.6%) and fecal incontinence (63.7%) were achieved for patients (both p < 0.0005). At final follow-up, a new onset of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation was induced or worsened in 3.9% and 0.4%. The actuarial 5-year external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse recurrence rates were 12.9% and 10.4%.
This was a retrospective study including patients with minimal follow-up. No validated scores were used to assess function. The study was monocentric, and there was no control group.
Robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective technique to treat rectal prolapse syndromes, providing an acceptable recurrence rate and good symptomatic relief with minimal morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A427.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0HIjl62TrZ7Fe8lbV-QEUpVfC0ZNMJrmybNUmh_femtoo4l-Ex772ZeYScMxgyEPnVTTkdwt8qRHpA-izlEAFPi0PSB2BxxHPIeuTEuY8AIYb8mPTiQggGRd4n7dTUxkcj5xrncU5fcemtbOkjunc6ReVNh-sN1cZ-ozB5tqaVncNrOqJp9IbS0vG6Q9vgUiGVnko6Q-sbaTdBotFu7cpgi_aUHGnZOjzb9wF5uR3Pyvto8nT3UI4mkeKQ-0jWggkNaZEJLWMh0yJJcqFqiSpTMoM0vBrnXENSJHOVacFTlsRxzTLJY5loPiCXO9_Oms8VOl8tGqewbeUSzcpVTCQCgqnIAjXZUZU1zlnUVWebRbi9YlBtc65CztX_nIPsYr9hVS9w_iv6CZZ_AU9Qd2o</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>van Iersel, Jan J</creator><creator>Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A</creator><creator>Paulides, Tim J C</creator><creator>Verheijen, Paul M</creator><creator>Draaisma, Werner A</creator><creator>Consten, Esther C J</creator><creator>Broeders, Ivo A M J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center</title><author>van Iersel, Jan J ; Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A ; Paulides, Tim J C ; Verheijen, Paul M ; Draaisma, Werner A ; Consten, Esther C J ; Broeders, Ivo A M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-ab919f05869fa29a584479cbaec6ca605089273f0484dc6f9351422b16a32a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Iersel, Jan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulides, Tim J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheijen, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draaisma, Werner A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consten, Esther C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broeders, Ivo A M J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Iersel, Jan J</au><au>Formijne Jonkers, Hendrik A</au><au>Paulides, Tim J C</au><au>Verheijen, Paul M</au><au>Draaisma, Werner A</au><au>Consten, Esther C J</au><au>Broeders, Ivo A M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1215</spage><epage>1223</epage><pages>1215-1223</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><abstract>Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is being increasingly performed internationally to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Robotic assistance appears advantageous for this procedure, but literature regarding robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is limited.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy in the largest consecutive series of patients to date.
This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data.
The study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.
All of the patients undergoing robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse syndromes between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated.
Preoperative and postoperative (mesh and nonmesh) morbidity and functional outcome were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 258 patients underwent robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (mean ± SD follow-up = 23.5 ± 21.8 mo; range, 0.2 - 65.1 mo). There were no conversions and only 5 intraoperative complications (1.9%). Mortality (0.4%) and major (1.9%) and minor (<30 d) early morbidity (7.0%) were acceptably low. Only 1 (1.3%) mesh-related complication (asymptomatic vaginal mesh erosion) was observed. A significant improvement in obstructed defecation (78.6%) and fecal incontinence (63.7%) were achieved for patients (both p < 0.0005). At final follow-up, a new onset of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation was induced or worsened in 3.9% and 0.4%. The actuarial 5-year external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse recurrence rates were 12.9% and 10.4%.
This was a retrospective study including patients with minimal follow-up. No validated scores were used to assess function. The study was monocentric, and there was no control group.
Robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective technique to treat rectal prolapse syndromes, providing an acceptable recurrence rate and good symptomatic relief with minimal morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A427.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28991087</pmid><doi>10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-3706 |
| ispartof | Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2017-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1215-1223 |
| issn | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949084496 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Laparoscopy - instrumentation Laparoscopy - methods Male Middle Aged Rectal Prolapse - surgery Rectum - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Surgical Mesh Tertiary Care Centers Treatment Outcome |
| title | Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot-Assisted%20Ventral%20Mesh%20Rectopexy%20for%20Rectal%20Prolapse:%20A%205-Year%20Experience%20at%20a%20Tertiary%20Referral%20Center&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=van%20Iersel,%20Jan%20J&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1215&rft.epage=1223&rft.pages=1215-1223&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949084496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949084496&rft_id=info:pmid/28991087&rfr_iscdi=true |