Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh
Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E147 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | E136 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 168 |
creator | Koppel, Johan van de Crain, Caitlin Mullan |
description | Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/508671 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19480019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/508671</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/508671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j297t-966c009eaa849cc7af1c941bf9929674f8d11aa96e56d6f5f330b1c409b6a9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1KwzAUAOAgiptTH0ECinfVpGmT5lI2p4OJ6OZ1SdN0zezSmrSKdz6Cz-iTGKnDS2_O4cDH4fwAcIzRBUYJvYx9YHgHDHFMWBCTkOyCIUKIBAhHbAAOnFv7kkc83gcDzFCCSEyH4GEhRaW-Pj4nqlEmV6aFM1PqTLe6NnBi9aty8FGtukpYuOycq-UzXDRCarOC2kABp1a58k20ysI7YV15CPYKUTl19JtH4Gl6vRzfBvP7m9n4ah6sQ87agFMq_TxKiCTiUjJRYMkjnBWch5yyqEhyjIXgVMU0p0VcEIIyLCPEMyp4jsgInPd9G1u_dMq16UY7qapKGFV3LqUchTRi7F-IeZQghLmHJ7-wyzYqTxurN8K-p9treXDWg06WWopV3fjdXbquO2v8qmn_BM9Oe7Z2bW3_2qD051Vb9Q1uW4JT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19480019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creator><contributor>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis ; Donald L. DeAngelis ; Associate Editor</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan ; Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis ; Donald L. DeAngelis ; Associate Editor</creatorcontrib><description>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/508671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17080356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Carex Plant - growth & development ; Carex stricta ; Demography ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; E‐Article ; Fresh Water ; Light ; Maine ; Modeling ; Models, Theoretical ; Plant growth ; Plant interaction ; Plants ; Spatial models ; Species ; Stricta ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147</ispartof><rights>2006 by The University of Chicago.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17080356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis</contributor><contributor>Donald L. DeAngelis</contributor><contributor>Associate Editor</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creatorcontrib><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carex Plant - growth & development</subject><subject>Carex stricta</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>E‐Article</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Maine</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant interaction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stricta</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1KwzAUAOAgiptTH0ECinfVpGmT5lI2p4OJ6OZ1SdN0zezSmrSKdz6Cz-iTGKnDS2_O4cDH4fwAcIzRBUYJvYx9YHgHDHFMWBCTkOyCIUKIBAhHbAAOnFv7kkc83gcDzFCCSEyH4GEhRaW-Pj4nqlEmV6aFM1PqTLe6NnBi9aty8FGtukpYuOycq-UzXDRCarOC2kABp1a58k20ysI7YV15CPYKUTl19JtH4Gl6vRzfBvP7m9n4ah6sQ87agFMq_TxKiCTiUjJRYMkjnBWch5yyqEhyjIXgVMU0p0VcEIIyLCPEMyp4jsgInPd9G1u_dMq16UY7qapKGFV3LqUchTRi7F-IeZQghLmHJ7-wyzYqTxurN8K-p9treXDWg06WWopV3fjdXbquO2v8qmn_BM9Oe7Z2bW3_2qD051Vb9Q1uW4JT</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Koppel, Johan van de</creator><creator>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><author>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j297t-966c009eaa849cc7af1c941bf9929674f8d11aa96e56d6f5f330b1c409b6a9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carex Plant - growth & development</topic><topic>Carex stricta</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>E‐Article</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Maine</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant interaction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stricta</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koppel, Johan van de</au><au>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</au><au>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis</au><au>Donald L. DeAngelis</au><au>Associate Editor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E136</spage><epage>E147</epage><pages>E136-E147</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><abstract>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>17080356</pmid><doi>10.1086/508671</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19480019 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Biomass Carex Plant - growth & development Carex stricta Demography Ecosystem Ecosystem models Ecosystems E‐Article Fresh Water Light Maine Modeling Models, Theoretical Plant growth Plant interaction Plants Spatial models Species Stricta Vegetation Wetlands |
title | Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale%E2%80%90Dependent%20Inhibition%20Drives%20Regular%20Tussock%20Spacing%20in%20a%20Freshwater%20Marsh&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Koppel,%20Johan%C2%A0van%C2%A0de&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E136&rft.epage=E147&rft.pages=E136-E147&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/508671&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/508671%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19480019&rft_id=info:pmid/17080356&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/508671&rfr_iscdi=true |