Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh

Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147
Hauptverfasser: Koppel, Johan van de, Crain, Caitlin Mullan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E147
container_issue 5
container_start_page E136
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 168
creator Koppel, Johan van de
Crain, Caitlin Mullan
description Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/508671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19480019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/508671</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/508671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j297t-966c009eaa849cc7af1c941bf9929674f8d11aa96e56d6f5f330b1c409b6a9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1KwzAUAOAgiptTH0ECinfVpGmT5lI2p4OJ6OZ1SdN0zezSmrSKdz6Cz-iTGKnDS2_O4cDH4fwAcIzRBUYJvYx9YHgHDHFMWBCTkOyCIUKIBAhHbAAOnFv7kkc83gcDzFCCSEyH4GEhRaW-Pj4nqlEmV6aFM1PqTLe6NnBi9aty8FGtukpYuOycq-UzXDRCarOC2kABp1a58k20ysI7YV15CPYKUTl19JtH4Gl6vRzfBvP7m9n4ah6sQ87agFMq_TxKiCTiUjJRYMkjnBWch5yyqEhyjIXgVMU0p0VcEIIyLCPEMyp4jsgInPd9G1u_dMq16UY7qapKGFV3LqUchTRi7F-IeZQghLmHJ7-wyzYqTxurN8K-p9treXDWg06WWopV3fjdXbquO2v8qmn_BM9Oe7Z2bW3_2qD051Vb9Q1uW4JT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19480019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creator><contributor>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis ; Donald L. DeAngelis ; Associate Editor</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan ; Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis ; Donald L. DeAngelis ; Associate Editor</creatorcontrib><description>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/508671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17080356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Carex Plant - growth &amp; development ; Carex stricta ; Demography ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; E‐Article ; Fresh Water ; Light ; Maine ; Modeling ; Models, Theoretical ; Plant growth ; Plant interaction ; Plants ; Spatial models ; Species ; Stricta ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147</ispartof><rights>2006 by The University of Chicago.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17080356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis</contributor><contributor>Donald L. DeAngelis</contributor><contributor>Associate Editor</contributor><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creatorcontrib><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carex Plant - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Carex stricta</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>E‐Article</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Maine</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant interaction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stricta</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1KwzAUAOAgiptTH0ECinfVpGmT5lI2p4OJ6OZ1SdN0zezSmrSKdz6Cz-iTGKnDS2_O4cDH4fwAcIzRBUYJvYx9YHgHDHFMWBCTkOyCIUKIBAhHbAAOnFv7kkc83gcDzFCCSEyH4GEhRaW-Pj4nqlEmV6aFM1PqTLe6NnBi9aty8FGtukpYuOycq-UzXDRCarOC2kABp1a58k20ysI7YV15CPYKUTl19JtH4Gl6vRzfBvP7m9n4ah6sQ87agFMq_TxKiCTiUjJRYMkjnBWch5yyqEhyjIXgVMU0p0VcEIIyLCPEMyp4jsgInPd9G1u_dMq16UY7qapKGFV3LqUchTRi7F-IeZQghLmHJ7-wyzYqTxurN8K-p9treXDWg06WWopV3fjdXbquO2v8qmn_BM9Oe7Z2bW3_2qD051Vb9Q1uW4JT</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Koppel, Johan van de</creator><creator>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</title><author>Koppel, Johan van de ; Crain, Caitlin Mullan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j297t-966c009eaa849cc7af1c941bf9929674f8d11aa96e56d6f5f330b1c409b6a9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carex Plant - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Carex stricta</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>E‐Article</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Maine</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant interaction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stricta</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koppel, Johan van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koppel, Johan van de</au><au>Crain, Caitlin Mullan</au><au>Associate Editor and Donald L. DeAngelis</au><au>Donald L. DeAngelis</au><au>Associate Editor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E136</spage><epage>E147</epage><pages>E136-E147</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><abstract>Regular spatial patterning is common in nature, and various mechanisms of self‐organization have been proposed to explain regular patterning. We report on regular spatial patterning inCarex strictain a freshwater wetland and investigate the applicability of theoretical models that explain regular patterning based on inhibition, facilitation, or interaction between the two. Spectral analysis of aerial photographs revealed that tussocks were regularly spaced at an average distance of 60 cm. Photosynthetically active radiation varied significantly with distance from the tussock and was lowest at intermediate distance from the tussock center (15–40 cm). Using transplants to assay growth conditions, we found thatC. strictagrew well in all distance classes with and without naturalC. strictabiomass, except at intermediate distances when buried inC. strictawrack. Our experimental results reveal thatC. strictainhibits its growth in a scale‐dependent manner: inhibition was found to peak at intermediate distance from the tussock. We compared three alternative models to examine potential mechanisms driving regularity and found that, similar to our experimental results, scale‐dependent inhibition provides the best explanation for the observed regular tussock spacing. Our study underlines the importance of scale‐dependent feedback in the formation of regular spatial patterning in ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>17080356</pmid><doi>10.1086/508671</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 2006-11, Vol.168 (5), p.E136-E147
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19480019
source MEDLINE; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Biomass
Carex Plant - growth & development
Carex stricta
Demography
Ecosystem
Ecosystem models
Ecosystems
E‐Article
Fresh Water
Light
Maine
Modeling
Models, Theoretical
Plant growth
Plant interaction
Plants
Spatial models
Species
Stricta
Vegetation
Wetlands
title Scale‐Dependent Inhibition Drives Regular Tussock Spacing in a Freshwater Marsh
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale%E2%80%90Dependent%20Inhibition%20Drives%20Regular%20Tussock%20Spacing%20in%20a%20Freshwater%20Marsh&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Koppel,%20Johan%C2%A0van%C2%A0de&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E136&rft.epage=E147&rft.pages=E136-E147&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/508671&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/508671%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19480019&rft_id=info:pmid/17080356&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/508671&rfr_iscdi=true