Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, sim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Patrick F., Tsuji, Brian, Booker, Brent M., Forrest, Alan, Bajic, Sanela, Kelchlin, Pamela, Bhavnani, Sujata M., Jones, Ronald N., Ambrose, Paul G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 386
container_issue 4
container_start_page 379
container_title Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
container_volume 56
creator Smith, Patrick F.
Tsuji, Brian
Booker, Brent M.
Forrest, Alan
Bajic, Sanela
Kelchlin, Pamela
Bhavnani, Sujata M.
Jones, Ronald N.
Ambrose, Paul G.
description An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC 24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log 10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC 24/MIC, C max/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC 24/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas C max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect ( E max) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log 10 reduction in log 10 ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC 24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC 24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19477217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0732889306002422</els_id><sourcerecordid>19477217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFFL5DAQx4Oc6N7qV5AinG9dkzbbNPd2rHoKgj7cPYdpMnGztM1e0i7opzd1F7x7OxiSEH7zn-FHyCWjC0ZZdb1ZGAcvndPBN84vCkqrxVRMHpEZq4XMKRX0C5lRURZ5XcvylHyNcUMpKySnJ-SUVbKksmAzAs9rCB1ob157SJEx8zbTaLfBv7k2gxdwfRyye8DOb9euHWPmetuO2L8BpmcG_XTu3BB8tv03K-u8wfaMHFtoI54f7jn5fXf7a3WfPz79fFj9eMw1L-WQ16LiklVc1wyWywKN0ctSC1GmYkaARkaLOn3zqrAWa64rDY1tjEQhCtGUc3K1z02r_xkxDqpzUWPbQo9-jIpJnkAmEvh9DyZ_MQa0ahtcB-FVMaomwWqj_hasJsFqKiZT88Vhyth0aD5bD0YT8O0AQNTQ2gC9dvGTqzml_IO72XOYnOwcBhW1w16jcQH1oIx3_7PPO2gPonQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19477217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><description>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC 24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log 10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC 24/MIC, C max/MIC, and %T &gt; MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC 24/MIC and %T &gt; MIC characterized the data well, whereas C max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect ( E max) was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log 10 reduction in log 10 ratio would require free drug %T &gt; MIC of 58% or AUC 24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC and an AUC 24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T &gt; MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T &gt; MIC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16930921</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DMIDDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cefprozil ; Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Haemophilus ; Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy ; Haemophilus Infections - microbiology ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects ; Haemophilus influenzae - growth &amp; development ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18400421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16930921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booker, Brent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajic, Sanela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelchlin, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><title>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC 24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log 10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC 24/MIC, C max/MIC, and %T &gt; MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC 24/MIC and %T &gt; MIC characterized the data well, whereas C max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect ( E max) was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log 10 reduction in log 10 ratio would require free drug %T &gt; MIC of 58% or AUC 24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC and an AUC 24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T &gt; MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T &gt; MIC.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cefprozil</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Haemophilus</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</subject><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkFFL5DAQx4Oc6N7qV5AinG9dkzbbNPd2rHoKgj7cPYdpMnGztM1e0i7opzd1F7x7OxiSEH7zn-FHyCWjC0ZZdb1ZGAcvndPBN84vCkqrxVRMHpEZq4XMKRX0C5lRURZ5XcvylHyNcUMpKySnJ-SUVbKksmAzAs9rCB1ob157SJEx8zbTaLfBv7k2gxdwfRyye8DOb9euHWPmetuO2L8BpmcG_XTu3BB8tv03K-u8wfaMHFtoI54f7jn5fXf7a3WfPz79fFj9eMw1L-WQ16LiklVc1wyWywKN0ctSC1GmYkaARkaLOn3zqrAWa64rDY1tjEQhCtGUc3K1z02r_xkxDqpzUWPbQo9-jIpJnkAmEvh9DyZ_MQa0ahtcB-FVMaomwWqj_hasJsFqKiZT88Vhyth0aD5bD0YT8O0AQNTQ2gC9dvGTqzml_IO72XOYnOwcBhW1w16jcQH1oIx3_7PPO2gPonQ</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Smith, Patrick F.</creator><creator>Tsuji, Brian</creator><creator>Booker, Brent M.</creator><creator>Forrest, Alan</creator><creator>Bajic, Sanela</creator><creator>Kelchlin, Pamela</creator><creator>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creator><creator>Jones, Ronald N.</creator><creator>Ambrose, Paul G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><author>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cefprozil</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Haemophilus</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booker, Brent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajic, Sanela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelchlin, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Patrick F.</au><au>Tsuji, Brian</au><au>Booker, Brent M.</au><au>Forrest, Alan</au><au>Bajic, Sanela</au><au>Kelchlin, Pamela</au><au>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</au><au>Jones, Ronald N.</au><au>Ambrose, Paul G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>379-386</pages><issn>0732-8893</issn><eissn>1879-0070</eissn><coden>DMIDDZ</coden><abstract>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC 24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log 10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC 24/MIC, C max/MIC, and %T &gt; MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC 24/MIC and %T &gt; MIC characterized the data well, whereas C max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect ( E max) was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log 10 reduction in log 10 ratio would require free drug %T &gt; MIC of 58% or AUC 24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T &gt; MIC and an AUC 24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T &gt; MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T &gt; MIC.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16930921</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-8893
ispartof Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386
issn 0732-8893
1879-0070
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19477217
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
Cefprozil
Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Haemophilus
Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy
Haemophilus Infections - microbiology
Haemophilus influenzae
Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects
Haemophilus influenzae - growth & development
Humans
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods
Microbiology
Miscellaneous
Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics
title Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacodynamics%20of%20cefprozil%20against%20Haemophilus%20influenzae%20in%20an%20in%20vitro%20pharmacodynamic%20model&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Smith,%20Patrick%20F.&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=379-386&rft.issn=0732-8893&rft.eissn=1879-0070&rft.coden=DMIDDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19477217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19477217&rft_id=info:pmid/16930921&rft_els_id=S0732889306002422&rfr_iscdi=true