Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model
An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, sim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Smith, Patrick F. Tsuji, Brian Booker, Brent M. Forrest, Alan Bajic, Sanela Kelchlin, Pamela Bhavnani, Sujata M. Jones, Ronald N. Ambrose, Paul G. |
description | An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against
Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of
H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC
24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log
10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC
CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC
24/MIC,
C
max/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC
24/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas
C
max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (
E
max) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log
10 reduction in log
10 ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC
24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC
24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against
H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19477217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0732889306002422</els_id><sourcerecordid>19477217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFFL5DAQx4Oc6N7qV5AinG9dkzbbNPd2rHoKgj7cPYdpMnGztM1e0i7opzd1F7x7OxiSEH7zn-FHyCWjC0ZZdb1ZGAcvndPBN84vCkqrxVRMHpEZq4XMKRX0C5lRURZ5XcvylHyNcUMpKySnJ-SUVbKksmAzAs9rCB1ob157SJEx8zbTaLfBv7k2gxdwfRyye8DOb9euHWPmetuO2L8BpmcG_XTu3BB8tv03K-u8wfaMHFtoI54f7jn5fXf7a3WfPz79fFj9eMw1L-WQ16LiklVc1wyWywKN0ctSC1GmYkaARkaLOn3zqrAWa64rDY1tjEQhCtGUc3K1z02r_xkxDqpzUWPbQo9-jIpJnkAmEvh9DyZ_MQa0ahtcB-FVMaomwWqj_hasJsFqKiZT88Vhyth0aD5bD0YT8O0AQNTQ2gC9dvGTqzml_IO72XOYnOwcBhW1w16jcQH1oIx3_7PPO2gPonQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19477217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><description>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against
Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of
H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC
24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log
10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC
CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC
24/MIC,
C
max/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC
24/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas
C
max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (
E
max) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log
10 reduction in log
10 ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC
24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC
24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against
H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16930921</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DMIDDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cefprozil ; Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Haemophilus ; Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy ; Haemophilus Infections - microbiology ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects ; Haemophilus influenzae - growth & development ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18400421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16930921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booker, Brent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajic, Sanela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelchlin, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><title>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against
Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of
H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC
24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log
10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC
CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC
24/MIC,
C
max/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC
24/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas
C
max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (
E
max) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log
10 reduction in log
10 ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC
24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC
24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against
H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cefprozil</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Haemophilus</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - growth & development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</subject><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkFFL5DAQx4Oc6N7qV5AinG9dkzbbNPd2rHoKgj7cPYdpMnGztM1e0i7opzd1F7x7OxiSEH7zn-FHyCWjC0ZZdb1ZGAcvndPBN84vCkqrxVRMHpEZq4XMKRX0C5lRURZ5XcvylHyNcUMpKySnJ-SUVbKksmAzAs9rCB1ob157SJEx8zbTaLfBv7k2gxdwfRyye8DOb9euHWPmetuO2L8BpmcG_XTu3BB8tv03K-u8wfaMHFtoI54f7jn5fXf7a3WfPz79fFj9eMw1L-WQ16LiklVc1wyWywKN0ctSC1GmYkaARkaLOn3zqrAWa64rDY1tjEQhCtGUc3K1z02r_xkxDqpzUWPbQo9-jIpJnkAmEvh9DyZ_MQa0ahtcB-FVMaomwWqj_hasJsFqKiZT88Vhyth0aD5bD0YT8O0AQNTQ2gC9dvGTqzml_IO72XOYnOwcBhW1w16jcQH1oIx3_7PPO2gPonQ</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Smith, Patrick F.</creator><creator>Tsuji, Brian</creator><creator>Booker, Brent M.</creator><creator>Forrest, Alan</creator><creator>Bajic, Sanela</creator><creator>Kelchlin, Pamela</creator><creator>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creator><creator>Jones, Ronald N.</creator><creator>Ambrose, Paul G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</title><author>Smith, Patrick F. ; Tsuji, Brian ; Booker, Brent M. ; Forrest, Alan ; Bajic, Sanela ; Kelchlin, Pamela ; Bhavnani, Sujata M. ; Jones, Ronald N. ; Ambrose, Paul G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-87649164c81a552eddc53c7737731d7ace1028edd462ffe84c6cabfbd9e7727b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cefprozil</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Haemophilus</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - growth & development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booker, Brent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajic, Sanela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelchlin, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Patrick F.</au><au>Tsuji, Brian</au><au>Booker, Brent M.</au><au>Forrest, Alan</au><au>Bajic, Sanela</au><au>Kelchlin, Pamela</au><au>Bhavnani, Sujata M.</au><au>Jones, Ronald N.</au><au>Ambrose, Paul G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>379-386</pages><issn>0732-8893</issn><eissn>1879-0070</eissn><coden>DMIDDZ</coden><abstract>An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against
Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of
H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC
24 given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log
10 ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC
CFU) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK–PD measures of activity: AUC
24/MIC,
C
max/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC
24/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas
C
max/MIC did not. Based on the PK–PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (
E
max) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log
10 reduction in log
10 ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC
24/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC
24/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK–PD of cefprozil against
H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16930921</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-8893 |
ispartof | Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2006-12, Vol.56 (4), p.379-386 |
issn | 0732-8893 1879-0070 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19477217 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacokinetics Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Cefprozil Cephalosporins - pharmacokinetics Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Haemophilus Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy Haemophilus Infections - microbiology Haemophilus influenzae Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects Haemophilus influenzae - growth & development Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods Microbiology Miscellaneous Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics |
title | Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacodynamics%20of%20cefprozil%20against%20Haemophilus%20influenzae%20in%20an%20in%20vitro%20pharmacodynamic%20model&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Smith,%20Patrick%20F.&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=379-386&rft.issn=0732-8893&rft.eissn=1879-0070&rft.coden=DMIDDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19477217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19477217&rft_id=info:pmid/16930921&rft_els_id=S0732889306002422&rfr_iscdi=true |