Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms
Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.759-766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 759 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Vanotti, M.B. Szogi, A.A. Vives, C.A. |
description | Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swine farms. Emission reductions were calculated using the approved United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) methodology in conjunction with monitoring information collected during full-scale demonstration of the new treatment system in a 4360-head swine operation in North Carolina (USA). Emission sources for the project and baseline manure management system were methane (CH
4) emissions from the decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide (N
2O) emissions during storage and handling of manure in the manure management system. Emission reductions resulted from the difference between total project and baseline emissions. The project activity included an on-farm wastewater treatment system consisting of liquid–solid separation, treatment of the separated liquid using aerobic biological N removal, chemical disinfection and soluble P removal using lime. The project activity was completed with a centralized facility that used aerobic composting to process the separated solids. Replacement of the lagoon technology with the cleaner aerobic technology reduced GHG emissions 96.9%, from 4972 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO
2-eq) to 153 tonnes CO
2-eq/year. Total net emission reductions by the project activity in the 4360-head finishing operation were 4776.6 tonnes CO
2-eq per year or 1.10 tonnes CO
2-eq/head per year. The dollar value from implementation of this project in this swine farm was US$19,106/year using current Chicago Climate Exchange trading values of US$4/t CO
2. This translates into a direct economic benefit to the producer of US$1.75 per finished pig. Thus, GHG emission reductions and credits can help compensate for the higher installation cost of cleaner aerobic technologies and facilitate producer adoption of environmentally superior technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons in the USA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19474349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X07003388</els_id><sourcerecordid>14855668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c89d054ee53ea3557a1dd01b0773617a5b629c12331b5f4e8cd95f7fd8f12bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDyBW4J49iO4wsSqkpBqsQFJG6W44zBq8Rp7exW-xC8M87uCm7AyZ7R94_-mZ-QlwxqBqx9u60fbJ5srBsAVYOugYtHZMM6patGyPYx2YCWbQWSf7sgz3LeAjDRMXhKLlgHLaiWbcjPm4QYf8y7jPS7zRSnkHOYI0047Nyy_mwcKMZ9SHOcMC52pPc7O4blQMN0l-Y9rl3q0zytjfFY2qNy9tRimvvgaPG6IF0S2uWI50Opp0xDpPkhRKTepik_J0-8HTO-OL-X5OuH6y9XH6vbzzefrt7fVk50fKlcpweQAlFytFxKZdkwAOtBKd4yZWXfNtqxhnPWSy-wc4OWXvmh86zpneCX5M1pbvF_v8O8mLK2w3G0EcspDNNCCS70v0HRSdm23f-AQmkpCyhOoEtzzgm9uUthsulgGJg1WLM1p2DNGqwBbUqwRfbqPH_XTzj8EZ2TLMDrM2Czs6NPNrqQf3MNNCBBrxu9O3FY7rsPmEx2AaPDISR0ixnm8HcnvwDYi8dF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14847955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vanotti, M.B. ; Szogi, A.A. ; Vives, C.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanotti, M.B. ; Szogi, A.A. ; Vives, C.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swine farms. Emission reductions were calculated using the approved United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) methodology in conjunction with monitoring information collected during full-scale demonstration of the new treatment system in a 4360-head swine operation in North Carolina (USA). Emission sources for the project and baseline manure management system were methane (CH
4) emissions from the decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide (N
2O) emissions during storage and handling of manure in the manure management system. Emission reductions resulted from the difference between total project and baseline emissions. The project activity included an on-farm wastewater treatment system consisting of liquid–solid separation, treatment of the separated liquid using aerobic biological N removal, chemical disinfection and soluble P removal using lime. The project activity was completed with a centralized facility that used aerobic composting to process the separated solids. Replacement of the lagoon technology with the cleaner aerobic technology reduced GHG emissions 96.9%, from 4972 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO
2-eq) to 153 tonnes CO
2-eq/year. Total net emission reductions by the project activity in the 4360-head finishing operation were 4776.6 tonnes CO
2-eq per year or 1.10 tonnes CO
2-eq/head per year. The dollar value from implementation of this project in this swine farm was US$19,106/year using current Chicago Climate Exchange trading values of US$4/t CO
2. This translates into a direct economic benefit to the producer of US$1.75 per finished pig. Thus, GHG emission reductions and credits can help compensate for the higher installation cost of cleaner aerobic technologies and facilitate producer adoption of environmentally superior technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons in the USA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18060761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerobiosis ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air Pollution - prevention & control ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; General purification processes ; General treatment and storage processes ; Greenhouse Effect ; Methane - analysis ; Nitrous Oxide - analysis ; North Carolina ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pollution ; Swine ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastes ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.759-766</ispartof><rights>2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c89d054ee53ea3557a1dd01b0773617a5b629c12331b5f4e8cd95f7fd8f12bc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c89d054ee53ea3557a1dd01b0773617a5b629c12331b5f4e8cd95f7fd8f12bc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,4024,4050,4051,23930,23931,25140,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20205099$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18060761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanotti, M.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vives, C.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swine farms. Emission reductions were calculated using the approved United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) methodology in conjunction with monitoring information collected during full-scale demonstration of the new treatment system in a 4360-head swine operation in North Carolina (USA). Emission sources for the project and baseline manure management system were methane (CH
4) emissions from the decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide (N
2O) emissions during storage and handling of manure in the manure management system. Emission reductions resulted from the difference between total project and baseline emissions. The project activity included an on-farm wastewater treatment system consisting of liquid–solid separation, treatment of the separated liquid using aerobic biological N removal, chemical disinfection and soluble P removal using lime. The project activity was completed with a centralized facility that used aerobic composting to process the separated solids. Replacement of the lagoon technology with the cleaner aerobic technology reduced GHG emissions 96.9%, from 4972 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO
2-eq) to 153 tonnes CO
2-eq/year. Total net emission reductions by the project activity in the 4360-head finishing operation were 4776.6 tonnes CO
2-eq per year or 1.10 tonnes CO
2-eq/head per year. The dollar value from implementation of this project in this swine farm was US$19,106/year using current Chicago Climate Exchange trading values of US$4/t CO
2. This translates into a direct economic benefit to the producer of US$1.75 per finished pig. Thus, GHG emission reductions and credits can help compensate for the higher installation cost of cleaner aerobic technologies and facilitate producer adoption of environmentally superior technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons in the USA.</description><subject>Aerobiosis</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - analysis</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDyBW4J49iO4wsSqkpBqsQFJG6W44zBq8Rp7exW-xC8M87uCm7AyZ7R94_-mZ-QlwxqBqx9u60fbJ5srBsAVYOugYtHZMM6patGyPYx2YCWbQWSf7sgz3LeAjDRMXhKLlgHLaiWbcjPm4QYf8y7jPS7zRSnkHOYI0047Nyy_mwcKMZ9SHOcMC52pPc7O4blQMN0l-Y9rl3q0zytjfFY2qNy9tRimvvgaPG6IF0S2uWI50Opp0xDpPkhRKTepik_J0-8HTO-OL-X5OuH6y9XH6vbzzefrt7fVk50fKlcpweQAlFytFxKZdkwAOtBKd4yZWXfNtqxhnPWSy-wc4OWXvmh86zpneCX5M1pbvF_v8O8mLK2w3G0EcspDNNCCS70v0HRSdm23f-AQmkpCyhOoEtzzgm9uUthsulgGJg1WLM1p2DNGqwBbUqwRfbqPH_XTzj8EZ2TLMDrM2Czs6NPNrqQf3MNNCBBrxu9O3FY7rsPmEx2AaPDISR0ixnm8HcnvwDYi8dF</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Vanotti, M.B.</creator><creator>Szogi, A.A.</creator><creator>Vives, C.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms</title><author>Vanotti, M.B. ; Szogi, A.A. ; Vives, C.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c89d054ee53ea3557a1dd01b0773617a5b629c12331b5f4e8cd95f7fd8f12bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aerobiosis</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - analysis</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanotti, M.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vives, C.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanotti, M.B.</au><au>Szogi, A.A.</au><au>Vives, C.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>759-766</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swine farms. Emission reductions were calculated using the approved United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) methodology in conjunction with monitoring information collected during full-scale demonstration of the new treatment system in a 4360-head swine operation in North Carolina (USA). Emission sources for the project and baseline manure management system were methane (CH
4) emissions from the decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide (N
2O) emissions during storage and handling of manure in the manure management system. Emission reductions resulted from the difference between total project and baseline emissions. The project activity included an on-farm wastewater treatment system consisting of liquid–solid separation, treatment of the separated liquid using aerobic biological N removal, chemical disinfection and soluble P removal using lime. The project activity was completed with a centralized facility that used aerobic composting to process the separated solids. Replacement of the lagoon technology with the cleaner aerobic technology reduced GHG emissions 96.9%, from 4972 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO
2-eq) to 153 tonnes CO
2-eq/year. Total net emission reductions by the project activity in the 4360-head finishing operation were 4776.6 tonnes CO
2-eq per year or 1.10 tonnes CO
2-eq/head per year. The dollar value from implementation of this project in this swine farm was US$19,106/year using current Chicago Climate Exchange trading values of US$4/t CO
2. This translates into a direct economic benefit to the producer of US$1.75 per finished pig. Thus, GHG emission reductions and credits can help compensate for the higher installation cost of cleaner aerobic technologies and facilitate producer adoption of environmentally superior technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons in the USA.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18060761</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.034</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.759-766 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19474349 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aerobiosis Air Pollutants - analysis Air Pollution - prevention & control Animal Husbandry Animals Applied sciences Carbon Dioxide - analysis Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology General purification processes General treatment and storage processes Greenhouse Effect Methane - analysis Nitrous Oxide - analysis North Carolina Other wastes and particular components of wastes Pollution Swine Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastes Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution |
title | Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greenhouse%20gas%20emission%20reduction%20and%20environmental%20quality%20improvement%20from%20implementation%20of%20aerobic%20waste%20treatment%20systems%20in%20swine%20farms&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Vanotti,%20M.B.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=759-766&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14855668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14847955&rft_id=info:pmid/18060761&rft_els_id=S0956053X07003388&rfr_iscdi=true |