Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

OBJECTIVESThis study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2–18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric emergency care 2018-11, Vol.34 (11), p.757-760
Hauptverfasser: Chicaiza, Henry P, Malia, Laurie, Mulvey, Christine H, Smith, Sharon R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 760
container_issue 11
container_start_page 757
container_title Pediatric emergency care
container_volume 34
creator Chicaiza, Henry P
Malia, Laurie
Mulvey, Christine H
Smith, Sharon R
description OBJECTIVESThis study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2–18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 with suspected acute appendicitis. Children were considered as having “suspected acute appendicitis” if they (1) presented with acute abdominal pain and had either a surgical consult or an abdominal ultrasound, or (2) presented or transferred with the stated suspicion of acute appendicitis. Pathology reports were used to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. The appendiceal diameters were determined by board-certified pediatric radiologists. RESULTSA total of 320 patient charts were reviewed (females, 57%; mean age, 10.9; SD, 3.9). Seventy-two percent (N = 230) of the patients screened positive for acute appendicitis via ultrasound, 69% (N = 222) had confirmed acute appendicitis, 75% (N = 239) of the ultrasound reports included an outer appendiceal diameter. Overall, ultrasound was found to be highly sensitive (91%) and moderately specific (74%). With an outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm as a cutoff, ultrasound had an excellent sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (43%). With an outer diameter of 7 mm as a cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 94% but specificity increased to 71%. With increasing cutoff size, the sensitivity decreased and specificity increased. CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that the optimal outer appendiceal diameter for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should be 7 mm instead of the currently used 6 mm.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1947100072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1947100072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-88b53eec0cae19b49b726e5093679c71579e3b1c6542ef22785f9f0999204d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhlySbFjuM4XlalPKRKIEQ3bCzHmbSGvLCTVvw9hpaHWODNLHzuHc1B6JTgMcGCX9zPpmP865GIp3toSBhlIUkJ20dDzGMRMpKQATpy7tkzjFJ6iAZRKngSMz5ETw-wNs50pl4G3QqCSdtCnRsNqgwujaqgAxusjQoWZWeVa_o6D4rGfrL-f1k3zrigKYKJ7rufuC90x-igUKWDk90cocXV7HF6E87vrm-nk3moKUvSME0zRgE01gqIyGKR8SgBhgVNuNCcMC6AZkQnLI6giPyVrBAFFkJEOM65oiN0vu1tbfPag-tkZZyGslQ1NL2TRMSceEE88mi8RbVtnLNQyNaaStk3SbD8sCq9VfnXqo-d7Tb0WQX5d-hLowfSLbBpSi_MvZT9BqxceYvd6v_udzydgtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1947100072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Chicaiza, Henry P ; Malia, Laurie ; Mulvey, Christine H ; Smith, Sharon R</creator><creatorcontrib>Chicaiza, Henry P ; Malia, Laurie ; Mulvey, Christine H ; Smith, Sharon R</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVESThis study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2–18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 with suspected acute appendicitis. Children were considered as having “suspected acute appendicitis” if they (1) presented with acute abdominal pain and had either a surgical consult or an abdominal ultrasound, or (2) presented or transferred with the stated suspicion of acute appendicitis. Pathology reports were used to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. The appendiceal diameters were determined by board-certified pediatric radiologists. RESULTSA total of 320 patient charts were reviewed (females, 57%; mean age, 10.9; SD, 3.9). Seventy-two percent (N = 230) of the patients screened positive for acute appendicitis via ultrasound, 69% (N = 222) had confirmed acute appendicitis, 75% (N = 239) of the ultrasound reports included an outer appendiceal diameter. Overall, ultrasound was found to be highly sensitive (91%) and moderately specific (74%). With an outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm as a cutoff, ultrasound had an excellent sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (43%). With an outer diameter of 7 mm as a cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 94% but specificity increased to 71%. With increasing cutoff size, the sensitivity decreased and specificity increased. CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that the optimal outer appendiceal diameter for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should be 7 mm instead of the currently used 6 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28976457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><ispartof>Pediatric emergency care, 2018-11, Vol.34 (11), p.757-760</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-88b53eec0cae19b49b726e5093679c71579e3b1c6542ef22785f9f0999204d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-88b53eec0cae19b49b726e5093679c71579e3b1c6542ef22785f9f0999204d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28976457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chicaiza, Henry P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malia, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvey, Christine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sharon R</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis</title><title>Pediatric emergency care</title><addtitle>Pediatr Emerg Care</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVESThis study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2–18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 with suspected acute appendicitis. Children were considered as having “suspected acute appendicitis” if they (1) presented with acute abdominal pain and had either a surgical consult or an abdominal ultrasound, or (2) presented or transferred with the stated suspicion of acute appendicitis. Pathology reports were used to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. The appendiceal diameters were determined by board-certified pediatric radiologists. RESULTSA total of 320 patient charts were reviewed (females, 57%; mean age, 10.9; SD, 3.9). Seventy-two percent (N = 230) of the patients screened positive for acute appendicitis via ultrasound, 69% (N = 222) had confirmed acute appendicitis, 75% (N = 239) of the ultrasound reports included an outer appendiceal diameter. Overall, ultrasound was found to be highly sensitive (91%) and moderately specific (74%). With an outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm as a cutoff, ultrasound had an excellent sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (43%). With an outer diameter of 7 mm as a cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 94% but specificity increased to 71%. With increasing cutoff size, the sensitivity decreased and specificity increased. CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that the optimal outer appendiceal diameter for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should be 7 mm instead of the currently used 6 mm.</description><issn>0749-5161</issn><issn>1535-1815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhlySbFjuM4XlalPKRKIEQ3bCzHmbSGvLCTVvw9hpaHWODNLHzuHc1B6JTgMcGCX9zPpmP865GIp3toSBhlIUkJ20dDzGMRMpKQATpy7tkzjFJ6iAZRKngSMz5ETw-wNs50pl4G3QqCSdtCnRsNqgwujaqgAxusjQoWZWeVa_o6D4rGfrL-f1k3zrigKYKJ7rufuC90x-igUKWDk90cocXV7HF6E87vrm-nk3moKUvSME0zRgE01gqIyGKR8SgBhgVNuNCcMC6AZkQnLI6giPyVrBAFFkJEOM65oiN0vu1tbfPag-tkZZyGslQ1NL2TRMSceEE88mi8RbVtnLNQyNaaStk3SbD8sCq9VfnXqo-d7Tb0WQX5d-hLowfSLbBpSi_MvZT9BqxceYvd6v_udzydgtg</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Chicaiza, Henry P</creator><creator>Malia, Laurie</creator><creator>Mulvey, Christine H</creator><creator>Smith, Sharon R</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis</title><author>Chicaiza, Henry P ; Malia, Laurie ; Mulvey, Christine H ; Smith, Sharon R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-88b53eec0cae19b49b726e5093679c71579e3b1c6542ef22785f9f0999204d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chicaiza, Henry P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malia, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvey, Christine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sharon R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric emergency care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chicaiza, Henry P</au><au>Malia, Laurie</au><au>Mulvey, Christine H</au><au>Smith, Sharon R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric emergency care</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Emerg Care</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>757</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>757-760</pages><issn>0749-5161</issn><eissn>1535-1815</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVESThis study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2–18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 with suspected acute appendicitis. Children were considered as having “suspected acute appendicitis” if they (1) presented with acute abdominal pain and had either a surgical consult or an abdominal ultrasound, or (2) presented or transferred with the stated suspicion of acute appendicitis. Pathology reports were used to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. The appendiceal diameters were determined by board-certified pediatric radiologists. RESULTSA total of 320 patient charts were reviewed (females, 57%; mean age, 10.9; SD, 3.9). Seventy-two percent (N = 230) of the patients screened positive for acute appendicitis via ultrasound, 69% (N = 222) had confirmed acute appendicitis, 75% (N = 239) of the ultrasound reports included an outer appendiceal diameter. Overall, ultrasound was found to be highly sensitive (91%) and moderately specific (74%). With an outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm as a cutoff, ultrasound had an excellent sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (43%). With an outer diameter of 7 mm as a cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 94% but specificity increased to 71%. With increasing cutoff size, the sensitivity decreased and specificity increased. CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that the optimal outer appendiceal diameter for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should be 7 mm instead of the currently used 6 mm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>28976457</pmid><doi>10.1097/PEC.0000000000001278</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5161
ispartof Pediatric emergency care, 2018-11, Vol.34 (11), p.757-760
issn 0749-5161
1535-1815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1947100072
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Appendiceal%20Diameter%20via%20Ultrasound%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Acute%20Appendicitis&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20emergency%20care&rft.au=Chicaiza,%20Henry%20P&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=757-760&rft.issn=0749-5161&rft.eissn=1535-1815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1947100072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1947100072&rft_id=info:pmid/28976457&rfr_iscdi=true