Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data
Objective To estimate resource use and costs associated with peripartum hysterectomy for the English National Health Service. Design/Setting Analysis of linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics (CPRD‐HES) data. Population Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2018-06, Vol.125 (7), p.874-883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 874 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Achana, FA Fleming, KM Tata, LJ Sultan, AA Petrou, S |
description | Objective
To estimate resource use and costs associated with peripartum hysterectomy for the English National Health Service.
Design/Setting
Analysis of linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics (CPRD‐HES) data.
Population
Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy between 1997 and 2013 and matched controls.
Methods
Inverse probability weighted generalised estimating equations were used to model the non‐linear trend in healthcare service use and costs over time, accounting for missing data, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, delivery year, smoking and socio‐economic indicators.
Main outcome measures
Primary care, hospital outpatient and inpatient attendances and costs (UK 2015 prices).
Results
The study sample included 1362 women (192 cases and 1170 controls) who gave birth between 1997 and 2013; 1088 (153 cases and 935 controls) of these were deliveries between 2003 and 2013 when all categories of hospital resource use were available. Based on the 2003–2013 delivery cohort, peripartum hysterectomy was associated with a mean adjusted additional total cost of £5380 (95% CI £4436–6687) and a cost ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.61–1.98) over 5 years of follow up compared with controls. Inpatient costs, mostly incurred during the first year following surgery, accounted for 78% excluding or 92% including delivery‐related costs.
Conclusion
Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased healthcare costs driven largely by increased post‐surgery hospitalisation rates. To reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes for women who undergo hysterectomy, interventions that reduce avoidable repeat hospitalisations following surgery such as providing active follow up, treatment and support in the community should be considered.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1471-0528.14950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1946428987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1946428987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-cd24d6964fd15181517fe58292a5943db708db3e52ae7e8a7bb0a708310226d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMovs_eJODFSzVJkz68qfhEWA96DmkydSNpsyYt0v_erLt68GJgyPDxmw_mG4SOKDmj6Z1TXtKMCFadUV4LsoF2f5XN755kJGfVDtqL8Z0QWjCSb6MdVtUlywndRW_PEOxChWHs8HyKAwTQg--mC6x6DNr3vrM69cpN0UbsW2zsEsFzUG6YaxUAax-HiMdo-zcc_DjYHtyUVOcSCAYbNagDtNUqF-Fw_e-j19ubl-v77Gl293B9-ZRpThnJtGHcFHXBW0MFrVKVLYiK1UyJmuemKUllmhwEU1BCpcqmISppOSWMFabO99HpyncR_McIcZCdjRqcUz34MUpa84Kn9asyoSd_0Hc_hrRplIzwMhdUcJ6o8xWlg48xQCsXwXYqTJISubyBXCYul4nL7xukieO179h0YH75n9ATIFbAp3Uw_ecnrx5nK-MvcViQkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047351544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Achana, FA ; Fleming, KM ; Tata, LJ ; Sultan, AA ; Petrou, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Achana, FA ; Fleming, KM ; Tata, LJ ; Sultan, AA ; Petrou, S</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To estimate resource use and costs associated with peripartum hysterectomy for the English National Health Service.
Design/Setting
Analysis of linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics (CPRD‐HES) data.
Population
Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy between 1997 and 2013 and matched controls.
Methods
Inverse probability weighted generalised estimating equations were used to model the non‐linear trend in healthcare service use and costs over time, accounting for missing data, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, delivery year, smoking and socio‐economic indicators.
Main outcome measures
Primary care, hospital outpatient and inpatient attendances and costs (UK 2015 prices).
Results
The study sample included 1362 women (192 cases and 1170 controls) who gave birth between 1997 and 2013; 1088 (153 cases and 935 controls) of these were deliveries between 2003 and 2013 when all categories of hospital resource use were available. Based on the 2003–2013 delivery cohort, peripartum hysterectomy was associated with a mean adjusted additional total cost of £5380 (95% CI £4436–6687) and a cost ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.61–1.98) over 5 years of follow up compared with controls. Inpatient costs, mostly incurred during the first year following surgery, accounted for 78% excluding or 92% including delivery‐related costs.
Conclusion
Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased healthcare costs driven largely by increased post‐surgery hospitalisation rates. To reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes for women who undergo hysterectomy, interventions that reduce avoidable repeat hospitalisations following surgery such as providing active follow up, treatment and support in the community should be considered.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28972301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body mass index ; Case-Control Studies ; Clinical practice research datalink ; Cohort Studies ; Costs ; Direct Service Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Economic analysis ; economic burden ; Female ; Health care expenditures ; healthcare costs ; hospital episodes statistics ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - economics ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; peripartum hysterectomy ; Peripartum Period ; Practice research ; Pregnancy ; routine data ; State Medicine ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2018-06, Vol.125 (7), p.874-883</ispartof><rights>2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-cd24d6964fd15181517fe58292a5943db708db3e52ae7e8a7bb0a708310226d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-cd24d6964fd15181517fe58292a5943db708db3e52ae7e8a7bb0a708310226d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.14950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.14950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28972301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Achana, FA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tata, LJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, AA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrou, S</creatorcontrib><title>Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective
To estimate resource use and costs associated with peripartum hysterectomy for the English National Health Service.
Design/Setting
Analysis of linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics (CPRD‐HES) data.
Population
Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy between 1997 and 2013 and matched controls.
Methods
Inverse probability weighted generalised estimating equations were used to model the non‐linear trend in healthcare service use and costs over time, accounting for missing data, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, delivery year, smoking and socio‐economic indicators.
Main outcome measures
Primary care, hospital outpatient and inpatient attendances and costs (UK 2015 prices).
Results
The study sample included 1362 women (192 cases and 1170 controls) who gave birth between 1997 and 2013; 1088 (153 cases and 935 controls) of these were deliveries between 2003 and 2013 when all categories of hospital resource use were available. Based on the 2003–2013 delivery cohort, peripartum hysterectomy was associated with a mean adjusted additional total cost of £5380 (95% CI £4436–6687) and a cost ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.61–1.98) over 5 years of follow up compared with controls. Inpatient costs, mostly incurred during the first year following surgery, accounted for 78% excluding or 92% including delivery‐related costs.
Conclusion
Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased healthcare costs driven largely by increased post‐surgery hospitalisation rates. To reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes for women who undergo hysterectomy, interventions that reduce avoidable repeat hospitalisations following surgery such as providing active follow up, treatment and support in the community should be considered.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clinical practice research datalink</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Direct Service Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>economic burden</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>healthcare costs</subject><subject>hospital episodes statistics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - economics</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>peripartum hysterectomy</subject><subject>Peripartum Period</subject><subject>Practice research</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>routine data</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMovs_eJODFSzVJkz68qfhEWA96DmkydSNpsyYt0v_erLt68GJgyPDxmw_mG4SOKDmj6Z1TXtKMCFadUV4LsoF2f5XN755kJGfVDtqL8Z0QWjCSb6MdVtUlywndRW_PEOxChWHs8HyKAwTQg--mC6x6DNr3vrM69cpN0UbsW2zsEsFzUG6YaxUAax-HiMdo-zcc_DjYHtyUVOcSCAYbNagDtNUqF-Fw_e-j19ubl-v77Gl293B9-ZRpThnJtGHcFHXBW0MFrVKVLYiK1UyJmuemKUllmhwEU1BCpcqmISppOSWMFabO99HpyncR_McIcZCdjRqcUz34MUpa84Kn9asyoSd_0Hc_hrRplIzwMhdUcJ6o8xWlg48xQCsXwXYqTJISubyBXCYul4nL7xukieO179h0YH75n9ATIFbAp3Uw_ecnrx5nK-MvcViQkw</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Achana, FA</creator><creator>Fleming, KM</creator><creator>Tata, LJ</creator><creator>Sultan, AA</creator><creator>Petrou, S</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data</title><author>Achana, FA ; Fleming, KM ; Tata, LJ ; Sultan, AA ; Petrou, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-cd24d6964fd15181517fe58292a5943db708db3e52ae7e8a7bb0a708310226d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clinical practice research datalink</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Direct Service Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>economic burden</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>healthcare costs</topic><topic>hospital episodes statistics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - economics</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>peripartum hysterectomy</topic><topic>Peripartum Period</topic><topic>Practice research</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>routine data</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Achana, FA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tata, LJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, AA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrou, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Achana, FA</au><au>Fleming, KM</au><au>Tata, LJ</au><au>Sultan, AA</au><au>Petrou, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>874-883</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objective
To estimate resource use and costs associated with peripartum hysterectomy for the English National Health Service.
Design/Setting
Analysis of linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics (CPRD‐HES) data.
Population
Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy between 1997 and 2013 and matched controls.
Methods
Inverse probability weighted generalised estimating equations were used to model the non‐linear trend in healthcare service use and costs over time, accounting for missing data, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, delivery year, smoking and socio‐economic indicators.
Main outcome measures
Primary care, hospital outpatient and inpatient attendances and costs (UK 2015 prices).
Results
The study sample included 1362 women (192 cases and 1170 controls) who gave birth between 1997 and 2013; 1088 (153 cases and 935 controls) of these were deliveries between 2003 and 2013 when all categories of hospital resource use were available. Based on the 2003–2013 delivery cohort, peripartum hysterectomy was associated with a mean adjusted additional total cost of £5380 (95% CI £4436–6687) and a cost ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.61–1.98) over 5 years of follow up compared with controls. Inpatient costs, mostly incurred during the first year following surgery, accounted for 78% excluding or 92% including delivery‐related costs.
Conclusion
Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased healthcare costs driven largely by increased post‐surgery hospitalisation rates. To reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes for women who undergo hysterectomy, interventions that reduce avoidable repeat hospitalisations following surgery such as providing active follow up, treatment and support in the community should be considered.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.
Tweetable
A large amount of NHS data on peripartum hysterectomy suggests active community follow up could reduce costs, #HealthEconomics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28972301</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.14950</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2018-06, Vol.125 (7), p.874-883 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1946428987 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Body mass index Case-Control Studies Clinical practice research datalink Cohort Studies Costs Direct Service Costs - statistics & numerical data Economic analysis economic burden Female Health care expenditures healthcare costs hospital episodes statistics Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - economics Hysterectomy - methods Mathematical models Nonlinear Dynamics peripartum hysterectomy Peripartum Period Practice research Pregnancy routine data State Medicine Statistical analysis Surgery United Kingdom |
title | Peripartum hysterectomy: an economic analysis of direct healthcare costs using routinely collected data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A43%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peripartum%20hysterectomy:%20an%20economic%20analysis%20of%20direct%20healthcare%20costs%20using%20routinely%20collected%20data&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Achana,%20FA&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=874-883&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1946428987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047351544&rft_id=info:pmid/28972301&rfr_iscdi=true |