System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Part 2: Uncertainty assessment

This paper focuses on assessing and applying the Federal Aviation Administration’s System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Version 1.5, to evaluate global aircraft fuel consumption and emissions. The model is capable of computing fuel burn and emissions on a flight-by-flight, fleet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment Transport and environment, 2007-08, Vol.12 (6), p.381-395
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Joosung J., Waitz, Ian A., Kim, Brian Y., Fleming, Gregg G., Maurice, Lourdes, Holsclaw, Curtis A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper focuses on assessing and applying the Federal Aviation Administration’s System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Version 1.5, to evaluate global aircraft fuel consumption and emissions. The model is capable of computing fuel burn and emissions on a flight-by-flight, fleet and global basis. Here, a parametric study was conducted to rank-order the effects that the modeling uncertainties had on estimates of fuel burn and emissions. Statistical methods were applied to analyze both the random and systematic errors of the model. Also, applying the model to a sample policy analysis case allowed an examination of more stringent engine certification standards for mitigating aviation emissions. Uncertainties of the model were carefully accounted for in the fuel burn and emissions scenarios of the policy options. Results show that for some applications, SAGE may be used to resolve small differences in fleet emissions performance. Although the absolute uncertainty in flight-by-flight NO x predictions from the model are of the order of 40%, results show that it is well within the current capabilities of the model to distinguish between the fleet average NO x emissions associated with the typical NO x stringency options considered in policy analyses.
ISSN:1361-9209
1879-2340
DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2007.03.006