Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation

Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tool...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91
Hauptverfasser: Scholcover, Federico, Gillan, Douglas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Human factors
container_volume 60
creator Scholcover, Federico
Gillan, Douglas J.
description Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research. Method Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded. Results Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off. Conclusion This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency. Application The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0018720817734727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720817734727</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1989314599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqsptskqMUv6Bgwfa8ZJNsSdlNarIr9L83pVWk4GkG5vfePB4A1xjdY8zYA0KYsxzxtBeE5ewEjDElLOOY41Mw3p2z3X0ELmJcI4RKUdBzMMq5KBkTZAzmy2jdCi5Mt_FBtvDDuGh7-2X7Lew9nAejrerh3ITGh046ZeDSaRPgTPbGqS20Lolb4zcmyN56dwnOGtlGc3WYE7B8flpMX7PZ-8vb9HGWKVKiPiuE0EprXSpdk1KzXGtFGyJRii-Z1EgqVuuaF3VJmoaqvClqSTWmCIucMFVMwN3edxP852BiX3U2KtO20hk_xAoLQhkuCScJvT1C134ILqVLFBcFJlSIRKE9pYKPMZim2gTbybCtMKp2bVfHbSfJzcF4qDujfwU_9SYg2wNRrsyfr_8ZfgNFv4do</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989314599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research. Method Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded. Results Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off. Conclusion This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency. Application The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720817734727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28967794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Astronaut training ; Astronauts ; Completion time ; Female ; Human behavior ; Humans ; Latency ; Male ; Man-Machine Systems ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Robotics ; Sensitivity ; Space life sciences ; Teleoperators ; Telerobots ; Time Perception - physiology ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91</ispartof><rights>2017, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720817734727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720817734727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28967794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research. Method Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded. Results Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off. Conclusion This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency. Application The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Astronaut training</subject><subject>Astronauts</subject><subject>Completion time</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Man-Machine Systems</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Teleoperators</subject><subject>Telerobots</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqsptskqMUv6Bgwfa8ZJNsSdlNarIr9L83pVWk4GkG5vfePB4A1xjdY8zYA0KYsxzxtBeE5ewEjDElLOOY41Mw3p2z3X0ELmJcI4RKUdBzMMq5KBkTZAzmy2jdCi5Mt_FBtvDDuGh7-2X7Lew9nAejrerh3ITGh046ZeDSaRPgTPbGqS20Lolb4zcmyN56dwnOGtlGc3WYE7B8flpMX7PZ-8vb9HGWKVKiPiuE0EprXSpdk1KzXGtFGyJRii-Z1EgqVuuaF3VJmoaqvClqSTWmCIucMFVMwN3edxP852BiX3U2KtO20hk_xAoLQhkuCScJvT1C134ILqVLFBcFJlSIRKE9pYKPMZim2gTbybCtMKp2bVfHbSfJzcF4qDujfwU_9SYg2wNRrsyfr_8ZfgNFv4do</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Scholcover, Federico</creator><creator>Gillan, Douglas J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><author>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Astronaut training</topic><topic>Astronauts</topic><topic>Completion time</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Man-Machine Systems</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Teleoperators</topic><topic>Telerobots</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholcover, Federico</au><au>Gillan, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>80-91</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research. Method Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded. Results Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off. Conclusion This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency. Application The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28967794</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720817734727</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716484
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Astronaut training
Astronauts
Completion time
Female
Human behavior
Humans
Latency
Male
Man-Machine Systems
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Robotics
Sensitivity
Space life sciences
Teleoperators
Telerobots
Time Perception - physiology
Visual stimuli
Young Adult
title Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Temporal%20Sensitivity%20to%20Predict%20Performance%20Under%20Latency%20in%20Teleoperation&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Scholcover,%20Federico&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=80-91&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720817734727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989314599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989314599&rft_id=info:pmid/28967794&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720817734727&rfr_iscdi=true