Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation
Objective This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response. Background As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tool...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Scholcover, Federico Gillan, Douglas J. |
description | Objective
This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response.
Background
As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research.
Method
Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded.
Results
Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off.
Conclusion
This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency.
Application
The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0018720817734727 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720817734727</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1989314599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqsptskqMUv6Bgwfa8ZJNsSdlNarIr9L83pVWk4GkG5vfePB4A1xjdY8zYA0KYsxzxtBeE5ewEjDElLOOY41Mw3p2z3X0ELmJcI4RKUdBzMMq5KBkTZAzmy2jdCi5Mt_FBtvDDuGh7-2X7Lew9nAejrerh3ITGh046ZeDSaRPgTPbGqS20Lolb4zcmyN56dwnOGtlGc3WYE7B8flpMX7PZ-8vb9HGWKVKiPiuE0EprXSpdk1KzXGtFGyJRii-Z1EgqVuuaF3VJmoaqvClqSTWmCIucMFVMwN3edxP852BiX3U2KtO20hk_xAoLQhkuCScJvT1C134ILqVLFBcFJlSIRKE9pYKPMZim2gTbybCtMKp2bVfHbSfJzcF4qDujfwU_9SYg2wNRrsyfr_8ZfgNFv4do</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989314599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response.
Background
As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research.
Method
Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded.
Results
Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off.
Conclusion
This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency.
Application
The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720817734727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28967794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Astronaut training ; Astronauts ; Completion time ; Female ; Human behavior ; Humans ; Latency ; Male ; Man-Machine Systems ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Robotics ; Sensitivity ; Space life sciences ; Teleoperators ; Telerobots ; Time Perception - physiology ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91</ispartof><rights>2017, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018720817734727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720817734727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28967794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective
This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response.
Background
As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research.
Method
Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded.
Results
Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off.
Conclusion
This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency.
Application
The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Astronaut training</subject><subject>Astronauts</subject><subject>Completion time</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Man-Machine Systems</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Teleoperators</subject><subject>Telerobots</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqsptskqMUv6Bgwfa8ZJNsSdlNarIr9L83pVWk4GkG5vfePB4A1xjdY8zYA0KYsxzxtBeE5ewEjDElLOOY41Mw3p2z3X0ELmJcI4RKUdBzMMq5KBkTZAzmy2jdCi5Mt_FBtvDDuGh7-2X7Lew9nAejrerh3ITGh046ZeDSaRPgTPbGqS20Lolb4zcmyN56dwnOGtlGc3WYE7B8flpMX7PZ-8vb9HGWKVKiPiuE0EprXSpdk1KzXGtFGyJRii-Z1EgqVuuaF3VJmoaqvClqSTWmCIucMFVMwN3edxP852BiX3U2KtO20hk_xAoLQhkuCScJvT1C134ILqVLFBcFJlSIRKE9pYKPMZim2gTbybCtMKp2bVfHbSfJzcF4qDujfwU_9SYg2wNRrsyfr_8ZfgNFv4do</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Scholcover, Federico</creator><creator>Gillan, Douglas J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</title><author>Scholcover, Federico ; Gillan, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-399dcddd6cdb46d72ddc5f4a0547a7ad0ac7bdb83b64ff5c2f3ba5d15019247c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Astronaut training</topic><topic>Astronauts</topic><topic>Completion time</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Man-Machine Systems</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Teleoperators</topic><topic>Telerobots</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholcover, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillan, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholcover, Federico</au><au>Gillan, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>80-91</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective
This article establishes a relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency between input and response.
Background
As the latency between human input and telerobot response increases, performance (e.g., speed to complete task and accuracy) declines. Tools, such as predictive displays, have been developed to ameliorate performance costs. However, more work is needed to understand the relationship between individual differences and task performance. Temporal sensitivity in particular was the focus of this research.
Method
Participants completed two tasks. In the time estimation task, participants estimated the duration of a series of visual stimuli. In the second task, participants drove a remote-controlled (RC) car through a track. On each trial, there was a latency between the participant’s input into the controller and the response by the RC car, with latencies ranging from 400 to 1,000 milliseconds between trials. Completion time and the number of errors made were recorded.
Results
Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors made during a trial but was not found to be a predictor of completion time. It was however predictive of error rate (i.e., errors per minute), suggesting a possible speed/accuracy trade-off.
Conclusion
This was an initial step in establishing a link between temporal sensitivity and performance with latency.
Application
The study has applications toward training teleoperators who may experience latency, such as astronauts and surgeons.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28967794</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720817734727</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 2018-02, Vol.60 (1), p.80-91 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716484 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Astronaut training Astronauts Completion time Female Human behavior Humans Latency Male Man-Machine Systems Psychomotor Performance - physiology Robotics Sensitivity Space life sciences Teleoperators Telerobots Time Perception - physiology Visual stimuli Young Adult |
title | Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Temporal%20Sensitivity%20to%20Predict%20Performance%20Under%20Latency%20in%20Teleoperation&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Scholcover,%20Federico&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=80-91&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720817734727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989314599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989314599&rft_id=info:pmid/28967794&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720817734727&rfr_iscdi=true |