Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool
Objectives To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care. Design Four‐step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2018-02, Vol.66 (2), p.394-400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 400 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 394 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | McCusker, Jane Minh Vu, T. T. Veillette, Nathalie Cossette, Sylvie Vadeboncoeur, Alain Ciampi, Antonio Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz Belzile, Eric |
description | Objectives
To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care.
Design
Four‐step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal component analysis and clinical judgment, (4) reliability and validity assessment.
Setting
Province of Quebec, Canada.
Participants
Lead ED nurses and physicians at 76 Quebec EDs who participated in a 2013/14 survey (66% of 116 adult nonpsychiatric EDs in the province).
Measurements
Geriatric care items (n = 62) grouped into seven preliminary content areas (screening and assessment, clinical protocols, discharge planning, staffing, physical environment, continuing education, quality assessment), lead nurse and physician perceptions of the quality of ED geriatric care, institutional prioritization of geriatric care, and ED type.
Results
Thirteen subscales were developed; most were associated with ED type and quality indicators.
Conclusion
Thirteen subscales for geriatric ED services are proposed for evaluation in various ED settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgs.15137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945214829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945214829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-169b3ba1a15b576beacba99f1f3635ec97960bbb29c3e9bc8910e51b234834ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9O3DAQh60KVLbQAy-AIvVSDlk8dpzEvSFYFhBShYAea9nJBGXlxFs7AeXWR-gz9kkwLOVQibnMH336afQRsg90DrGOVvdhDgJ48YHMQHCWigzEFplRSlla5pDtkE8hrCgFRsvyI9lhpcwpy-iM_FzYGv3f33_OfIt9badk0aG_x76aklNcaz902A_f4vyA1q2fl0T3dfJD27bWQ-v6xDWJTq7HeBim5DgEDOEFu3XO7pHtRtuAn1_7Lrk7W9yenKdX35cXJ8dXacUFL1LIpeFGgwZhRJEb1JXRUjbQ8JwLrGQR_zXGMFlxlKYqJVAUYBjPSp5p5Lvk6yZ37d2vEcOgujZUaK3u0Y1BgcwEg6xkMqJf_kNXbvR9_E6xaIgWBeQ0UocbqvIuBI-NWvu2035SQNWzdBWlqxfpkT14TRxNh_Ub-c9yBI42wGNrcXo_SV0ubzaRT9MYi9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001077160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>McCusker, Jane ; Minh Vu, T. T. ; Veillette, Nathalie ; Cossette, Sylvie ; Vadeboncoeur, Alain ; Ciampi, Antonio ; Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz ; Belzile, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Jane ; Minh Vu, T. T. ; Veillette, Nathalie ; Cossette, Sylvie ; Vadeboncoeur, Alain ; Ciampi, Antonio ; Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz ; Belzile, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care.
Design
Four‐step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal component analysis and clinical judgment, (4) reliability and validity assessment.
Setting
Province of Quebec, Canada.
Participants
Lead ED nurses and physicians at 76 Quebec EDs who participated in a 2013/14 survey (66% of 116 adult nonpsychiatric EDs in the province).
Measurements
Geriatric care items (n = 62) grouped into seven preliminary content areas (screening and assessment, clinical protocols, discharge planning, staffing, physical environment, continuing education, quality assessment), lead nurse and physician perceptions of the quality of ED geriatric care, institutional prioritization of geriatric care, and ED type.
Results
Thirteen subscales were developed; most were associated with ED type and quality indicators.
Conclusion
Thirteen subscales for geriatric ED services are proposed for evaluation in various ED settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15137</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28960240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; emergency department ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; geriatric ; Geriatrics ; Health Services for the Aged - standards ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Patient Discharge ; Physicians ; Quality ; quality assessment ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - organization & administration ; Quality control ; Quebec ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2018-02, Vol.66 (2), p.394-400</ispartof><rights>2017, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2017, The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2017, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2017, The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2018 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-169b3ba1a15b576beacba99f1f3635ec97960bbb29c3e9bc8910e51b234834ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-169b3ba1a15b576beacba99f1f3635ec97960bbb29c3e9bc8910e51b234834ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgs.15137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgs.15137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28960240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minh Vu, T. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veillette, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossette, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadeboncoeur, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciampi, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belzile, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Objectives
To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care.
Design
Four‐step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal component analysis and clinical judgment, (4) reliability and validity assessment.
Setting
Province of Quebec, Canada.
Participants
Lead ED nurses and physicians at 76 Quebec EDs who participated in a 2013/14 survey (66% of 116 adult nonpsychiatric EDs in the province).
Measurements
Geriatric care items (n = 62) grouped into seven preliminary content areas (screening and assessment, clinical protocols, discharge planning, staffing, physical environment, continuing education, quality assessment), lead nurse and physician perceptions of the quality of ED geriatric care, institutional prioritization of geriatric care, and ED type.
Results
Thirteen subscales were developed; most were associated with ED type and quality indicators.
Conclusion
Thirteen subscales for geriatric ED services are proposed for evaluation in various ED settings.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>geriatric</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9O3DAQh60KVLbQAy-AIvVSDlk8dpzEvSFYFhBShYAea9nJBGXlxFs7AeXWR-gz9kkwLOVQibnMH336afQRsg90DrGOVvdhDgJ48YHMQHCWigzEFplRSlla5pDtkE8hrCgFRsvyI9lhpcwpy-iM_FzYGv3f33_OfIt9badk0aG_x76aklNcaz902A_f4vyA1q2fl0T3dfJD27bWQ-v6xDWJTq7HeBim5DgEDOEFu3XO7pHtRtuAn1_7Lrk7W9yenKdX35cXJ8dXacUFL1LIpeFGgwZhRJEb1JXRUjbQ8JwLrGQR_zXGMFlxlKYqJVAUYBjPSp5p5Lvk6yZ37d2vEcOgujZUaK3u0Y1BgcwEg6xkMqJf_kNXbvR9_E6xaIgWBeQ0UocbqvIuBI-NWvu2035SQNWzdBWlqxfpkT14TRxNh_Ub-c9yBI42wGNrcXo_SV0ubzaRT9MYi9M</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>McCusker, Jane</creator><creator>Minh Vu, T. T.</creator><creator>Veillette, Nathalie</creator><creator>Cossette, Sylvie</creator><creator>Vadeboncoeur, Alain</creator><creator>Ciampi, Antonio</creator><creator>Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz</creator><creator>Belzile, Eric</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool</title><author>McCusker, Jane ; Minh Vu, T. T. ; Veillette, Nathalie ; Cossette, Sylvie ; Vadeboncoeur, Alain ; Ciampi, Antonio ; Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz ; Belzile, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-169b3ba1a15b576beacba99f1f3635ec97960bbb29c3e9bc8910e51b234834ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>geriatric</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minh Vu, T. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veillette, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossette, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadeboncoeur, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciampi, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belzile, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCusker, Jane</au><au>Minh Vu, T. T.</au><au>Veillette, Nathalie</au><au>Cossette, Sylvie</au><au>Vadeboncoeur, Alain</au><au>Ciampi, Antonio</au><au>Cetin‐Sahin, Deniz</au><au>Belzile, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>394-400</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To develop and validate a comprehensive quality assessment tool for emergency department (ED) geriatric care.
Design
Four‐step study: (1) Content development of tool by a multidisciplinary panel, (2) survey of ED lead physicians and nurses, (3) development of subscales using principal component analysis and clinical judgment, (4) reliability and validity assessment.
Setting
Province of Quebec, Canada.
Participants
Lead ED nurses and physicians at 76 Quebec EDs who participated in a 2013/14 survey (66% of 116 adult nonpsychiatric EDs in the province).
Measurements
Geriatric care items (n = 62) grouped into seven preliminary content areas (screening and assessment, clinical protocols, discharge planning, staffing, physical environment, continuing education, quality assessment), lead nurse and physician perceptions of the quality of ED geriatric care, institutional prioritization of geriatric care, and ED type.
Results
Thirteen subscales were developed; most were associated with ED type and quality indicators.
Conclusion
Thirteen subscales for geriatric ED services are proposed for evaluation in various ED settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28960240</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.15137</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2018-02, Vol.66 (2), p.394-400 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945214829 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged emergency department Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data geriatric Geriatrics Health Services for the Aged - standards Humans Length of Stay Nursing Staff, Hospital Patient Discharge Physicians Quality quality assessment Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Quality Assurance, Health Care - organization & administration Quality control Quebec Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires - standards |
title | Elder‐Friendly Emergency Department: Development and Validation of a Quality Assessment Tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elder%E2%80%90Friendly%20Emergency%20Department:%20Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20Quality%20Assessment%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=McCusker,%20Jane&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=394-400&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.15137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1945214829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001077160&rft_id=info:pmid/28960240&rfr_iscdi=true |