An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force

The 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) granted relief to the Department of Defense (DOD) on compliance with certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specifically, the Secretary of the Interior was mandated to exempt DOD from critical habitat designation on military install...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Federal facilities environmental journal 2004-09, Vol.15 (3), p.19-28
Hauptverfasser: Sitzabee, William E., Bleckmann, Charles A., England, Ellen C.
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 3
container_start_page 19
container_title Federal facilities environmental journal
container_volume 15
creator Sitzabee, William E.
Bleckmann, Charles A.
England, Ellen C.
description The 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) granted relief to the Department of Defense (DOD) on compliance with certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specifically, the Secretary of the Interior was mandated to exempt DOD from critical habitat designation on military installations provided that the installation had an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), as required by the Sikes Act, and the resources to effectively implement the plan. DOD viewed this legislative relief as an important step in addressing one element of general encroachment concerns on military lands. This article reviews the background of the critical habitat issue on military lands and the steps that led to the provisions included in the 2004 NDAA. To determine the status and degree of implementation of the ESA provisions of the 2004 NDAA in the U.S. Air Force (USAF), the principal author conducted a survey of USAF range natural resources managers. The results of that survey indicate that the USAF is meeting the requirements of the 2004 NDAA by having valid INRMPs for its installations and by providing adequate funding for their implementation. However, the survey results suggested several areas where improvement was needed, particularly in educating natural resources managers about documenting the impacts of critical species on training ranges, partnering with outside groups to leverage manpower and financial resources, and improving public education and awareness of USAF training range environmental programs. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ffej.20021
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19440217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14721042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1771-44e8c012192cc9011b28312404aeaf5f44700a2f9f376112e7d408af7b1a7ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQCMEEp8Lv8ATA1LKnePEyVigLSAEEh9itIxzhkDqBDuF9t-TUmCE6U669254UbSPMEAAfmQtvQx4v-FatIUphzhLMVnvdxB5LEDmm9F2CC8AUGSZ2Irs0DF61_VMd1XjWGPZyJXaPZGnkt22ZCoKbGg6RnOatksmsMqx7plYSa323ZRct9RKsuQCMe3Kr-v94HbAhpVn48Yb2o02rK4D7X3Pneh-PLo7OYsvryfnJ8PL2KCUGAtBuQHkWHBjCkB85HmCXIDQpG1qhZAAmtvCJjJD5CRLAbm28hG1JEqTnehg9bf1zduMQqemVTBU19pRMwsKCyH6OPJ_UEjeN-M9eLgCjW9C8GRV66up9guFoJbN1bK5-mrew7iCP6qaFn-QajweXfw48cqpQkfzX0f7V5XJRKbq4WqiHtIbwIvjU4XJJ9qrkO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>14721042</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sitzabee, William E. ; Bleckmann, Charles A. ; England, Ellen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sitzabee, William E. ; Bleckmann, Charles A. ; England, Ellen C.</creatorcontrib><description>The 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) granted relief to the Department of Defense (DOD) on compliance with certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specifically, the Secretary of the Interior was mandated to exempt DOD from critical habitat designation on military installations provided that the installation had an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), as required by the Sikes Act, and the resources to effectively implement the plan. DOD viewed this legislative relief as an important step in addressing one element of general encroachment concerns on military lands. This article reviews the background of the critical habitat issue on military lands and the steps that led to the provisions included in the 2004 NDAA. To determine the status and degree of implementation of the ESA provisions of the 2004 NDAA in the U.S. Air Force (USAF), the principal author conducted a survey of USAF range natural resources managers. The results of that survey indicate that the USAF is meeting the requirements of the 2004 NDAA by having valid INRMPs for its installations and by providing adequate funding for their implementation. However, the survey results suggested several areas where improvement was needed, particularly in educating natural resources managers about documenting the impacts of critical species on training ranges, partnering with outside groups to leverage manpower and financial resources, and improving public education and awareness of USAF training range environmental programs. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-4078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ffej.20021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Federal facilities environmental journal, 2004-09, Vol.15 (3), p.19-28</ispartof><rights>2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fffej.20021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fffej.20021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>777,781,1412,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sitzabee, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleckmann, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>England, Ellen C.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force</title><title>Federal facilities environmental journal</title><addtitle>Fedl. Fac. Environ. J</addtitle><description>The 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) granted relief to the Department of Defense (DOD) on compliance with certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specifically, the Secretary of the Interior was mandated to exempt DOD from critical habitat designation on military installations provided that the installation had an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), as required by the Sikes Act, and the resources to effectively implement the plan. DOD viewed this legislative relief as an important step in addressing one element of general encroachment concerns on military lands. This article reviews the background of the critical habitat issue on military lands and the steps that led to the provisions included in the 2004 NDAA. To determine the status and degree of implementation of the ESA provisions of the 2004 NDAA in the U.S. Air Force (USAF), the principal author conducted a survey of USAF range natural resources managers. The results of that survey indicate that the USAF is meeting the requirements of the 2004 NDAA by having valid INRMPs for its installations and by providing adequate funding for their implementation. However, the survey results suggested several areas where improvement was needed, particularly in educating natural resources managers about documenting the impacts of critical species on training ranges, partnering with outside groups to leverage manpower and financial resources, and improving public education and awareness of USAF training range environmental programs. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><issn>1048-4078</issn><issn>1520-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQCMEEp8Lv8ATA1LKnePEyVigLSAEEh9itIxzhkDqBDuF9t-TUmCE6U669254UbSPMEAAfmQtvQx4v-FatIUphzhLMVnvdxB5LEDmm9F2CC8AUGSZ2Irs0DF61_VMd1XjWGPZyJXaPZGnkt22ZCoKbGg6RnOatksmsMqx7plYSa323ZRct9RKsuQCMe3Kr-v94HbAhpVn48Yb2o02rK4D7X3Pneh-PLo7OYsvryfnJ8PL2KCUGAtBuQHkWHBjCkB85HmCXIDQpG1qhZAAmtvCJjJD5CRLAbm28hG1JEqTnehg9bf1zduMQqemVTBU19pRMwsKCyH6OPJ_UEjeN-M9eLgCjW9C8GRV66up9guFoJbN1bK5-mrew7iCP6qaFn-QajweXfw48cqpQkfzX0f7V5XJRKbq4WqiHtIbwIvjU4XJJ9qrkO8</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Sitzabee, William E.</creator><creator>Bleckmann, Charles A.</creator><creator>England, Ellen C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force</title><author>Sitzabee, William E. ; Bleckmann, Charles A. ; England, Ellen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1771-44e8c012192cc9011b28312404aeaf5f44700a2f9f376112e7d408af7b1a7ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sitzabee, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleckmann, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>England, Ellen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Federal facilities environmental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sitzabee, William E.</au><au>Bleckmann, Charles A.</au><au>England, Ellen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force</atitle><jtitle>Federal facilities environmental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Fedl. Fac. Environ. J</addtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>19-28</pages><issn>1048-4078</issn><eissn>1520-6513</eissn><abstract>The 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) granted relief to the Department of Defense (DOD) on compliance with certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specifically, the Secretary of the Interior was mandated to exempt DOD from critical habitat designation on military installations provided that the installation had an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), as required by the Sikes Act, and the resources to effectively implement the plan. DOD viewed this legislative relief as an important step in addressing one element of general encroachment concerns on military lands. This article reviews the background of the critical habitat issue on military lands and the steps that led to the provisions included in the 2004 NDAA. To determine the status and degree of implementation of the ESA provisions of the 2004 NDAA in the U.S. Air Force (USAF), the principal author conducted a survey of USAF range natural resources managers. The results of that survey indicate that the USAF is meeting the requirements of the 2004 NDAA by having valid INRMPs for its installations and by providing adequate funding for their implementation. However, the survey results suggested several areas where improvement was needed, particularly in educating natural resources managers about documenting the impacts of critical species on training ranges, partnering with outside groups to leverage manpower and financial resources, and improving public education and awareness of USAF training range environmental programs. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ffej.20021</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1048-4078
ispartof Federal facilities environmental journal, 2004-09, Vol.15 (3), p.19-28
issn 1048-4078
1520-6513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19440217
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title An evaluation of Endangered Species Act exemptions in the department of defense and the U.S. Air Force
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20Endangered%20Species%20Act%20exemptions%20in%20the%20department%20of%20defense%20and%20the%20U.S.%20Air%20Force&rft.jtitle=Federal%20facilities%20environmental%20journal&rft.au=Sitzabee,%20William%20E.&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=19-28&rft.issn=1048-4078&rft.eissn=1520-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ffej.20021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14721042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14721042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true