Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water?
Science-based, holistic, site-specific water conservation practices can reduce water use on turfgrass sites without adversely affecting turfgrass performance. However, when water use is decreased below a certain threshold, performance declines. Water conservation measures that reduce turfgrass perfo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural water management 2006-02, Vol.80 (1), p.117-131 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 131 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 117 |
| container_title | Agricultural water management |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Carrow, Robert N. |
| description | Science-based, holistic, site-specific water conservation practices can reduce water use on turfgrass sites without adversely affecting turfgrass performance. However, when water use is decreased below a certain threshold, performance declines. Water conservation measures that reduce turfgrass performance essentially decrease its economic, environmental, recreational, and aesthetic values, which can in turn adversely impact many ‘stakeholders’, including the local economy and those affected by increased wind erosion, water erosion, or fire hazard. On larger turfgrass sites, considerable costs are associated with some water conservation strategies, especially when the quality of an alternative irrigation water source is poor or redesign of the landscape and/or irrigation system is involved. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19437484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377405002933</els_id><sourcerecordid>19437484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-e0994eba0434a2328468559cd6f3e17508b278b22ef6eb28626d636c1334dca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCTiQC9wSxh7Hdg4I0RW0SCv1UHq2vM6k9Sp_Ftvbqre-Bq_Hk-AlFb1x-GZ8-H0z468o3jKoGTD5cVfb6zubag7Q1KBqAP2sWDGtsOJc4_NiBah0hUqJl8WrGHcAIECoVXG6tlN5R-Vo_ZSyynQIfZnm0h1imkcK8ffDrzLa5GNvXfJzpn26KQeKscwrKXx-Xbzo7RDpzWM_Ka6-ff2xPq82F2ff1182lRONShVB2wraWhAoLEeuhdRN07pO9khMNaC3XGVx6iVtuZZcdhKlY4iic1bhSfFhmbsP888DxWRGHx0Ng51oPkTDWoFKaJFBXEAX5hgD9WYf_GjDvWFgjnmZnfmblznmZUCZnFd2bRZXoD25fxYistf-CN8atBpyuc_KTpmbz2IGc90fX0wZhszcpDGPe_94rY3ODn2wk_Px6RLVyBZRZu7dwvV2zleFzFxdcmAIDGTTMJ6JTwtBOdxbT8FE52ly1PlALplu9v_92B9bp6Rm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19437484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water?</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Carrow, Robert N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrow, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><description>Science-based, holistic, site-specific water conservation practices can reduce water use on turfgrass sites without adversely affecting turfgrass performance. However, when water use is decreased below a certain threshold, performance declines. Water conservation measures that reduce turfgrass performance essentially decrease its economic, environmental, recreational, and aesthetic values, which can in turn adversely impact many ‘stakeholders’, including the local economy and those affected by increased wind erosion, water erosion, or fire hazard. On larger turfgrass sites, considerable costs are associated with some water conservation strategies, especially when the quality of an alternative irrigation water source is poor or redesign of the landscape and/or irrigation system is involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; best management practices ; Best management practices for water conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; conservation programs ; cost benefit analysis ; Drought resistance ; drought tolerance ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; irrigation scheduling ; irrigation systems ; Irrigation. Drainage ; landscaping ; lawns and turf ; literature reviews ; turf grasses ; Turfgrass ; Water conservation ; water harvesting ; Water management ; water reuse ; water use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2006-02, Vol.80 (1), p.117-131</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-e0994eba0434a2328468559cd6f3e17508b278b22ef6eb28626d636c1334dca73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-e0994eba0434a2328468559cd6f3e17508b278b22ef6eb28626d636c1334dca73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,4008,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17569336$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a80_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a1-3_3ap_3a117-131.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrow, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><title>Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water?</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>Science-based, holistic, site-specific water conservation practices can reduce water use on turfgrass sites without adversely affecting turfgrass performance. However, when water use is decreased below a certain threshold, performance declines. Water conservation measures that reduce turfgrass performance essentially decrease its economic, environmental, recreational, and aesthetic values, which can in turn adversely impact many ‘stakeholders’, including the local economy and those affected by increased wind erosion, water erosion, or fire hazard. On larger turfgrass sites, considerable costs are associated with some water conservation strategies, especially when the quality of an alternative irrigation water source is poor or redesign of the landscape and/or irrigation system is involved.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>best management practices</subject><subject>Best management practices for water conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>conservation programs</subject><subject>cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>irrigation scheduling</subject><subject>irrigation systems</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>landscaping</subject><subject>lawns and turf</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>turf grasses</subject><subject>Turfgrass</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>water harvesting</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>water reuse</subject><subject>water use efficiency</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCTiQC9wSxh7Hdg4I0RW0SCv1UHq2vM6k9Sp_Ftvbqre-Bq_Hk-AlFb1x-GZ8-H0z468o3jKoGTD5cVfb6zubag7Q1KBqAP2sWDGtsOJc4_NiBah0hUqJl8WrGHcAIECoVXG6tlN5R-Vo_ZSyynQIfZnm0h1imkcK8ffDrzLa5GNvXfJzpn26KQeKscwrKXx-Xbzo7RDpzWM_Ka6-ff2xPq82F2ff1182lRONShVB2wraWhAoLEeuhdRN07pO9khMNaC3XGVx6iVtuZZcdhKlY4iic1bhSfFhmbsP888DxWRGHx0Ng51oPkTDWoFKaJFBXEAX5hgD9WYf_GjDvWFgjnmZnfmblznmZUCZnFd2bRZXoD25fxYistf-CN8atBpyuc_KTpmbz2IGc90fX0wZhszcpDGPe_94rY3ODn2wk_Px6RLVyBZRZu7dwvV2zleFzFxdcmAIDGTTMJ6JTwtBOdxbT8FE52ly1PlALplu9v_92B9bp6Rm</recordid><startdate>20060224</startdate><enddate>20060224</enddate><creator>Carrow, Robert N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060224</creationdate><title>Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water?</title><author>Carrow, Robert N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-e0994eba0434a2328468559cd6f3e17508b278b22ef6eb28626d636c1334dca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>best management practices</topic><topic>Best management practices for water conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>conservation programs</topic><topic>cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>irrigation scheduling</topic><topic>irrigation systems</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>landscaping</topic><topic>lawns and turf</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>turf grasses</topic><topic>Turfgrass</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>water harvesting</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>water reuse</topic><topic>water use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrow, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrow, Robert N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water?</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2006-02-24</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>117-131</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>Science-based, holistic, site-specific water conservation practices can reduce water use on turfgrass sites without adversely affecting turfgrass performance. However, when water use is decreased below a certain threshold, performance declines. Water conservation measures that reduce turfgrass performance essentially decrease its economic, environmental, recreational, and aesthetic values, which can in turn adversely impact many ‘stakeholders’, including the local economy and those affected by increased wind erosion, water erosion, or fire hazard. On larger turfgrass sites, considerable costs are associated with some water conservation strategies, especially when the quality of an alternative irrigation water source is poor or redesign of the landscape and/or irrigation system is involved.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.008</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-3774 |
| ispartof | Agricultural water management, 2006-02, Vol.80 (1), p.117-131 |
| issn | 0378-3774 1873-2283 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19437484 |
| source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions best management practices Best management practices for water conservation Biological and medical sciences conservation programs cost benefit analysis Drought resistance drought tolerance Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production irrigation scheduling irrigation systems Irrigation. Drainage landscaping lawns and turf literature reviews turf grasses Turfgrass Water conservation water harvesting Water management water reuse water use efficiency |
| title | Can we maintain turf to customers’ satisfaction with less water? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20maintain%20turf%20to%20customers%E2%80%99%20satisfaction%20with%20less%20water?&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Carrow,%20Robert%20N.&rft.date=2006-02-24&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=117-131&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19437484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19437484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378377405002933&rfr_iscdi=true |