The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes

The largest observed earthquakes occur on subduction interfaces and frequently cause widespread damage and loss of life. Understanding the rupture behavior of megathrust events is crucial for earthquake rupture physics, as well as for earthquake early-warning systems. However, the large variability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2017-09, Vol.357 (6357), p.1277-1281
Hauptverfasser: Meier, M.-A., Ampuero, J. P., Heaton, T. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1281
container_issue 6357
container_start_page 1277
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 357
creator Meier, M.-A.
Ampuero, J. P.
Heaton, T. H.
description The largest observed earthquakes occur on subduction interfaces and frequently cause widespread damage and loss of life. Understanding the rupture behavior of megathrust events is crucial for earthquake rupture physics, as well as for earthquake early-warning systems. However, the large variability in behavior between individual events seemingly defies a description with a simple unifying model. Here we use three source time function (STF) data sets for subduction zone earthquakes, with moment magnitude M w ≥ 7, and show that such large ruptures share a typical universal behavior. The median STF is scalable between events with different sizes, grows linearly, and is nearly triangular. The deviations from the median behavior are multiplicative and Gaussian—that is, they are proportionally larger for larger events. Our observations suggest that earthquake magnitudes cannot be predicted from the characteristics of rupture onsets.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.aan5643
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942675702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26399889</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26399889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-fa3755147052cc6d10311c8c51cfa08e0f3cbaa180c50c73f2ced896d6bde1613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwM4EisbCkPcexY7Ohii-pEkuZI8d2iEs-WjsZ-u9x1QASw-mG97lXpwehawxzjBO28MqaVpm5lC1lKTlBUwyCxiIBcoqmAITFHDI6QRfebwBCJsg5miRcEMqBTNHDujJRZbU2beRts62tsv0-6srID4UeVG-7NmrMp-wrN_g-MtL11W6QX8ZforNS1t5cjXuGPp6f1svXePX-8rZ8XMUyJayPS0kySnGaAU2UYhoDwVhxRbEqJXADJVGFlJiDoqAyUibKaC6YZoU2mGEyQ_fH3q3rdoPxfd5Yr0xdy9Z0g8-xSBOW0QySgN79Qzfd4NrwXaCyVISBQ-HiSCnXee9MmW-dbaTb5xjyg9Z81JqPWsPF7dg7FI3Rv_yPxwDcHIGN7zv3lzMiBA_QN0aLftA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1974997401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Meier, M.-A. ; Ampuero, J. P. ; Heaton, T. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meier, M.-A. ; Ampuero, J. P. ; Heaton, T. H.</creatorcontrib><description>The largest observed earthquakes occur on subduction interfaces and frequently cause widespread damage and loss of life. Understanding the rupture behavior of megathrust events is crucial for earthquake rupture physics, as well as for earthquake early-warning systems. However, the large variability in behavior between individual events seemingly defies a description with a simple unifying model. Here we use three source time function (STF) data sets for subduction zone earthquakes, with moment magnitude M w ≥ 7, and show that such large ruptures share a typical universal behavior. The median STF is scalable between events with different sizes, grows linearly, and is nearly triangular. The deviations from the median behavior are multiplicative and Gaussian—that is, they are proportionally larger for larger events. Our observations suggest that earthquake magnitudes cannot be predicted from the characteristics of rupture onsets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5643</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28935803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Early warning systems ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Emergency communications systems ; Energy ; Injury prevention ; Interfaces ; Physics ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Seismic activity ; Subduction (geology) ; Time functions ; Warning systems</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2017-09, Vol.357 (6357), p.1277-1281</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-fa3755147052cc6d10311c8c51cfa08e0f3cbaa180c50c73f2ced896d6bde1613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-fa3755147052cc6d10311c8c51cfa08e0f3cbaa180c50c73f2ced896d6bde1613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2949-8602 ; 0000-0003-3363-2197 ; 0000-0002-4827-7987</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26399889$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26399889$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,2871,2872,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meier, M.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampuero, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heaton, T. H.</creatorcontrib><title>The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>The largest observed earthquakes occur on subduction interfaces and frequently cause widespread damage and loss of life. Understanding the rupture behavior of megathrust events is crucial for earthquake rupture physics, as well as for earthquake early-warning systems. However, the large variability in behavior between individual events seemingly defies a description with a simple unifying model. Here we use three source time function (STF) data sets for subduction zone earthquakes, with moment magnitude M w ≥ 7, and show that such large ruptures share a typical universal behavior. The median STF is scalable between events with different sizes, grows linearly, and is nearly triangular. The deviations from the median behavior are multiplicative and Gaussian—that is, they are proportionally larger for larger events. Our observations suggest that earthquake magnitudes cannot be predicted from the characteristics of rupture onsets.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Early warning systems</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Emergency communications systems</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Time functions</subject><subject>Warning systems</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwM4EisbCkPcexY7Ohii-pEkuZI8d2iEs-WjsZ-u9x1QASw-mG97lXpwehawxzjBO28MqaVpm5lC1lKTlBUwyCxiIBcoqmAITFHDI6QRfebwBCJsg5miRcEMqBTNHDujJRZbU2beRts62tsv0-6srID4UeVG-7NmrMp-wrN_g-MtL11W6QX8ZforNS1t5cjXuGPp6f1svXePX-8rZ8XMUyJayPS0kySnGaAU2UYhoDwVhxRbEqJXADJVGFlJiDoqAyUibKaC6YZoU2mGEyQ_fH3q3rdoPxfd5Yr0xdy9Z0g8-xSBOW0QySgN79Qzfd4NrwXaCyVISBQ-HiSCnXee9MmW-dbaTb5xjyg9Z81JqPWsPF7dg7FI3Rv_yPxwDcHIGN7zv3lzMiBA_QN0aLftA</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Meier, M.-A.</creator><creator>Ampuero, J. P.</creator><creator>Heaton, T. H.</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-8602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-2197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-7987</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes</title><author>Meier, M.-A. ; Ampuero, J. P. ; Heaton, T. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-fa3755147052cc6d10311c8c51cfa08e0f3cbaa180c50c73f2ced896d6bde1613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Early warning systems</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Emergency communications systems</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Time functions</topic><topic>Warning systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meier, M.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampuero, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heaton, T. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meier, M.-A.</au><au>Ampuero, J. P.</au><au>Heaton, T. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>357</volume><issue>6357</issue><spage>1277</spage><epage>1281</epage><pages>1277-1281</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>The largest observed earthquakes occur on subduction interfaces and frequently cause widespread damage and loss of life. Understanding the rupture behavior of megathrust events is crucial for earthquake rupture physics, as well as for earthquake early-warning systems. However, the large variability in behavior between individual events seemingly defies a description with a simple unifying model. Here we use three source time function (STF) data sets for subduction zone earthquakes, with moment magnitude M w ≥ 7, and show that such large ruptures share a typical universal behavior. The median STF is scalable between events with different sizes, grows linearly, and is nearly triangular. The deviations from the median behavior are multiplicative and Gaussian—that is, they are proportionally larger for larger events. Our observations suggest that earthquake magnitudes cannot be predicted from the characteristics of rupture onsets.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>28935803</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.aan5643</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-8602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-2197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-7987</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2017-09, Vol.357 (6357), p.1277-1281
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942675702
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Algorithms
Early warning systems
Earthquake damage
Earthquake prediction
Earthquakes
Emergency communications systems
Energy
Injury prevention
Interfaces
Physics
Rupture
Rupturing
Seismic activity
Subduction (geology)
Time functions
Warning systems
title The hidden simplicity of subduction megathrust earthquakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20hidden%20simplicity%20of%20subduction%20megathrust%20earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Meier,%20M.-A.&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=357&rft.issue=6357&rft.spage=1277&rft.epage=1281&rft.pages=1277-1281&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.aan5643&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26399889%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1974997401&rft_id=info:pmid/28935803&rft_jstor_id=26399889&rfr_iscdi=true