Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters
The PhATE (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model presented in this paper was developed as a tool to estimate concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. surface waters that result from patient use (or consumption) of medicines. PhATE uses a mass balance app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2004-02, Vol.38 (3), p.838-849 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 849 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 838 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Anderson, Paul D. D'Aco, Vincent J. Shanahan, Peter Chapra, Steven C. Buzby, Mary E. Cunningham, Virginia L. DuPlessie, Beth M. Hayes, Eileen P. Mastrocco, Frank J. Parke, Neil J. Rader, John C. Samuelian, John H. Schwab, Bradley W. |
description | The PhATE (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model presented in this paper was developed as a tool to estimate concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. surface waters that result from patient use (or consumption) of medicines. PhATE uses a mass balance approach to model predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) in 11 watersheds selected to be representative of most hydrologic regions of the United States. The model divides rivers into discrete segments. It estimates the mass of API that enters a segment from upstream or from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and is subsequently lost from the segment via in-stream loss mechanisms or flow diversions (i.e., man-made withdrawals). POTW discharge loads are estimated based on the population served, the API use per capita, the potential loss of the compound associated with human use (e.g., metabolism), and the portion of the API mass removed in the POTW. Simulations using three surrogate compounds show that PECs generated by PhATE are generally within an order of magnitude of measured concentrations and that the cumulative probability distribution of PECs for all watersheds included in PhATE is consistent with the nationwide distribution of measured concentrations of the surrogate compounds. Model simulations for 11 APIs yielded four categories of results. (1) PECs fit measured data for two compounds. (2) PECs are below analytical method detection limits and thus are consistent with measured data for three compounds. (3) PECs are higher than (i.e., not consistent with) measured data for three compounds. However, this may be the consequence of as yet unidentified depletion mechanisms. (4) PECs are several orders of magnitude below some measured data but consistent with most measured data for three compounds. For the fourth category, closer examination of sampling locations suggests that the field-measured concentrations for these compounds do not accurately reflect human use. Overall, these results demonstrate that PhATE may be used to predict screening-level concentrations of APIs and related compounds in the environment as well as to evaluate the suitability of existing fate information for an API. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es034430b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19426091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19426091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-bdacc02b5cabe1c4900f82076223f21696df1a4576e275ab224bf3abcef2840e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctqFEEUBuBCDGYSXfgCUggGXPR46t69DO0lIUEDk2h2xemaKu3Yl7GqG8zbW2GGDOjCVS3Ox8-p_xDyksGSAWfvfAIhpYDmCVkwxaFQpWJPyQKAiaIS-vaQHKV0BwBcQPmMHDJZ6bI0fEEuVi56P7TDd3o6YHef2kTHQM_mHgd69QNjj87PU-uwo_XYb8Z5WCfaDvRmuVrS1RxDntNvOPmYnpODgF3yL3bvMbn5-OG6Pisuv3w6r08vC1RCT0WzRueAN8ph45mTFUAoORjNuQic6UqvA0OpjPbcKGw4l00Q2DgfeCnBi2Nyss3dxPHX7NNk-zY533U4-HFOllWSa6jY_6HUpck1ZPj6L3g3zjH3kWxujAlmjMro7Ra5OKYUfbCb2PYY7y0D-3AH-3iHbF_tAuem9-u93BWfwZsdwJS7DREH16a9U1IwJcrsiq1r0-R_P84x_rTaCKPs9dXKyvK9rD_f1vbrPhdd2n_i3wX_AFcyqNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230131775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Anderson, Paul D. ; D'Aco, Vincent J. ; Shanahan, Peter ; Chapra, Steven C. ; Buzby, Mary E. ; Cunningham, Virginia L. ; DuPlessie, Beth M. ; Hayes, Eileen P. ; Mastrocco, Frank J. ; Parke, Neil J. ; Rader, John C. ; Samuelian, John H. ; Schwab, Bradley W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Paul D. ; D'Aco, Vincent J. ; Shanahan, Peter ; Chapra, Steven C. ; Buzby, Mary E. ; Cunningham, Virginia L. ; DuPlessie, Beth M. ; Hayes, Eileen P. ; Mastrocco, Frank J. ; Parke, Neil J. ; Rader, John C. ; Samuelian, John H. ; Schwab, Bradley W.</creatorcontrib><description>The PhATE (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model presented in this paper was developed as a tool to estimate concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. surface waters that result from patient use (or consumption) of medicines. PhATE uses a mass balance approach to model predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) in 11 watersheds selected to be representative of most hydrologic regions of the United States. The model divides rivers into discrete segments. It estimates the mass of API that enters a segment from upstream or from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and is subsequently lost from the segment via in-stream loss mechanisms or flow diversions (i.e., man-made withdrawals). POTW discharge loads are estimated based on the population served, the API use per capita, the potential loss of the compound associated with human use (e.g., metabolism), and the portion of the API mass removed in the POTW. Simulations using three surrogate compounds show that PECs generated by PhATE are generally within an order of magnitude of measured concentrations and that the cumulative probability distribution of PECs for all watersheds included in PhATE is consistent with the nationwide distribution of measured concentrations of the surrogate compounds. Model simulations for 11 APIs yielded four categories of results. (1) PECs fit measured data for two compounds. (2) PECs are below analytical method detection limits and thus are consistent with measured data for three compounds. (3) PECs are higher than (i.e., not consistent with) measured data for three compounds. However, this may be the consequence of as yet unidentified depletion mechanisms. (4) PECs are several orders of magnitude below some measured data but consistent with most measured data for three compounds. For the fourth category, closer examination of sampling locations suggests that the field-measured concentrations for these compounds do not accurately reflect human use. Overall, these results demonstrate that PhATE may be used to predict screening-level concentrations of APIs and related compounds in the environment as well as to evaluate the suitability of existing fate information for an API.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es034430b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14968872</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Chemical contaminants ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forecasting ; Models, Theoretical ; Natural water pollution ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Rivers ; Studies ; Surface water ; United States ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2004-02, Vol.38 (3), p.838-849</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 1, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-bdacc02b5cabe1c4900f82076223f21696df1a4576e275ab224bf3abcef2840e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-bdacc02b5cabe1c4900f82076223f21696df1a4576e275ab224bf3abcef2840e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es034430b$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es034430b$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15431538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14968872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Aco, Vincent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanahan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapra, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzby, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Virginia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPlessie, Beth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Eileen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrocco, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parke, Neil J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rader, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelian, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Bradley W.</creatorcontrib><title>Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>The PhATE (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model presented in this paper was developed as a tool to estimate concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. surface waters that result from patient use (or consumption) of medicines. PhATE uses a mass balance approach to model predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) in 11 watersheds selected to be representative of most hydrologic regions of the United States. The model divides rivers into discrete segments. It estimates the mass of API that enters a segment from upstream or from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and is subsequently lost from the segment via in-stream loss mechanisms or flow diversions (i.e., man-made withdrawals). POTW discharge loads are estimated based on the population served, the API use per capita, the potential loss of the compound associated with human use (e.g., metabolism), and the portion of the API mass removed in the POTW. Simulations using three surrogate compounds show that PECs generated by PhATE are generally within an order of magnitude of measured concentrations and that the cumulative probability distribution of PECs for all watersheds included in PhATE is consistent with the nationwide distribution of measured concentrations of the surrogate compounds. Model simulations for 11 APIs yielded four categories of results. (1) PECs fit measured data for two compounds. (2) PECs are below analytical method detection limits and thus are consistent with measured data for three compounds. (3) PECs are higher than (i.e., not consistent with) measured data for three compounds. However, this may be the consequence of as yet unidentified depletion mechanisms. (4) PECs are several orders of magnitude below some measured data but consistent with most measured data for three compounds. For the fourth category, closer examination of sampling locations suggests that the field-measured concentrations for these compounds do not accurately reflect human use. Overall, these results demonstrate that PhATE may be used to predict screening-level concentrations of APIs and related compounds in the environment as well as to evaluate the suitability of existing fate information for an API.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctqFEEUBuBCDGYSXfgCUggGXPR46t69DO0lIUEDk2h2xemaKu3Yl7GqG8zbW2GGDOjCVS3Ox8-p_xDyksGSAWfvfAIhpYDmCVkwxaFQpWJPyQKAiaIS-vaQHKV0BwBcQPmMHDJZ6bI0fEEuVi56P7TDd3o6YHef2kTHQM_mHgd69QNjj87PU-uwo_XYb8Z5WCfaDvRmuVrS1RxDntNvOPmYnpODgF3yL3bvMbn5-OG6Pisuv3w6r08vC1RCT0WzRueAN8ph45mTFUAoORjNuQic6UqvA0OpjPbcKGw4l00Q2DgfeCnBi2Nyss3dxPHX7NNk-zY533U4-HFOllWSa6jY_6HUpck1ZPj6L3g3zjH3kWxujAlmjMro7Ra5OKYUfbCb2PYY7y0D-3AH-3iHbF_tAuem9-u93BWfwZsdwJS7DREH16a9U1IwJcrsiq1r0-R_P84x_rTaCKPs9dXKyvK9rD_f1vbrPhdd2n_i3wX_AFcyqNg</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Anderson, Paul D.</creator><creator>D'Aco, Vincent J.</creator><creator>Shanahan, Peter</creator><creator>Chapra, Steven C.</creator><creator>Buzby, Mary E.</creator><creator>Cunningham, Virginia L.</creator><creator>DuPlessie, Beth M.</creator><creator>Hayes, Eileen P.</creator><creator>Mastrocco, Frank J.</creator><creator>Parke, Neil J.</creator><creator>Rader, John C.</creator><creator>Samuelian, John H.</creator><creator>Schwab, Bradley W.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters</title><author>Anderson, Paul D. ; D'Aco, Vincent J. ; Shanahan, Peter ; Chapra, Steven C. ; Buzby, Mary E. ; Cunningham, Virginia L. ; DuPlessie, Beth M. ; Hayes, Eileen P. ; Mastrocco, Frank J. ; Parke, Neil J. ; Rader, John C. ; Samuelian, John H. ; Schwab, Bradley W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-bdacc02b5cabe1c4900f82076223f21696df1a4576e275ab224bf3abcef2840e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Aco, Vincent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanahan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapra, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzby, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Virginia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuPlessie, Beth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Eileen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrocco, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parke, Neil J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rader, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelian, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Bradley W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Paul D.</au><au>D'Aco, Vincent J.</au><au>Shanahan, Peter</au><au>Chapra, Steven C.</au><au>Buzby, Mary E.</au><au>Cunningham, Virginia L.</au><au>DuPlessie, Beth M.</au><au>Hayes, Eileen P.</au><au>Mastrocco, Frank J.</au><au>Parke, Neil J.</au><au>Rader, John C.</au><au>Samuelian, John H.</au><au>Schwab, Bradley W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>838</spage><epage>849</epage><pages>838-849</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>The PhATE (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model presented in this paper was developed as a tool to estimate concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. surface waters that result from patient use (or consumption) of medicines. PhATE uses a mass balance approach to model predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) in 11 watersheds selected to be representative of most hydrologic regions of the United States. The model divides rivers into discrete segments. It estimates the mass of API that enters a segment from upstream or from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and is subsequently lost from the segment via in-stream loss mechanisms or flow diversions (i.e., man-made withdrawals). POTW discharge loads are estimated based on the population served, the API use per capita, the potential loss of the compound associated with human use (e.g., metabolism), and the portion of the API mass removed in the POTW. Simulations using three surrogate compounds show that PECs generated by PhATE are generally within an order of magnitude of measured concentrations and that the cumulative probability distribution of PECs for all watersheds included in PhATE is consistent with the nationwide distribution of measured concentrations of the surrogate compounds. Model simulations for 11 APIs yielded four categories of results. (1) PECs fit measured data for two compounds. (2) PECs are below analytical method detection limits and thus are consistent with measured data for three compounds. (3) PECs are higher than (i.e., not consistent with) measured data for three compounds. However, this may be the consequence of as yet unidentified depletion mechanisms. (4) PECs are several orders of magnitude below some measured data but consistent with most measured data for three compounds. For the fourth category, closer examination of sampling locations suggests that the field-measured concentrations for these compounds do not accurately reflect human use. Overall, these results demonstrate that PhATE may be used to predict screening-level concentrations of APIs and related compounds in the environment as well as to evaluate the suitability of existing fate information for an API.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>14968872</pmid><doi>10.1021/es034430b</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2004-02, Vol.38 (3), p.838-849 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19426091 |
source | MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Chemical contaminants Continental surface waters Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Forecasting Models, Theoretical Natural water pollution Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis Pharmaceuticals Pollution Pollution, environment geology Rivers Studies Surface water United States Waste Disposal, Fluid Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water pollution Water treatment and pollution Watersheds |
title | Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20Analysis%20of%20Human%20Pharmaceutical%20Compounds%20in%20U.S.%20Surface%20Waters&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Anderson,%20Paul%20D.&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=838&rft.epage=849&rft.pages=838-849&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es034430b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19426091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230131775&rft_id=info:pmid/14968872&rfr_iscdi=true |