Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency

The seasonal trend in root mass, root distribution with depth and root/shoot ratios along a degradation gradient were quantified over a 2 year period (2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons) for a semi-arid rangeland. Water-use efficiency (WUE) for each rangeland condition is defined as the quantity of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of arid environments 2005-02, Vol.60 (3), p.457-481
1. Verfasser: Snyman, H.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 481
container_issue 3
container_start_page 457
container_title Journal of arid environments
container_volume 60
creator Snyman, H.A.
description The seasonal trend in root mass, root distribution with depth and root/shoot ratios along a degradation gradient were quantified over a 2 year period (2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons) for a semi-arid rangeland. Water-use efficiency (WUE) for each rangeland condition is defined as the quantity of above-ground phytomass produced per unit of water evap-transpired. Sampling was from rangeland artificially maintained in 3 different rangeland conditions viz. good, moderate and poor. Roots were extracted to a depth of 900 with 50mm intervals, using a corer and then separated from the soil by wet sieving. Sampling of both above- and belowground phytomass production including litter, were at approximately bi-monthly intervals to account for major seasonal changes. Most of the grassroots were found in the first 150mm soil layer, but root distribution tended to be more superficial with rangeland degradation. Root mass in semi-arid rangelands are strongly seasonal with the most active growth taking place during March and April, when the aboveground is dormant. Both the above- and belowground phytomass productions decreased by rangeland degradation (p⩽0.01). The growing seasonal (October–March) average root mass to a depth of 900mm was 3185, 2336 and 1162kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition, compared to the average above-ground phytomass production over the same period of 2341, 1648 and 695kgha−1. It seems that root mass is greater than above-ground biomass for this semi-arid rangeland, with root production also more sensitive to rangeland degradation than above-ground production. The root/shoot ratios for rangeland in good, moderate and poor conditions ranged between 1.57–3.20, 1.65–3.46 and 2.06–7.14, respectively. Water-use efficiency declined (p⩽0.01) with rangeland degradation. Rangeland in good condition averaged a WUE of 2.97kg above-ground phytomass produced ha−1mm−1 evapo-transpiration. The average litter productions were 99.55, 61.51 and 24.00kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition. As a proportion of annual phytomass production, litterfall of 5.35% for rangeland in good condition was obtained. This study is one of few root studies available where different rangeland conditions were evaluated and can serve as guidelines for sustainable utilization of the rangeland ecosystem in semi-arid climate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.06.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19411788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140196304001260</els_id><sourcerecordid>14730201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-459e2dc484e56b99e943c9e2a85e20c7b6fc80013ddab8f99242b9269199843f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EEsPAK4BXrEh67TiemBVVRaFSJaT-SOwsx76eepSJi50Uddc1a56QJ8HpwLorS9ffPcc-h5C3DGoGTB7t6p1JweF4V3MAUYOsAeQzsmKg2kpx_v05WQETUDElm5fkVc47AMbatlmRXxdm3OJgRkcdbpNxZgpxpGGkhmbch2qRppdxnm7osU_Bmj8Pv88-FsAPM44WaaEzmhxHM9AU40RdyFMK_bwIfXgcHeWb5SIt2pkuXj_NhKmaM1L0PthQlO5fkxfeDBnf_DvX5Pr089XJ1-r825ezk-PzygrJp0q0CrmzohPYyl4pVKKxZWS6FjnYTS-97cr_GudM33mluOC94lIxpTrR-GZN3h90b1P8MWOe9D5ki0MJAeOcNVOCsU3XPQ2KTQO8OK2JPIA2xZwTen2bwt6ke81ALx3pnf7fkV460iB16agsvjssehO12aaQ9fXloghQ3t21vBCfDgSWRO4CJp0f00IXEtpJuxieMvkLubOqMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14730201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Snyman, H.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyman, H.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The seasonal trend in root mass, root distribution with depth and root/shoot ratios along a degradation gradient were quantified over a 2 year period (2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons) for a semi-arid rangeland. Water-use efficiency (WUE) for each rangeland condition is defined as the quantity of above-ground phytomass produced per unit of water evap-transpired. Sampling was from rangeland artificially maintained in 3 different rangeland conditions viz. good, moderate and poor. Roots were extracted to a depth of 900 with 50mm intervals, using a corer and then separated from the soil by wet sieving. Sampling of both above- and belowground phytomass production including litter, were at approximately bi-monthly intervals to account for major seasonal changes. Most of the grassroots were found in the first 150mm soil layer, but root distribution tended to be more superficial with rangeland degradation. Root mass in semi-arid rangelands are strongly seasonal with the most active growth taking place during March and April, when the aboveground is dormant. Both the above- and belowground phytomass productions decreased by rangeland degradation (p⩽0.01). The growing seasonal (October–March) average root mass to a depth of 900mm was 3185, 2336 and 1162kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition, compared to the average above-ground phytomass production over the same period of 2341, 1648 and 695kgha−1. It seems that root mass is greater than above-ground biomass for this semi-arid rangeland, with root production also more sensitive to rangeland degradation than above-ground production. The root/shoot ratios for rangeland in good, moderate and poor conditions ranged between 1.57–3.20, 1.65–3.46 and 2.06–7.14, respectively. Water-use efficiency declined (p⩽0.01) with rangeland degradation. Rangeland in good condition averaged a WUE of 2.97kg above-ground phytomass produced ha−1mm−1 evapo-transpiration. The average litter productions were 99.55, 61.51 and 24.00kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition. As a proportion of annual phytomass production, litterfall of 5.35% for rangeland in good condition was obtained. This study is one of few root studies available where different rangeland conditions were evaluated and can serve as guidelines for sustainable utilization of the rangeland ecosystem in semi-arid climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-922X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.06.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Above-ground phytomass ; degradation ; dry matter accumulation ; evapotranspiration ; grazing intensity ; Litter ; plant litter ; Rangeland condition ; rangelands ; Root distribution ; root growth ; Root mass ; roots ; seasonal variation ; semiarid zones ; shoots ; Water-use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid environments, 2005-02, Vol.60 (3), p.457-481</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-459e2dc484e56b99e943c9e2a85e20c7b6fc80013ddab8f99242b9269199843f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-459e2dc484e56b99e943c9e2a85e20c7b6fc80013ddab8f99242b9269199843f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.06.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyman, H.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency</title><title>Journal of arid environments</title><description>The seasonal trend in root mass, root distribution with depth and root/shoot ratios along a degradation gradient were quantified over a 2 year period (2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons) for a semi-arid rangeland. Water-use efficiency (WUE) for each rangeland condition is defined as the quantity of above-ground phytomass produced per unit of water evap-transpired. Sampling was from rangeland artificially maintained in 3 different rangeland conditions viz. good, moderate and poor. Roots were extracted to a depth of 900 with 50mm intervals, using a corer and then separated from the soil by wet sieving. Sampling of both above- and belowground phytomass production including litter, were at approximately bi-monthly intervals to account for major seasonal changes. Most of the grassroots were found in the first 150mm soil layer, but root distribution tended to be more superficial with rangeland degradation. Root mass in semi-arid rangelands are strongly seasonal with the most active growth taking place during March and April, when the aboveground is dormant. Both the above- and belowground phytomass productions decreased by rangeland degradation (p⩽0.01). The growing seasonal (October–March) average root mass to a depth of 900mm was 3185, 2336 and 1162kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition, compared to the average above-ground phytomass production over the same period of 2341, 1648 and 695kgha−1. It seems that root mass is greater than above-ground biomass for this semi-arid rangeland, with root production also more sensitive to rangeland degradation than above-ground production. The root/shoot ratios for rangeland in good, moderate and poor conditions ranged between 1.57–3.20, 1.65–3.46 and 2.06–7.14, respectively. Water-use efficiency declined (p⩽0.01) with rangeland degradation. Rangeland in good condition averaged a WUE of 2.97kg above-ground phytomass produced ha−1mm−1 evapo-transpiration. The average litter productions were 99.55, 61.51 and 24.00kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition. As a proportion of annual phytomass production, litterfall of 5.35% for rangeland in good condition was obtained. This study is one of few root studies available where different rangeland conditions were evaluated and can serve as guidelines for sustainable utilization of the rangeland ecosystem in semi-arid climate.</description><subject>Above-ground phytomass</subject><subject>degradation</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>evapotranspiration</subject><subject>grazing intensity</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>plant litter</subject><subject>Rangeland condition</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Root distribution</subject><subject>root growth</subject><subject>Root mass</subject><subject>roots</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>Water-use efficiency</subject><issn>0140-1963</issn><issn>1095-922X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EEsPAK4BXrEh67TiemBVVRaFSJaT-SOwsx76eepSJi50Uddc1a56QJ8HpwLorS9ffPcc-h5C3DGoGTB7t6p1JweF4V3MAUYOsAeQzsmKg2kpx_v05WQETUDElm5fkVc47AMbatlmRXxdm3OJgRkcdbpNxZgpxpGGkhmbch2qRppdxnm7osU_Bmj8Pv88-FsAPM44WaaEzmhxHM9AU40RdyFMK_bwIfXgcHeWb5SIt2pkuXj_NhKmaM1L0PthQlO5fkxfeDBnf_DvX5Pr089XJ1-r825ezk-PzygrJp0q0CrmzohPYyl4pVKKxZWS6FjnYTS-97cr_GudM33mluOC94lIxpTrR-GZN3h90b1P8MWOe9D5ki0MJAeOcNVOCsU3XPQ2KTQO8OK2JPIA2xZwTen2bwt6ke81ALx3pnf7fkV460iB16agsvjssehO12aaQ9fXloghQ3t21vBCfDgSWRO4CJp0f00IXEtpJuxieMvkLubOqMA</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Snyman, H.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency</title><author>Snyman, H.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-459e2dc484e56b99e943c9e2a85e20c7b6fc80013ddab8f99242b9269199843f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Above-ground phytomass</topic><topic>degradation</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>evapotranspiration</topic><topic>grazing intensity</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>plant litter</topic><topic>Rangeland condition</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Root distribution</topic><topic>root growth</topic><topic>Root mass</topic><topic>roots</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>Water-use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyman, H.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyman, H.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>457-481</pages><issn>0140-1963</issn><eissn>1095-922X</eissn><abstract>The seasonal trend in root mass, root distribution with depth and root/shoot ratios along a degradation gradient were quantified over a 2 year period (2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons) for a semi-arid rangeland. Water-use efficiency (WUE) for each rangeland condition is defined as the quantity of above-ground phytomass produced per unit of water evap-transpired. Sampling was from rangeland artificially maintained in 3 different rangeland conditions viz. good, moderate and poor. Roots were extracted to a depth of 900 with 50mm intervals, using a corer and then separated from the soil by wet sieving. Sampling of both above- and belowground phytomass production including litter, were at approximately bi-monthly intervals to account for major seasonal changes. Most of the grassroots were found in the first 150mm soil layer, but root distribution tended to be more superficial with rangeland degradation. Root mass in semi-arid rangelands are strongly seasonal with the most active growth taking place during March and April, when the aboveground is dormant. Both the above- and belowground phytomass productions decreased by rangeland degradation (p⩽0.01). The growing seasonal (October–March) average root mass to a depth of 900mm was 3185, 2336 and 1162kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition, compared to the average above-ground phytomass production over the same period of 2341, 1648 and 695kgha−1. It seems that root mass is greater than above-ground biomass for this semi-arid rangeland, with root production also more sensitive to rangeland degradation than above-ground production. The root/shoot ratios for rangeland in good, moderate and poor conditions ranged between 1.57–3.20, 1.65–3.46 and 2.06–7.14, respectively. Water-use efficiency declined (p⩽0.01) with rangeland degradation. Rangeland in good condition averaged a WUE of 2.97kg above-ground phytomass produced ha−1mm−1 evapo-transpiration. The average litter productions were 99.55, 61.51 and 24.00kgha−1, respectively, for rangeland in good, moderate and poor condition. As a proportion of annual phytomass production, litterfall of 5.35% for rangeland in good condition was obtained. This study is one of few root studies available where different rangeland conditions were evaluated and can serve as guidelines for sustainable utilization of the rangeland ecosystem in semi-arid climate.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.06.006</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-1963
ispartof Journal of arid environments, 2005-02, Vol.60 (3), p.457-481
issn 0140-1963
1095-922X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19411788
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Above-ground phytomass
degradation
dry matter accumulation
evapotranspiration
grazing intensity
Litter
plant litter
Rangeland condition
rangelands
Root distribution
root growth
Root mass
roots
seasonal variation
semiarid zones
shoots
Water-use efficiency
title Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rangeland%20degradation%20in%20a%20semi-arid%20South%20Africa%E2%80%94I:%20influence%20on%20seasonal%20root%20distribution,%20root/shoot%20ratios%20and%20water-use%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20environments&rft.au=Snyman,%20H.A.&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=457-481&rft.issn=0140-1963&rft.eissn=1095-922X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.06.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14730201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14730201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140196304001260&rfr_iscdi=true