Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach
Macro level data indicate that people experiencing mental distress experience poor health, social and economic outcomes. The sociology of mental health has a series of dominant competing explanations of the mechanisms at personal, social and structural levels that generate these poor outcomes. This...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2017-10, Vol.191, p.160-167 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 167 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 191 |
creator | Brunner, Richard |
description | Macro level data indicate that people experiencing mental distress experience poor health, social and economic outcomes. The sociology of mental health has a series of dominant competing explanations of the mechanisms at personal, social and structural levels that generate these poor outcomes. This article explains the limitations of these approaches and takes up the challenge of Hopper (2007) who in this journal proposed the capabilities approach as a means of normatively reconceptualising the experiences of people with mental distress, with a renewed focus on agency, equality and genuine opportunity. Using an innovative methodology to operationalise the capabilities approach, findings from an in-depth qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of twenty-two people with recent inpatient experience of psychiatric units in Scotland are presented. The paper demonstrates that the capabilities approach can be applied to reconceptualise how unjust social outcomes happen for this social group. It distinguishes how the results of using a capabilities approach to analysis are distinct from established dominant analytical frameworks through four added features: a focus on actual lived outcomes; the role of capabilities as well as functionings; being normative; and incorporating agency. The capabilities approach is found to be an operationalisable framework; the findings have implications for professionals and systems in the specific context of mental health; and the capabilities approach offers a fertile basis for normative studies in wider aspects of health and wellbeing.
•People with mental distress experience poor outcomes in life.•Capabilities approach can be applied to interpret how poor outcomes are reproduced.•Capabilities approach focuses on normativity, agency, and actual lived outcomes.•Capabilities approach foregrounds what people could do as well as what people do do.•Capabilities approach offers an original contribution to the recovery agenda. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940598140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953617305506</els_id><sourcerecordid>1940598140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-59b6a8c4cb15452d8f60017f2ef2d381dabeef694e856e0415160c52f030ad063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhi1UBMvHXwAfe0k6duJ8nCq0Aoq0Ui8gjpZjTxSvknVqO1vtv8erhV57GumdZ-adeQm5Z5AzYNWPbR6cDtpOaHIOrM6hzZN-RlasqYtMFGX9jayA13XWiqK6JFchbAGAQVNckEvetLwQnK2IfR8O1Dg6o5tHpH9tHOiEu6hGamyIHkOgg9ojnZ3zNJna1HFL1G7C8JM-ucXTMUFuF2jv3UTjgFSrWXV2tNFioGqevVN6uCHnvRoD3n7Wa_L29Pi6_pVtfj-_rB82mS45xEy0XaUaXeqOiVJw0_RVOrvuOfbcFA0zqkPsq7bERlQIJROsAi14DwUoA1VxTb6f9ibbPwuGKCcbNI6j2qFbgmRtCaJtWAkJrU-o9i4Ej72cvZ2UP0gG8piz3Mp_OctjzhJamfQ0efdpsnTH3tfcV7AJeDgBmF7dW_QybcGdRmM96iiNs_81-QA_nJRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940598140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brunner, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Macro level data indicate that people experiencing mental distress experience poor health, social and economic outcomes. The sociology of mental health has a series of dominant competing explanations of the mechanisms at personal, social and structural levels that generate these poor outcomes. This article explains the limitations of these approaches and takes up the challenge of Hopper (2007) who in this journal proposed the capabilities approach as a means of normatively reconceptualising the experiences of people with mental distress, with a renewed focus on agency, equality and genuine opportunity. Using an innovative methodology to operationalise the capabilities approach, findings from an in-depth qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of twenty-two people with recent inpatient experience of psychiatric units in Scotland are presented. The paper demonstrates that the capabilities approach can be applied to reconceptualise how unjust social outcomes happen for this social group. It distinguishes how the results of using a capabilities approach to analysis are distinct from established dominant analytical frameworks through four added features: a focus on actual lived outcomes; the role of capabilities as well as functionings; being normative; and incorporating agency. The capabilities approach is found to be an operationalisable framework; the findings have implications for professionals and systems in the specific context of mental health; and the capabilities approach offers a fertile basis for normative studies in wider aspects of health and wellbeing.
•People with mental distress experience poor outcomes in life.•Capabilities approach can be applied to interpret how poor outcomes are reproduced.•Capabilities approach focuses on normativity, agency, and actual lived outcomes.•Capabilities approach foregrounds what people could do as well as what people do do.•Capabilities approach offers an original contribution to the recovery agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28923521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capabilities approach ; Humans ; Mental Disorders - etiology ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental distress ; Psychiatric ; Qualitative methods ; Qualitative Research ; Scotland ; Social Conditions ; Stress, Psychological - complications ; Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2017-10, Vol.191, p.160-167</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-59b6a8c4cb15452d8f60017f2ef2d381dabeef694e856e0415160c52f030ad063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-59b6a8c4cb15452d8f60017f2ef2d381dabeef694e856e0415160c52f030ad063</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1436-7404</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617305506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Macro level data indicate that people experiencing mental distress experience poor health, social and economic outcomes. The sociology of mental health has a series of dominant competing explanations of the mechanisms at personal, social and structural levels that generate these poor outcomes. This article explains the limitations of these approaches and takes up the challenge of Hopper (2007) who in this journal proposed the capabilities approach as a means of normatively reconceptualising the experiences of people with mental distress, with a renewed focus on agency, equality and genuine opportunity. Using an innovative methodology to operationalise the capabilities approach, findings from an in-depth qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of twenty-two people with recent inpatient experience of psychiatric units in Scotland are presented. The paper demonstrates that the capabilities approach can be applied to reconceptualise how unjust social outcomes happen for this social group. It distinguishes how the results of using a capabilities approach to analysis are distinct from established dominant analytical frameworks through four added features: a focus on actual lived outcomes; the role of capabilities as well as functionings; being normative; and incorporating agency. The capabilities approach is found to be an operationalisable framework; the findings have implications for professionals and systems in the specific context of mental health; and the capabilities approach offers a fertile basis for normative studies in wider aspects of health and wellbeing.
•People with mental distress experience poor outcomes in life.•Capabilities approach can be applied to interpret how poor outcomes are reproduced.•Capabilities approach focuses on normativity, agency, and actual lived outcomes.•Capabilities approach foregrounds what people could do as well as what people do do.•Capabilities approach offers an original contribution to the recovery agenda.</description><subject>Capabilities approach</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental distress</subject><subject>Psychiatric</subject><subject>Qualitative methods</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Social Conditions</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhi1UBMvHXwAfe0k6duJ8nCq0Aoq0Ui8gjpZjTxSvknVqO1vtv8erhV57GumdZ-adeQm5Z5AzYNWPbR6cDtpOaHIOrM6hzZN-RlasqYtMFGX9jayA13XWiqK6JFchbAGAQVNckEvetLwQnK2IfR8O1Dg6o5tHpH9tHOiEu6hGamyIHkOgg9ojnZ3zNJna1HFL1G7C8JM-ucXTMUFuF2jv3UTjgFSrWXV2tNFioGqevVN6uCHnvRoD3n7Wa_L29Pi6_pVtfj-_rB82mS45xEy0XaUaXeqOiVJw0_RVOrvuOfbcFA0zqkPsq7bERlQIJROsAi14DwUoA1VxTb6f9ibbPwuGKCcbNI6j2qFbgmRtCaJtWAkJrU-o9i4Ej72cvZ2UP0gG8piz3Mp_OctjzhJamfQ0efdpsnTH3tfcV7AJeDgBmF7dW_QybcGdRmM96iiNs_81-QA_nJRY</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Brunner, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-7404</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach</title><author>Brunner, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-59b6a8c4cb15452d8f60017f2ef2d381dabeef694e856e0415160c52f030ad063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Capabilities approach</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental distress</topic><topic>Psychiatric</topic><topic>Qualitative methods</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Social Conditions</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunner, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>191</volume><spage>160</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>160-167</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Macro level data indicate that people experiencing mental distress experience poor health, social and economic outcomes. The sociology of mental health has a series of dominant competing explanations of the mechanisms at personal, social and structural levels that generate these poor outcomes. This article explains the limitations of these approaches and takes up the challenge of Hopper (2007) who in this journal proposed the capabilities approach as a means of normatively reconceptualising the experiences of people with mental distress, with a renewed focus on agency, equality and genuine opportunity. Using an innovative methodology to operationalise the capabilities approach, findings from an in-depth qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of twenty-two people with recent inpatient experience of psychiatric units in Scotland are presented. The paper demonstrates that the capabilities approach can be applied to reconceptualise how unjust social outcomes happen for this social group. It distinguishes how the results of using a capabilities approach to analysis are distinct from established dominant analytical frameworks through four added features: a focus on actual lived outcomes; the role of capabilities as well as functionings; being normative; and incorporating agency. The capabilities approach is found to be an operationalisable framework; the findings have implications for professionals and systems in the specific context of mental health; and the capabilities approach offers a fertile basis for normative studies in wider aspects of health and wellbeing.
•People with mental distress experience poor outcomes in life.•Capabilities approach can be applied to interpret how poor outcomes are reproduced.•Capabilities approach focuses on normativity, agency, and actual lived outcomes.•Capabilities approach foregrounds what people could do as well as what people do do.•Capabilities approach offers an original contribution to the recovery agenda.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28923521</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-7404</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2017-10, Vol.191, p.160-167 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940598140 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Capabilities approach Humans Mental Disorders - etiology Mental Disorders - psychology Mental distress Psychiatric Qualitative methods Qualitative Research Scotland Social Conditions Stress, Psychological - complications Stress, Psychological - psychology |
title | Why do people with mental distress have poor social outcomes? Four lessons from the capabilities approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20people%20with%20mental%20distress%20have%20poor%20social%20outcomes?%20Four%20lessons%20from%20the%20capabilities%20approach&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Brunner,%20Richard&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=191&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=160-167&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940598140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940598140&rft_id=info:pmid/28923521&rft_els_id=S0277953617305506&rfr_iscdi=true |