Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material

Which post-and-core combination will best improve the performance of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule is still unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the restoration of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2018-05, Vol.119 (5), p.769-776
Hauptverfasser: Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso, de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio, Del Bel Cury, Altair A., Magne, Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 776
container_issue 5
container_start_page 769
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 119
creator Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso
de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio
Del Bel Cury, Altair A.
Magne, Pascal
description Which post-and-core combination will best improve the performance of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule is still unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the restoration of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule using glass-ceramic crowns bonded to various composite resin foundation restorations and 2 types of posts. Sixty decoronated endodontically treated bovine incisors without a ferrule were divided into 4 groups and restored with various post-and-core foundation restorations. NfPfB=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and bulk-fill resin foundation restoration (B); NfPfP=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and dual-polymerized composite resin core foundation restoration (P); NfPt=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and resin core foundation restoration; and NfPtB=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and bulk-fill resin core foundation restoration (B). Two additional groups from previously published data from the same authors (FPf=2mm of ferrule (F) and glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration; and NfPf=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration), which were tested concomitantly and using the same experimental arrangement, were included for comparison. All teeth were prepared to receive bonded glass-ceramic crowns luted with dual-polymerized resin cement and were subjected to accelerated fatigue testing under submerged conditions at room temperature. Cyclic isometric loading was applied to the incisal edge at an angle of 30 degrees with a frequency of 5 Hz, beginning with a load of 100 N (5000 cycles). A 100-N load increase was applied every 15000 cycles. The specimens were loaded until failure or to a maximum of 1000 N (140000 cycles). The 6 groups (4 groups from the present study and 2 groups from the previously published study) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank post hoc test at α=.05 for pairwise comparisons). None of the tested specimen withstood all 140 000 cycles. All specimens without a ferrule were affected by an initial failure phenomenon (wide gap at the lingual margin between the core foundation restoration/crown assembly and the root). NfPfP, NfPt, and NfPtB had similar survival (29649 to 30987 mean cycles until initial failure). NfPfB outperformed NfPt and NfPtB. None of the post-and-core foundation restoration materials were a
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940598014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391317303682</els_id><sourcerecordid>1940598014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4a5526c316c0fdba188f53f66997864eb2b7ecef3fd70f875f4430d2d47ce69f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEUtBCIpoW_UO2Ry279vd4bqKKAVIkDcLYc-xkc7drB9gbyK_jLOErKlZOt0cy892YQuiV4IJjIu92wz6k4iHWgmIwDFgMm9BnaEDyNvVScPEcbjCnt2UTYFbouZYcxVmIkL9EVVRNlgqsN-vNlzYdwMHOXfAe_K8QSDjAfO2cW8x1cB9Ell2IN1swNrhlMbXCINpSUS5eh1JQb8ivUH50L3kNuW3X1uIdyMt2nUktvoutt43U-rdGZGlK8SM__pbnmYOZX6IU3c4HXl_cGfXt4__X-Y__4-cOn-3ePvWVS1Z4bIai0jEiLvdsaopQXzEs5TaOSHLZ0O4IFz7wbsVej8Jwz7KjjowU5eXaD3px9W4w_17aIXkKxMM8mQlqLJhPHYlKY8EaVZ6ptiZcMXu9zWEw-aoL1qQy9009l6FMZGgvdymjC28uMdbuA-yd7Sr8R3p4J0C49BMi62ADRggsZbNUuhf_N-AvqkaP7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940598014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso ; de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio ; Del Bel Cury, Altair A. ; Magne, Pascal</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso ; de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio ; Del Bel Cury, Altair A. ; Magne, Pascal</creatorcontrib><description>Which post-and-core combination will best improve the performance of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule is still unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the restoration of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule using glass-ceramic crowns bonded to various composite resin foundation restorations and 2 types of posts. Sixty decoronated endodontically treated bovine incisors without a ferrule were divided into 4 groups and restored with various post-and-core foundation restorations. NfPfB=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and bulk-fill resin foundation restoration (B); NfPfP=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and dual-polymerized composite resin core foundation restoration (P); NfPt=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and resin core foundation restoration; and NfPtB=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and bulk-fill resin core foundation restoration (B). Two additional groups from previously published data from the same authors (FPf=2mm of ferrule (F) and glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration; and NfPf=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration), which were tested concomitantly and using the same experimental arrangement, were included for comparison. All teeth were prepared to receive bonded glass-ceramic crowns luted with dual-polymerized resin cement and were subjected to accelerated fatigue testing under submerged conditions at room temperature. Cyclic isometric loading was applied to the incisal edge at an angle of 30 degrees with a frequency of 5 Hz, beginning with a load of 100 N (5000 cycles). A 100-N load increase was applied every 15000 cycles. The specimens were loaded until failure or to a maximum of 1000 N (140000 cycles). The 6 groups (4 groups from the present study and 2 groups from the previously published study) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank post hoc test at α=.05 for pairwise comparisons). None of the tested specimen withstood all 140 000 cycles. All specimens without a ferrule were affected by an initial failure phenomenon (wide gap at the lingual margin between the core foundation restoration/crown assembly and the root). NfPfP, NfPt, and NfPtB had similar survival (29649 to 30987 mean cycles until initial failure). NfPfB outperformed NfPt and NfPtB. None of the post-and-core foundation restoration materials were able to match the performance of the ferrule group FPf (72667 cycles). In all groups, 100% of failures were catastrophic. The survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule was slightly improved by the use of a fiber post with a bulk-fill composite resin core foundation restoration. However, none of the post-and-core techniques was able to compensate for the absence of a ferrule. The presence of the posts always adversely affected the failure mode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28923548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Crowns ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; In Vitro Techniques ; Incisor ; Post and Core Technique ; Titanium - chemistry ; Tooth, Nonvital - rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2018-05, Vol.119 (5), p.769-776</ispartof><rights>2017 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4a5526c316c0fdba188f53f66997864eb2b7ecef3fd70f875f4430d2d47ce69f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4a5526c316c0fdba188f53f66997864eb2b7ecef3fd70f875f4430d2d47ce69f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Bel Cury, Altair A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Pascal</creatorcontrib><title>Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Which post-and-core combination will best improve the performance of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule is still unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the restoration of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule using glass-ceramic crowns bonded to various composite resin foundation restorations and 2 types of posts. Sixty decoronated endodontically treated bovine incisors without a ferrule were divided into 4 groups and restored with various post-and-core foundation restorations. NfPfB=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and bulk-fill resin foundation restoration (B); NfPfP=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and dual-polymerized composite resin core foundation restoration (P); NfPt=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and resin core foundation restoration; and NfPtB=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and bulk-fill resin core foundation restoration (B). Two additional groups from previously published data from the same authors (FPf=2mm of ferrule (F) and glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration; and NfPf=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration), which were tested concomitantly and using the same experimental arrangement, were included for comparison. All teeth were prepared to receive bonded glass-ceramic crowns luted with dual-polymerized resin cement and were subjected to accelerated fatigue testing under submerged conditions at room temperature. Cyclic isometric loading was applied to the incisal edge at an angle of 30 degrees with a frequency of 5 Hz, beginning with a load of 100 N (5000 cycles). A 100-N load increase was applied every 15000 cycles. The specimens were loaded until failure or to a maximum of 1000 N (140000 cycles). The 6 groups (4 groups from the present study and 2 groups from the previously published study) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank post hoc test at α=.05 for pairwise comparisons). None of the tested specimen withstood all 140 000 cycles. All specimens without a ferrule were affected by an initial failure phenomenon (wide gap at the lingual margin between the core foundation restoration/crown assembly and the root). NfPfP, NfPt, and NfPtB had similar survival (29649 to 30987 mean cycles until initial failure). NfPfB outperformed NfPt and NfPtB. None of the post-and-core foundation restoration materials were able to match the performance of the ferrule group FPf (72667 cycles). In all groups, 100% of failures were catastrophic. The survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule was slightly improved by the use of a fiber post with a bulk-fill composite resin core foundation restoration. However, none of the post-and-core techniques was able to compensate for the absence of a ferrule. The presence of the posts always adversely affected the failure mode.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Incisor</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - rehabilitation</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEUtBCIpoW_UO2Ry279vd4bqKKAVIkDcLYc-xkc7drB9gbyK_jLOErKlZOt0cy892YQuiV4IJjIu92wz6k4iHWgmIwDFgMm9BnaEDyNvVScPEcbjCnt2UTYFbouZYcxVmIkL9EVVRNlgqsN-vNlzYdwMHOXfAe_K8QSDjAfO2cW8x1cB9Ell2IN1swNrhlMbXCINpSUS5eh1JQb8ivUH50L3kNuW3X1uIdyMt2nUktvoutt43U-rdGZGlK8SM__pbnmYOZX6IU3c4HXl_cGfXt4__X-Y__4-cOn-3ePvWVS1Z4bIai0jEiLvdsaopQXzEs5TaOSHLZ0O4IFz7wbsVej8Jwz7KjjowU5eXaD3px9W4w_17aIXkKxMM8mQlqLJhPHYlKY8EaVZ6ptiZcMXu9zWEw-aoL1qQy9009l6FMZGgvdymjC28uMdbuA-yd7Sr8R3p4J0C49BMi62ADRggsZbNUuhf_N-AvqkaP7</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso</creator><creator>de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio</creator><creator>Del Bel Cury, Altair A.</creator><creator>Magne, Pascal</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material</title><author>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso ; de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio ; Del Bel Cury, Altair A. ; Magne, Pascal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4a5526c316c0fdba188f53f66997864eb2b7ecef3fd70f875f4430d2d47ce69f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Incisor</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Bel Cury, Altair A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Pascal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso</au><au>de Carvalho, Marco Aurélio</au><au>Del Bel Cury, Altair A.</au><au>Magne, Pascal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>769</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>769-776</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Which post-and-core combination will best improve the performance of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule is still unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the restoration of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule using glass-ceramic crowns bonded to various composite resin foundation restorations and 2 types of posts. Sixty decoronated endodontically treated bovine incisors without a ferrule were divided into 4 groups and restored with various post-and-core foundation restorations. NfPfB=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and bulk-fill resin foundation restoration (B); NfPfP=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and dual-polymerized composite resin core foundation restoration (P); NfPt=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and resin core foundation restoration; and NfPtB=no-ferrule (Nf) with titanium post (Pt) and bulk-fill resin core foundation restoration (B). Two additional groups from previously published data from the same authors (FPf=2mm of ferrule (F) and glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration; and NfPf=no-ferrule (Nf) with glass-fiber post (Pf) and composite resin core foundation restoration), which were tested concomitantly and using the same experimental arrangement, were included for comparison. All teeth were prepared to receive bonded glass-ceramic crowns luted with dual-polymerized resin cement and were subjected to accelerated fatigue testing under submerged conditions at room temperature. Cyclic isometric loading was applied to the incisal edge at an angle of 30 degrees with a frequency of 5 Hz, beginning with a load of 100 N (5000 cycles). A 100-N load increase was applied every 15000 cycles. The specimens were loaded until failure or to a maximum of 1000 N (140000 cycles). The 6 groups (4 groups from the present study and 2 groups from the previously published study) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank post hoc test at α=.05 for pairwise comparisons). None of the tested specimen withstood all 140 000 cycles. All specimens without a ferrule were affected by an initial failure phenomenon (wide gap at the lingual margin between the core foundation restoration/crown assembly and the root). NfPfP, NfPt, and NfPtB had similar survival (29649 to 30987 mean cycles until initial failure). NfPfB outperformed NfPt and NfPtB. None of the post-and-core foundation restoration materials were able to match the performance of the ferrule group FPf (72667 cycles). In all groups, 100% of failures were catastrophic. The survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors without a ferrule was slightly improved by the use of a fiber post with a bulk-fill composite resin core foundation restoration. However, none of the post-and-core techniques was able to compensate for the absence of a ferrule. The presence of the posts always adversely affected the failure mode.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28923548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2018-05, Vol.119 (5), p.769-776
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940598014
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Cattle
Ceramics - chemistry
Composite Resins - chemistry
Crowns
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Restoration Failure
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
In Vitro Techniques
Incisor
Post and Core Technique
Titanium - chemistry
Tooth, Nonvital - rehabilitation
title Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20of%20extensively%20damaged%20endodontically%20treated%20incisors%20restored%20with%20different%20types%20of%20posts-and-core%20foundation%20restoration%20material&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Lazari,%20Priscilla%20Cardoso&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=769-776&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940598014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940598014&rft_id=info:pmid/28923548&rft_els_id=S0022391317303682&rfr_iscdi=true