Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958

In the mid-twentieth century film studios sent their screenplays to Hollywood's official censorship body, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and to the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency for approval and recommendations for revision. This article examines the negotiations between f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal for the history of science 2017-09, Vol.50 (3), p.451-472
1. Verfasser: KIRBY, DAVID A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 472
container_issue 3
container_start_page 451
container_title The British journal for the history of science
container_volume 50
creator KIRBY, DAVID A.
description In the mid-twentieth century film studios sent their screenplays to Hollywood's official censorship body, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and to the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency for approval and recommendations for revision. This article examines the negotiations between filmmakers and censorship groups in order to show the stories that censors did, and did not, want told about pregnancy, childbirth and abortion, as well as how studios fought to tell their own stories about human reproduction. I find that censors considered pregnancy to be a state of grace and a holy obligation that was restricted to married women. For censors, human reproduction was not only a private matter, it was also an unpleasant biological process whose entertainment value was questionable. They worried that realistic portrayals of pregnancy and childbirth would scare young women away from pursuing motherhood. In addition, I demonstrate how filmmakers overcame censors’ strict prohibitions against abortion by utilizing ambiguity in their storytelling. Ultimately, I argue that censors believed that pregnancy and childbirth should be celebrated but not seen. But if pregnancy and childbirth were required then censors preferred mythic versions of motherhood instead of what they believed to be the sacred but horrific biological reality of human reproduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007087417000814
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940596788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007087417000814</cupid><jstor_id>26849845</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26849845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-365aaf55c39758ef4ad2e495bd4dda706e1170d6a8b92d919d4d6f5e912e59993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVoSbZpHyCHFEEuPawbyZJsKbcQ0j8QKCQN9GZkabyrxZa2kl0I9JB36Bv2SSqz2wZaetJI85v5RvMhdELJW0pofX5HCKmJrDmtcyQpP0ALymteEEK_PEOLOV3M-SP0IqVNvgqu5CE6KqUqGWVkgb7fwmrq9ej8ChvnYcihwWkM0UHCug3TiCNsY7CTGV3wF3gbYeW1Nw9LbNaut62L43o5o3EGsPYWD-GbA2zApxDT2m2x83hcA76_W2KqGPn5-IMqIV-i553uE7zan8fo_t3156sPxc2n9x-vLm8Kw5kcC1YJrTshDFO1kNBxbUvgSrSWW6trUgHNC7CVlq0qraIqv1edAEVLEEopdoze7Prmf3ydII3N4JKBvtcewpQaqjgRqqqlzOjZX-gmTNHn6ZqSMSkVk6XIFN1RJoaUInTNNrpBx4eGkma2pvnHmlzzet95agewfyp-e5GB0x2wmdf_lK9kNo3Pomwvqoc2OruCp9n-L_sLLiSiIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338893825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>KIRBY, DAVID A.</creator><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><description>In the mid-twentieth century film studios sent their screenplays to Hollywood's official censorship body, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and to the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency for approval and recommendations for revision. This article examines the negotiations between filmmakers and censorship groups in order to show the stories that censors did, and did not, want told about pregnancy, childbirth and abortion, as well as how studios fought to tell their own stories about human reproduction. I find that censors considered pregnancy to be a state of grace and a holy obligation that was restricted to married women. For censors, human reproduction was not only a private matter, it was also an unpleasant biological process whose entertainment value was questionable. They worried that realistic portrayals of pregnancy and childbirth would scare young women away from pursuing motherhood. In addition, I demonstrate how filmmakers overcame censors’ strict prohibitions against abortion by utilizing ambiguity in their storytelling. Ultimately, I argue that censors believed that pregnancy and childbirth should be celebrated but not seen. But if pregnancy and childbirth were required then censors preferred mythic versions of motherhood instead of what they believed to be the sacred but horrific biological reality of human reproduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-001X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007087417000814</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28923130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - history ; Abortion, Induced - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Ambiguity ; Audiences ; Biological activity ; Catholicism - history ; Catholics ; Censorship ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Christianity ; Entertainment ; Female ; Frogs ; Government Regulation - history ; History of medicine and histology ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Male ; Morals ; Mothers ; Motion pictures ; Motion Pictures - history ; Motion Pictures - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Negotiations ; Parturition ; Pregnancy ; Reproduction ; Reproduction (biology) ; Social Control, Formal ; Storytelling ; Twins ; United States ; Unpleasant ; Wives ; Womens health ; Young women</subject><ispartof>The British journal for the history of science, 2017-09, Vol.50 (3), p.451-472</ispartof><rights>Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2017</rights><rights>British Society for the History of Science 2017</rights><rights>2017 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-365aaf55c39758ef4ad2e495bd4dda706e1170d6a8b92d919d4d6f5e912e59993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-365aaf55c39758ef4ad2e495bd4dda706e1170d6a8b92d919d4d6f5e912e59993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26849845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007087417000814/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><title>Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958</title><title>The British journal for the history of science</title><addtitle>Br J Hist Sci</addtitle><description>In the mid-twentieth century film studios sent their screenplays to Hollywood's official censorship body, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and to the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency for approval and recommendations for revision. This article examines the negotiations between filmmakers and censorship groups in order to show the stories that censors did, and did not, want told about pregnancy, childbirth and abortion, as well as how studios fought to tell their own stories about human reproduction. I find that censors considered pregnancy to be a state of grace and a holy obligation that was restricted to married women. For censors, human reproduction was not only a private matter, it was also an unpleasant biological process whose entertainment value was questionable. They worried that realistic portrayals of pregnancy and childbirth would scare young women away from pursuing motherhood. In addition, I demonstrate how filmmakers overcame censors’ strict prohibitions against abortion by utilizing ambiguity in their storytelling. Ultimately, I argue that censors believed that pregnancy and childbirth should be celebrated but not seen. But if pregnancy and childbirth were required then censors preferred mythic versions of motherhood instead of what they believed to be the sacred but horrific biological reality of human reproduction.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - history</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Catholicism - history</subject><subject>Catholics</subject><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Entertainment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Government Regulation - history</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Motion pictures</subject><subject>Motion Pictures - history</subject><subject>Motion Pictures - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Social Control, Formal</subject><subject>Storytelling</subject><subject>Twins</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Unpleasant</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young women</subject><issn>0007-0874</issn><issn>1474-001X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9q3DAQxkVoSbZpHyCHFEEuPawbyZJsKbcQ0j8QKCQN9GZkabyrxZa2kl0I9JB36Bv2SSqz2wZaetJI85v5RvMhdELJW0pofX5HCKmJrDmtcyQpP0ALymteEEK_PEOLOV3M-SP0IqVNvgqu5CE6KqUqGWVkgb7fwmrq9ej8ChvnYcihwWkM0UHCug3TiCNsY7CTGV3wF3gbYeW1Nw9LbNaut62L43o5o3EGsPYWD-GbA2zApxDT2m2x83hcA76_W2KqGPn5-IMqIV-i553uE7zan8fo_t3156sPxc2n9x-vLm8Kw5kcC1YJrTshDFO1kNBxbUvgSrSWW6trUgHNC7CVlq0qraIqv1edAEVLEEopdoze7Prmf3ydII3N4JKBvtcewpQaqjgRqqqlzOjZX-gmTNHn6ZqSMSkVk6XIFN1RJoaUInTNNrpBx4eGkma2pvnHmlzzet95agewfyp-e5GB0x2wmdf_lK9kNo3Pomwvqoc2OruCp9n-L_sLLiSiIQ</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>KIRBY, DAVID A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958</title><author>KIRBY, DAVID A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-365aaf55c39758ef4ad2e495bd4dda706e1170d6a8b92d919d4d6f5e912e59993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - history</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Catholicism - history</topic><topic>Catholics</topic><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Entertainment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Government Regulation - history</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Motion pictures</topic><topic>Motion Pictures - history</topic><topic>Motion Pictures - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Social Control, Formal</topic><topic>Storytelling</topic><topic>Twins</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Unpleasant</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KIRBY, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The British journal for the history of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KIRBY, DAVID A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958</atitle><jtitle>The British journal for the history of science</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Hist Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>451-472</pages><issn>0007-0874</issn><eissn>1474-001X</eissn><abstract>In the mid-twentieth century film studios sent their screenplays to Hollywood's official censorship body, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and to the Catholic Church's Legion of Decency for approval and recommendations for revision. This article examines the negotiations between filmmakers and censorship groups in order to show the stories that censors did, and did not, want told about pregnancy, childbirth and abortion, as well as how studios fought to tell their own stories about human reproduction. I find that censors considered pregnancy to be a state of grace and a holy obligation that was restricted to married women. For censors, human reproduction was not only a private matter, it was also an unpleasant biological process whose entertainment value was questionable. They worried that realistic portrayals of pregnancy and childbirth would scare young women away from pursuing motherhood. In addition, I demonstrate how filmmakers overcame censors’ strict prohibitions against abortion by utilizing ambiguity in their storytelling. Ultimately, I argue that censors believed that pregnancy and childbirth should be celebrated but not seen. But if pregnancy and childbirth were required then censors preferred mythic versions of motherhood instead of what they believed to be the sacred but horrific biological reality of human reproduction.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28923130</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007087417000814</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0874
ispartof The British journal for the history of science, 2017-09, Vol.50 (3), p.451-472
issn 0007-0874
1474-001X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940596788
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Abortion
Abortion, Induced - history
Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence
Ambiguity
Audiences
Biological activity
Catholicism - history
Catholics
Censorship
Childbirth & labor
Christianity
Entertainment
Female
Frogs
Government Regulation - history
History of medicine and histology
History, 20th Century
Humans
Male
Morals
Mothers
Motion pictures
Motion Pictures - history
Motion Pictures - legislation & jurisprudence
Negotiations
Parturition
Pregnancy
Reproduction
Reproduction (biology)
Social Control, Formal
Storytelling
Twins
United States
Unpleasant
Wives
Womens health
Young women
title Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulating%20cinematic%20stories%20about%20reproduction:%20pregnancy,%20childbirth,%20abortion%20and%20movie%20censorship%20in%20the%20US,%201930%E2%80%931958&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20for%20the%20history%20of%20science&rft.au=KIRBY,%20DAVID%20A.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=451-472&rft.issn=0007-0874&rft.eissn=1474-001X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007087417000814&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26849845%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338893825&rft_id=info:pmid/28923130&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007087417000814&rft_jstor_id=26849845&rfr_iscdi=true