A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS

In 1995, the Manual of California Vegetation introduced a quantitatively based method for classifying and mapping vegetation in California. We used this method to develop a classification of vegetation types for Napa County, which we then used to attribute the polygons of a new vegetation map. The n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Madroño 2004-10, Vol.51 (4), p.343-363
Hauptverfasser: Thorne, James H., Kennedy, Jeffery A., Quinn, James F., McCoy, Michael, Keeler-Wolf, Todd, Menke, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 363
container_issue 4
container_start_page 343
container_title Madroño
container_volume 51
creator Thorne, James H.
Kennedy, Jeffery A.
Quinn, James F.
McCoy, Michael
Keeler-Wolf, Todd
Menke, John
description In 1995, the Manual of California Vegetation introduced a quantitatively based method for classifying and mapping vegetation in California. We used this method to develop a classification of vegetation types for Napa County, which we then used to attribute the polygons of a new vegetation map. The new map was produced by on-screen digitizing over USGS Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (DOQQ's) with the aid of ancillary digital maps. We identified the distribution of 56 landcover types, 48 dominated by natural vegetation, at the alliance or aggregated alliance level, in 28,456 polygons across 2042 km². The effective minimum mapping unit is below one hectare. The methods used, the mapping classification system developed, and the extents of landcover types mapped are presented. In a comparison with two previous digital vegetation maps for the area, the US Forest Service's CalVeg and the Gap Analysis Program's GAP maps, the MCV map had finer spatial and floristic resolution. The MCV map has 15 more vegetation types than CalVeg and 22 more vegetation types than GAP. The MCV map contains more riparian corridors and isolated wetlands, identifying 157 km² of these types, compared to 7 km 2 for CalVeg and a non-spatial result for GAP.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19402026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41425563</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41425563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j536-ca80c6e349f7ab6ff2ec634a5c2784e8af1f38d708f184a277d9a073db4de6113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QciTb4U0SZP2MXRtF-iSsWaCTyVrE9jY3Gy3B3-Df9rIRHy6nHvP-S6cGzCJM0oihjN-CyYIYRpljPB78DCOuyCTJMkm4EvA16IqjDBawYVYQl1CJZYC5nqtzBtcN1JV0MyLcFRrUf_cc1HLUq-U_MvKEM5r0TSylPlVCjWD0jSBs1iKlWzCymioA2kFZ7KSJrD-pcPr5hHcebsf3dPvnAJTFiafR7WuAraOdglhUWdT1DFHaOa53TDvsesYoTbpME-pS62PPUl7jlIfp9RizvvMIk76De0di2MyBS9X7Gk4flzceG4P27Fz-719d8fL2IbaEEaYBePz1bgbz8ehPQ3bgx0-WxrTUB4j5Bv7B18W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19402026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Thorne, James H. ; Kennedy, Jeffery A. ; Quinn, James F. ; McCoy, Michael ; Keeler-Wolf, Todd ; Menke, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorne, James H. ; Kennedy, Jeffery A. ; Quinn, James F. ; McCoy, Michael ; Keeler-Wolf, Todd ; Menke, John</creatorcontrib><description>In 1995, the Manual of California Vegetation introduced a quantitatively based method for classifying and mapping vegetation in California. We used this method to develop a classification of vegetation types for Napa County, which we then used to attribute the polygons of a new vegetation map. The new map was produced by on-screen digitizing over USGS Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (DOQQ's) with the aid of ancillary digital maps. We identified the distribution of 56 landcover types, 48 dominated by natural vegetation, at the alliance or aggregated alliance level, in 28,456 polygons across 2042 km². The effective minimum mapping unit is below one hectare. The methods used, the mapping classification system developed, and the extents of landcover types mapped are presented. In a comparison with two previous digital vegetation maps for the area, the US Forest Service's CalVeg and the Gap Analysis Program's GAP maps, the MCV map had finer spatial and floristic resolution. The MCV map has 15 more vegetation types than CalVeg and 22 more vegetation types than GAP. The MCV map contains more riparian corridors and isolated wetlands, identifying 157 km² of these types, compared to 7 km 2 for CalVeg and a non-spatial result for GAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-9637</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>California Botanical Society</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Environmental conservation ; Freshwater ; Good agricultural practices ; Land cover ; Natural resources conservation ; Pine trees ; Plants ; Polygons ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Madroño, 2004-10, Vol.51 (4), p.343-363</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41425563$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41425563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorne, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Jeffery A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeler-Wolf, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, John</creatorcontrib><title>A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS</title><title>Madroño</title><description>In 1995, the Manual of California Vegetation introduced a quantitatively based method for classifying and mapping vegetation in California. We used this method to develop a classification of vegetation types for Napa County, which we then used to attribute the polygons of a new vegetation map. The new map was produced by on-screen digitizing over USGS Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (DOQQ's) with the aid of ancillary digital maps. We identified the distribution of 56 landcover types, 48 dominated by natural vegetation, at the alliance or aggregated alliance level, in 28,456 polygons across 2042 km². The effective minimum mapping unit is below one hectare. The methods used, the mapping classification system developed, and the extents of landcover types mapped are presented. In a comparison with two previous digital vegetation maps for the area, the US Forest Service's CalVeg and the Gap Analysis Program's GAP maps, the MCV map had finer spatial and floristic resolution. The MCV map has 15 more vegetation types than CalVeg and 22 more vegetation types than GAP. The MCV map contains more riparian corridors and isolated wetlands, identifying 157 km² of these types, compared to 7 km 2 for CalVeg and a non-spatial result for GAP.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Good agricultural practices</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Polygons</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0024-9637</issn><issn>1943-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QciTb4U0SZP2MXRtF-iSsWaCTyVrE9jY3Gy3B3-Df9rIRHy6nHvP-S6cGzCJM0oihjN-CyYIYRpljPB78DCOuyCTJMkm4EvA16IqjDBawYVYQl1CJZYC5nqtzBtcN1JV0MyLcFRrUf_cc1HLUq-U_MvKEM5r0TSylPlVCjWD0jSBs1iKlWzCymioA2kFZ7KSJrD-pcPr5hHcebsf3dPvnAJTFiafR7WuAraOdglhUWdT1DFHaOa53TDvsesYoTbpME-pS62PPUl7jlIfp9RizvvMIk76De0di2MyBS9X7Gk4flzceG4P27Fz-719d8fL2IbaEEaYBePz1bgbz8ehPQ3bgx0-WxrTUB4j5Bv7B18W</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Thorne, James H.</creator><creator>Kennedy, Jeffery A.</creator><creator>Quinn, James F.</creator><creator>McCoy, Michael</creator><creator>Keeler-Wolf, Todd</creator><creator>Menke, John</creator><general>California Botanical Society</general><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS</title><author>Thorne, James H. ; Kennedy, Jeffery A. ; Quinn, James F. ; McCoy, Michael ; Keeler-Wolf, Todd ; Menke, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j536-ca80c6e349f7ab6ff2ec634a5c2784e8af1f38d708f184a277d9a073db4de6113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Good agricultural practices</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Polygons</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorne, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Jeffery A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeler-Wolf, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Madroño</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorne, James H.</au><au>Kennedy, Jeffery A.</au><au>Quinn, James F.</au><au>McCoy, Michael</au><au>Keeler-Wolf, Todd</au><au>Menke, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS</atitle><jtitle>Madroño</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>343-363</pages><issn>0024-9637</issn><eissn>1943-6297</eissn><abstract>In 1995, the Manual of California Vegetation introduced a quantitatively based method for classifying and mapping vegetation in California. We used this method to develop a classification of vegetation types for Napa County, which we then used to attribute the polygons of a new vegetation map. The new map was produced by on-screen digitizing over USGS Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (DOQQ's) with the aid of ancillary digital maps. We identified the distribution of 56 landcover types, 48 dominated by natural vegetation, at the alliance or aggregated alliance level, in 28,456 polygons across 2042 km². The effective minimum mapping unit is below one hectare. The methods used, the mapping classification system developed, and the extents of landcover types mapped are presented. In a comparison with two previous digital vegetation maps for the area, the US Forest Service's CalVeg and the Gap Analysis Program's GAP maps, the MCV map had finer spatial and floristic resolution. The MCV map has 15 more vegetation types than CalVeg and 22 more vegetation types than GAP. The MCV map contains more riparian corridors and isolated wetlands, identifying 157 km² of these types, compared to 7 km 2 for CalVeg and a non-spatial result for GAP.</abstract><pub>California Botanical Society</pub><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-9637
ispartof Madroño, 2004-10, Vol.51 (4), p.343-363
issn 0024-9637
1943-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19402026
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Alliances
Environmental conservation
Freshwater
Good agricultural practices
Land cover
Natural resources conservation
Pine trees
Plants
Polygons
Vegetation
title A VEGETATON MAP OF NAPA COUNTY USING THE MANUAL OF CALIFORNIA VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND ITS COMPARISON TO OTHER DIGITAL VEGETATION MAPS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20VEGETATON%20MAP%20OF%20NAPA%20COUNTY%20USING%20THE%20MANUAL%20OF%20CALIFORNIA%20VEGETATION%20CLASSIFICATION%20AND%20ITS%20COMPARISON%20TO%20OTHER%20DIGITAL%20VEGETATION%20MAPS&rft.jtitle=Madro%C3%B1o&rft.au=Thorne,%20James%20H.&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=343-363&rft.issn=0024-9637&rft.eissn=1943-6297&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41425563%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19402026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41425563&rfr_iscdi=true