Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms
The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Almatroudi, A. Tahir, S. Hu, H. Chowdhury, D. Gosbell, I.B. Jensen, S.O. Whiteley, G.S. Deva, A.K. Glasbey, T. Vickery, K. |
description | The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms.
To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments.
S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat).
Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining.
S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940195613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670117305042</els_id><sourcerecordid>1940195613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15ak6ZpN-BFxC8QPKjnkCYTmqVt1iQV9t-bsusevczLzLzzwjwIXRFcEEzq23Wx7uxYlJg0BeYFxs0RWhJGy7zklB-jJSac5XWDyQKdhbDGGKc5O0WLcsUJp7ReIv8R5abb9k45paaQyclDEu23eZi8kQqy1jpj-yHtPGSDS8VDsCHKMWbRZR3IpD7VAeZJJ8fUSm2jdaPss26rvYygDzkX6MTIPsDlXs_R19Pj58NL_vb-_Ppw_5YryuqY08qsdAWEaKgZL6uGqlq2LTNUauCGaa4qWjFVloa1tWkabnhLGVWScFIBp-foZpe78e57ghDFYIOCvpcjuCkIwqsZUE1ospY7q_IuBA9GbLwdpN8KgsXMWqzFzFrMrAXmIrFOR9f7_KkdQB9O_uAmw93OAOnLHwteBGVhVKCtBxWFdva__F9AEZMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940195613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms.
To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments.
S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat).
Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining.
S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28919336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofilms ; Dry-surface biofilms ; Heat disinfection ; Heat sterilization ; Infection control ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167</ispartof><rights>2017 The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosbell, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deva, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasbey, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms.
To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments.
S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat).
Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining.
S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</description><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Dry-surface biofilms</subject><subject>Heat disinfection</subject><subject>Heat sterilization</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15ak6ZpN-BFxC8QPKjnkCYTmqVt1iQV9t-bsusevczLzLzzwjwIXRFcEEzq23Wx7uxYlJg0BeYFxs0RWhJGy7zklB-jJSac5XWDyQKdhbDGGKc5O0WLcsUJp7ReIv8R5abb9k45paaQyclDEu23eZi8kQqy1jpj-yHtPGSDS8VDsCHKMWbRZR3IpD7VAeZJJ8fUSm2jdaPss26rvYygDzkX6MTIPsDlXs_R19Pj58NL_vb-_Ppw_5YryuqY08qsdAWEaKgZL6uGqlq2LTNUauCGaa4qWjFVloa1tWkabnhLGVWScFIBp-foZpe78e57ghDFYIOCvpcjuCkIwqsZUE1ospY7q_IuBA9GbLwdpN8KgsXMWqzFzFrMrAXmIrFOR9f7_KkdQB9O_uAmw93OAOnLHwteBGVhVKCtBxWFdva__F9AEZMY</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Almatroudi, A.</creator><creator>Tahir, S.</creator><creator>Hu, H.</creator><creator>Chowdhury, D.</creator><creator>Gosbell, I.B.</creator><creator>Jensen, S.O.</creator><creator>Whiteley, G.S.</creator><creator>Deva, A.K.</creator><creator>Glasbey, T.</creator><creator>Vickery, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><author>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Dry-surface biofilms</topic><topic>Heat disinfection</topic><topic>Heat sterilization</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosbell, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deva, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasbey, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almatroudi, A.</au><au>Tahir, S.</au><au>Hu, H.</au><au>Chowdhury, D.</au><au>Gosbell, I.B.</au><au>Jensen, S.O.</au><au>Whiteley, G.S.</au><au>Deva, A.K.</au><au>Glasbey, T.</au><au>Vickery, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>161-167</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms.
To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments.
S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat).
Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining.
S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28919336</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940195613 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biofilms Dry-surface biofilms Heat disinfection Heat sterilization Infection control Staphylococcus aureus |
title | Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staphylococcus%20aureus%20dry-surface%20biofilms%20are%20more%20resistant%20to%20heat%20treatment%20than%20traditional%20hydrated%20biofilms&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Almatroudi,%20A.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=161-167&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940195613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940195613&rft_id=info:pmid/28919336&rft_els_id=S0195670117305042&rfr_iscdi=true |