Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms

The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167
Hauptverfasser: Almatroudi, A., Tahir, S., Hu, H., Chowdhury, D., Gosbell, I.B., Jensen, S.O., Whiteley, G.S., Deva, A.K., Glasbey, T., Vickery, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 98
creator Almatroudi, A.
Tahir, S.
Hu, H.
Chowdhury, D.
Gosbell, I.B.
Jensen, S.O.
Whiteley, G.S.
Deva, A.K.
Glasbey, T.
Vickery, K.
description The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940195613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670117305042</els_id><sourcerecordid>1940195613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15ak6ZpN-BFxC8QPKjnkCYTmqVt1iQV9t-bsusevczLzLzzwjwIXRFcEEzq23Wx7uxYlJg0BeYFxs0RWhJGy7zklB-jJSac5XWDyQKdhbDGGKc5O0WLcsUJp7ReIv8R5abb9k45paaQyclDEu23eZi8kQqy1jpj-yHtPGSDS8VDsCHKMWbRZR3IpD7VAeZJJ8fUSm2jdaPss26rvYygDzkX6MTIPsDlXs_R19Pj58NL_vb-_Ppw_5YryuqY08qsdAWEaKgZL6uGqlq2LTNUauCGaa4qWjFVloa1tWkabnhLGVWScFIBp-foZpe78e57ghDFYIOCvpcjuCkIwqsZUE1ospY7q_IuBA9GbLwdpN8KgsXMWqzFzFrMrAXmIrFOR9f7_KkdQB9O_uAmw93OAOnLHwteBGVhVKCtBxWFdva__F9AEZMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940195613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28919336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofilms ; Dry-surface biofilms ; Heat disinfection ; Heat sterilization ; Infection control ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167</ispartof><rights>2017 The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosbell, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deva, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasbey, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</description><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Dry-surface biofilms</subject><subject>Heat disinfection</subject><subject>Heat sterilization</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15ak6ZpN-BFxC8QPKjnkCYTmqVt1iQV9t-bsusevczLzLzzwjwIXRFcEEzq23Wx7uxYlJg0BeYFxs0RWhJGy7zklB-jJSac5XWDyQKdhbDGGKc5O0WLcsUJp7ReIv8R5abb9k45paaQyclDEu23eZi8kQqy1jpj-yHtPGSDS8VDsCHKMWbRZR3IpD7VAeZJJ8fUSm2jdaPss26rvYygDzkX6MTIPsDlXs_R19Pj58NL_vb-_Ppw_5YryuqY08qsdAWEaKgZL6uGqlq2LTNUauCGaa4qWjFVloa1tWkabnhLGVWScFIBp-foZpe78e57ghDFYIOCvpcjuCkIwqsZUE1ospY7q_IuBA9GbLwdpN8KgsXMWqzFzFrMrAXmIrFOR9f7_KkdQB9O_uAmw93OAOnLHwteBGVhVKCtBxWFdva__F9AEZMY</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Almatroudi, A.</creator><creator>Tahir, S.</creator><creator>Hu, H.</creator><creator>Chowdhury, D.</creator><creator>Gosbell, I.B.</creator><creator>Jensen, S.O.</creator><creator>Whiteley, G.S.</creator><creator>Deva, A.K.</creator><creator>Glasbey, T.</creator><creator>Vickery, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</title><author>Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I.B. ; Jensen, S.O. ; Whiteley, G.S. ; Deva, A.K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-34f8d4e11de6592473c6abb5f3ade9f5d9c4345c22f5b6f779f9b353ca1914e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Dry-surface biofilms</topic><topic>Heat disinfection</topic><topic>Heat sterilization</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almatroudi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosbell, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deva, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasbey, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almatroudi, A.</au><au>Tahir, S.</au><au>Hu, H.</au><au>Chowdhury, D.</au><au>Gosbell, I.B.</au><au>Jensen, S.O.</au><au>Whiteley, G.S.</au><au>Deva, A.K.</au><au>Glasbey, T.</au><au>Vickery, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>161-167</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62–74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43–60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28919336</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2018-02, Vol.98 (2), p.161-167
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940195613
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biofilms
Dry-surface biofilms
Heat disinfection
Heat sterilization
Infection control
Staphylococcus aureus
title Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staphylococcus%20aureus%20dry-surface%20biofilms%20are%20more%20resistant%20to%20heat%20treatment%20than%20traditional%20hydrated%20biofilms&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Almatroudi,%20A.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=161-167&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940195613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940195613&rft_id=info:pmid/28919336&rft_els_id=S0195670117305042&rfr_iscdi=true