Taphonomy and paleobiology

Taphonomy plays diverse roles in paleobiology. These include assessing sample quality relevant to ecologic, biogeographic, and evolutionary questions, diagnosing the roles of various taphonomic agents, processes and circumstances in generating the sedimentary and fossil records, and reconstructing t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paleobiology 2000-12, Vol.26 (sp4), p.103-147
Hauptverfasser: Behrensmeyer, Anna K, Kidwell, Susan M, Gastaldo, Robert A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue sp4
container_start_page 103
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 26
creator Behrensmeyer, Anna K
Kidwell, Susan M
Gastaldo, Robert A
description Taphonomy plays diverse roles in paleobiology. These include assessing sample quality relevant to ecologic, biogeographic, and evolutionary questions, diagnosing the roles of various taphonomic agents, processes and circumstances in generating the sedimentary and fossil records, and reconstructing the dynamics of organic recycling over time as a part of Earth history. Major advances over the past 15 years have occurred in understanding (1) the controls on preservation, especially the ecology and biogeochemistry of soft-tissue preservation, and the dominance of biological versus physical agents in the destruction of remains from all major taxonomic groups (plants, invertebrates, vertebrates); (2) scales of spatial and temporal resolution, particularly the relatively minor role of out-of-habitat transport contrasted with the major effects of time-averaging; (3) quantitative compositional fidelity; that is, the degree to which different types of assemblages reflect the species composition and abundance of source faunas and floras; and (4) large-scale variations through time in preservational regimes (megabiases), caused by the evolution of new bodyplans and behavioral capabilities, and by broad-scale changes in climate, tectonics, and geochemistry of Earth surface systems. Paleobiological questions regarding major trends in biodiversity, major extinctions and recoveries, timing of cladogenesis and rates of evolution, and the role of environmental forcing in evolution all entail issues appropriate for taphonomic analysis, and a wide range of strategies are being developed to minimize the impact of sample incompleteness and bias. These include taphonomically robust metrics of paleontologic patterns, gap analysis, equalizing samples via rarefaction, inferences about preservation probability, isotaphonomic comparisons, taphonomic control taxa, and modeling of artificial fossil assemblages based on modern analogues. All of this work is yielding a more quantitative assessment of both the positive and negative aspects of paleobiological samples. Comparisons and syntheses of patterns across major groups and over a wider range of temporal and spatial scales present a challenging and exciting agenda for taphonomy in the coming decades.
doi_str_mv 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[103:TAP]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19399574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1571655</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1571655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-da5bee548dd72c769ce32a935bc8a83ccba3af195ddd4ca5fd6a6f318d1e12f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBxCHnhAgpfgROzFcKBEvqVI5lBNCq43tQFFah7g99N_jKAjunPYwM99qhpALRsdMKXVJqU6TXGTijFNKz7l6ZVRczSfPb3xMx8Xsmu-QAdMiT6QQbJcMfgP75CCEzxjSUmUDcjzH5sOv_HI7wpUdNVg7Xy587d-3h2Svwjq4o587JC_3d_PiMZnOHp6KyTTBlOp1YlGWzsk0tzbjJlPaOMFRC1maHHNhTIkCK6altTY1KCurUFWC5ZY5xisthuS05zat_9q4sIblIhhX17hyfhMg1tBaZmk03vZG0_oQWldB0y6W2G6BUehmga4ldC2hmwW4ioqAOAtwoFDMgEfISQ_5DGvf_hFkxpSUUb7p5TiCX7n_fPgG-pt06w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19399574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taphonomy and paleobiology</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Behrensmeyer, Anna K ; Kidwell, Susan M ; Gastaldo, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Behrensmeyer, Anna K ; Kidwell, Susan M ; Gastaldo, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>Taphonomy plays diverse roles in paleobiology. These include assessing sample quality relevant to ecologic, biogeographic, and evolutionary questions, diagnosing the roles of various taphonomic agents, processes and circumstances in generating the sedimentary and fossil records, and reconstructing the dynamics of organic recycling over time as a part of Earth history. Major advances over the past 15 years have occurred in understanding (1) the controls on preservation, especially the ecology and biogeochemistry of soft-tissue preservation, and the dominance of biological versus physical agents in the destruction of remains from all major taxonomic groups (plants, invertebrates, vertebrates); (2) scales of spatial and temporal resolution, particularly the relatively minor role of out-of-habitat transport contrasted with the major effects of time-averaging; (3) quantitative compositional fidelity; that is, the degree to which different types of assemblages reflect the species composition and abundance of source faunas and floras; and (4) large-scale variations through time in preservational regimes (megabiases), caused by the evolution of new bodyplans and behavioral capabilities, and by broad-scale changes in climate, tectonics, and geochemistry of Earth surface systems. Paleobiological questions regarding major trends in biodiversity, major extinctions and recoveries, timing of cladogenesis and rates of evolution, and the role of environmental forcing in evolution all entail issues appropriate for taphonomic analysis, and a wide range of strategies are being developed to minimize the impact of sample incompleteness and bias. These include taphonomically robust metrics of paleontologic patterns, gap analysis, equalizing samples via rarefaction, inferences about preservation probability, isotaphonomic comparisons, taphonomic control taxa, and modeling of artificial fossil assemblages based on modern analogues. All of this work is yielding a more quantitative assessment of both the positive and negative aspects of paleobiological samples. Comparisons and syntheses of patterns across major groups and over a wider range of temporal and spatial scales present a challenging and exciting agenda for taphonomy in the coming decades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[103:TAP]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paleontological Society</publisher><subject>Bones ; DEEP TIME: PALEOBIOLOGY'S PERSPECTIVE ; Fossils ; Geology ; Marine ecology ; Paleobiology ; Paleoecology ; Paleontology ; Taphonomy ; Taxa ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Paleobiology, 2000-12, Vol.26 (sp4), p.103-147</ispartof><rights>The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-da5bee548dd72c769ce32a935bc8a83ccba3af195ddd4ca5fd6a6f318d1e12f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-da5bee548dd72c769ce32a935bc8a83ccba3af195ddd4ca5fd6a6f318d1e12f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[103:TAP]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1571655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behrensmeyer, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidwell, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastaldo, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Taphonomy and paleobiology</title><title>Paleobiology</title><description>Taphonomy plays diverse roles in paleobiology. These include assessing sample quality relevant to ecologic, biogeographic, and evolutionary questions, diagnosing the roles of various taphonomic agents, processes and circumstances in generating the sedimentary and fossil records, and reconstructing the dynamics of organic recycling over time as a part of Earth history. Major advances over the past 15 years have occurred in understanding (1) the controls on preservation, especially the ecology and biogeochemistry of soft-tissue preservation, and the dominance of biological versus physical agents in the destruction of remains from all major taxonomic groups (plants, invertebrates, vertebrates); (2) scales of spatial and temporal resolution, particularly the relatively minor role of out-of-habitat transport contrasted with the major effects of time-averaging; (3) quantitative compositional fidelity; that is, the degree to which different types of assemblages reflect the species composition and abundance of source faunas and floras; and (4) large-scale variations through time in preservational regimes (megabiases), caused by the evolution of new bodyplans and behavioral capabilities, and by broad-scale changes in climate, tectonics, and geochemistry of Earth surface systems. Paleobiological questions regarding major trends in biodiversity, major extinctions and recoveries, timing of cladogenesis and rates of evolution, and the role of environmental forcing in evolution all entail issues appropriate for taphonomic analysis, and a wide range of strategies are being developed to minimize the impact of sample incompleteness and bias. These include taphonomically robust metrics of paleontologic patterns, gap analysis, equalizing samples via rarefaction, inferences about preservation probability, isotaphonomic comparisons, taphonomic control taxa, and modeling of artificial fossil assemblages based on modern analogues. All of this work is yielding a more quantitative assessment of both the positive and negative aspects of paleobiological samples. Comparisons and syntheses of patterns across major groups and over a wider range of temporal and spatial scales present a challenging and exciting agenda for taphonomy in the coming decades.</description><subject>Bones</subject><subject>DEEP TIME: PALEOBIOLOGY'S PERSPECTIVE</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Paleobiology</subject><subject>Paleoecology</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Taphonomy</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0094-8373</issn><issn>1938-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBxCHnhAgpfgROzFcKBEvqVI5lBNCq43tQFFah7g99N_jKAjunPYwM99qhpALRsdMKXVJqU6TXGTijFNKz7l6ZVRczSfPb3xMx8Xsmu-QAdMiT6QQbJcMfgP75CCEzxjSUmUDcjzH5sOv_HI7wpUdNVg7Xy587d-3h2Svwjq4o587JC_3d_PiMZnOHp6KyTTBlOp1YlGWzsk0tzbjJlPaOMFRC1maHHNhTIkCK6altTY1KCurUFWC5ZY5xisthuS05zat_9q4sIblIhhX17hyfhMg1tBaZmk03vZG0_oQWldB0y6W2G6BUehmga4ldC2hmwW4ioqAOAtwoFDMgEfISQ_5DGvf_hFkxpSUUb7p5TiCX7n_fPgG-pt06w</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Behrensmeyer, Anna K</creator><creator>Kidwell, Susan M</creator><creator>Gastaldo, Robert A</creator><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Taphonomy and paleobiology</title><author>Behrensmeyer, Anna K ; Kidwell, Susan M ; Gastaldo, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-da5bee548dd72c769ce32a935bc8a83ccba3af195ddd4ca5fd6a6f318d1e12f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Bones</topic><topic>DEEP TIME: PALEOBIOLOGY'S PERSPECTIVE</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Paleobiology</topic><topic>Paleoecology</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Taphonomy</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behrensmeyer, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidwell, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastaldo, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behrensmeyer, Anna K</au><au>Kidwell, Susan M</au><au>Gastaldo, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taphonomy and paleobiology</atitle><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>sp4</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>103-147</pages><issn>0094-8373</issn><eissn>1938-5331</eissn><abstract>Taphonomy plays diverse roles in paleobiology. These include assessing sample quality relevant to ecologic, biogeographic, and evolutionary questions, diagnosing the roles of various taphonomic agents, processes and circumstances in generating the sedimentary and fossil records, and reconstructing the dynamics of organic recycling over time as a part of Earth history. Major advances over the past 15 years have occurred in understanding (1) the controls on preservation, especially the ecology and biogeochemistry of soft-tissue preservation, and the dominance of biological versus physical agents in the destruction of remains from all major taxonomic groups (plants, invertebrates, vertebrates); (2) scales of spatial and temporal resolution, particularly the relatively minor role of out-of-habitat transport contrasted with the major effects of time-averaging; (3) quantitative compositional fidelity; that is, the degree to which different types of assemblages reflect the species composition and abundance of source faunas and floras; and (4) large-scale variations through time in preservational regimes (megabiases), caused by the evolution of new bodyplans and behavioral capabilities, and by broad-scale changes in climate, tectonics, and geochemistry of Earth surface systems. Paleobiological questions regarding major trends in biodiversity, major extinctions and recoveries, timing of cladogenesis and rates of evolution, and the role of environmental forcing in evolution all entail issues appropriate for taphonomic analysis, and a wide range of strategies are being developed to minimize the impact of sample incompleteness and bias. These include taphonomically robust metrics of paleontologic patterns, gap analysis, equalizing samples via rarefaction, inferences about preservation probability, isotaphonomic comparisons, taphonomic control taxa, and modeling of artificial fossil assemblages based on modern analogues. All of this work is yielding a more quantitative assessment of both the positive and negative aspects of paleobiological samples. Comparisons and syntheses of patterns across major groups and over a wider range of temporal and spatial scales present a challenging and exciting agenda for taphonomy in the coming decades.</abstract><pub>Paleontological Society</pub><doi>10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[103:TAP]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>45</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8373
ispartof Paleobiology, 2000-12, Vol.26 (sp4), p.103-147
issn 0094-8373
1938-5331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19399574
source Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete
subjects Bones
DEEP TIME: PALEOBIOLOGY'S PERSPECTIVE
Fossils
Geology
Marine ecology
Paleobiology
Paleoecology
Paleontology
Taphonomy
Taxa
Vertebrates
title Taphonomy and paleobiology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A42%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taphonomy%20and%20paleobiology&rft.jtitle=Paleobiology&rft.au=Behrensmeyer,%20Anna%20K&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=sp4&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=103-147&rft.issn=0094-8373&rft.eissn=1938-5331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26%5B103:TAP%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1571655%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19399574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1571655&rfr_iscdi=true