Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida
We conducted 262 call-broadcast point-count surveys (1–6 replicate surveys on each of 62 points) using standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols between 31 May and 7 July 2006 on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, an island off the northwest coast of Florida. We conducted double...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Wilson journal of ornithology 2008-09, Vol.120 (3), p.513-518 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 518 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 513 |
| container_title | The Wilson journal of ornithology |
| container_volume | 120 |
| creator | Nadeau, Christopher P. Conway, Courtney J. Smith, Bradley S. Lewis, Thomas E. |
| description | We conducted 262 call-broadcast point-count surveys (1–6 replicate surveys on each of 62 points) using standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols between 31 May and 7 July 2006 on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, an island off the northwest coast of Florida. We conducted double-blind multiple-observer surveys, paired morning and evening surveys, and paired morning and night surveys to examine the influence of call-broadcast and time of day on detection probability. Observer detection probability for all species pooled was 75% and was similar between passive (69%) and call-broadcast (65%) periods. Detection probability was higher on morning than evening (t = 3.0, P = 0.030) or night (t = 3.4, P = 0.042) surveys when we pooled all species. Detection probability was higher (but not significant for all species) on morning compared to evening or night surveys for all five focal species detected on surveys: Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris), Purple Gallinule (Porphyrula martinica), Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), and American Coot (Fulica americana). We detected more Least Bitterns (t = 2.4, P = 0.064) and Common Moorhens (t = 2.8, P = 0.026) on morning than evening surveys, and more Clapper Rails (t = 5.1, P = 0.014) on morning than night surveys. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1676/07-041.1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19399058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A185428859</galeid><jstor_id>20456186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A185428859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-b7e71d4daf1b5a823b165372bf104c464edb152e0516286406f2b97977f927863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0t2L1DAQAPAiCp6n4D8gFB9EH7ImbdK0j8fifcDqgR_PIWmmNUs3WZPUu_Wvd46Vw5UVlDwkJL8ZMpMUxXNGF6yRzVsqCeVswR4UJ6yrWyI4lw9xLURHOO_Y4-JJSmtKcbsWJ4V_r2_dxv1wfiwtZOizC77cxmC0cZPLuzIM5Q3kSXtLLGzBW_C5NC7aVNo53sVtg_OZ9GHGgzTH77BLpfOlDzF_vYGUIfryfArRWf20eDToKcGzX_Np8eX83eflJVldX1wtz1bENBXLxEiQzHKrB2aEbqvasEbUsjIDo7znDQdrmKiACtZUbcNpM1Smk52UQ1fJtqlPi1f7vFjJtxnvoDYu9TBhGRDmpLA1XUdFi_DlH3Ad5ujxbmgwUU2ZRET2aNQTKOeHkKPuR_AQ9RQ8DA63z1greNW2okO_OOJxWNi4_mjAm4MANBlu86jnlNTVp4__YT_8s20vVoeWHLN9mCYYQeHzLK8P_eu972NIKcKgttFtdNwpRtXdV1RUKvyKiiF9safrlEO8dxXlomG_v5ZxAbvz90Q_Aba04oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198633017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Nadeau, Christopher P. ; Conway, Courtney J. ; Smith, Bradley S. ; Lewis, Thomas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Christopher P. ; Conway, Courtney J. ; Smith, Bradley S. ; Lewis, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted 262 call-broadcast point-count surveys (1–6 replicate surveys on each of 62 points) using standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols between 31 May and 7 July 2006 on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, an island off the northwest coast of Florida. We conducted double-blind multiple-observer surveys, paired morning and evening surveys, and paired morning and night surveys to examine the influence of call-broadcast and time of day on detection probability. Observer detection probability for all species pooled was 75% and was similar between passive (69%) and call-broadcast (65%) periods. Detection probability was higher on morning than evening (t = 3.0, P = 0.030) or night (t = 3.4, P = 0.042) surveys when we pooled all species. Detection probability was higher (but not significant for all species) on morning compared to evening or night surveys for all five focal species detected on surveys: Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris), Purple Gallinule (Porphyrula martinica), Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), and American Coot (Fulica americana). We detected more Least Bitterns (t = 2.4, P = 0.064) and Common Moorhens (t = 2.8, P = 0.026) on morning than evening surveys, and more Clapper Rails (t = 5.1, P = 0.014) on morning than night surveys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-4491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1676/07-041.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WILBAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Collins: Wilson Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal vocalization ; Aves ; Bird conservation ; Bird songs ; Birds ; Birds, Protection of ; Cloud cover ; Field study ; Fulica americana ; Gallinula chloropus ; Identification and classification ; Ixobrychus exilis ; Major s ; Marshes ; Methods ; Ornithology ; Porphyrula ; Rallus longirostris ; Rare birds ; Research methodology ; Temperature ; Waterfowl ; Wetland ecology ; Wetlands ; Wildlife refuges ; Wind velocity</subject><ispartof>The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2008-09, Vol.120 (3), p.513-518</ispartof><rights>The Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wilson Ornithological Society Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-b7e71d4daf1b5a823b165372bf104c464edb152e0516286406f2b97977f927863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-b7e71d4daf1b5a823b165372bf104c464edb152e0516286406f2b97977f927863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1676/07-041.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20456186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,26967,27913,27914,52352,58006,58239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Courtney J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida</title><title>The Wilson journal of ornithology</title><addtitle>Wilson Journal of Ornithology</addtitle><description>We conducted 262 call-broadcast point-count surveys (1–6 replicate surveys on each of 62 points) using standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols between 31 May and 7 July 2006 on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, an island off the northwest coast of Florida. We conducted double-blind multiple-observer surveys, paired morning and evening surveys, and paired morning and night surveys to examine the influence of call-broadcast and time of day on detection probability. Observer detection probability for all species pooled was 75% and was similar between passive (69%) and call-broadcast (65%) periods. Detection probability was higher on morning than evening (t = 3.0, P = 0.030) or night (t = 3.4, P = 0.042) surveys when we pooled all species. Detection probability was higher (but not significant for all species) on morning compared to evening or night surveys for all five focal species detected on surveys: Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris), Purple Gallinule (Porphyrula martinica), Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), and American Coot (Fulica americana). We detected more Least Bitterns (t = 2.4, P = 0.064) and Common Moorhens (t = 2.8, P = 0.026) on morning than evening surveys, and more Clapper Rails (t = 5.1, P = 0.014) on morning than night surveys.</description><subject>Animal vocalization</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Bird conservation</subject><subject>Bird songs</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds, Protection of</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Fulica americana</subject><subject>Gallinula chloropus</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Ixobrychus exilis</subject><subject>Major s</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Porphyrula</subject><subject>Rallus longirostris</subject><subject>Rare birds</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetland ecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife refuges</subject><subject>Wind velocity</subject><issn>1559-4491</issn><issn>1938-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV0t2L1DAQAPAiCp6n4D8gFB9EH7ImbdK0j8fifcDqgR_PIWmmNUs3WZPUu_Wvd46Vw5UVlDwkJL8ZMpMUxXNGF6yRzVsqCeVswR4UJ6yrWyI4lw9xLURHOO_Y4-JJSmtKcbsWJ4V_r2_dxv1wfiwtZOizC77cxmC0cZPLuzIM5Q3kSXtLLGzBW_C5NC7aVNo53sVtg_OZ9GHGgzTH77BLpfOlDzF_vYGUIfryfArRWf20eDToKcGzX_Np8eX83eflJVldX1wtz1bENBXLxEiQzHKrB2aEbqvasEbUsjIDo7znDQdrmKiACtZUbcNpM1Smk52UQ1fJtqlPi1f7vFjJtxnvoDYu9TBhGRDmpLA1XUdFi_DlH3Ad5ujxbmgwUU2ZRET2aNQTKOeHkKPuR_AQ9RQ8DA63z1greNW2okO_OOJxWNi4_mjAm4MANBlu86jnlNTVp4__YT_8s20vVoeWHLN9mCYYQeHzLK8P_eu972NIKcKgttFtdNwpRtXdV1RUKvyKiiF9safrlEO8dxXlomG_v5ZxAbvz90Q_Aba04oA</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Nadeau, Christopher P.</creator><creator>Conway, Courtney J.</creator><creator>Smith, Bradley S.</creator><creator>Lewis, Thomas E.</creator><general>Wilson Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida</title><author>Nadeau, Christopher P. ; Conway, Courtney J. ; Smith, Bradley S. ; Lewis, Thomas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-b7e71d4daf1b5a823b165372bf104c464edb152e0516286406f2b97977f927863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal vocalization</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Bird conservation</topic><topic>Bird songs</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds, Protection of</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Fulica americana</topic><topic>Gallinula chloropus</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Ixobrychus exilis</topic><topic>Major s</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Porphyrula</topic><topic>Rallus longirostris</topic><topic>Rare birds</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetland ecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife refuges</topic><topic>Wind velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Courtney J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nadeau, Christopher P.</au><au>Conway, Courtney J.</au><au>Smith, Bradley S.</au><au>Lewis, Thomas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida</atitle><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle><addtitle>Wilson Journal of Ornithology</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>513-518</pages><issn>1559-4491</issn><eissn>1938-5447</eissn><coden>WILBAI</coden><abstract>We conducted 262 call-broadcast point-count surveys (1–6 replicate surveys on each of 62 points) using standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols between 31 May and 7 July 2006 on St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge, an island off the northwest coast of Florida. We conducted double-blind multiple-observer surveys, paired morning and evening surveys, and paired morning and night surveys to examine the influence of call-broadcast and time of day on detection probability. Observer detection probability for all species pooled was 75% and was similar between passive (69%) and call-broadcast (65%) periods. Detection probability was higher on morning than evening (t = 3.0, P = 0.030) or night (t = 3.4, P = 0.042) surveys when we pooled all species. Detection probability was higher (but not significant for all species) on morning compared to evening or night surveys for all five focal species detected on surveys: Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris), Purple Gallinule (Porphyrula martinica), Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), and American Coot (Fulica americana). We detected more Least Bitterns (t = 2.4, P = 0.064) and Common Moorhens (t = 2.8, P = 0.026) on morning than evening surveys, and more Clapper Rails (t = 5.1, P = 0.014) on morning than night surveys.</abstract><cop>Fort Collins</cop><pub>Wilson Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.1676/07-041.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1559-4491 |
| ispartof | The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2008-09, Vol.120 (3), p.513-518 |
| issn | 1559-4491 1938-5447 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19399058 |
| source | BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Animal vocalization Aves Bird conservation Bird songs Birds Birds, Protection of Cloud cover Field study Fulica americana Gallinula chloropus Identification and classification Ixobrychus exilis Major s Marshes Methods Ornithology Porphyrula Rallus longirostris Rare birds Research methodology Temperature Waterfowl Wetland ecology Wetlands Wildlife refuges Wind velocity |
| title | Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A03%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximizing%20detection%20probability%20of%20wetland-dependent%20birds%20during%20point-count%20surveys%20in%20northwestern%20Florida&rft.jtitle=The%20Wilson%20journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Nadeau,%20Christopher%20P.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=513-518&rft.issn=1559-4491&rft.eissn=1938-5447&rft.coden=WILBAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1676/07-041.1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA185428859%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198633017&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A185428859&rft_jstor_id=20456186&rfr_iscdi=true |