White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland

Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of arid environments 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033
Hauptverfasser: Meek, M.G., Cooper, S.M., Owens, M.K., Cooper, R.M., Wappel, A.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2033
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2026
container_title Journal of arid environments
container_volume 72
creator Meek, M.G.
Cooper, S.M.
Owens, M.K.
Cooper, R.M.
Wappel, A.L.
description Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19396134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140196308001535</els_id><sourcerecordid>19396134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu2zAMhoViBZqlfYXOl-1mj5JsWbptCLplQIAe2qK9CbJEpwpcOZOUAn37KUi360488CP58yPkmkJDgYqvu2ZnoncYXhsGIBsQDQA7IwsKqqsVY08fyAJoCzVVgl-QjyntACjtOr4g68dnn7HOxk_oKocYK-dTjn44ZD-HyocqYtrPIWGV52pvsn2uhkMMPmyr0o8mbHEywV2S89FMCa_e65I8_Li5X63rze3PX6vvm9py1ecauXIcrLQg23ZUHEdsh7ETAIoOsuuwRzsOTEoGbAAEJqwyjhoJjMlBCr4kX05793H-fcCU9YtPFqeSAedD0lRxJShvCyhOoI1zShFHvY_-xcQ3TUEfxemd_itOH8VpELqIK4Of3y-YZM00lhetT_-mGYi-VX1fuE8nbjSzNttYmIc7BpQD7Vol22PWbycCi5BXj1En6zFYdD6izdrN_n9h_gBA8JC6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19396134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-922X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAENDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; cattle ; drought ; Fire ; Forest and land fires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; global positioning systems ; GPS ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant growth ; prescribed burning ; rain ; range management ; regrowth ; semiarid zones ; Shrubland ; Spatial distribution ; spatial variation ; Synecology ; temporal variation ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Texas ; vegetation cover ; Weather damages. Fires ; wild animals ; wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid environments, 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196308001535$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20674977$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><title>Journal of arid environments</title><description>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>Fire</subject><subject>Forest and land fires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>range management</subject><subject>regrowth</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>Shrubland</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>Weather damages. Fires</subject><subject>wild animals</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0140-1963</issn><issn>1095-922X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFu2zAMhoViBZqlfYXOl-1mj5JsWbptCLplQIAe2qK9CbJEpwpcOZOUAn37KUi360488CP58yPkmkJDgYqvu2ZnoncYXhsGIBsQDQA7IwsKqqsVY08fyAJoCzVVgl-QjyntACjtOr4g68dnn7HOxk_oKocYK-dTjn44ZD-HyocqYtrPIWGV52pvsn2uhkMMPmyr0o8mbHEywV2S89FMCa_e65I8_Li5X63rze3PX6vvm9py1ecauXIcrLQg23ZUHEdsh7ETAIoOsuuwRzsOTEoGbAAEJqwyjhoJjMlBCr4kX05793H-fcCU9YtPFqeSAedD0lRxJShvCyhOoI1zShFHvY_-xcQ3TUEfxemd_itOH8VpELqIK4Of3y-YZM00lhetT_-mGYi-VX1fuE8nbjSzNttYmIc7BpQD7Vol22PWbycCi5BXj1En6zFYdD6izdrN_n9h_gBA8JC6</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Meek, M.G.</creator><creator>Cooper, S.M.</creator><creator>Owens, M.K.</creator><creator>Cooper, R.M.</creator><creator>Wappel, A.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><author>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>Fire</topic><topic>Forest and land fires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>range management</topic><topic>regrowth</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>Shrubland</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>Weather damages. Fires</topic><topic>wild animals</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meek, M.G.</au><au>Cooper, S.M.</au><au>Owens, M.K.</au><au>Cooper, R.M.</au><au>Wappel, A.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2026</spage><epage>2033</epage><pages>2026-2033</pages><issn>0140-1963</issn><eissn>1095-922X</eissn><coden>JAENDR</coden><abstract>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-1963
ispartof Journal of arid environments, 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033
issn 0140-1963
1095-922X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19396134
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
cattle
drought
Fire
Forest and land fires
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
global positioning systems
GPS
Odocoileus virginianus
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
plant growth
prescribed burning
rain
range management
regrowth
semiarid zones
Shrubland
Spatial distribution
spatial variation
Synecology
temporal variation
Terrestrial ecosystems
Texas
vegetation cover
Weather damages. Fires
wild animals
wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
title White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=White-tailed%20deer%20distribution%20in%20response%20to%20patch%20burning%20on%20rangeland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20environments&rft.au=Meek,%20M.G.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2026&rft.epage=2033&rft.pages=2026-2033&rft.issn=0140-1963&rft.eissn=1095-922X&rft.coden=JAENDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19396134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19396134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140196308001535&rfr_iscdi=true