White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland
Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of arid environments 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2033 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2026 |
container_title | Journal of arid environments |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Meek, M.G. Cooper, S.M. Owens, M.K. Cooper, R.M. Wappel, A.L. |
description | Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19396134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140196308001535</els_id><sourcerecordid>19396134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu2zAMhoViBZqlfYXOl-1mj5JsWbptCLplQIAe2qK9CbJEpwpcOZOUAn37KUi360488CP58yPkmkJDgYqvu2ZnoncYXhsGIBsQDQA7IwsKqqsVY08fyAJoCzVVgl-QjyntACjtOr4g68dnn7HOxk_oKocYK-dTjn44ZD-HyocqYtrPIWGV52pvsn2uhkMMPmyr0o8mbHEywV2S89FMCa_e65I8_Li5X63rze3PX6vvm9py1ecauXIcrLQg23ZUHEdsh7ETAIoOsuuwRzsOTEoGbAAEJqwyjhoJjMlBCr4kX05793H-fcCU9YtPFqeSAedD0lRxJShvCyhOoI1zShFHvY_-xcQ3TUEfxemd_itOH8VpELqIK4Of3y-YZM00lhetT_-mGYi-VX1fuE8nbjSzNttYmIc7BpQD7Vol22PWbycCi5BXj1En6zFYdD6izdrN_n9h_gBA8JC6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19396134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-922X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAENDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; cattle ; drought ; Fire ; Forest and land fires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; global positioning systems ; GPS ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant growth ; prescribed burning ; rain ; range management ; regrowth ; semiarid zones ; Shrubland ; Spatial distribution ; spatial variation ; Synecology ; temporal variation ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Texas ; vegetation cover ; Weather damages. Fires ; wild animals ; wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid environments, 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196308001535$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20674977$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><title>Journal of arid environments</title><description>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>Fire</subject><subject>Forest and land fires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>range management</subject><subject>regrowth</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>Shrubland</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>Weather damages. Fires</subject><subject>wild animals</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0140-1963</issn><issn>1095-922X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFu2zAMhoViBZqlfYXOl-1mj5JsWbptCLplQIAe2qK9CbJEpwpcOZOUAn37KUi360488CP58yPkmkJDgYqvu2ZnoncYXhsGIBsQDQA7IwsKqqsVY08fyAJoCzVVgl-QjyntACjtOr4g68dnn7HOxk_oKocYK-dTjn44ZD-HyocqYtrPIWGV52pvsn2uhkMMPmyr0o8mbHEywV2S89FMCa_e65I8_Li5X63rze3PX6vvm9py1ecauXIcrLQg23ZUHEdsh7ETAIoOsuuwRzsOTEoGbAAEJqwyjhoJjMlBCr4kX05793H-fcCU9YtPFqeSAedD0lRxJShvCyhOoI1zShFHvY_-xcQ3TUEfxemd_itOH8VpELqIK4Of3y-YZM00lhetT_-mGYi-VX1fuE8nbjSzNttYmIc7BpQD7Vol22PWbycCi5BXj1En6zFYdD6izdrN_n9h_gBA8JC6</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Meek, M.G.</creator><creator>Cooper, S.M.</creator><creator>Owens, M.K.</creator><creator>Cooper, R.M.</creator><creator>Wappel, A.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</title><author>Meek, M.G. ; Cooper, S.M. ; Owens, M.K. ; Cooper, R.M. ; Wappel, A.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e39d30c8c0844f93efe4bf560091b855e7ecfb288202b0e026c9ad1a80228b863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>Fire</topic><topic>Forest and land fires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>range management</topic><topic>regrowth</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>Shrubland</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>Weather damages. Fires</topic><topic>wild animals</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meek, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappel, A.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meek, M.G.</au><au>Cooper, S.M.</au><au>Owens, M.K.</au><au>Cooper, R.M.</au><au>Wappel, A.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2026</spage><epage>2033</epage><pages>2026-2033</pages><issn>0140-1963</issn><eissn>1095-922X</eissn><coden>JAENDR</coden><abstract>Management of rangelands has changed substantially over the past few decades; today there is greater emphasis on wildlife management and increased interest in using natural disturbances such as fire to manage rangeland plant and animal communities. To determine the effect of prescribed fires on the distribution of white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus), we used Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to monitor the movements of bucks and does during four, month-long, trials before and during the year after implementation of three late summer burns. Deer were expected to increase their use of burned areas to take advantage of fresh plant growth after the disturbance. However, the only increased use of burns occurred 1–2 months after treatment. The presence of cattle did not limit deer use of burns. Low use of burned areas was attributed to drought conditions, which limited vegetation regrowth. Other than a brief flush of fresh grass in autumn, no changes in plant cover could be ascribed to the burns. Thus, in semi-arid areas, use of prescribed burns to reduce brush cover and increase forb production for deer may not be successful, at least in the short-term, if lack of rainfall limits regrowth of vegetation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-1963 |
ispartof | Journal of arid environments, 2008-11, Vol.72 (11), p.2026-2033 |
issn | 0140-1963 1095-922X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19396134 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences cattle drought Fire Forest and land fires Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology global positioning systems GPS Odocoileus virginianus Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection plant growth prescribed burning rain range management regrowth semiarid zones Shrubland Spatial distribution spatial variation Synecology temporal variation Terrestrial ecosystems Texas vegetation cover Weather damages. Fires wild animals wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | White-tailed deer distribution in response to patch burning on rangeland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=White-tailed%20deer%20distribution%20in%20response%20to%20patch%20burning%20on%20rangeland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20environments&rft.au=Meek,%20M.G.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2026&rft.epage=2033&rft.pages=2026-2033&rft.issn=0140-1963&rft.eissn=1095-922X&rft.coden=JAENDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19396134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19396134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140196308001535&rfr_iscdi=true |