role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants
A longstanding goal in the study of biological invasions is to predict why some species are successful invaders, whereas others are not. To understand this process, detailed information is required concerning the pool of species that have the opportunity to become established. Here we develop an ext...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2005-11, Vol.102 (47), p.17032-17035 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 17035 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 47 |
| container_start_page | 17032 |
| container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
| container_volume | 102 |
| creator | Suarez, A.V Holway, D.A Ward, P.S |
| description | A longstanding goal in the study of biological invasions is to predict why some species are successful invaders, whereas others are not. To understand this process, detailed information is required concerning the pool of species that have the opportunity to become established. Here we develop an extensive database of ant species unintentionally transported to the continental United States and use these data to test how opportunity and species-level ecological attributes affect the probability of establishment. This database includes an amount of information on failed introductions that may be unparalleled for any group of unintentionally introduced insects. We found a high diversity of species (232 species from 394 records), 12% of which have become established in the continental United States. The probability of establishment increased with the number of times a species was transported (propagule pressure) but was also influenced by nesting habit. Ground nesting species were more likely to become established compared with arboreal species. These results highlight the value of developing similar databases for additional groups of organisms transported by humans to obtain quantitative data on the first stages of the invasion process: opportunity and transport. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.0506119102 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19392150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4152347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4152347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-97951001ce808f4c010879ed323af184fc4d9c94205c15c78873a64ff3f366233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9llduxGdVcHFtPfma5KNIKVWoeBCuw4xL2mnzEueSabY_94M79Gnq67CzfmdkxsOIW8RThEGdraNtpyCAImoEegzskLQ2Euu4TlZAdChV5zyI_KqlDsA0ELBS3KEkiophVyRy5wm36XQpe025TrHsT50Y-zqre_aEKuPdUzRTu2y5rSe3TIuhphitHW8952NtbwmL4Kdin-zP4_J9ZeLn-df-6vvl9_OP1_1Tmhaez1ogQDovAIVuAMENWi_ZpTZgIoHx9faaU5BOBRuUGpgVvIQWGBSUsaOyadd7nb-tfFr19bLdjLbPG5sfjDJjuZ_JY635ibdG6TtISVawMk-IKffsy_VbMbi_DTZ6NNcjFSK0kY-CaJmmqKABp7tQJdTKdmHx20QzNKSWVoyh5aa4_2_nzjw-1oa8HEPLM5DHDV8MDgAoybM01T9n9rY7gm2Ie92yF2pKT8yHAVlfGjyh50cbDL2Jo_FXP-ggKy1MwA06C-s7Lmt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19392150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Suarez, A.V ; Holway, D.A ; Ward, P.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Suarez, A.V ; Holway, D.A ; Ward, P.S</creatorcontrib><description>A longstanding goal in the study of biological invasions is to predict why some species are successful invaders, whereas others are not. To understand this process, detailed information is required concerning the pool of species that have the opportunity to become established. Here we develop an extensive database of ant species unintentionally transported to the continental United States and use these data to test how opportunity and species-level ecological attributes affect the probability of establishment. This database includes an amount of information on failed introductions that may be unparalleled for any group of unintentionally introduced insects. We found a high diversity of species (232 species from 394 records), 12% of which have become established in the continental United States. The probability of establishment increased with the number of times a species was transported (propagule pressure) but was also influenced by nesting habit. Ground nesting species were more likely to become established compared with arboreal species. These results highlight the value of developing similar databases for additional groups of organisms transported by humans to obtain quantitative data on the first stages of the invasion process: opportunity and transport.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506119102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16286656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ants ; Ants - classification ; arboreal nesting ; Biological Sciences ; Biological taxonomies ; Commerce ; Datasets ; Ecological invasion ; Ecosystem ; Formicidae ; Genera ; ground nesting ; insect behavior ; Insect colonies ; Insect ecology ; Insect nests ; introduced species ; Invasive species ; longitudinal studies ; nesting ; unintentionally introduced species ; United States ; zoogeography</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2005-11, Vol.102 (47), p.17032-17035</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005, The National Academy of Sciences 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-97951001ce808f4c010879ed323af184fc4d9c94205c15c78873a64ff3f366233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-97951001ce808f4c010879ed323af184fc4d9c94205c15c78873a64ff3f366233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/102/47.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4152347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4152347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27922,27923,53789,53791,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suarez, A.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holway, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, P.S</creatorcontrib><title>role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>A longstanding goal in the study of biological invasions is to predict why some species are successful invaders, whereas others are not. To understand this process, detailed information is required concerning the pool of species that have the opportunity to become established. Here we develop an extensive database of ant species unintentionally transported to the continental United States and use these data to test how opportunity and species-level ecological attributes affect the probability of establishment. This database includes an amount of information on failed introductions that may be unparalleled for any group of unintentionally introduced insects. We found a high diversity of species (232 species from 394 records), 12% of which have become established in the continental United States. The probability of establishment increased with the number of times a species was transported (propagule pressure) but was also influenced by nesting habit. Ground nesting species were more likely to become established compared with arboreal species. These results highlight the value of developing similar databases for additional groups of organisms transported by humans to obtain quantitative data on the first stages of the invasion process: opportunity and transport.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Ants - classification</subject><subject>arboreal nesting</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>ground nesting</subject><subject>insect behavior</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insect nests</subject><subject>introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>longitudinal studies</subject><subject>nesting</subject><subject>unintentionally introduced species</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>zoogeography</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9llduxGdVcHFtPfma5KNIKVWoeBCuw4xL2mnzEueSabY_94M79Gnq67CzfmdkxsOIW8RThEGdraNtpyCAImoEegzskLQ2Euu4TlZAdChV5zyI_KqlDsA0ELBS3KEkiophVyRy5wm36XQpe025TrHsT50Y-zqre_aEKuPdUzRTu2y5rSe3TIuhphitHW8952NtbwmL4Kdin-zP4_J9ZeLn-df-6vvl9_OP1_1Tmhaez1ogQDovAIVuAMENWi_ZpTZgIoHx9faaU5BOBRuUGpgVvIQWGBSUsaOyadd7nb-tfFr19bLdjLbPG5sfjDJjuZ_JY635ibdG6TtISVawMk-IKffsy_VbMbi_DTZ6NNcjFSK0kY-CaJmmqKABp7tQJdTKdmHx20QzNKSWVoyh5aa4_2_nzjw-1oa8HEPLM5DHDV8MDgAoybM01T9n9rY7gm2Ie92yF2pKT8yHAVlfGjyh50cbDL2Jo_FXP-ggKy1MwA06C-s7Lmt</recordid><startdate>20051122</startdate><enddate>20051122</enddate><creator>Suarez, A.V</creator><creator>Holway, D.A</creator><creator>Ward, P.S</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051122</creationdate><title>role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants</title><author>Suarez, A.V ; Holway, D.A ; Ward, P.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-97951001ce808f4c010879ed323af184fc4d9c94205c15c78873a64ff3f366233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Ants - classification</topic><topic>arboreal nesting</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>ground nesting</topic><topic>insect behavior</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insect nests</topic><topic>introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>longitudinal studies</topic><topic>nesting</topic><topic>unintentionally introduced species</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>zoogeography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suarez, A.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holway, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, P.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suarez, A.V</au><au>Holway, D.A</au><au>Ward, P.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2005-11-22</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>47</issue><spage>17032</spage><epage>17035</epage><pages>17032-17035</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>A longstanding goal in the study of biological invasions is to predict why some species are successful invaders, whereas others are not. To understand this process, detailed information is required concerning the pool of species that have the opportunity to become established. Here we develop an extensive database of ant species unintentionally transported to the continental United States and use these data to test how opportunity and species-level ecological attributes affect the probability of establishment. This database includes an amount of information on failed introductions that may be unparalleled for any group of unintentionally introduced insects. We found a high diversity of species (232 species from 394 records), 12% of which have become established in the continental United States. The probability of establishment increased with the number of times a species was transported (propagule pressure) but was also influenced by nesting habit. Ground nesting species were more likely to become established compared with arboreal species. These results highlight the value of developing similar databases for additional groups of organisms transported by humans to obtain quantitative data on the first stages of the invasion process: opportunity and transport.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>16286656</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0506119102</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2005-11, Vol.102 (47), p.17032-17035 |
| issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19392150 |
| source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Animals Ants Ants - classification arboreal nesting Biological Sciences Biological taxonomies Commerce Datasets Ecological invasion Ecosystem Formicidae Genera ground nesting insect behavior Insect colonies Insect ecology Insect nests introduced species Invasive species longitudinal studies nesting unintentionally introduced species United States zoogeography |
| title | role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=role%20of%20opportunity%20in%20the%20unintentional%20introduction%20of%20nonnative%20ants&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Suarez,%20A.V&rft.date=2005-11-22&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=47&rft.spage=17032&rft.epage=17035&rft.pages=17032-17035&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0506119102&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4152347%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19392150&rft_id=info:pmid/16286656&rft_jstor_id=4152347&rfr_iscdi=true |