An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data

There has been significant focus on drug-induced QT interval prolongation caused by block of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG)-encoded potassium channel. Regulatory guidance has been implemented to assess QT interval prolongation risk: preclinical guidance requires a candidate drug's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicological sciences 2017-09, Vol.159 (1), p.94-101
Hauptverfasser: Pollard, Christopher E, Skinner, Matthew, Lazic, Stanley E, Prior, Helen M, Conlon, Kelly M, Valentin, Jean-Pierre, Dota, Corina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 94
container_title Toxicological sciences
container_volume 159
creator Pollard, Christopher E
Skinner, Matthew
Lazic, Stanley E
Prior, Helen M
Conlon, Kelly M
Valentin, Jean-Pierre
Dota, Corina
description There has been significant focus on drug-induced QT interval prolongation caused by block of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG)-encoded potassium channel. Regulatory guidance has been implemented to assess QT interval prolongation risk: preclinical guidance requires a candidate drug's potency as a hERG channel blocker to be defined and also its effect on QT interval in a non-rodent species; clinical guidance requires a "Thorough QT Study" during development, although some QT prolonging compounds are identified earlier via a Phase I study. Clinical, heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) data on 24 compounds (13 positives; 11 negatives) were compared with their effect on dog QTc and the concentration of compound causing 50% inhibition (IC50) of hERG current. Concordance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity across a range of decision thresholds, thus yielding receiver operating characteristic curves of sensitivity versus (1-specificity). The area under the curve of ROC curves (for which 0.5 and 1 indicate chance and perfect concordance, respectively) was used to summarize concordance. Three aspects of preclinical data were compared with the clinical outcome (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values shown in brackets): absolute hERG IC50 (0.78); safety margin between hERG IC50 and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.80); safety margin between QTc effects in dogs and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.81). Positive and negative predictive values of absolute hERG IC50 indicated that from an early drug discovery perspective, low potency compounds can be progressed on the basis of a low risk of causing a QTc increase.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/toxsci/kfx125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1938861106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938861106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-4e35a3d653c40a492e8f6dc9f50f7a691274d9a29f713fd6c4695d322297045e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqUwsiKPLKF-JI49lvKqVImHysAUGftaNaROiV1o_z2FFKZ776dzv-EgdErJBSWKD1OzjsYP392asmIP9behyIhian-3CyJJDx3F-EYIpYKoQ9RjUhGeS9lHL6OAR0HXm-gjbhxOc8BPUOvkmxDnfokvIX0BBPzQgql98EbXWAeLx3_H4wxPQoL2U9fZ7ydYfKWTPkYHTtcRTnZzgJ5vrmfju2x6fzsZj6aZ4UqmLAdeaG5FwU1OdK4YSCesUa4grtRCUVbmVmmmXEm5s8LkQhWWM8ZUSfIC-ACdd73LtvlYQUzVwkcDda0DNKtYUcWlFJQSsUWzDjVtE2MLrlq2fqHbTUVJ9WOz6mxWnc0tf7arXr0uwP7Tf_r4N3VtcaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938861106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pollard, Christopher E ; Skinner, Matthew ; Lazic, Stanley E ; Prior, Helen M ; Conlon, Kelly M ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Dota, Corina</creator><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christopher E ; Skinner, Matthew ; Lazic, Stanley E ; Prior, Helen M ; Conlon, Kelly M ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Dota, Corina</creatorcontrib><description>There has been significant focus on drug-induced QT interval prolongation caused by block of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG)-encoded potassium channel. Regulatory guidance has been implemented to assess QT interval prolongation risk: preclinical guidance requires a candidate drug's potency as a hERG channel blocker to be defined and also its effect on QT interval in a non-rodent species; clinical guidance requires a "Thorough QT Study" during development, although some QT prolonging compounds are identified earlier via a Phase I study. Clinical, heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) data on 24 compounds (13 positives; 11 negatives) were compared with their effect on dog QTc and the concentration of compound causing 50% inhibition (IC50) of hERG current. Concordance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity across a range of decision thresholds, thus yielding receiver operating characteristic curves of sensitivity versus (1-specificity). The area under the curve of ROC curves (for which 0.5 and 1 indicate chance and perfect concordance, respectively) was used to summarize concordance. Three aspects of preclinical data were compared with the clinical outcome (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values shown in brackets): absolute hERG IC50 (0.78); safety margin between hERG IC50 and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.80); safety margin between QTc effects in dogs and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.81). Positive and negative predictive values of absolute hERG IC50 indicated that from an early drug discovery perspective, low potency compounds can be progressed on the basis of a low risk of causing a QTc increase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28903488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Dog Diseases - physiopathology ; Dogs ; Electrocardiography ; Humans ; Long QT Syndrome - physiopathology ; Long QT Syndrome - veterinary ; Patch-Clamp Techniques ; ROC Curve</subject><ispartof>Toxicological sciences, 2017-09, Vol.159 (1), p.94-101</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-4e35a3d653c40a492e8f6dc9f50f7a691274d9a29f713fd6c4695d322297045e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-4e35a3d653c40a492e8f6dc9f50f7a691274d9a29f713fd6c4695d322297045e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazic, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prior, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conlon, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dota, Corina</creatorcontrib><title>An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data</title><title>Toxicological sciences</title><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><description>There has been significant focus on drug-induced QT interval prolongation caused by block of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG)-encoded potassium channel. Regulatory guidance has been implemented to assess QT interval prolongation risk: preclinical guidance requires a candidate drug's potency as a hERG channel blocker to be defined and also its effect on QT interval in a non-rodent species; clinical guidance requires a "Thorough QT Study" during development, although some QT prolonging compounds are identified earlier via a Phase I study. Clinical, heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) data on 24 compounds (13 positives; 11 negatives) were compared with their effect on dog QTc and the concentration of compound causing 50% inhibition (IC50) of hERG current. Concordance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity across a range of decision thresholds, thus yielding receiver operating characteristic curves of sensitivity versus (1-specificity). The area under the curve of ROC curves (for which 0.5 and 1 indicate chance and perfect concordance, respectively) was used to summarize concordance. Three aspects of preclinical data were compared with the clinical outcome (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values shown in brackets): absolute hERG IC50 (0.78); safety margin between hERG IC50 and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.80); safety margin between QTc effects in dogs and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.81). Positive and negative predictive values of absolute hERG IC50 indicated that from an early drug discovery perspective, low potency compounds can be progressed on the basis of a low risk of causing a QTc increase.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long QT Syndrome - physiopathology</subject><subject>Long QT Syndrome - veterinary</subject><subject>Patch-Clamp Techniques</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqUwsiKPLKF-JI49lvKqVImHysAUGftaNaROiV1o_z2FFKZ776dzv-EgdErJBSWKD1OzjsYP392asmIP9behyIhian-3CyJJDx3F-EYIpYKoQ9RjUhGeS9lHL6OAR0HXm-gjbhxOc8BPUOvkmxDnfokvIX0BBPzQgql98EbXWAeLx3_H4wxPQoL2U9fZ7ydYfKWTPkYHTtcRTnZzgJ5vrmfju2x6fzsZj6aZ4UqmLAdeaG5FwU1OdK4YSCesUa4grtRCUVbmVmmmXEm5s8LkQhWWM8ZUSfIC-ACdd73LtvlYQUzVwkcDda0DNKtYUcWlFJQSsUWzDjVtE2MLrlq2fqHbTUVJ9WOz6mxWnc0tf7arXr0uwP7Tf_r4N3VtcaY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Pollard, Christopher E</creator><creator>Skinner, Matthew</creator><creator>Lazic, Stanley E</creator><creator>Prior, Helen M</creator><creator>Conlon, Kelly M</creator><creator>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Dota, Corina</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data</title><author>Pollard, Christopher E ; Skinner, Matthew ; Lazic, Stanley E ; Prior, Helen M ; Conlon, Kelly M ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Dota, Corina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-4e35a3d653c40a492e8f6dc9f50f7a691274d9a29f713fd6c4695d322297045e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long QT Syndrome - physiopathology</topic><topic>Long QT Syndrome - veterinary</topic><topic>Patch-Clamp Techniques</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazic, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prior, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conlon, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dota, Corina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pollard, Christopher E</au><au>Skinner, Matthew</au><au>Lazic, Stanley E</au><au>Prior, Helen M</au><au>Conlon, Kelly M</au><au>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Dota, Corina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>94-101</pages><issn>1096-6080</issn><eissn>1096-0929</eissn><abstract>There has been significant focus on drug-induced QT interval prolongation caused by block of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG)-encoded potassium channel. Regulatory guidance has been implemented to assess QT interval prolongation risk: preclinical guidance requires a candidate drug's potency as a hERG channel blocker to be defined and also its effect on QT interval in a non-rodent species; clinical guidance requires a "Thorough QT Study" during development, although some QT prolonging compounds are identified earlier via a Phase I study. Clinical, heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) data on 24 compounds (13 positives; 11 negatives) were compared with their effect on dog QTc and the concentration of compound causing 50% inhibition (IC50) of hERG current. Concordance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity across a range of decision thresholds, thus yielding receiver operating characteristic curves of sensitivity versus (1-specificity). The area under the curve of ROC curves (for which 0.5 and 1 indicate chance and perfect concordance, respectively) was used to summarize concordance. Three aspects of preclinical data were compared with the clinical outcome (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values shown in brackets): absolute hERG IC50 (0.78); safety margin between hERG IC50 and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.80); safety margin between QTc effects in dogs and clinical peak free plasma exposure (0.81). Positive and negative predictive values of absolute hERG IC50 indicated that from an early drug discovery perspective, low potency compounds can be progressed on the basis of a low risk of causing a QTc increase.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28903488</pmid><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfx125</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-6080
ispartof Toxicological sciences, 2017-09, Vol.159 (1), p.94-101
issn 1096-6080
1096-0929
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1938861106
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animals
Dog Diseases - physiopathology
Dogs
Electrocardiography
Humans
Long QT Syndrome - physiopathology
Long QT Syndrome - veterinary
Patch-Clamp Techniques
ROC Curve
title An Analysis of the Relationship Between Preclinical and Clinical QT Interval-Related Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A38%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20Preclinical%20and%20Clinical%20QT%20Interval-Related%20Data&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20sciences&rft.au=Pollard,%20Christopher%20E&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=94-101&rft.issn=1096-6080&rft.eissn=1096-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfx125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938861106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938861106&rft_id=info:pmid/28903488&rfr_iscdi=true