Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si
Considering the emerging advantages related to da Vinci Xi robotic platform, the aim of this study is to compare for the first time the operative outcomes of this tool to the previous da Vinci Si during transoral robotic surgery (TORS), both performed for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the base o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of robotic surgery 2018-09, Vol.12 (3), p.417-423 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 423 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 417 |
| container_title | Journal of robotic surgery |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Alessandrini, Marco Pavone, Isabella Micarelli, Alessandro Caporale, Claudio |
| description | Considering the emerging advantages related to da Vinci Xi robotic platform, the aim of this study is to compare for the first time the operative outcomes of this tool to the previous da Vinci Si during transoral robotic surgery (TORS), both performed for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the base of tongue (BOT). Intra- and peri-operative outcomes of eight patients with early stage (T1–T2) of the BOT carcinoma and undergoing TORS by means of the da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Xi-TORS) are compared with the da Vinci Si group ones (Si-TORS). With respect to Si-TORS group, Xi-TORS group demonstrated a significantly shorter overall operative time, console time, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as peri-operative pain intensity and length of mean hospital stays and nasogastric tube positioning. Considering recent advantages offered by surgical robotic techniques, the da Vinci Xi Surgical System preliminary outcomes could suggest its possible future routine implementation in BOT squamous cell carcinoma procedures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1938854089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938854089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-cccb8e797d7a6db6fbd5a1e6b0f3269b02aa0dc83bd76120ee4877638f62bd3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLFTEQRoMozjj6A9xIgRs3rXnc7qTdyeALBlw4irtQSarHDN3JnaQbceF_N5c7jiC4SkFOfVXFYeyp4C8F5_pVFUJz0XGhO6573o332Kkwg-rkbhT372qjTtijWq8573WvxEN2Is3Ie2n0Kft1WTDVXHCGkl1eo4e6lSsqP2HKBdbvBA4rQZ5gzelqI6g3Gy55q-BpnsFj8THlBV8Dwr7QHJeYsHX7vOyxxJoTOFp_ECUICF9j8hG-RcAU4HN8zB5MOFd6cvuesS_v3l6ef-guPr3_eP7movNKy7Xz3jtDetRB4xDcMLnQo6DB8UnJYXRcIvLgjXJBD0Jyop3RelBmGqQLyqkz9uKYuy_5ZqO62iXWw_6YqJ1ixaiM6XfcjA19_g96nbeS2nZWjsJo0WttGiWOlC-51kKT3Ze4tLut4Pbgxh7d2ObGHtzYQ_Kz2-TNLRTuOv7IaIA8ArV9pebg7-j_p_4G33GbHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918715778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Alessandrini, Marco ; Pavone, Isabella ; Micarelli, Alessandro ; Caporale, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alessandrini, Marco ; Pavone, Isabella ; Micarelli, Alessandro ; Caporale, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>Considering the emerging advantages related to da Vinci Xi robotic platform, the aim of this study is to compare for the first time the operative outcomes of this tool to the previous da Vinci Si during transoral robotic surgery (TORS), both performed for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the base of tongue (BOT). Intra- and peri-operative outcomes of eight patients with early stage (T1–T2) of the BOT carcinoma and undergoing TORS by means of the da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Xi-TORS) are compared with the da Vinci Si group ones (Si-TORS). With respect to Si-TORS group, Xi-TORS group demonstrated a significantly shorter overall operative time, console time, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as peri-operative pain intensity and length of mean hospital stays and nasogastric tube positioning. Considering recent advantages offered by surgical robotic techniques, the da Vinci Xi Surgical System preliminary outcomes could suggest its possible future routine implementation in BOT squamous cell carcinoma procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28905287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; FDA approval ; Female ; General anesthesia ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Tongue ; Tongue Neoplasms - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Urology ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-09, Vol.12 (3), p.417-423</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-cccb8e797d7a6db6fbd5a1e6b0f3269b02aa0dc83bd76120ee4877638f62bd3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-cccb8e797d7a6db6fbd5a1e6b0f3269b02aa0dc83bd76120ee4877638f62bd3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1535-6312</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918715778?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28905287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alessandrini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavone, Isabella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micarelli, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporale, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>Considering the emerging advantages related to da Vinci Xi robotic platform, the aim of this study is to compare for the first time the operative outcomes of this tool to the previous da Vinci Si during transoral robotic surgery (TORS), both performed for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the base of tongue (BOT). Intra- and peri-operative outcomes of eight patients with early stage (T1–T2) of the BOT carcinoma and undergoing TORS by means of the da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Xi-TORS) are compared with the da Vinci Si group ones (Si-TORS). With respect to Si-TORS group, Xi-TORS group demonstrated a significantly shorter overall operative time, console time, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as peri-operative pain intensity and length of mean hospital stays and nasogastric tube positioning. Considering recent advantages offered by surgical robotic techniques, the da Vinci Xi Surgical System preliminary outcomes could suggest its possible future routine implementation in BOT squamous cell carcinoma procedures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Tongue</subject><subject>Tongue Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLFTEQRoMozjj6A9xIgRs3rXnc7qTdyeALBlw4irtQSarHDN3JnaQbceF_N5c7jiC4SkFOfVXFYeyp4C8F5_pVFUJz0XGhO6573o332Kkwg-rkbhT372qjTtijWq8573WvxEN2Is3Ie2n0Kft1WTDVXHCGkl1eo4e6lSsqP2HKBdbvBA4rQZ5gzelqI6g3Gy55q-BpnsFj8THlBV8Dwr7QHJeYsHX7vOyxxJoTOFp_ECUICF9j8hG-RcAU4HN8zB5MOFd6cvuesS_v3l6ef-guPr3_eP7movNKy7Xz3jtDetRB4xDcMLnQo6DB8UnJYXRcIvLgjXJBD0Jyop3RelBmGqQLyqkz9uKYuy_5ZqO62iXWw_6YqJ1ixaiM6XfcjA19_g96nbeS2nZWjsJo0WttGiWOlC-51kKT3Ze4tLut4Pbgxh7d2ObGHtzYQ_Kz2-TNLRTuOv7IaIA8ArV9pebg7-j_p_4G33GbHQ</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Alessandrini, Marco</creator><creator>Pavone, Isabella</creator><creator>Micarelli, Alessandro</creator><creator>Caporale, Claudio</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-6312</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si</title><author>Alessandrini, Marco ; Pavone, Isabella ; Micarelli, Alessandro ; Caporale, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-cccb8e797d7a6db6fbd5a1e6b0f3269b02aa0dc83bd76120ee4877638f62bd3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Tongue</topic><topic>Tongue Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alessandrini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavone, Isabella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micarelli, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporale, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alessandrini, Marco</au><au>Pavone, Isabella</au><au>Micarelli, Alessandro</au><au>Caporale, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>417-423</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>Considering the emerging advantages related to da Vinci Xi robotic platform, the aim of this study is to compare for the first time the operative outcomes of this tool to the previous da Vinci Si during transoral robotic surgery (TORS), both performed for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the base of tongue (BOT). Intra- and peri-operative outcomes of eight patients with early stage (T1–T2) of the BOT carcinoma and undergoing TORS by means of the da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Xi-TORS) are compared with the da Vinci Si group ones (Si-TORS). With respect to Si-TORS group, Xi-TORS group demonstrated a significantly shorter overall operative time, console time, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as peri-operative pain intensity and length of mean hospital stays and nasogastric tube positioning. Considering recent advantages offered by surgical robotic techniques, the da Vinci Xi Surgical System preliminary outcomes could suggest its possible future routine implementation in BOT squamous cell carcinoma procedures.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>28905287</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-6312</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1863-2483 |
| ispartof | Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-09, Vol.12 (3), p.417-423 |
| issn | 1863-2483 1863-2491 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1938854089 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Cancer Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery FDA approval Female General anesthesia Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgery Original Article Ostomy Patients Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data Squamous cell carcinoma Surgeons Surgery Surgical outcomes Tongue Tongue Neoplasms - surgery Treatment Outcome Tumors Urology Variance analysis |
| title | Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transoral%20robotic%20surgery%20for%20the%20base%20of%20tongue%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma:%20a%20preliminary%20comparison%20between%20da%20Vinci%20Xi%20and%20Si&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Alessandrini,%20Marco&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=417-423&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938854089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918715778&rft_id=info:pmid/28905287&rfr_iscdi=true |