Letter to the Editor: Sources of bias and need for caution in interpreting the results of Spoth et al.'s (2017) PROSPER study

[...]claims of intervention effectiveness are problematic for at least three reasons: the potential for selection bias in the sample used in the study; the low rate of participation in the SFP 10-14; and the possibility that the positive results reported were the result of flexible data analysis and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological medicine 2018-03, Vol.48 (4), p.694-696
1. Verfasser: Gorman, D M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!