Letter to the Editor: Sources of bias and need for caution in interpreting the results of Spoth et al.'s (2017) PROSPER study
[...]claims of intervention effectiveness are problematic for at least three reasons: the potential for selection bias in the sample used in the study; the low rate of participation in the SFP 10-14; and the possibility that the positive results reported were the result of flexible data analysis and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological medicine 2018-03, Vol.48 (4), p.694-696 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!