Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges

Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2017-10, Vol.119 (4), p.339-348.e1
Hauptverfasser: Akuete, Kwei, Guffey, Danielle, Israelsen, Ryan B., Broyles, John M., Higgins, Lori Jo, Green, Todd D., Naimi, David R., MacGinnitie, Andrew J., Vitalpur, Girish, Minard, Charles G., Davis, Carla M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 348.e1
container_issue 4
container_start_page 339
container_title Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology
container_volume 119
creator Akuete, Kwei
Guffey, Danielle
Israelsen, Ryan B.
Broyles, John M.
Higgins, Lori Jo
Green, Todd D.
Naimi, David R.
MacGinnitie, Andrew J.
Vitalpur, Girish
Minard, Charles G.
Davis, Carla M.
description Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting. Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South. As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1937756991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1081120617305951</els_id><sourcerecordid>1937756991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c01beccb34f1a1d69baa88c74746793a7c1876b69ec46bcb8a0929330fa969473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpqVOnfyCHsMde1hmtZH1ALiGkXyTkkpyFdna2lpF3HWltmn8fGTs9FgZmDs_7wjyMXXBYcODqar3wgw-LBrheQJnGfGBnfClkLaVQH8sNhte8ATVjX3JeAwA3Snxms8YYC2Kpztjvh12cAtIwUaq2ifY-0oBUjX1Vyrer1-j_hlyFocIYhoB16zN11Zh8rPpx7Cpc-Vgifyifs0-9j5m-nvacPX-_e7r9Wd8__vh1e3NfowSYagTeEmIrZM8975RtvTcGtdRSaSu8Rm60apUllKrF1niwjRUCem-VlVrM2bdj7zaNLzvKk9uEjBSjH2jcZcet0HqprOUFbY4opjHnRL3bprDx6dVxcAeHbu0ODt3BoYMyjSmhy1P_rt1Q9y_yLq0A10eAypf7QMllDAdrXUiEk-vG8L_-N1Ilgq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937756991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Akuete, Kwei ; Guffey, Danielle ; Israelsen, Ryan B. ; Broyles, John M. ; Higgins, Lori Jo ; Green, Todd D. ; Naimi, David R. ; MacGinnitie, Andrew J. ; Vitalpur, Girish ; Minard, Charles G. ; Davis, Carla M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akuete, Kwei ; Guffey, Danielle ; Israelsen, Ryan B. ; Broyles, John M. ; Higgins, Lori Jo ; Green, Todd D. ; Naimi, David R. ; MacGinnitie, Andrew J. ; Vitalpur, Girish ; Minard, Charles G. ; Davis, Carla M.</creatorcontrib><description>Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting. Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South. As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28890356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Allergens - immunology ; Anaphylaxis - diagnosis ; Anaphylaxis - epidemiology ; Anaphylaxis - physiopathology ; Arachis - chemistry ; Arachis - immunology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology ; Food Hypersensitivity - physiopathology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant ; Linear Models ; Prevalence ; Risk ; Sex Factors ; Skin Tests ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology, 2017-10, Vol.119 (4), p.339-348.e1</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c01beccb34f1a1d69baa88c74746793a7c1876b69ec46bcb8a0929330fa969473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c01beccb34f1a1d69baa88c74746793a7c1876b69ec46bcb8a0929330fa969473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120617305951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akuete, Kwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guffey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israelsen, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broyles, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Lori Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Todd D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naimi, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGinnitie, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitalpur, Girish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minard, Charles G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Carla M.</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges</title><title>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</title><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><description>Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting. Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South. As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arachis - chemistry</subject><subject>Arachis - immunology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1081-1206</issn><issn>1534-4436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpqVOnfyCHsMde1hmtZH1ALiGkXyTkkpyFdna2lpF3HWltmn8fGTs9FgZmDs_7wjyMXXBYcODqar3wgw-LBrheQJnGfGBnfClkLaVQH8sNhte8ATVjX3JeAwA3Snxms8YYC2Kpztjvh12cAtIwUaq2ifY-0oBUjX1Vyrer1-j_hlyFocIYhoB16zN11Zh8rPpx7Cpc-Vgifyifs0-9j5m-nvacPX-_e7r9Wd8__vh1e3NfowSYagTeEmIrZM8975RtvTcGtdRSaSu8Rm60apUllKrF1niwjRUCem-VlVrM2bdj7zaNLzvKk9uEjBSjH2jcZcet0HqprOUFbY4opjHnRL3bprDx6dVxcAeHbu0ODt3BoYMyjSmhy1P_rt1Q9y_yLq0A10eAypf7QMllDAdrXUiEk-vG8L_-N1Ilgq8</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Akuete, Kwei</creator><creator>Guffey, Danielle</creator><creator>Israelsen, Ryan B.</creator><creator>Broyles, John M.</creator><creator>Higgins, Lori Jo</creator><creator>Green, Todd D.</creator><creator>Naimi, David R.</creator><creator>MacGinnitie, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Vitalpur, Girish</creator><creator>Minard, Charles G.</creator><creator>Davis, Carla M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges</title><author>Akuete, Kwei ; Guffey, Danielle ; Israelsen, Ryan B. ; Broyles, John M. ; Higgins, Lori Jo ; Green, Todd D. ; Naimi, David R. ; MacGinnitie, Andrew J. ; Vitalpur, Girish ; Minard, Charles G. ; Davis, Carla M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c01beccb34f1a1d69baa88c74746793a7c1876b69ec46bcb8a0929330fa969473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arachis - chemistry</topic><topic>Arachis - immunology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akuete, Kwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guffey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israelsen, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broyles, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Lori Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Todd D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naimi, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGinnitie, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitalpur, Girish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minard, Charles G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Carla M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akuete, Kwei</au><au>Guffey, Danielle</au><au>Israelsen, Ryan B.</au><au>Broyles, John M.</au><au>Higgins, Lori Jo</au><au>Green, Todd D.</au><au>Naimi, David R.</au><au>MacGinnitie, Andrew J.</au><au>Vitalpur, Girish</au><au>Minard, Charles G.</au><au>Davis, Carla M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges</atitle><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>348.e1</epage><pages>339-348.e1</pages><issn>1081-1206</issn><eissn>1534-4436</eissn><abstract>Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting. Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South. As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28890356</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.028</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-1206
ispartof Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 2017-10, Vol.119 (4), p.339-348.e1
issn 1081-1206
1534-4436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1937756991
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Allergens - immunology
Anaphylaxis - diagnosis
Anaphylaxis - epidemiology
Anaphylaxis - physiopathology
Arachis - chemistry
Arachis - immunology
Child
Child, Preschool
Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology
Food Hypersensitivity - physiopathology
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Linear Models
Prevalence
Risk
Sex Factors
Skin Tests
United States - epidemiology
title Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20prevalence%20of%20anaphylaxis%20in%20clinic-based%20oral%20food%20challenges&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20allergy,%20asthma,%20&%20immunology&rft.au=Akuete,%20Kwei&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=348.e1&rft.pages=339-348.e1&rft.issn=1081-1206&rft.eissn=1534-4436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1937756991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937756991&rft_id=info:pmid/28890356&rft_els_id=S1081120617305951&rfr_iscdi=true