Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate

The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the producti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemSusChem 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.320-326
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Yun, Deng, Yilin, Handoko, Albertus D., Goh, Gregory K. L., Yeo, Boon Siang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 1
container_start_page 320
container_title ChemSusChem
container_volume 11
creator Huang, Yun
Deng, Yilin
Handoko, Albertus D.
Goh, Gregory K. L.
Yeo, Boon Siang
description The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the production of various CO2 reduction products to almost exclusively formate. Sulfur is doped into the Cu catalysts by dipping the Cu substrates into ammonium polysulfide solutions. Catalyst films with the highest sulfur content of 2.7 at % showed the largest formate current density (jHCOO- ) of −13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is approximately 46 times larger than that previously reported for Cu(110) surfaces. At −0.8 V versus RHE, the faradaic efficiency of formate was maintained at approximately 75 % for 12 h of continuous electrolysis. Through the analysis of the evolution of the jHCOO- and jH2 values with the sulfur content, we show that sulfur doping increases formate production and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Ag–S and Cu–Se catalysts did not exhibit any significant enhancement towards the reduction of CO2 to formate. This demonstrates clearly that sulfur and copper acted synergistically to promote the selective formation of formate. A hypothesis about the role of sulfur is proposed and discussed. A little S makes a big difference: The presence of only 2.7 at % sulfur in a copper catalyst can tune its selectivity significantly for CO2 electroreduction from a wide range of products to almost exclusively formate [−13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)]. A clear positive correlation between the sulfur content and the production of formate is demonstrated.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cssc.201701314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1937519613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1986133240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-5c7c623c3324ea8eac54a9ece74278a83c76b30fa385e87cf7aae2c659bac2cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v00AQhleIiobClSNaiQuXpPvl3fUROQ0gRarUFImbNZmMwZGTNbt2ITd-Ar-xv6S2UoLEpad5D888Gs3L2BspZlIIdYkp4UwJ6YTU0jxjE-mtmWbWfH1-ylqes5cpbYWwIrf2BTtX3ntptJ2weANdHfbQ8Dml-tueh4qv-qbq4_3vP_PQ0oYXoW0p8gI6aA6pS7wKkXffia-oIezqO-JXY4gh0qbHUTdaCojrIc3r8KveEO8CX4S4g45esbMKmkSvH-cF-7K4ui0-TZfXHz8XH5ZTNG68Gx1apVFrZQg8AWYGckJyRjkPXqOzay0q0D4j77ByAKTQZvkaUCHqC_b-6G1j-NFT6spdnZCaBvYU-lTKXLtM5lbqAX33H7oNfRy-MlJ-JJQRAzU7UhhDSpGqso31DuKhlKIc2yjHNspTG8PC20dtv97R5oT_ff8A5EfgZ93Q4QldWaxWxT_5A7zdmKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986133240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Huang, Yun ; Deng, Yilin ; Handoko, Albertus D. ; Goh, Gregory K. L. ; Yeo, Boon Siang</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yun ; Deng, Yilin ; Handoko, Albertus D. ; Goh, Gregory K. L. ; Yeo, Boon Siang</creatorcontrib><description>The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the production of various CO2 reduction products to almost exclusively formate. Sulfur is doped into the Cu catalysts by dipping the Cu substrates into ammonium polysulfide solutions. Catalyst films with the highest sulfur content of 2.7 at % showed the largest formate current density (jHCOO- ) of −13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is approximately 46 times larger than that previously reported for Cu(110) surfaces. At −0.8 V versus RHE, the faradaic efficiency of formate was maintained at approximately 75 % for 12 h of continuous electrolysis. Through the analysis of the evolution of the jHCOO- and jH2 values with the sulfur content, we show that sulfur doping increases formate production and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Ag–S and Cu–Se catalysts did not exhibit any significant enhancement towards the reduction of CO2 to formate. This demonstrates clearly that sulfur and copper acted synergistically to promote the selective formation of formate. A hypothesis about the role of sulfur is proposed and discussed. A little S makes a big difference: The presence of only 2.7 at % sulfur in a copper catalyst can tune its selectivity significantly for CO2 electroreduction from a wide range of products to almost exclusively formate [−13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)]. A clear positive correlation between the sulfur content and the production of formate is demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-5631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-564X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201701314</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28881436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - chemistry ; carbon dioxide reduction ; Catalysis ; Catalysts ; Copper ; Copper - chemistry ; Copper oxides ; doping ; electrocatalysis ; Electrochemical Techniques - methods ; Electrodes ; Electrolysis ; Electrowinning ; Energy consumption ; Energy utilization ; Formates - chemistry ; Formic acid ; Hydrogen evolution reactions ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Substrates ; Sulfur ; Sulfur - chemistry ; Sulfur content</subject><ispartof>ChemSusChem, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.320-326</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-5c7c623c3324ea8eac54a9ece74278a83c76b30fa385e87cf7aae2c659bac2cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-5c7c623c3324ea8eac54a9ece74278a83c76b30fa385e87cf7aae2c659bac2cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5157-8633 ; 0000-0003-1609-0867 ; 0000-0003-2617-7595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcssc.201701314$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcssc.201701314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28881436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handoko, Albertus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Gregory K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Boon Siang</creatorcontrib><title>Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate</title><title>ChemSusChem</title><addtitle>ChemSusChem</addtitle><description>The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the production of various CO2 reduction products to almost exclusively formate. Sulfur is doped into the Cu catalysts by dipping the Cu substrates into ammonium polysulfide solutions. Catalyst films with the highest sulfur content of 2.7 at % showed the largest formate current density (jHCOO- ) of −13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is approximately 46 times larger than that previously reported for Cu(110) surfaces. At −0.8 V versus RHE, the faradaic efficiency of formate was maintained at approximately 75 % for 12 h of continuous electrolysis. Through the analysis of the evolution of the jHCOO- and jH2 values with the sulfur content, we show that sulfur doping increases formate production and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Ag–S and Cu–Se catalysts did not exhibit any significant enhancement towards the reduction of CO2 to formate. This demonstrates clearly that sulfur and copper acted synergistically to promote the selective formation of formate. A hypothesis about the role of sulfur is proposed and discussed. A little S makes a big difference: The presence of only 2.7 at % sulfur in a copper catalyst can tune its selectivity significantly for CO2 electroreduction from a wide range of products to almost exclusively formate [−13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)]. A clear positive correlation between the sulfur content and the production of formate is demonstrated.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>carbon dioxide reduction</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper - chemistry</subject><subject>Copper oxides</subject><subject>doping</subject><subject>electrocatalysis</subject><subject>Electrochemical Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Electrowinning</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy utilization</subject><subject>Formates - chemistry</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>Hydrogen evolution reactions</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur - chemistry</subject><subject>Sulfur content</subject><issn>1864-5631</issn><issn>1864-564X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v00AQhleIiobClSNaiQuXpPvl3fUROQ0gRarUFImbNZmMwZGTNbt2ITd-Ar-xv6S2UoLEpad5D888Gs3L2BspZlIIdYkp4UwJ6YTU0jxjE-mtmWbWfH1-ylqes5cpbYWwIrf2BTtX3ntptJ2weANdHfbQ8Dml-tueh4qv-qbq4_3vP_PQ0oYXoW0p8gI6aA6pS7wKkXffia-oIezqO-JXY4gh0qbHUTdaCojrIc3r8KveEO8CX4S4g45esbMKmkSvH-cF-7K4ui0-TZfXHz8XH5ZTNG68Gx1apVFrZQg8AWYGckJyRjkPXqOzay0q0D4j77ByAKTQZvkaUCHqC_b-6G1j-NFT6spdnZCaBvYU-lTKXLtM5lbqAX33H7oNfRy-MlJ-JJQRAzU7UhhDSpGqso31DuKhlKIc2yjHNspTG8PC20dtv97R5oT_ff8A5EfgZ93Q4QldWaxWxT_5A7zdmKU</recordid><startdate>20180110</startdate><enddate>20180110</enddate><creator>Huang, Yun</creator><creator>Deng, Yilin</creator><creator>Handoko, Albertus D.</creator><creator>Goh, Gregory K. L.</creator><creator>Yeo, Boon Siang</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-8633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-0867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-7595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180110</creationdate><title>Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate</title><author>Huang, Yun ; Deng, Yilin ; Handoko, Albertus D. ; Goh, Gregory K. L. ; Yeo, Boon Siang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-5c7c623c3324ea8eac54a9ece74278a83c76b30fa385e87cf7aae2c659bac2cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>carbon dioxide reduction</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper - chemistry</topic><topic>Copper oxides</topic><topic>doping</topic><topic>electrocatalysis</topic><topic>Electrochemical Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Electrowinning</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy utilization</topic><topic>Formates - chemistry</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>Hydrogen evolution reactions</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur - chemistry</topic><topic>Sulfur content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handoko, Albertus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Gregory K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Boon Siang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ChemSusChem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Yun</au><au>Deng, Yilin</au><au>Handoko, Albertus D.</au><au>Goh, Gregory K. L.</au><au>Yeo, Boon Siang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate</atitle><jtitle>ChemSusChem</jtitle><addtitle>ChemSusChem</addtitle><date>2018-01-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>320-326</pages><issn>1864-5631</issn><eissn>1864-564X</eissn><abstract>The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the production of various CO2 reduction products to almost exclusively formate. Sulfur is doped into the Cu catalysts by dipping the Cu substrates into ammonium polysulfide solutions. Catalyst films with the highest sulfur content of 2.7 at % showed the largest formate current density (jHCOO- ) of −13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is approximately 46 times larger than that previously reported for Cu(110) surfaces. At −0.8 V versus RHE, the faradaic efficiency of formate was maintained at approximately 75 % for 12 h of continuous electrolysis. Through the analysis of the evolution of the jHCOO- and jH2 values with the sulfur content, we show that sulfur doping increases formate production and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Ag–S and Cu–Se catalysts did not exhibit any significant enhancement towards the reduction of CO2 to formate. This demonstrates clearly that sulfur and copper acted synergistically to promote the selective formation of formate. A hypothesis about the role of sulfur is proposed and discussed. A little S makes a big difference: The presence of only 2.7 at % sulfur in a copper catalyst can tune its selectivity significantly for CO2 electroreduction from a wide range of products to almost exclusively formate [−13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)]. A clear positive correlation between the sulfur content and the production of formate is demonstrated.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28881436</pmid><doi>10.1002/cssc.201701314</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-8633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-0867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-7595</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1864-5631
ispartof ChemSusChem, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.320-326
issn 1864-5631
1864-564X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1937519613
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - chemistry
carbon dioxide reduction
Catalysis
Catalysts
Copper
Copper - chemistry
Copper oxides
doping
electrocatalysis
Electrochemical Techniques - methods
Electrodes
Electrolysis
Electrowinning
Energy consumption
Energy utilization
Formates - chemistry
Formic acid
Hydrogen evolution reactions
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Oxidation-Reduction
Substrates
Sulfur
Sulfur - chemistry
Sulfur content
title Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rational%20Design%20of%20Sulfur%E2%80%90Doped%20Copper%20Catalysts%20for%20the%20Selective%20Electroreduction%20of%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20to%20Formate&rft.jtitle=ChemSusChem&rft.au=Huang,%20Yun&rft.date=2018-01-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=320-326&rft.issn=1864-5631&rft.eissn=1864-564X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cssc.201701314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1986133240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986133240&rft_id=info:pmid/28881436&rfr_iscdi=true