The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion

Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2018-08, Vol.25 (22), p.21308-21317
Hauptverfasser: Córdoba, Verónica, Fernández, Mónica, Santalla, Estela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21317
container_issue 22
container_start_page 21308
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 25
creator Córdoba, Verónica
Fernández, Mónica
Santalla, Estela
description Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L capacity under mesophilic conditions were used to carry out the experiment. The highest biogas yield was observed in A treatment (554 ± 75 mL/g volatile solid (VS)). Cumulative methane production decreased from 382 ± 22 to 232 ± 5 mL/g VS when SIR increased from 1:1 to 6:1. The first-order model and the modified Gompertz equation were used to model the experimental cumulative methane yield giving adjustments with coefficients of determination of 96 and 99% respectively. The effect of the SIR was analysed based on the kinetic parameters of the Gompertz equation, which are methane production potential, maximum methane production rate and lag-phase time. The best performance in terms of the kinetic parameters was obtained for treatment A; however, treatment B could still ensure a stable process. The use of higher inoculum concentration generated 463.1% higher methane production rate and required 77.3% shorter adaptation time (lag phase) in the SIR range studied. When higher SIR was used (e.g. 14:1, previous work), it could be observed that the Gompertz equation also adjusted adequately the experimental data ( R 2  > 0.99) although the lag-phase time did not remain in a linear relationship with SIR but exponentially above SIR = 6:1. These results demonstrated that when a low amount of inoculum was used, the adaptation time of microorganisms resulted much higher than expected delaying the methane production and extending the time needed to achieve adequate performance of the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936269497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1936269497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-aafad43643428830662820f3c3906a466a461f93be61eb0f98a9b0b1f1c81c903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFqHSEUhqW0NLdJHqCbInTTzTTnqFfHZQlpWgh0k67F8WpiekdTdbj07etw0xQKXYiI3_nPDx8hbxE-IoC6qIh8KwdANQBwPcgXZIMSxaCE1i_JBrQQA3IhTsibWh8AGGimXpMTNo5qy7a4Ie323lMfgneN5kDrMtVWbPMXMWW37JeZ9lfMNCfaOvkjJt-iqys7-3Zvk6ePJe8W16FEY6L10BF6sLX5Q88p1CbrS56io7t45-vKnZFXwe6rP3-6T8n3z1e3l1-Gm2_XXy8_3QxObFUbrA12J7gUXPTCHKRkI4PAHdcgrZDrwaD55CX6CYIerZ5gwoBuRKeBn5IPx9xe8efSd5s5Vuf3-147L9Wg5pJJLbTq6Pt_0Ie8lNTbGQZKcTFKOXYKj5Qrudbig3kscbbll0EwqxJzVGK6ErMqMbLPvHtKXqbZ754n_jjoADsCtX-lO1_-rv5_6m8nPpdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2077348668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Córdoba, Verónica ; Fernández, Mónica ; Santalla, Estela</creator><creatorcontrib>Córdoba, Verónica ; Fernández, Mónica ; Santalla, Estela</creatorcontrib><description>Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L capacity under mesophilic conditions were used to carry out the experiment. The highest biogas yield was observed in A treatment (554 ± 75 mL/g volatile solid (VS)). Cumulative methane production decreased from 382 ± 22 to 232 ± 5 mL/g VS when SIR increased from 1:1 to 6:1. The first-order model and the modified Gompertz equation were used to model the experimental cumulative methane yield giving adjustments with coefficients of determination of 96 and 99% respectively. The effect of the SIR was analysed based on the kinetic parameters of the Gompertz equation, which are methane production potential, maximum methane production rate and lag-phase time. The best performance in terms of the kinetic parameters was obtained for treatment A; however, treatment B could still ensure a stable process. The use of higher inoculum concentration generated 463.1% higher methane production rate and required 77.3% shorter adaptation time (lag phase) in the SIR range studied. When higher SIR was used (e.g. 14:1, previous work), it could be observed that the Gompertz equation also adjusted adequately the experimental data ( R 2  &gt; 0.99) although the lag-phase time did not remain in a linear relationship with SIR but exponentially above SIR = 6:1. These results demonstrated that when a low amount of inoculum was used, the adaptation time of microorganisms resulted much higher than expected delaying the methane production and extending the time needed to achieve adequate performance of the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28875251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Adaptation ; Advances in Environmental Biotechnology and Engineering 2016 ; Alternative energy sources ; Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobiosis ; Animal wastes ; Animals ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bacteria ; Biofuels - analysis ; Biogas ; Bioreactors ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Hogs ; Inoculum ; Kinetics ; Lag phase ; Manures ; Mathematical models ; Methane ; Methane - metabolism ; Microorganisms ; Parameters ; Reactors ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sewage sludge ; Sludge ; Substrates ; Swine ; Waste Water - chemistry ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018-08, Vol.25 (22), p.21308-21317</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-aafad43643428830662820f3c3906a466a461f93be61eb0f98a9b0b1f1c81c903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-aafad43643428830662820f3c3906a466a461f93be61eb0f98a9b0b1f1c81c903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6601-7452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Córdoba, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santalla, Estela</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L capacity under mesophilic conditions were used to carry out the experiment. The highest biogas yield was observed in A treatment (554 ± 75 mL/g volatile solid (VS)). Cumulative methane production decreased from 382 ± 22 to 232 ± 5 mL/g VS when SIR increased from 1:1 to 6:1. The first-order model and the modified Gompertz equation were used to model the experimental cumulative methane yield giving adjustments with coefficients of determination of 96 and 99% respectively. The effect of the SIR was analysed based on the kinetic parameters of the Gompertz equation, which are methane production potential, maximum methane production rate and lag-phase time. The best performance in terms of the kinetic parameters was obtained for treatment A; however, treatment B could still ensure a stable process. The use of higher inoculum concentration generated 463.1% higher methane production rate and required 77.3% shorter adaptation time (lag phase) in the SIR range studied. When higher SIR was used (e.g. 14:1, previous work), it could be observed that the Gompertz equation also adjusted adequately the experimental data ( R 2  &gt; 0.99) although the lag-phase time did not remain in a linear relationship with SIR but exponentially above SIR = 6:1. These results demonstrated that when a low amount of inoculum was used, the adaptation time of microorganisms resulted much higher than expected delaying the methane production and extending the time needed to achieve adequate performance of the process.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Advances in Environmental Biotechnology and Engineering 2016</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofuels - analysis</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Lag phase</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - metabolism</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Waste Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFqHSEUhqW0NLdJHqCbInTTzTTnqFfHZQlpWgh0k67F8WpiekdTdbj07etw0xQKXYiI3_nPDx8hbxE-IoC6qIh8KwdANQBwPcgXZIMSxaCE1i_JBrQQA3IhTsibWh8AGGimXpMTNo5qy7a4Ie323lMfgneN5kDrMtVWbPMXMWW37JeZ9lfMNCfaOvkjJt-iqys7-3Zvk6ePJe8W16FEY6L10BF6sLX5Q88p1CbrS56io7t45-vKnZFXwe6rP3-6T8n3z1e3l1-Gm2_XXy8_3QxObFUbrA12J7gUXPTCHKRkI4PAHdcgrZDrwaD55CX6CYIerZ5gwoBuRKeBn5IPx9xe8efSd5s5Vuf3-147L9Wg5pJJLbTq6Pt_0Ie8lNTbGQZKcTFKOXYKj5Qrudbig3kscbbll0EwqxJzVGK6ErMqMbLPvHtKXqbZ754n_jjoADsCtX-lO1_-rv5_6m8nPpdE</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Córdoba, Verónica</creator><creator>Fernández, Mónica</creator><creator>Santalla, Estela</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-7452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion</title><author>Córdoba, Verónica ; Fernández, Mónica ; Santalla, Estela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-aafad43643428830662820f3c3906a466a461f93be61eb0f98a9b0b1f1c81c903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Advances in Environmental Biotechnology and Engineering 2016</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofuels - analysis</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Lag phase</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - metabolism</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Waste Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Córdoba, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santalla, Estela</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Córdoba, Verónica</au><au>Fernández, Mónica</au><au>Santalla, Estela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>21308</spage><epage>21317</epage><pages>21308-21317</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L capacity under mesophilic conditions were used to carry out the experiment. The highest biogas yield was observed in A treatment (554 ± 75 mL/g volatile solid (VS)). Cumulative methane production decreased from 382 ± 22 to 232 ± 5 mL/g VS when SIR increased from 1:1 to 6:1. The first-order model and the modified Gompertz equation were used to model the experimental cumulative methane yield giving adjustments with coefficients of determination of 96 and 99% respectively. The effect of the SIR was analysed based on the kinetic parameters of the Gompertz equation, which are methane production potential, maximum methane production rate and lag-phase time. The best performance in terms of the kinetic parameters was obtained for treatment A; however, treatment B could still ensure a stable process. The use of higher inoculum concentration generated 463.1% higher methane production rate and required 77.3% shorter adaptation time (lag phase) in the SIR range studied. When higher SIR was used (e.g. 14:1, previous work), it could be observed that the Gompertz equation also adjusted adequately the experimental data ( R 2  &gt; 0.99) although the lag-phase time did not remain in a linear relationship with SIR but exponentially above SIR = 6:1. These results demonstrated that when a low amount of inoculum was used, the adaptation time of microorganisms resulted much higher than expected delaying the methane production and extending the time needed to achieve adequate performance of the process.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28875251</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-7452</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1344
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018-08, Vol.25 (22), p.21308-21317
issn 0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936269497
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acidification
Adaptation
Advances in Environmental Biotechnology and Engineering 2016
Alternative energy sources
Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobiosis
Animal wastes
Animals
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bacteria
Biofuels - analysis
Biogas
Bioreactors
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental science
Hogs
Inoculum
Kinetics
Lag phase
Manures
Mathematical models
Methane
Methane - metabolism
Microorganisms
Parameters
Reactors
Sewage - chemistry
Sewage sludge
Sludge
Substrates
Swine
Waste Water - chemistry
Waste Water Technology
Wastewater
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20substrate/inoculum%20ratio%20on%20the%20kinetics%20of%20methane%20production%20in%20swine%20wastewater%20anaerobic%20digestion&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=C%C3%B3rdoba,%20Ver%C3%B3nica&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=21308&rft.epage=21317&rft.pages=21308-21317&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1936269497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2077348668&rft_id=info:pmid/28875251&rfr_iscdi=true