Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization
Objective Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The patient : patient-centered outcomes research 2018-04, Vol.11 (2), p.217-223 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 223 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 217 |
| container_title | The patient : patient-centered outcomes research |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Mosby, Danielle L. Manierre, Matthew J. Martin, Steve S. Kolm, Paul Abuzaid, A. Sami Jurkovitz, Claudine T. Elliott, Daniel J. Weintraub, William S. |
| description | Objective
Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.
Methods
All adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.
Results
Four hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (
p
= 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (
p
= 0.052) and procedure by age (
p
= 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.
Conclusions
This study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly “very satisfied” when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936269311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1936269311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-c4c4b82d230e0bcea825853812dee55a06ce5a4822825e3e15ed9161dd99dd7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4AF6k4MVLNZNHm55kKb5gQfFxDtl0ql267Zq0in56s3RdQfA0A_ObfyY_Qo6AngGl6bkXlKUQU0jj0IhYbJExQKpiSBLY3vSSj8ie93NKkzBIdsmIKZVKIdMxubg3XYVNFz2G6ktju6ptoo-qe41y4zCalB26KG9d2xj3GT3gu_G2r42rvswKPSA7pak9Hq7rPnm-unzKb-Lp3fVtPpnGljPRxVZYMVOsYJwinVk0ikkluQJWIEppaGJRGqEYCwPkCBKLDBIoiiwrihT5PjkdcpeufevRd3pReYt1bRpse68h4wlLMg4Q0JM_6LztXROu0yzIoFRRkIGCgbKu9d5hqZeuWoQ_aqB6ZVcPdnWwq1d2tQg7x-vkfrbAYrPxozMAbAB8GDUv6H6f_j_1G32yg70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165008015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Mosby, Danielle L. ; Manierre, Matthew J. ; Martin, Steve S. ; Kolm, Paul ; Abuzaid, A. Sami ; Jurkovitz, Claudine T. ; Elliott, Daniel J. ; Weintraub, William S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosby, Danielle L. ; Manierre, Matthew J. ; Martin, Steve S. ; Kolm, Paul ; Abuzaid, A. Sami ; Jurkovitz, Claudine T. ; Elliott, Daniel J. ; Weintraub, William S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.
Methods
All adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.
Results
Four hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (
p
= 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (
p
= 0.052) and procedure by age (
p
= 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.
Conclusions
This study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly “very satisfied” when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-1653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-1661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28875457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Age ; Cardiovascular disease ; Comorbidity ; Coronary vessels ; Gender differences ; Health Administration ; Health care ; Health Economics ; Heart attacks ; Heart surgery ; Hospitals ; Informatics ; Information technology ; Intervention ; Intubation ; Medicaid ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mortality ; Original Research Article ; Patient satisfaction ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Rehabilitation ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research, 2018-04, Vol.11 (2), p.217-223</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Apr 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-c4c4b82d230e0bcea825853812dee55a06ce5a4822825e3e15ed9161dd99dd7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosby, Danielle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manierre, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Steve S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolm, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuzaid, A. Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovitz, Claudine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, William S.</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization</title><title>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</title><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><description>Objective
Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.
Methods
All adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.
Results
Four hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (
p
= 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (
p
= 0.052) and procedure by age (
p
= 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.
Conclusions
This study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly “very satisfied” when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>1178-1653</issn><issn>1178-1661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4AF6k4MVLNZNHm55kKb5gQfFxDtl0ql267Zq0in56s3RdQfA0A_ObfyY_Qo6AngGl6bkXlKUQU0jj0IhYbJExQKpiSBLY3vSSj8ie93NKkzBIdsmIKZVKIdMxubg3XYVNFz2G6ktju6ptoo-qe41y4zCalB26KG9d2xj3GT3gu_G2r42rvswKPSA7pak9Hq7rPnm-unzKb-Lp3fVtPpnGljPRxVZYMVOsYJwinVk0ikkluQJWIEppaGJRGqEYCwPkCBKLDBIoiiwrihT5PjkdcpeufevRd3pReYt1bRpse68h4wlLMg4Q0JM_6LztXROu0yzIoFRRkIGCgbKu9d5hqZeuWoQ_aqB6ZVcPdnWwq1d2tQg7x-vkfrbAYrPxozMAbAB8GDUv6H6f_j_1G32yg70</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Mosby, Danielle L.</creator><creator>Manierre, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Martin, Steve S.</creator><creator>Kolm, Paul</creator><creator>Abuzaid, A. Sami</creator><creator>Jurkovitz, Claudine T.</creator><creator>Elliott, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Weintraub, William S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization</title><author>Mosby, Danielle L. ; Manierre, Matthew J. ; Martin, Steve S. ; Kolm, Paul ; Abuzaid, A. Sami ; Jurkovitz, Claudine T. ; Elliott, Daniel J. ; Weintraub, William S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-c4c4b82d230e0bcea825853812dee55a06ce5a4822825e3e15ed9161dd99dd7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosby, Danielle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manierre, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Steve S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolm, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuzaid, A. Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovitz, Claudine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, William S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosby, Danielle L.</au><au>Manierre, Matthew J.</au><au>Martin, Steve S.</au><au>Kolm, Paul</au><au>Abuzaid, A. Sami</au><au>Jurkovitz, Claudine T.</au><au>Elliott, Daniel J.</au><au>Weintraub, William S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization</atitle><jtitle>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</jtitle><stitle>Patient</stitle><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>217-223</pages><issn>1178-1653</issn><eissn>1178-1661</eissn><abstract>Objective
Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.
Methods
All adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.
Results
Four hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (
p
= 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (
p
= 0.052) and procedure by age (
p
= 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.
Conclusions
This study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly “very satisfied” when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>28875457</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1178-1653 |
| ispartof | The patient : patient-centered outcomes research, 2018-04, Vol.11 (2), p.217-223 |
| issn | 1178-1653 1178-1661 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936269311 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Age Cardiovascular disease Comorbidity Coronary vessels Gender differences Health Administration Health care Health Economics Heart attacks Heart surgery Hospitals Informatics Information technology Intervention Intubation Medicaid Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mortality Original Research Article Patient satisfaction Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Public Health Quality of life Quality of Life Research Rehabilitation Veins & arteries |
| title | Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Satisfaction%20with%20Care%20After%20Coronary%20Revascularization&rft.jtitle=The%20patient%20:%20patient-centered%20outcomes%20research&rft.au=Mosby,%20Danielle%20L.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=217-223&rft.issn=1178-1653&rft.eissn=1178-1661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1936269311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165008015&rft_id=info:pmid/28875457&rfr_iscdi=true |