Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review
Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported. To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexual medicine reviews 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.253-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 253 |
container_title | Sexual medicine reviews |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Falcone, Marco Garaffa, Giulio Castiglione, Fabio Ralph, David J. |
description | Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported.
To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications.
The present review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration standards for systematic reviews. A systematic search for the terms penile fracture, fracture of penis, trauma of penis, rupture of corpora cavernosa, and immediate management of penile fracture was been carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index databases.
Etiology of penile fracture, clinical presentation, types of radiologic investigations and their accuracy, surgical approach, suture material used for tunica repair, timing of surgical exploration, intraoperative findings, surgical complications, and functional outcomes.
The total number of patients analyzed was 438, and the patients' an average age was 36 years. The most frequent reported cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse (80% of cases). The most common finding at examination was a penile hematoma (97.5%). Although operator dependent, in experienced hands, ultrasonography was found to be a useful tool in confirming the location of the albuginea tear and identifying the presence of any concomitant urethral injury, helping the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach. Early surgical repair of a penile fracture was found to be a safe procedure, although long-term complications are not uncommon. Tertiary referral centers that managed a larger number of cases seemed to obtain more satisfactory long-term results with a significantly smaller number of complications.
A low incidence of postoperative complications and full satisfactory functional outcomes are reported when early repair is performed in high-volume centers.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253–260. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936261330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2050052117300884</els_id><sourcerecordid>1936261330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9cbf3c93207c761fb277cbc948bce07469c2bcd4a11241c3b05f9b1dcfb7982c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKA0EQHEQxIeYHPMgevWycx75GvIRoVIgoas7DTG-vbNhHnJlV8_duSBRPNgVdh6qCKkJOGZ0wypKL1cR91XbCKUsntAeVB2TIaUxDGnN2-IcPyNi5Fe1PSiEieUwGPMvSSPB4SOazzlpsfPCgG_2G9Za2RfCETVlhMLcafGfxMpg2wXId-ja81h6Dl43zWGtfQvCMHyV-npCjQlcOx_s_Isv5zevsLlw83t7PposQRJz4UIIpBEjBaQppwgrD0xQMyCgzgDSNEgncQB5pxnjEQBgaF9KwHAqTyoyDGJHzXe7atu8dOq_q0gFWlW6w7ZxiUiQ8YULQXsp3UrCtcxYLtbZlre1GMaq2E6qV2k6othMq2oPK3nS2z-9Mjfmv5WewXnC1E2Dfsm9ulYMSG8C8tAhe5W35X_43_piBfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936261330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Falcone, Marco ; Garaffa, Giulio ; Castiglione, Fabio ; Ralph, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falcone, Marco ; Garaffa, Giulio ; Castiglione, Fabio ; Ralph, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported.
To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications.
The present review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration standards for systematic reviews. A systematic search for the terms penile fracture, fracture of penis, trauma of penis, rupture of corpora cavernosa, and immediate management of penile fracture was been carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index databases.
Etiology of penile fracture, clinical presentation, types of radiologic investigations and their accuracy, surgical approach, suture material used for tunica repair, timing of surgical exploration, intraoperative findings, surgical complications, and functional outcomes.
The total number of patients analyzed was 438, and the patients' an average age was 36 years. The most frequent reported cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse (80% of cases). The most common finding at examination was a penile hematoma (97.5%). Although operator dependent, in experienced hands, ultrasonography was found to be a useful tool in confirming the location of the albuginea tear and identifying the presence of any concomitant urethral injury, helping the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach. Early surgical repair of a penile fracture was found to be a safe procedure, although long-term complications are not uncommon. Tertiary referral centers that managed a larger number of cases seemed to obtain more satisfactory long-term results with a significantly smaller number of complications.
A low incidence of postoperative complications and full satisfactory functional outcomes are reported when early repair is performed in high-volume centers.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253–260.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28874325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Curvature ; Penile Fracture ; Penile Hematoma ; Penile Trauma ; Penis - injuries ; Penis - surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Rupture - diagnosis ; Rupture - etiology ; Rupture - surgery ; Urogenital Surgical Procedures</subject><ispartof>Sexual medicine reviews, 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.253-260</ispartof><rights>2017 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9cbf3c93207c761fb277cbc948bce07469c2bcd4a11241c3b05f9b1dcfb7982c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9cbf3c93207c761fb277cbc948bce07469c2bcd4a11241c3b05f9b1dcfb7982c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falcone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garaffa, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglione, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review</title><title>Sexual medicine reviews</title><addtitle>Sex Med Rev</addtitle><description>Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported.
To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications.
The present review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration standards for systematic reviews. A systematic search for the terms penile fracture, fracture of penis, trauma of penis, rupture of corpora cavernosa, and immediate management of penile fracture was been carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index databases.
Etiology of penile fracture, clinical presentation, types of radiologic investigations and their accuracy, surgical approach, suture material used for tunica repair, timing of surgical exploration, intraoperative findings, surgical complications, and functional outcomes.
The total number of patients analyzed was 438, and the patients' an average age was 36 years. The most frequent reported cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse (80% of cases). The most common finding at examination was a penile hematoma (97.5%). Although operator dependent, in experienced hands, ultrasonography was found to be a useful tool in confirming the location of the albuginea tear and identifying the presence of any concomitant urethral injury, helping the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach. Early surgical repair of a penile fracture was found to be a safe procedure, although long-term complications are not uncommon. Tertiary referral centers that managed a larger number of cases seemed to obtain more satisfactory long-term results with a significantly smaller number of complications.
A low incidence of postoperative complications and full satisfactory functional outcomes are reported when early repair is performed in high-volume centers.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253–260.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Penile Curvature</subject><subject>Penile Fracture</subject><subject>Penile Hematoma</subject><subject>Penile Trauma</subject><subject>Penis - injuries</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rupture - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rupture - etiology</subject><subject>Rupture - surgery</subject><subject>Urogenital Surgical Procedures</subject><issn>2050-0521</issn><issn>2050-0521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKA0EQHEQxIeYHPMgevWycx75GvIRoVIgoas7DTG-vbNhHnJlV8_duSBRPNgVdh6qCKkJOGZ0wypKL1cR91XbCKUsntAeVB2TIaUxDGnN2-IcPyNi5Fe1PSiEieUwGPMvSSPB4SOazzlpsfPCgG_2G9Za2RfCETVlhMLcafGfxMpg2wXId-ja81h6Dl43zWGtfQvCMHyV-npCjQlcOx_s_Isv5zevsLlw83t7PposQRJz4UIIpBEjBaQppwgrD0xQMyCgzgDSNEgncQB5pxnjEQBgaF9KwHAqTyoyDGJHzXe7atu8dOq_q0gFWlW6w7ZxiUiQ8YULQXsp3UrCtcxYLtbZlre1GMaq2E6qV2k6othMq2oPK3nS2z-9Mjfmv5WewXnC1E2Dfsm9ulYMSG8C8tAhe5W35X_43_piBfw</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Falcone, Marco</creator><creator>Garaffa, Giulio</creator><creator>Castiglione, Fabio</creator><creator>Ralph, David J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review</title><author>Falcone, Marco ; Garaffa, Giulio ; Castiglione, Fabio ; Ralph, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9cbf3c93207c761fb277cbc948bce07469c2bcd4a11241c3b05f9b1dcfb7982c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Penile Curvature</topic><topic>Penile Fracture</topic><topic>Penile Hematoma</topic><topic>Penile Trauma</topic><topic>Penis - injuries</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rupture - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rupture - etiology</topic><topic>Rupture - surgery</topic><topic>Urogenital Surgical Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falcone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garaffa, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglione, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexual medicine reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falcone, Marco</au><au>Garaffa, Giulio</au><au>Castiglione, Fabio</au><au>Ralph, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Sexual medicine reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Med Rev</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>253-260</pages><issn>2050-0521</issn><eissn>2050-0521</eissn><abstract>Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported.
To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications.
The present review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration standards for systematic reviews. A systematic search for the terms penile fracture, fracture of penis, trauma of penis, rupture of corpora cavernosa, and immediate management of penile fracture was been carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index databases.
Etiology of penile fracture, clinical presentation, types of radiologic investigations and their accuracy, surgical approach, suture material used for tunica repair, timing of surgical exploration, intraoperative findings, surgical complications, and functional outcomes.
The total number of patients analyzed was 438, and the patients' an average age was 36 years. The most frequent reported cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse (80% of cases). The most common finding at examination was a penile hematoma (97.5%). Although operator dependent, in experienced hands, ultrasonography was found to be a useful tool in confirming the location of the albuginea tear and identifying the presence of any concomitant urethral injury, helping the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach. Early surgical repair of a penile fracture was found to be a safe procedure, although long-term complications are not uncommon. Tertiary referral centers that managed a larger number of cases seemed to obtain more satisfactory long-term results with a significantly smaller number of complications.
A low incidence of postoperative complications and full satisfactory functional outcomes are reported when early repair is performed in high-volume centers.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253–260.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28874325</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-0521 |
ispartof | Sexual medicine reviews, 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.253-260 |
issn | 2050-0521 2050-0521 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936261330 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Journals |
subjects | Adult Erectile Dysfunction Humans Male Penile Curvature Penile Fracture Penile Hematoma Penile Trauma Penis - injuries Penis - surgery Postoperative Complications Rupture - diagnosis Rupture - etiology Rupture - surgery Urogenital Surgical Procedures |
title | Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T18%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Management%20of%20Penile%20Fracture:%20An%20Up-to-Date%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Sexual%20medicine%20reviews&rft.au=Falcone,%20Marco&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=253-260&rft.issn=2050-0521&rft.eissn=2050-0521&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1936261330%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936261330&rft_id=info:pmid/28874325&rft_els_id=S2050052117300884&rfr_iscdi=true |