Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review

The sural flap procedure is a versatile technique that can be used to cover many types of defects about the lower extremity. The management of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with underlying osteomyelitis is difficult. The goal for any of these patients is to create a biomechanically stab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & Ankle Specialist 2017-12, Vol.10 (6), p.560-566
Hauptverfasser: Persaud, Sham, Chesser, Anthony, Pereira, Ryan, Ross, Adrianne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 6
container_start_page 560
container_title Foot & Ankle Specialist
container_volume 10
creator Persaud, Sham
Chesser, Anthony
Pereira, Ryan
Ross, Adrianne
description The sural flap procedure is a versatile technique that can be used to cover many types of defects about the lower extremity. The management of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with underlying osteomyelitis is difficult. The goal for any of these patients is to create a biomechanically stable foot for weight-bearing purposes with no continued infection. Data were gathered using multiple databases from the years 2000 to 2016. Data were compiled looking at the number of subjects, age, comorbidities, number of complications, number of failures, and average flap size of complications/failures. A total of 110 patients were gathered using 5 separate articles. Twenty-two of the 110 patients had short-term complications. Flap failure was seen in 9/110 patients. A significant difference was noticed in flap size between flap failure and complication groups and nonfailure groups. The average flap size of patients who had some form of complication or failure was 51.87 cm2 in size. The average graft size for patients without complications during their recovery was 36.54 cm2. Within our study, the failure rate of 8.9% and complication rate of 13.7% are consistent with previous reports on sural perforator flaps. Last, with regard to the effect of flap size, there were significant differences between patients with a successful outcome and those who experienced complications or failures. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Systematic review
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1938640017729496
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936259360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1938640017729496</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1936259360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-10fd9bdd7fd29174c3d7a2399a2c8e37fceb094c6bbb4638e265da73581884693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UD1PwzAUtBCIlo-dCXlkIOA4qR2zIcSXVKmIUjFGjv0CrpK42A6oTPx0XLUwILG8d7p3d9I7hI5ScpamnJ-nIitYTkjEVOSCbaHhiko4y9j2Bq_uA7Tn_ZwQRljOdtGAFgXPCeND9DXtnWzwTSMXeOYB19bh8Ar4yYEMLXQB2xo_277THj-b8IpnnQbXLE33gic-gG2X0Jhg_AW-dbIOeGo-AUv84EAbFWKa6fCkD8q2cBr56TKaWhmMwo_wbuDjAO3UsvFwuNn7aHZz_XR1l4wnt_dXl-NE0RENSUpqLSqtea2pSHmuMs0lzYSQVBWQ8VpBRUSuWFVVOcsKoGykJc9GRVoUORPZPjpZ5y6cfevBh7I1XkHTyA5s78vYFaOjOEiUkrVUOeu9g7pcONNKtyxTUq56L__2Hi3Hm_S-akH_Gn6KjoJkLfDyBcq57V0Xv_0_8BswpIsZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936259360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Persaud, Sham ; Chesser, Anthony ; Pereira, Ryan ; Ross, Adrianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Sham ; Chesser, Anthony ; Pereira, Ryan ; Ross, Adrianne</creatorcontrib><description>The sural flap procedure is a versatile technique that can be used to cover many types of defects about the lower extremity. The management of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with underlying osteomyelitis is difficult. The goal for any of these patients is to create a biomechanically stable foot for weight-bearing purposes with no continued infection. Data were gathered using multiple databases from the years 2000 to 2016. Data were compiled looking at the number of subjects, age, comorbidities, number of complications, number of failures, and average flap size of complications/failures. A total of 110 patients were gathered using 5 separate articles. Twenty-two of the 110 patients had short-term complications. Flap failure was seen in 9/110 patients. A significant difference was noticed in flap size between flap failure and complication groups and nonfailure groups. The average flap size of patients who had some form of complication or failure was 51.87 cm2 in size. The average graft size for patients without complications during their recovery was 36.54 cm2. Within our study, the failure rate of 8.9% and complication rate of 13.7% are consistent with previous reports on sural perforator flaps. Last, with regard to the effect of flap size, there were significant differences between patients with a successful outcome and those who experienced complications or failures. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Systematic review</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-6400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1938640017729496</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28874067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Female ; Foot Injuries - diagnosis ; Foot Injuries - surgery ; Graft Rejection ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Leg Injuries - diagnosis ; Leg Injuries - surgery ; Male ; Myocutaneous Flap - blood supply ; Myocutaneous Flap - transplantation ; Osteomyelitis - diagnosis ; Osteomyelitis - surgery ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Soft Tissue Injuries - diagnosis ; Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; Ankle Specialist, 2017-12, Vol.10 (6), p.560-566</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-10fd9bdd7fd29174c3d7a2399a2c8e37fceb094c6bbb4638e265da73581884693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-10fd9bdd7fd29174c3d7a2399a2c8e37fceb094c6bbb4638e265da73581884693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1938640017729496$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1938640017729496$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Sham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Adrianne</creatorcontrib><title>Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review</title><title>Foot &amp; Ankle Specialist</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><description>The sural flap procedure is a versatile technique that can be used to cover many types of defects about the lower extremity. The management of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with underlying osteomyelitis is difficult. The goal for any of these patients is to create a biomechanically stable foot for weight-bearing purposes with no continued infection. Data were gathered using multiple databases from the years 2000 to 2016. Data were compiled looking at the number of subjects, age, comorbidities, number of complications, number of failures, and average flap size of complications/failures. A total of 110 patients were gathered using 5 separate articles. Twenty-two of the 110 patients had short-term complications. Flap failure was seen in 9/110 patients. A significant difference was noticed in flap size between flap failure and complication groups and nonfailure groups. The average flap size of patients who had some form of complication or failure was 51.87 cm2 in size. The average graft size for patients without complications during their recovery was 36.54 cm2. Within our study, the failure rate of 8.9% and complication rate of 13.7% are consistent with previous reports on sural perforator flaps. Last, with regard to the effect of flap size, there were significant differences between patients with a successful outcome and those who experienced complications or failures. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Systematic review</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Foot Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Rejection</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Myocutaneous Flap - blood supply</subject><subject>Myocutaneous Flap - transplantation</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - surgery</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>1938-6400</issn><issn>1938-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UD1PwzAUtBCIlo-dCXlkIOA4qR2zIcSXVKmIUjFGjv0CrpK42A6oTPx0XLUwILG8d7p3d9I7hI5ScpamnJ-nIitYTkjEVOSCbaHhiko4y9j2Bq_uA7Tn_ZwQRljOdtGAFgXPCeND9DXtnWzwTSMXeOYB19bh8Ar4yYEMLXQB2xo_277THj-b8IpnnQbXLE33gic-gG2X0Jhg_AW-dbIOeGo-AUv84EAbFWKa6fCkD8q2cBr56TKaWhmMwo_wbuDjAO3UsvFwuNn7aHZz_XR1l4wnt_dXl-NE0RENSUpqLSqtea2pSHmuMs0lzYSQVBWQ8VpBRUSuWFVVOcsKoGykJc9GRVoUORPZPjpZ5y6cfevBh7I1XkHTyA5s78vYFaOjOEiUkrVUOeu9g7pcONNKtyxTUq56L__2Hi3Hm_S-akH_Gn6KjoJkLfDyBcq57V0Xv_0_8BswpIsZ</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Persaud, Sham</creator><creator>Chesser, Anthony</creator><creator>Pereira, Ryan</creator><creator>Ross, Adrianne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review</title><author>Persaud, Sham ; Chesser, Anthony ; Pereira, Ryan ; Ross, Adrianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-10fd9bdd7fd29174c3d7a2399a2c8e37fceb094c6bbb4638e265da73581884693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Foot Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Rejection</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Myocutaneous Flap - blood supply</topic><topic>Myocutaneous Flap - transplantation</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - surgery</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Sham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Adrianne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; Ankle Specialist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Persaud, Sham</au><au>Chesser, Anthony</au><au>Pereira, Ryan</au><au>Ross, Adrianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; Ankle Specialist</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>560-566</pages><issn>1938-6400</issn><eissn>1938-7636</eissn><abstract>The sural flap procedure is a versatile technique that can be used to cover many types of defects about the lower extremity. The management of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity with underlying osteomyelitis is difficult. The goal for any of these patients is to create a biomechanically stable foot for weight-bearing purposes with no continued infection. Data were gathered using multiple databases from the years 2000 to 2016. Data were compiled looking at the number of subjects, age, comorbidities, number of complications, number of failures, and average flap size of complications/failures. A total of 110 patients were gathered using 5 separate articles. Twenty-two of the 110 patients had short-term complications. Flap failure was seen in 9/110 patients. A significant difference was noticed in flap size between flap failure and complication groups and nonfailure groups. The average flap size of patients who had some form of complication or failure was 51.87 cm2 in size. The average graft size for patients without complications during their recovery was 36.54 cm2. Within our study, the failure rate of 8.9% and complication rate of 13.7% are consistent with previous reports on sural perforator flaps. Last, with regard to the effect of flap size, there were significant differences between patients with a successful outcome and those who experienced complications or failures. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Systematic review</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28874067</pmid><doi>10.1177/1938640017729496</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-6400
ispartof Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2017-12, Vol.10 (6), p.560-566
issn 1938-6400
1938-7636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1936259360
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Female
Foot Injuries - diagnosis
Foot Injuries - surgery
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Leg Injuries - diagnosis
Leg Injuries - surgery
Male
Myocutaneous Flap - blood supply
Myocutaneous Flap - transplantation
Osteomyelitis - diagnosis
Osteomyelitis - surgery
Predictive Value of Tests
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Soft Tissue Injuries - diagnosis
Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing - physiology
title Sural Flap Use for the Treatment of Wounds With Underlying Osteomyelitis: Graft Size a Predictor in Outcome, a Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sural%20Flap%20Use%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Wounds%20With%20Underlying%20Osteomyelitis:%20Graft%20Size%20a%20Predictor%20in%20Outcome,%20a%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20Ankle%20Specialist&rft.au=Persaud,%20Sham&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=560-566&rft.issn=1938-6400&rft.eissn=1938-7636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1938640017729496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1936259360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936259360&rft_id=info:pmid/28874067&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1938640017729496&rfr_iscdi=true