Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anticancer research 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.5301-5307
Hauptverfasser: Kudou, Michihiro, Shiozaki, Atsushi, Fujiwara, Hitoshi, Konishi, Hirotaka, Shoda, Katsutoshi, Arita, Tomohiro, Kosuga, Toshiyuki, Morimura, Ryo, Murayama, Yasutoshi, Kuriu, Yoshiaki, Ikoma, Hisashi, Kubota, Takeshi, Nakanishi, Masayoshi, Okamoto, Kazuma, Dohi, Osamu, Konishi, Hideyuki, Naito, Yuji, Otsuji, Eigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5307
container_issue 9
container_start_page 5301
container_title Anticancer research
container_volume 37
creator Kudou, Michihiro
Shiozaki, Atsushi
Fujiwara, Hitoshi
Konishi, Hirotaka
Shoda, Katsutoshi
Arita, Tomohiro
Kosuga, Toshiyuki
Morimura, Ryo
Murayama, Yasutoshi
Kuriu, Yoshiaki
Ikoma, Hisashi
Kubota, Takeshi
Nakanishi, Masayoshi
Okamoto, Kazuma
Dohi, Osamu
Konishi, Hideyuki
Naito, Yuji
Otsuji, Eigo
description This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases). Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases. AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.
doi_str_mv 10.21873/anticanres.11956
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1935814152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1935814152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-b07c93b6808af871b8b9d812cd42278ba630245793b7fe57fd8447c11056feb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMlOwzAURS0EoqXwAWxQlmxSPMTTsiphkCohMawjx7GLURoHO1n07zEdYPWe3j3vLg4A1wjOMRKc3KlucFp1wcQ5QpKyEzBFXKKcUwJPwRRiCnMOIZ2Aixi_IGRMCnIOJlgIDiUTUxBKa1OF3mbeZoumcYPznWqztzGs073NXk00-veYLexgQlZ2jY_a904npt6M2sdE3bt4xKwPKelNSL0uRWX0_adam7QuVadNuARnVrXRXB3mDHw8lO_Lp3z18vi8XKxyjSUb8hpyLUnNBBTKCo5qUctGIKybAmMuasUIxAXlieHWUG4bURRcIwQps6amZAZu97198N-jiUO1cVGbtlWd8WOskCRUoAJRnFC0R3XwMQZjqz64jQrbCsFqp7r6V13tVKefm0N90mCav4-jW_IDkTJ-GQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935814152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kudou, Michihiro ; Shiozaki, Atsushi ; Fujiwara, Hitoshi ; Konishi, Hirotaka ; Shoda, Katsutoshi ; Arita, Tomohiro ; Kosuga, Toshiyuki ; Morimura, Ryo ; Murayama, Yasutoshi ; Kuriu, Yoshiaki ; Ikoma, Hisashi ; Kubota, Takeshi ; Nakanishi, Masayoshi ; Okamoto, Kazuma ; Dohi, Osamu ; Konishi, Hideyuki ; Naito, Yuji ; Otsuji, Eigo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kudou, Michihiro ; Shiozaki, Atsushi ; Fujiwara, Hitoshi ; Konishi, Hirotaka ; Shoda, Katsutoshi ; Arita, Tomohiro ; Kosuga, Toshiyuki ; Morimura, Ryo ; Murayama, Yasutoshi ; Kuriu, Yoshiaki ; Ikoma, Hisashi ; Kubota, Takeshi ; Nakanishi, Masayoshi ; Okamoto, Kazuma ; Dohi, Osamu ; Konishi, Hideyuki ; Naito, Yuji ; Otsuji, Eigo</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases). Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases. AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-7005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28870968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece</publisher><subject>Aged ; Disease-Free Survival ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Anticancer research, 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.5301-5307</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28870968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kudou, Michihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiozaki, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoda, Katsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosuga, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimura, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murayama, Yasutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuriu, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikoma, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuji, Eigo</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer</title><title>Anticancer research</title><addtitle>Anticancer Res</addtitle><description>This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases). Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases. AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0250-7005</issn><issn>1791-7530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMlOwzAURS0EoqXwAWxQlmxSPMTTsiphkCohMawjx7GLURoHO1n07zEdYPWe3j3vLg4A1wjOMRKc3KlucFp1wcQ5QpKyEzBFXKKcUwJPwRRiCnMOIZ2Aixi_IGRMCnIOJlgIDiUTUxBKa1OF3mbeZoumcYPznWqztzGs073NXk00-veYLexgQlZ2jY_a904npt6M2sdE3bt4xKwPKelNSL0uRWX0_adam7QuVadNuARnVrXRXB3mDHw8lO_Lp3z18vi8XKxyjSUb8hpyLUnNBBTKCo5qUctGIKybAmMuasUIxAXlieHWUG4bURRcIwQps6amZAZu97198N-jiUO1cVGbtlWd8WOskCRUoAJRnFC0R3XwMQZjqz64jQrbCsFqp7r6V13tVKefm0N90mCav4-jW_IDkTJ-GQ</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Kudou, Michihiro</creator><creator>Shiozaki, Atsushi</creator><creator>Fujiwara, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Konishi, Hirotaka</creator><creator>Shoda, Katsutoshi</creator><creator>Arita, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Kosuga, Toshiyuki</creator><creator>Morimura, Ryo</creator><creator>Murayama, Yasutoshi</creator><creator>Kuriu, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Ikoma, Hisashi</creator><creator>Kubota, Takeshi</creator><creator>Nakanishi, Masayoshi</creator><creator>Okamoto, Kazuma</creator><creator>Dohi, Osamu</creator><creator>Konishi, Hideyuki</creator><creator>Naito, Yuji</creator><creator>Otsuji, Eigo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer</title><author>Kudou, Michihiro ; Shiozaki, Atsushi ; Fujiwara, Hitoshi ; Konishi, Hirotaka ; Shoda, Katsutoshi ; Arita, Tomohiro ; Kosuga, Toshiyuki ; Morimura, Ryo ; Murayama, Yasutoshi ; Kuriu, Yoshiaki ; Ikoma, Hisashi ; Kubota, Takeshi ; Nakanishi, Masayoshi ; Okamoto, Kazuma ; Dohi, Osamu ; Konishi, Hideyuki ; Naito, Yuji ; Otsuji, Eigo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-b07c93b6808af871b8b9d812cd42278ba630245793b7fe57fd8447c11056feb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kudou, Michihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiozaki, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoda, Katsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosuga, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimura, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murayama, Yasutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuriu, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikoma, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuji, Eigo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anticancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kudou, Michihiro</au><au>Shiozaki, Atsushi</au><au>Fujiwara, Hitoshi</au><au>Konishi, Hirotaka</au><au>Shoda, Katsutoshi</au><au>Arita, Tomohiro</au><au>Kosuga, Toshiyuki</au><au>Morimura, Ryo</au><au>Murayama, Yasutoshi</au><au>Kuriu, Yoshiaki</au><au>Ikoma, Hisashi</au><au>Kubota, Takeshi</au><au>Nakanishi, Masayoshi</au><au>Okamoto, Kazuma</au><au>Dohi, Osamu</au><au>Konishi, Hideyuki</au><au>Naito, Yuji</au><au>Otsuji, Eigo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Anticancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Anticancer Res</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5301</spage><epage>5307</epage><pages>5301-5307</pages><issn>0250-7005</issn><eissn>1791-7530</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases). Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases. AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pmid>28870968</pmid><doi>10.21873/anticanres.11956</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0250-7005
ispartof Anticancer research, 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.5301-5307
issn 0250-7005
1791-7530
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1935814152
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Disease-Free Survival
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Additional%20Surgical%20Resection%20After%20Endoscopic%20Submucosal%20Dissection%20for%20Superficial%20Esophageal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Anticancer%20research&rft.au=Kudou,%20Michihiro&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5301&rft.epage=5307&rft.pages=5301-5307&rft.issn=0250-7005&rft.eissn=1791-7530&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/anticanres.11956&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1935814152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935814152&rft_id=info:pmid/28870968&rfr_iscdi=true