The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues
Telehealth is a way to provide health-care services to a patient from a provider who is at another location. The most common methods include a live interactive visit with the patient, interpretation of imaging, and monitoring of patient progress. Principally, telehealth is a way of providing a servi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-09, Vol.99 (17), p.e93-e93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | e93 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Wongworawat, Montri D. Capistrant, Gary Stephenson, John M. |
description | Telehealth is a way to provide health-care services to a patient from a provider who is at another location. The most common methods include a live interactive visit with the patient, interpretation of imaging, and monitoring of patient progress. Principally, telehealth is a way of providing a service rather than a type of service. It is about patient care, not data care.Examples of orthopaedic applications include conducting patient examinations, interpreting imaging studies, and providing postoperative care. Teleconsultation has been shown to be cost-effective. Other examples in orthopaedic research include the application of telemedicine when measuring patient-reported outcomes. Especially in cases when the patient lives far away from the provider, telehealth reduces time, produces good patient satisfaction, and costs less than hands-on care. As in everyday life, consumers have learned to demand convenience, ease of use, choice, control, and direct access. The ubiquity of telecommunications, combined with consumer technology savviness, drives the demand for telehealth. Unfortunately, the nation's largest payer for health services is one of the most restrictive for telehealth coverage. Medicare's restrictions are mostly the work of the U.S. Congress under Part B law. Video visits are very narrowly covered. Another major policy barrier is that interstate telehealth requires multiple state licenses for the physician, who must be licensed in the jurisdiction of each patient as well as the provider's physical locations. As Medicare shifts toward capitated payment and other value-based methods, there are opportunities to remove such restrictions.Despite these challenges, some states have been proactive in implementing telehealth systems. Arkansas is one of these states, and being a rural state with 2 main population centers, specialty care is relatively sparse. Implemented in 2014, the hand trauma program has been a partnership between the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Arkansas Trauma Communications Center (ATCC). This program has been very successful in decreasing the rate of hand trauma transfer, allowing patients to be treated closer to home while having coordinated access to fellowship-trained hand surgeons when necessary.More widespread innovation of orthopaedic applications for telehealth requires physician buy-in and health-systems partnerships. The regulatory environment will need streamlining. Ultimately, consumer demand |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.16.01095 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1935813179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1935813179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2243-3f2f1bcb6751dfa65d753e0015a4ec44cebedaba8277210cc9a3b69d2ce923cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFv0zAUxq0JxLrBcVfkI5eU9-zYSbiVio1OlXqgO1uO86IG0jjYDtX-e9J1cHrS00_fp-_H2B3CUiDoz49fH38sUS8BoVJXbIFKqgxlqd-wBYDArJJKXbObGH8CQJ5D8Y5di7IsxAwu2NP-QHw3jj6kaejSM1-dbJciT55vyTZ8F9LBj5aazvE99XQg26cD3wyD_2NT54cvfLVb8XXoUudszzcxThTfs7et7SN9eL237On-2379PdvuHjbr1TZzQuQyk61osXa1LhQ2rdWqKZQkAFQ2J5fnjmpqbG1LURTzWOcqK2tdNcJRJaRz8pZ9uuSOwf-ee5M5dtFR39uB_BQNzuNLlFhUM5pdUBd8jIFaM4buaMOzQTBnk-Zs0qA2LyZn_uNr9FQfqflP_1M3A_kFOPk-UYi_-ulEwVwEGTjL1kJmArCACjRk8wel_Atmon4t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935813179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wongworawat, Montri D. ; Capistrant, Gary ; Stephenson, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wongworawat, Montri D. ; Capistrant, Gary ; Stephenson, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>Telehealth is a way to provide health-care services to a patient from a provider who is at another location. The most common methods include a live interactive visit with the patient, interpretation of imaging, and monitoring of patient progress. Principally, telehealth is a way of providing a service rather than a type of service. It is about patient care, not data care.Examples of orthopaedic applications include conducting patient examinations, interpreting imaging studies, and providing postoperative care. Teleconsultation has been shown to be cost-effective. Other examples in orthopaedic research include the application of telemedicine when measuring patient-reported outcomes. Especially in cases when the patient lives far away from the provider, telehealth reduces time, produces good patient satisfaction, and costs less than hands-on care. As in everyday life, consumers have learned to demand convenience, ease of use, choice, control, and direct access. The ubiquity of telecommunications, combined with consumer technology savviness, drives the demand for telehealth. Unfortunately, the nation's largest payer for health services is one of the most restrictive for telehealth coverage. Medicare's restrictions are mostly the work of the U.S. Congress under Part B law. Video visits are very narrowly covered. Another major policy barrier is that interstate telehealth requires multiple state licenses for the physician, who must be licensed in the jurisdiction of each patient as well as the provider's physical locations. As Medicare shifts toward capitated payment and other value-based methods, there are opportunities to remove such restrictions.Despite these challenges, some states have been proactive in implementing telehealth systems. Arkansas is one of these states, and being a rural state with 2 main population centers, specialty care is relatively sparse. Implemented in 2014, the hand trauma program has been a partnership between the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Arkansas Trauma Communications Center (ATCC). This program has been very successful in decreasing the rate of hand trauma transfer, allowing patients to be treated closer to home while having coordinated access to fellowship-trained hand surgeons when necessary.More widespread innovation of orthopaedic applications for telehealth requires physician buy-in and health-systems partnerships. The regulatory environment will need streamlining. Ultimately, consumer demand will drive the implementation of technology to make care more accessible, convenient, and cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01095</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28872535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Orthopedics ; Telemedicine ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-09, Vol.99 (17), p.e93-e93</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2243-3f2f1bcb6751dfa65d753e0015a4ec44cebedaba8277210cc9a3b69d2ce923cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2530-5612</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28872535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wongworawat, Montri D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capistrant, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Telehealth is a way to provide health-care services to a patient from a provider who is at another location. The most common methods include a live interactive visit with the patient, interpretation of imaging, and monitoring of patient progress. Principally, telehealth is a way of providing a service rather than a type of service. It is about patient care, not data care.Examples of orthopaedic applications include conducting patient examinations, interpreting imaging studies, and providing postoperative care. Teleconsultation has been shown to be cost-effective. Other examples in orthopaedic research include the application of telemedicine when measuring patient-reported outcomes. Especially in cases when the patient lives far away from the provider, telehealth reduces time, produces good patient satisfaction, and costs less than hands-on care. As in everyday life, consumers have learned to demand convenience, ease of use, choice, control, and direct access. The ubiquity of telecommunications, combined with consumer technology savviness, drives the demand for telehealth. Unfortunately, the nation's largest payer for health services is one of the most restrictive for telehealth coverage. Medicare's restrictions are mostly the work of the U.S. Congress under Part B law. Video visits are very narrowly covered. Another major policy barrier is that interstate telehealth requires multiple state licenses for the physician, who must be licensed in the jurisdiction of each patient as well as the provider's physical locations. As Medicare shifts toward capitated payment and other value-based methods, there are opportunities to remove such restrictions.Despite these challenges, some states have been proactive in implementing telehealth systems. Arkansas is one of these states, and being a rural state with 2 main population centers, specialty care is relatively sparse. Implemented in 2014, the hand trauma program has been a partnership between the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Arkansas Trauma Communications Center (ATCC). This program has been very successful in decreasing the rate of hand trauma transfer, allowing patients to be treated closer to home while having coordinated access to fellowship-trained hand surgeons when necessary.More widespread innovation of orthopaedic applications for telehealth requires physician buy-in and health-systems partnerships. The regulatory environment will need streamlining. Ultimately, consumer demand will drive the implementation of technology to make care more accessible, convenient, and cost-effective.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFv0zAUxq0JxLrBcVfkI5eU9-zYSbiVio1OlXqgO1uO86IG0jjYDtX-e9J1cHrS00_fp-_H2B3CUiDoz49fH38sUS8BoVJXbIFKqgxlqd-wBYDArJJKXbObGH8CQJ5D8Y5di7IsxAwu2NP-QHw3jj6kaejSM1-dbJciT55vyTZ8F9LBj5aazvE99XQg26cD3wyD_2NT54cvfLVb8XXoUudszzcxThTfs7et7SN9eL237On-2379PdvuHjbr1TZzQuQyk61osXa1LhQ2rdWqKZQkAFQ2J5fnjmpqbG1LURTzWOcqK2tdNcJRJaRz8pZ9uuSOwf-ee5M5dtFR39uB_BQNzuNLlFhUM5pdUBd8jIFaM4buaMOzQTBnk-Zs0qA2LyZn_uNr9FQfqflP_1M3A_kFOPk-UYi_-ulEwVwEGTjL1kJmArCACjRk8wel_Atmon4t</recordid><startdate>20170906</startdate><enddate>20170906</enddate><creator>Wongworawat, Montri D.</creator><creator>Capistrant, Gary</creator><creator>Stephenson, John M.</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-5612</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170906</creationdate><title>The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues</title><author>Wongworawat, Montri D. ; Capistrant, Gary ; Stephenson, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2243-3f2f1bcb6751dfa65d753e0015a4ec44cebedaba8277210cc9a3b69d2ce923cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wongworawat, Montri D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capistrant, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wongworawat, Montri D.</au><au>Capistrant, Gary</au><au>Stephenson, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-09-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>e93</spage><epage>e93</epage><pages>e93-e93</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Telehealth is a way to provide health-care services to a patient from a provider who is at another location. The most common methods include a live interactive visit with the patient, interpretation of imaging, and monitoring of patient progress. Principally, telehealth is a way of providing a service rather than a type of service. It is about patient care, not data care.Examples of orthopaedic applications include conducting patient examinations, interpreting imaging studies, and providing postoperative care. Teleconsultation has been shown to be cost-effective. Other examples in orthopaedic research include the application of telemedicine when measuring patient-reported outcomes. Especially in cases when the patient lives far away from the provider, telehealth reduces time, produces good patient satisfaction, and costs less than hands-on care. As in everyday life, consumers have learned to demand convenience, ease of use, choice, control, and direct access. The ubiquity of telecommunications, combined with consumer technology savviness, drives the demand for telehealth. Unfortunately, the nation's largest payer for health services is one of the most restrictive for telehealth coverage. Medicare's restrictions are mostly the work of the U.S. Congress under Part B law. Video visits are very narrowly covered. Another major policy barrier is that interstate telehealth requires multiple state licenses for the physician, who must be licensed in the jurisdiction of each patient as well as the provider's physical locations. As Medicare shifts toward capitated payment and other value-based methods, there are opportunities to remove such restrictions.Despite these challenges, some states have been proactive in implementing telehealth systems. Arkansas is one of these states, and being a rural state with 2 main population centers, specialty care is relatively sparse. Implemented in 2014, the hand trauma program has been a partnership between the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Arkansas Trauma Communications Center (ATCC). This program has been very successful in decreasing the rate of hand trauma transfer, allowing patients to be treated closer to home while having coordinated access to fellowship-trained hand surgeons when necessary.More widespread innovation of orthopaedic applications for telehealth requires physician buy-in and health-systems partnerships. The regulatory environment will need streamlining. Ultimately, consumer demand will drive the implementation of technology to make care more accessible, convenient, and cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>28872535</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.01095</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-5612</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-09, Vol.99 (17), p.e93-e93 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1935813179 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Humans Orthopedics Telemedicine United States |
title | The Opportunity Awaits to Lead Orthopaedic Telehealth Innovation: AOA Critical Issues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Opportunity%20Awaits%20to%20Lead%20Orthopaedic%20Telehealth%20Innovation:%20AOA%20Critical%20Issues&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Wongworawat,%20Montri%20D.&rft.date=2017-09-06&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=e93&rft.epage=e93&rft.pages=e93-e93&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.01095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1935813179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935813179&rft_id=info:pmid/28872535&rfr_iscdi=true |