Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors
Vigilant behavior in wild ungulates is critical to guard against predation. However, few studies have examined vigilant behavior in domesticated ungulates. Considering the expansion of large predator populations, understanding vigilant behavior and factors that influence it will help with the manage...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rangeland ecology & management 2008-05, Vol.61 (3), p.321-328 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 328 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | Rangeland ecology & management |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Kluever, Bryan M. Breck, Stewart W. Howery, Larry D. Krausman, Paul R. Bergman, David L. |
description | Vigilant behavior in wild ungulates is critical to guard against predation. However, few studies have examined vigilant behavior in domesticated ungulates. Considering the expansion of large predator populations, understanding vigilant behavior and factors that influence it will help with the management of livestock. We observed adult female cattle (Bos taurus L.) in open-range conditions where large predators (wolves [Canis lupus L.] and mountain lions [Puma concolor (L.).]) were common threats during summers of 2005 and 2006 in eastern Arizona. This study was designed to determine 1) to what extent cattle exhibit vigilant behavior compared to published data on wild ungulates, 2) whether predation events influence vigilance rates of cattle, and 3) whether social and environmental factors affect vigilance of cattle. Cattle exhibited vigilant behavior (3% ± 0.19%) during peak foraging periods, but at a lower rate than wild ungulates. Cows with calves were more than twice as vigilant (4.5% ± 0.46%) as those without calves (2.0% ± 0.27%). Single cattle and groups of two to five exhibited higher vigilance rates (4.2% ± 0.79%) than groups of six to 20 (2.5% ± 0.32%) and groups of > 20 (3.0% ± 0.41%). Cattle in groups of > 20 increased vigilance as visual obstruction increased. Mother cows whose calves were preyed upon (n = 5) exhibited a 3% to 48% increase in vigilance within 3 d after their calves were killed; this rate returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Conversely, mother cows reduced foraging after their calves were killed from 88.5% ± 1.69% to 43.5% ± 11.4%; foraging rate also returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Cattle exhibit vigilance at lower levels compared to wild ungulates, but this behavior appears to be at least partially an antipredatory behavior. Our findings provide support that predators can influence cattle behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2111/07-087.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19342865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25146788</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742408500418</els_id><sourcerecordid>25146788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b439t-9caf12dcac6aaa77354d0bfab80ae0225bdf4b40057e869351eaf0e1803512663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFr1UAQhYMoWKvgHxCDD8WHpp3Z7GYT3-TSaqFgoa2vy2QzqXvJ3a27uYX-ezem-CD6NMOcj5k5pyjeIpwIRDwFXUGrT_BZcYBKYaVAtM9_91BpKeTL4lVKW4C6QdQHhfnu7txE3nLpfLmheZ74U3nzg8sLP057XoQwlleRB5pd8MfldbCOpizPHMkus3Rckh_KM__gYvA79nPWz7MWYnpdvBhpSvzmqR4Wt-dnN5uv1eW3Lxebz5dVL-turjpLI4rBkm2ISOtayQH6kfoWiEEI1Q-j7CWA0tw2Xa2QaQTGFnIrmqY-LI7Wvfcx_Nxzms3OJctTtsZhnwx2tRRtozL44S9wG_bR59-MQAGikV2boY8rZGNIKfJo7qPbUXw0CGaJ2YA2OWaDGX23otuU_f7hhELZ6HZZ9X7VRwqG7qJL5vZaANYAHSqQIhNiJTjn8-A4mmTdEvzgItvZDMH96-yT396F4Pn___0CX3md6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212026498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Kluever, Bryan M. ; Breck, Stewart W. ; Howery, Larry D. ; Krausman, Paul R. ; Bergman, David L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kluever, Bryan M. ; Breck, Stewart W. ; Howery, Larry D. ; Krausman, Paul R. ; Bergman, David L.</creatorcontrib><description>Vigilant behavior in wild ungulates is critical to guard against predation. However, few studies have examined vigilant behavior in domesticated ungulates. Considering the expansion of large predator populations, understanding vigilant behavior and factors that influence it will help with the management of livestock. We observed adult female cattle (Bos taurus L.) in open-range conditions where large predators (wolves [Canis lupus L.] and mountain lions [Puma concolor (L.).]) were common threats during summers of 2005 and 2006 in eastern Arizona. This study was designed to determine 1) to what extent cattle exhibit vigilant behavior compared to published data on wild ungulates, 2) whether predation events influence vigilance rates of cattle, and 3) whether social and environmental factors affect vigilance of cattle. Cattle exhibited vigilant behavior (3% ± 0.19%) during peak foraging periods, but at a lower rate than wild ungulates. Cows with calves were more than twice as vigilant (4.5% ± 0.46%) as those without calves (2.0% ± 0.27%). Single cattle and groups of two to five exhibited higher vigilance rates (4.2% ± 0.79%) than groups of six to 20 (2.5% ± 0.32%) and groups of > 20 (3.0% ± 0.41%). Cattle in groups of > 20 increased vigilance as visual obstruction increased. Mother cows whose calves were preyed upon (n = 5) exhibited a 3% to 48% increase in vigilance within 3 d after their calves were killed; this rate returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Conversely, mother cows reduced foraging after their calves were killed from 88.5% ± 1.69% to 43.5% ± 11.4%; foraging rate also returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Cattle exhibit vigilance at lower levels compared to wild ungulates, but this behavior appears to be at least partially an antipredatory behavior. Our findings provide support that predators can influence cattle behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/07-087.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044: Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Birds ; Bos taurus ; Calves ; Canis lupus ; Cattle ; domestic animals ; Environment ; females ; Foraging ; foraging behavior ; Group size ; herbivore ; Influence ; lactation status ; Livestock ; Predation ; predator-prey relationships ; Predators ; Puma concolor ; Research Papers ; Sample size ; ungulate ; Ungulates ; Vegetation ; vigilance behavior ; wild animals ; wildlife-livestock relations ; Wolves</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology & management, 2008-05, Vol.61 (3), p.321-328</ispartof><rights>Society for Range Management</rights><rights>2008 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b439t-9caf12dcac6aaa77354d0bfab80ae0225bdf4b40057e869351eaf0e1803512663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b439t-9caf12dcac6aaa77354d0bfab80ae0225bdf4b40057e869351eaf0e1803512663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2111/07-087.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,26955,27901,27902,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kluever, Bryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breck, Stewart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howery, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krausman, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, David L.</creatorcontrib><title>Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors</title><title>Rangeland ecology & management</title><description>Vigilant behavior in wild ungulates is critical to guard against predation. However, few studies have examined vigilant behavior in domesticated ungulates. Considering the expansion of large predator populations, understanding vigilant behavior and factors that influence it will help with the management of livestock. We observed adult female cattle (Bos taurus L.) in open-range conditions where large predators (wolves [Canis lupus L.] and mountain lions [Puma concolor (L.).]) were common threats during summers of 2005 and 2006 in eastern Arizona. This study was designed to determine 1) to what extent cattle exhibit vigilant behavior compared to published data on wild ungulates, 2) whether predation events influence vigilance rates of cattle, and 3) whether social and environmental factors affect vigilance of cattle. Cattle exhibited vigilant behavior (3% ± 0.19%) during peak foraging periods, but at a lower rate than wild ungulates. Cows with calves were more than twice as vigilant (4.5% ± 0.46%) as those without calves (2.0% ± 0.27%). Single cattle and groups of two to five exhibited higher vigilance rates (4.2% ± 0.79%) than groups of six to 20 (2.5% ± 0.32%) and groups of > 20 (3.0% ± 0.41%). Cattle in groups of > 20 increased vigilance as visual obstruction increased. Mother cows whose calves were preyed upon (n = 5) exhibited a 3% to 48% increase in vigilance within 3 d after their calves were killed; this rate returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Conversely, mother cows reduced foraging after their calves were killed from 88.5% ± 1.69% to 43.5% ± 11.4%; foraging rate also returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Cattle exhibit vigilance at lower levels compared to wild ungulates, but this behavior appears to be at least partially an antipredatory behavior. Our findings provide support that predators can influence cattle behavior.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bos taurus</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>domestic animals</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>foraging behavior</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>herbivore</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>lactation status</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predator-prey relationships</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Puma concolor</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>ungulate</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vigilance behavior</subject><subject>wild animals</subject><subject>wildlife-livestock relations</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFr1UAQhYMoWKvgHxCDD8WHpp3Z7GYT3-TSaqFgoa2vy2QzqXvJ3a27uYX-ezem-CD6NMOcj5k5pyjeIpwIRDwFXUGrT_BZcYBKYaVAtM9_91BpKeTL4lVKW4C6QdQHhfnu7txE3nLpfLmheZ74U3nzg8sLP057XoQwlleRB5pd8MfldbCOpizPHMkus3Rckh_KM__gYvA79nPWz7MWYnpdvBhpSvzmqR4Wt-dnN5uv1eW3Lxebz5dVL-turjpLI4rBkm2ISOtayQH6kfoWiEEI1Q-j7CWA0tw2Xa2QaQTGFnIrmqY-LI7Wvfcx_Nxzms3OJctTtsZhnwx2tRRtozL44S9wG_bR59-MQAGikV2boY8rZGNIKfJo7qPbUXw0CGaJ2YA2OWaDGX23otuU_f7hhELZ6HZZ9X7VRwqG7qJL5vZaANYAHSqQIhNiJTjn8-A4mmTdEvzgItvZDMH96-yT396F4Pn___0CX3md6Q</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Kluever, Bryan M.</creator><creator>Breck, Stewart W.</creator><creator>Howery, Larry D.</creator><creator>Krausman, Paul R.</creator><creator>Bergman, David L.</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Pres Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors</title><author>Kluever, Bryan M. ; Breck, Stewart W. ; Howery, Larry D. ; Krausman, Paul R. ; Bergman, David L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b439t-9caf12dcac6aaa77354d0bfab80ae0225bdf4b40057e869351eaf0e1803512663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bos taurus</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>domestic animals</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>foraging behavior</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>herbivore</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>lactation status</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predator-prey relationships</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Puma concolor</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>ungulate</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vigilance behavior</topic><topic>wild animals</topic><topic>wildlife-livestock relations</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kluever, Bryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breck, Stewart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howery, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krausman, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, David L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kluever, Bryan M.</au><au>Breck, Stewart W.</au><au>Howery, Larry D.</au><au>Krausman, Paul R.</au><au>Bergman, David L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>321-328</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Vigilant behavior in wild ungulates is critical to guard against predation. However, few studies have examined vigilant behavior in domesticated ungulates. Considering the expansion of large predator populations, understanding vigilant behavior and factors that influence it will help with the management of livestock. We observed adult female cattle (Bos taurus L.) in open-range conditions where large predators (wolves [Canis lupus L.] and mountain lions [Puma concolor (L.).]) were common threats during summers of 2005 and 2006 in eastern Arizona. This study was designed to determine 1) to what extent cattle exhibit vigilant behavior compared to published data on wild ungulates, 2) whether predation events influence vigilance rates of cattle, and 3) whether social and environmental factors affect vigilance of cattle. Cattle exhibited vigilant behavior (3% ± 0.19%) during peak foraging periods, but at a lower rate than wild ungulates. Cows with calves were more than twice as vigilant (4.5% ± 0.46%) as those without calves (2.0% ± 0.27%). Single cattle and groups of two to five exhibited higher vigilance rates (4.2% ± 0.79%) than groups of six to 20 (2.5% ± 0.32%) and groups of > 20 (3.0% ± 0.41%). Cattle in groups of > 20 increased vigilance as visual obstruction increased. Mother cows whose calves were preyed upon (n = 5) exhibited a 3% to 48% increase in vigilance within 3 d after their calves were killed; this rate returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Conversely, mother cows reduced foraging after their calves were killed from 88.5% ± 1.69% to 43.5% ± 11.4%; foraging rate also returned to near baseline levels after 10 d. Cattle exhibit vigilance at lower levels compared to wild ungulates, but this behavior appears to be at least partially an antipredatory behavior. Our findings provide support that predators can influence cattle behavior.</abstract><cop>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044</cop><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/07-087.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7424 |
ispartof | Rangeland ecology & management, 2008-05, Vol.61 (3), p.321-328 |
issn | 1550-7424 1551-5028 1551-5028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19342865 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; BioOne Complete |
subjects | Animal behavior Birds Bos taurus Calves Canis lupus Cattle domestic animals Environment females Foraging foraging behavior Group size herbivore Influence lactation status Livestock Predation predator-prey relationships Predators Puma concolor Research Papers Sample size ungulate Ungulates Vegetation vigilance behavior wild animals wildlife-livestock relations Wolves |
title | Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vigilance%20in%20Cattle:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Predation,%20Social%20Interactions,%20and%20Environmental%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Kluever,%20Bryan%20M.&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=321-328&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/07-087.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25146788%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212026498&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25146788&rft_els_id=S1550742408500418&rfr_iscdi=true |