Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract

The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of oral sciences 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384
Hauptverfasser: Wessel, Stefan W., Mei, Henny C., Slomp, Anje M., Belt‐Gritter, Betsy, Dodds, Michael W. J., Busscher, Henk J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 5
container_start_page 379
container_title European journal of oral sciences
container_volume 125
creator Wessel, Stefan W.
Mei, Henny C.
Slomp, Anje M.
Belt‐Gritter, Betsy
Dodds, Michael W. J.
Busscher, Henk J.
description The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eos.12370
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1934281933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1934281933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9P2zAYBnALDUEHHPYFJku7wCHgP41jH1FVGBKoh27nyHFft2ZJXOwE6A3xCfYZ90lwCeOAhA-2LP_06JUfhL5RckrTOgMfTynjBdlBIyoIyUjB2Bc0IoqoTEou9tHXGG8JoZyqYg_tMynzghVqhJ7nUNt_T3_XEAy4e1jgxvfdygLUWLcLvF5tojM-CbOCxhld49gHqw1gsBZMF7G2HQScnh9cu8TLvonY-LbTrt3eow-V6_yQdqOXra-dxpUOfzA8dkGb7hDtWl1HOHo7D9Dvi-mvyc_senZ5NTm_zgyXkmTAx4pWQnJtraCqAmPoguuqYszq9AvKFiwfayssT0gKmoPIZXoXRhiiJD9Ax0PuOvi7HmJXNi4aqGvdgu9jSRUfM5l2nuiPD_TW96FN021VzjhNsyR1MigTfIwBbLkOrtFhU1JSbospUzHlazHJfn9L7KsGFu_yfxMJnA3gwdWw-TypnM7mQ-QLG5SbQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935231491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><description>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eos.12370</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28857279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bacteria ; Bark ; Chewing Gum ; Contact angle ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dentistry ; Female ; Food ; Food safety ; Gingiva ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Hydrophobicity ; Magnolia ; Male ; Mastication ; Middle Aged ; Neutralization ; oral moistness ; oral sensing ; pH effects ; Photoelectron spectroscopy ; Plant Bark - chemistry ; Plant Extracts - pharmacology ; Saliva ; Saliva - secretion ; salivary film composition ; Self Report ; Smoothness ; Sorbitol ; Sorbitol - pharmacology ; Spectroscopy ; Sugar ; sugar‐free chewing gum ; Surface Properties ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teeth ; tooth hydrophobicity</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384</ispartof><rights>2017 Eur J Oral Sci</rights><rights>2017 Eur J Oral Sci.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Journal of Oral Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feos.12370$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feos.12370$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28857279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slomp, Anje M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Chewing Gum</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Gingiva</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Magnolia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mastication</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>oral moistness</subject><subject>oral sensing</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><subject>Plant Bark - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Saliva - secretion</subject><subject>salivary film composition</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Smoothness</subject><subject>Sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugar‐free chewing gum</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>tooth hydrophobicity</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9P2zAYBnALDUEHHPYFJku7wCHgP41jH1FVGBKoh27nyHFft2ZJXOwE6A3xCfYZ90lwCeOAhA-2LP_06JUfhL5RckrTOgMfTynjBdlBIyoIyUjB2Bc0IoqoTEou9tHXGG8JoZyqYg_tMynzghVqhJ7nUNt_T3_XEAy4e1jgxvfdygLUWLcLvF5tojM-CbOCxhld49gHqw1gsBZMF7G2HQScnh9cu8TLvonY-LbTrt3eow-V6_yQdqOXra-dxpUOfzA8dkGb7hDtWl1HOHo7D9Dvi-mvyc_senZ5NTm_zgyXkmTAx4pWQnJtraCqAmPoguuqYszq9AvKFiwfayssT0gKmoPIZXoXRhiiJD9Ax0PuOvi7HmJXNi4aqGvdgu9jSRUfM5l2nuiPD_TW96FN021VzjhNsyR1MigTfIwBbLkOrtFhU1JSbospUzHlazHJfn9L7KsGFu_yfxMJnA3gwdWw-TypnM7mQ-QLG5SbQA</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Wessel, Stefan W.</creator><creator>Mei, Henny C.</creator><creator>Slomp, Anje M.</creator><creator>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creator><creator>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creator><creator>Busscher, Henk J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><author>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Chewing Gum</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Gingiva</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Magnolia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mastication</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>oral moistness</topic><topic>oral sensing</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Photoelectron spectroscopy</topic><topic>Plant Bark - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Saliva - secretion</topic><topic>salivary film composition</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Smoothness</topic><topic>Sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugar‐free chewing gum</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>tooth hydrophobicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slomp, Anje M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wessel, Stefan W.</au><au>Mei, Henny C.</au><au>Slomp, Anje M.</au><au>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</au><au>Dodds, Michael W. J.</au><au>Busscher, Henk J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>379-384</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28857279</pmid><doi>10.1111/eos.12370</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0909-8836
ispartof European journal of oral sciences, 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384
issn 0909-8836
1600-0722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1934281933
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Bacteria
Bark
Chewing Gum
Contact angle
Cross-Over Studies
Dentistry
Female
Food
Food safety
Gingiva
Humans
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Hydrophobicity
Magnolia
Male
Mastication
Middle Aged
Neutralization
oral moistness
oral sensing
pH effects
Photoelectron spectroscopy
Plant Bark - chemistry
Plant Extracts - pharmacology
Saliva
Saliva - secretion
salivary film composition
Self Report
Smoothness
Sorbitol
Sorbitol - pharmacology
Spectroscopy
Sugar
sugar‐free chewing gum
Surface Properties
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teeth
tooth hydrophobicity
title Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self%E2%80%90perceived%20mouthfeel%20and%20physico%E2%80%90chemical%20surface%20effects%20after%20chewing%20gums%20containing%20sorbitol%20and%20Magnolia%20bark%20extract&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Wessel,%20Stefan%20W.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=379-384&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eos.12370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1934281933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935231491&rft_id=info:pmid/28857279&rfr_iscdi=true