Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract
The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of oral sciences 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | European journal of oral sciences |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Wessel, Stefan W. Mei, Henny C. Slomp, Anje M. Belt‐Gritter, Betsy Dodds, Michael W. J. Busscher, Henk J. |
description | The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eos.12370 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1934281933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1934281933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9P2zAYBnALDUEHHPYFJku7wCHgP41jH1FVGBKoh27nyHFft2ZJXOwE6A3xCfYZ90lwCeOAhA-2LP_06JUfhL5RckrTOgMfTynjBdlBIyoIyUjB2Bc0IoqoTEou9tHXGG8JoZyqYg_tMynzghVqhJ7nUNt_T3_XEAy4e1jgxvfdygLUWLcLvF5tojM-CbOCxhld49gHqw1gsBZMF7G2HQScnh9cu8TLvonY-LbTrt3eow-V6_yQdqOXra-dxpUOfzA8dkGb7hDtWl1HOHo7D9Dvi-mvyc_senZ5NTm_zgyXkmTAx4pWQnJtraCqAmPoguuqYszq9AvKFiwfayssT0gKmoPIZXoXRhiiJD9Ax0PuOvi7HmJXNi4aqGvdgu9jSRUfM5l2nuiPD_TW96FN021VzjhNsyR1MigTfIwBbLkOrtFhU1JSbospUzHlazHJfn9L7KsGFu_yfxMJnA3gwdWw-TypnM7mQ-QLG5SbQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935231491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><description>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eos.12370</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28857279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bacteria ; Bark ; Chewing Gum ; Contact angle ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dentistry ; Female ; Food ; Food safety ; Gingiva ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Hydrophobicity ; Magnolia ; Male ; Mastication ; Middle Aged ; Neutralization ; oral moistness ; oral sensing ; pH effects ; Photoelectron spectroscopy ; Plant Bark - chemistry ; Plant Extracts - pharmacology ; Saliva ; Saliva - secretion ; salivary film composition ; Self Report ; Smoothness ; Sorbitol ; Sorbitol - pharmacology ; Spectroscopy ; Sugar ; sugar‐free chewing gum ; Surface Properties ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teeth ; tooth hydrophobicity</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384</ispartof><rights>2017 Eur J Oral Sci</rights><rights>2017 Eur J Oral Sci.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Journal of Oral Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feos.12370$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feos.12370$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28857279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slomp, Anje M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Chewing Gum</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Gingiva</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Magnolia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mastication</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>oral moistness</subject><subject>oral sensing</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><subject>Plant Bark - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Saliva - secretion</subject><subject>salivary film composition</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Smoothness</subject><subject>Sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugar‐free chewing gum</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>tooth hydrophobicity</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9P2zAYBnALDUEHHPYFJku7wCHgP41jH1FVGBKoh27nyHFft2ZJXOwE6A3xCfYZ90lwCeOAhA-2LP_06JUfhL5RckrTOgMfTynjBdlBIyoIyUjB2Bc0IoqoTEou9tHXGG8JoZyqYg_tMynzghVqhJ7nUNt_T3_XEAy4e1jgxvfdygLUWLcLvF5tojM-CbOCxhld49gHqw1gsBZMF7G2HQScnh9cu8TLvonY-LbTrt3eow-V6_yQdqOXra-dxpUOfzA8dkGb7hDtWl1HOHo7D9Dvi-mvyc_senZ5NTm_zgyXkmTAx4pWQnJtraCqAmPoguuqYszq9AvKFiwfayssT0gKmoPIZXoXRhiiJD9Ax0PuOvi7HmJXNi4aqGvdgu9jSRUfM5l2nuiPD_TW96FN021VzjhNsyR1MigTfIwBbLkOrtFhU1JSbospUzHlazHJfn9L7KsGFu_yfxMJnA3gwdWw-TypnM7mQ-QLG5SbQA</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Wessel, Stefan W.</creator><creator>Mei, Henny C.</creator><creator>Slomp, Anje M.</creator><creator>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creator><creator>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creator><creator>Busscher, Henk J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</title><author>Wessel, Stefan W. ; Mei, Henny C. ; Slomp, Anje M. ; Belt‐Gritter, Betsy ; Dodds, Michael W. J. ; Busscher, Henk J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-e3491b683aff619becc1d3abb22fa1119f7254af6f36838615e658abb6c6c0983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Chewing Gum</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Gingiva</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Magnolia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mastication</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>oral moistness</topic><topic>oral sensing</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Photoelectron spectroscopy</topic><topic>Plant Bark - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Saliva - secretion</topic><topic>salivary film composition</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Smoothness</topic><topic>Sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugar‐free chewing gum</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>tooth hydrophobicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Stefan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slomp, Anje M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Michael W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wessel, Stefan W.</au><au>Mei, Henny C.</au><au>Slomp, Anje M.</au><au>Belt‐Gritter, Betsy</au><au>Dodds, Michael W. J.</au><au>Busscher, Henk J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>379-384</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>The European Food Safety Authority recognizes the contribution of sugar‐free chewing gum to oral health through increased salivation, clearance of food debris, and neutralization of biofilm pH. Magnolia bark extract is a gum additive shown to reduce the prevalence of bad‐breath bacteria but its effects on self‐perceived mouthfeel are unknown. This paper aims to relate the effects of sorbitol‐containing chewing gum, with and without Magnolia bark extract, on tooth‐surface hydrophobicity and salivary‐film composition with self‐perceived mouthfeel. In a crossover clinical trial, volunteers chewed sorbitol‐containing gum, with or without Magnolia bark extract added, three times daily during a 4‐wk time period. A subset of volunteers also chewed Parafilm as a mastication control. Oral moistness and tooth smoothness were assessed using questionnaires, and intra‐oral water‐contact angles were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after, chewing. Simultaneously, saliva samples were collected, placed on glass slides, and the compositions of the adsorbed film were measured using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chewing of gum, regardless of whether or not it contained Magnolia bark extract, improved self‐perceived mouthfeel up to 60 min, concurrent with a more hydrophilic tooth surface and an increased amount of O1s electrons bound at 532.6 eV in salivary films. Chewing of Parafilm affected neither tooth‐surface hydrophobicity nor salivary‐film composition. Accordingly, adsorption of sorbitol, rather than the presence of Magnolia bark extract or increased salivation, is responsible for improved self‐perceived mouthfeel.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28857279</pmid><doi>10.1111/eos.12370</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-8900</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0909-8836 |
ispartof | European journal of oral sciences, 2017-10, Vol.125 (5), p.379-384 |
issn | 0909-8836 1600-0722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1934281933 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Bacteria Bark Chewing Gum Contact angle Cross-Over Studies Dentistry Female Food Food safety Gingiva Humans Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Hydrophobicity Magnolia Male Mastication Middle Aged Neutralization oral moistness oral sensing pH effects Photoelectron spectroscopy Plant Bark - chemistry Plant Extracts - pharmacology Saliva Saliva - secretion salivary film composition Self Report Smoothness Sorbitol Sorbitol - pharmacology Spectroscopy Sugar sugar‐free chewing gum Surface Properties Surveys and Questionnaires Teeth tooth hydrophobicity |
title | Self‐perceived mouthfeel and physico‐chemical surface effects after chewing gums containing sorbitol and Magnolia bark extract |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self%E2%80%90perceived%20mouthfeel%20and%20physico%E2%80%90chemical%20surface%20effects%20after%20chewing%20gums%20containing%20sorbitol%20and%20Magnolia%20bark%20extract&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Wessel,%20Stefan%20W.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=379-384&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eos.12370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1934281933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935231491&rft_id=info:pmid/28857279&rfr_iscdi=true |