Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock

Effects of recreational pack stock grazing on mountain meadows in Yosemite National Park were assessed in a 5-year study. Yosemite is a designated wilderness, to be managed such that its natural conditions are preserved. Studies were conducted in 3 characteristic meadow types: shorthair sedge (Carex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rangeland ecology & management 2004-03, Vol.57 (2), p.153-160
Hauptverfasser: COLE, DAVID N., VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W., MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P., MOORE, PEGGY E., MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Rangeland ecology & management
container_volume 57
creator COLE, DAVID N.
VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W.
MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P.
MOORE, PEGGY E.
MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.
description Effects of recreational pack stock grazing on mountain meadows in Yosemite National Park were assessed in a 5-year study. Yosemite is a designated wilderness, to be managed such that its natural conditions are preserved. Studies were conducted in 3 characteristic meadow types: shorthair sedge (Carex filifolia Nutt.), Brewer's reed grass (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), and tufted hairgrass [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Horses and mules grazed experimental plots at intensities of 15 to 69% utilization for 4 seasons. In all 3 meadows, grazing caused decreases in productivity. The mean reduction after 4 years of grazing was 18% in the shorthair sedge meadow, 17% in the Brewer's reed grass meadow, and 22% in the tufted hairgrass meadow. Grazing also caused shifts in basal groundcover (usually a reduction in vegetation cover and increase in bare soil cover), and changes in species composition. Productivity and vegetation cover decreased as percent utilization increased, while bare soil cover increased as utilization increased. Changes in species composition were less predictably related to differences in grazing intensity. Passive management of grazing is insufficient in wilderness areas that are regularly used by groups with recreational stock. Wilderness managers need to monitor meadow conditions and the grazing intensities that occur. Our study suggests that biomass and ground cover are more sensitive indicators of grazing impact than species composition. Managers must make decisions about maximum acceptable levels of grazing impact and then develop guidelines for maximum use levels, based on data such as ours that relates grazing intensity to meadow response.Original Abstract: En un estudio de 5 anos se evaluaron los efectos del apacentamiento de animales para actividades recreativas sobre las praderas de las montanas del Parque Nacional Yosemite. Yosemite esta designado como una area protegida virgen para ser manejada de tal manera que sus condiciones naturales sean preservadas. Los estudios se condujeron en 3 tipos caracteristicos de pradera: 'Shorthair sedge' (Carex filifolia Nutt.), 'Brewer's reed grass' (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), y 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Caballos y mulas apacentaron las parcelas experimentales a intensidades de 15 a 69% de utilizacion durante 4 estaciones. En los 3 tipos de praderas el apacentamiento causo una disminucion en la productividad. Despues de 4 anos de apacentamiento, la reduccio
doi_str_mv 10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0153:ROMMTG]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19339068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17421233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-d3425a26d7db78e7aa659cbca8539c0dcdff16923536f65dafbc1729bc58239d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M1LwzAYx_EgCs7p_5CT6KFbXpq-6EmLTmGjMOZJ5CFN0lHXNjXpkPnXuzrx6ul5Dl9-hw9CU0omjFI6pULQQBCWXDFCwmsi4ldCBb9Z5ovFavbGJmSS5bfsCI3-yuOfnwRxyMJTdOb9OyE8ojQeoful8Z1tvcG2xI3dtr2sWtwYqe2nx73Faye_qnaNix12Rjkj-8q2ssadVBvse6s25-iklLU3F793jF4eH1bZUzDPZ8_Z3TxQnFMWaB4yIVmkY13EiYmljESqCiUTwVNFtNJlSaOUccGjMhJaloWiMUsLJRLGU83H6PKw2zn7sTW-h6byytS1bI3deqAp5ymJkv_DvQNlnO_D2SFUznrvTAmdqxrpdkAJDNgwEMJACAM27LFhwIYDNjAgkOXA-DedJXYn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17421233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>COLE, DAVID N. ; VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W. ; MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P. ; MOORE, PEGGY E. ; MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</creator><creatorcontrib>COLE, DAVID N. ; VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W. ; MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P. ; MOORE, PEGGY E. ; MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of recreational pack stock grazing on mountain meadows in Yosemite National Park were assessed in a 5-year study. Yosemite is a designated wilderness, to be managed such that its natural conditions are preserved. Studies were conducted in 3 characteristic meadow types: shorthair sedge (Carex filifolia Nutt.), Brewer's reed grass (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), and tufted hairgrass [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Horses and mules grazed experimental plots at intensities of 15 to 69% utilization for 4 seasons. In all 3 meadows, grazing caused decreases in productivity. The mean reduction after 4 years of grazing was 18% in the shorthair sedge meadow, 17% in the Brewer's reed grass meadow, and 22% in the tufted hairgrass meadow. Grazing also caused shifts in basal groundcover (usually a reduction in vegetation cover and increase in bare soil cover), and changes in species composition. Productivity and vegetation cover decreased as percent utilization increased, while bare soil cover increased as utilization increased. Changes in species composition were less predictably related to differences in grazing intensity. Passive management of grazing is insufficient in wilderness areas that are regularly used by groups with recreational stock. Wilderness managers need to monitor meadow conditions and the grazing intensities that occur. Our study suggests that biomass and ground cover are more sensitive indicators of grazing impact than species composition. Managers must make decisions about maximum acceptable levels of grazing impact and then develop guidelines for maximum use levels, based on data such as ours that relates grazing intensity to meadow response.Original Abstract: En un estudio de 5 anos se evaluaron los efectos del apacentamiento de animales para actividades recreativas sobre las praderas de las montanas del Parque Nacional Yosemite. Yosemite esta designado como una area protegida virgen para ser manejada de tal manera que sus condiciones naturales sean preservadas. Los estudios se condujeron en 3 tipos caracteristicos de pradera: 'Shorthair sedge' (Carex filifolia Nutt.), 'Brewer's reed grass' (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), y 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Caballos y mulas apacentaron las parcelas experimentales a intensidades de 15 a 69% de utilizacion durante 4 estaciones. En los 3 tipos de praderas el apacentamiento causo una disminucion en la productividad. Despues de 4 anos de apacentamiento, la reduccion promedio fue 18% en la pradera de 'Shorthair sedge' Nutt.) 17% en la de 'Brewer's reed grass' y 22% en la de 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. El apacentamiento tambien causo cambios en la cobertura basal (usualmente una reduccion en la cobertura de la vegetacion y un incremento en la cobertura de suelo desnudo) y cambios en la composicion de especies. Conforme el porcentaje de utilizacion aumento la productividad y la cobertura de plantas se redujo y el suelo desnudo aumento. Los cambios en la composicion de especies fueron menos predecibles en relacion a las diferencias en la intensidad de apacentamiento. El manejo pasivo del apacentamiento es insuficiente en las areas protegidas virgenes que regularmente son utilizadas por grupos con ganado recreativo. Los manejadores de estas areas necesitan monitorear las condiciones de la paradera y las intensidades de apacentamiento que ocurren. Nuestro estudio sugiere que la biomasa y la cobertura vegetal son indicadores mas sensitivos del impacto del apacentamiento que la composicion de especies. Los manejadores deben tomar decisiones acerca de los niveles maximos aceptables del impacto del apacentamiento y entonces desarrollar guias para los niveles maximos de uso basadas en datos tales como los nuestros que relacionan la intensidad de apacentamiento con la respuesta de la pradera.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0153:ROMMTG]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Calamagrostis breweri ; Carex filifolia ; Deschampsia ; Deschampsia caespitosa</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology &amp; management, 2004-03, Vol.57 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-d3425a26d7db78e7aa659cbca8539c0dcdff16923536f65dafbc1729bc58239d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-d3425a26d7db78e7aa659cbca8539c0dcdff16923536f65dafbc1729bc58239d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>COLE, DAVID N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORE, PEGGY E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</creatorcontrib><title>Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock</title><title>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</title><description>Effects of recreational pack stock grazing on mountain meadows in Yosemite National Park were assessed in a 5-year study. Yosemite is a designated wilderness, to be managed such that its natural conditions are preserved. Studies were conducted in 3 characteristic meadow types: shorthair sedge (Carex filifolia Nutt.), Brewer's reed grass (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), and tufted hairgrass [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Horses and mules grazed experimental plots at intensities of 15 to 69% utilization for 4 seasons. In all 3 meadows, grazing caused decreases in productivity. The mean reduction after 4 years of grazing was 18% in the shorthair sedge meadow, 17% in the Brewer's reed grass meadow, and 22% in the tufted hairgrass meadow. Grazing also caused shifts in basal groundcover (usually a reduction in vegetation cover and increase in bare soil cover), and changes in species composition. Productivity and vegetation cover decreased as percent utilization increased, while bare soil cover increased as utilization increased. Changes in species composition were less predictably related to differences in grazing intensity. Passive management of grazing is insufficient in wilderness areas that are regularly used by groups with recreational stock. Wilderness managers need to monitor meadow conditions and the grazing intensities that occur. Our study suggests that biomass and ground cover are more sensitive indicators of grazing impact than species composition. Managers must make decisions about maximum acceptable levels of grazing impact and then develop guidelines for maximum use levels, based on data such as ours that relates grazing intensity to meadow response.Original Abstract: En un estudio de 5 anos se evaluaron los efectos del apacentamiento de animales para actividades recreativas sobre las praderas de las montanas del Parque Nacional Yosemite. Yosemite esta designado como una area protegida virgen para ser manejada de tal manera que sus condiciones naturales sean preservadas. Los estudios se condujeron en 3 tipos caracteristicos de pradera: 'Shorthair sedge' (Carex filifolia Nutt.), 'Brewer's reed grass' (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), y 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Caballos y mulas apacentaron las parcelas experimentales a intensidades de 15 a 69% de utilizacion durante 4 estaciones. En los 3 tipos de praderas el apacentamiento causo una disminucion en la productividad. Despues de 4 anos de apacentamiento, la reduccion promedio fue 18% en la pradera de 'Shorthair sedge' Nutt.) 17% en la de 'Brewer's reed grass' y 22% en la de 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. El apacentamiento tambien causo cambios en la cobertura basal (usualmente una reduccion en la cobertura de la vegetacion y un incremento en la cobertura de suelo desnudo) y cambios en la composicion de especies. Conforme el porcentaje de utilizacion aumento la productividad y la cobertura de plantas se redujo y el suelo desnudo aumento. Los cambios en la composicion de especies fueron menos predecibles en relacion a las diferencias en la intensidad de apacentamiento. El manejo pasivo del apacentamiento es insuficiente en las areas protegidas virgenes que regularmente son utilizadas por grupos con ganado recreativo. Los manejadores de estas areas necesitan monitorear las condiciones de la paradera y las intensidades de apacentamiento que ocurren. Nuestro estudio sugiere que la biomasa y la cobertura vegetal son indicadores mas sensitivos del impacto del apacentamiento que la composicion de especies. Los manejadores deben tomar decisiones acerca de los niveles maximos aceptables del impacto del apacentamiento y entonces desarrollar guias para los niveles maximos de uso basadas en datos tales como los nuestros que relacionan la intensidad de apacentamiento con la respuesta de la pradera.</description><subject>Calamagrostis breweri</subject><subject>Carex filifolia</subject><subject>Deschampsia</subject><subject>Deschampsia caespitosa</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M1LwzAYx_EgCs7p_5CT6KFbXpq-6EmLTmGjMOZJ5CFN0lHXNjXpkPnXuzrx6ul5Dl9-hw9CU0omjFI6pULQQBCWXDFCwmsi4ldCBb9Z5ovFavbGJmSS5bfsCI3-yuOfnwRxyMJTdOb9OyE8ojQeoful8Z1tvcG2xI3dtr2sWtwYqe2nx73Faye_qnaNix12Rjkj-8q2ssadVBvse6s25-iklLU3F793jF4eH1bZUzDPZ8_Z3TxQnFMWaB4yIVmkY13EiYmljESqCiUTwVNFtNJlSaOUccGjMhJaloWiMUsLJRLGU83H6PKw2zn7sTW-h6byytS1bI3deqAp5ymJkv_DvQNlnO_D2SFUznrvTAmdqxrpdkAJDNgwEMJACAM27LFhwIYDNjAgkOXA-DedJXYn</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>COLE, DAVID N.</creator><creator>VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W.</creator><creator>MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P.</creator><creator>MOORE, PEGGY E.</creator><creator>MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock</title><author>COLE, DAVID N. ; VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W. ; MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P. ; MOORE, PEGGY E. ; MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-d3425a26d7db78e7aa659cbca8539c0dcdff16923536f65dafbc1729bc58239d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Calamagrostis breweri</topic><topic>Carex filifolia</topic><topic>Deschampsia</topic><topic>Deschampsia caespitosa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>COLE, DAVID N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORE, PEGGY E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>COLE, DAVID N.</au><au>VAN WAGTENDONK, JAN W.</au><au>MCCLARAN, MITCHEL P.</au><au>MOORE, PEGGY E.</au><au>MCDOUGALD, NEIL K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Effects of recreational pack stock grazing on mountain meadows in Yosemite National Park were assessed in a 5-year study. Yosemite is a designated wilderness, to be managed such that its natural conditions are preserved. Studies were conducted in 3 characteristic meadow types: shorthair sedge (Carex filifolia Nutt.), Brewer's reed grass (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), and tufted hairgrass [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Horses and mules grazed experimental plots at intensities of 15 to 69% utilization for 4 seasons. In all 3 meadows, grazing caused decreases in productivity. The mean reduction after 4 years of grazing was 18% in the shorthair sedge meadow, 17% in the Brewer's reed grass meadow, and 22% in the tufted hairgrass meadow. Grazing also caused shifts in basal groundcover (usually a reduction in vegetation cover and increase in bare soil cover), and changes in species composition. Productivity and vegetation cover decreased as percent utilization increased, while bare soil cover increased as utilization increased. Changes in species composition were less predictably related to differences in grazing intensity. Passive management of grazing is insufficient in wilderness areas that are regularly used by groups with recreational stock. Wilderness managers need to monitor meadow conditions and the grazing intensities that occur. Our study suggests that biomass and ground cover are more sensitive indicators of grazing impact than species composition. Managers must make decisions about maximum acceptable levels of grazing impact and then develop guidelines for maximum use levels, based on data such as ours that relates grazing intensity to meadow response.Original Abstract: En un estudio de 5 anos se evaluaron los efectos del apacentamiento de animales para actividades recreativas sobre las praderas de las montanas del Parque Nacional Yosemite. Yosemite esta designado como una area protegida virgen para ser manejada de tal manera que sus condiciones naturales sean preservadas. Los estudios se condujeron en 3 tipos caracteristicos de pradera: 'Shorthair sedge' (Carex filifolia Nutt.), 'Brewer's reed grass' (Calamagrostis breweri Thurber), y 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. Caballos y mulas apacentaron las parcelas experimentales a intensidades de 15 a 69% de utilizacion durante 4 estaciones. En los 3 tipos de praderas el apacentamiento causo una disminucion en la productividad. Despues de 4 anos de apacentamiento, la reduccion promedio fue 18% en la pradera de 'Shorthair sedge' Nutt.) 17% en la de 'Brewer's reed grass' y 22% en la de 'Tufted hairgrass' [Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv.]. El apacentamiento tambien causo cambios en la cobertura basal (usualmente una reduccion en la cobertura de la vegetacion y un incremento en la cobertura de suelo desnudo) y cambios en la composicion de especies. Conforme el porcentaje de utilizacion aumento la productividad y la cobertura de plantas se redujo y el suelo desnudo aumento. Los cambios en la composicion de especies fueron menos predecibles en relacion a las diferencias en la intensidad de apacentamiento. El manejo pasivo del apacentamiento es insuficiente en las areas protegidas virgenes que regularmente son utilizadas por grupos con ganado recreativo. Los manejadores de estas areas necesitan monitorear las condiciones de la paradera y las intensidades de apacentamiento que ocurren. Nuestro estudio sugiere que la biomasa y la cobertura vegetal son indicadores mas sensitivos del impacto del apacentamiento que la composicion de especies. Los manejadores deben tomar decisiones acerca de los niveles maximos aceptables del impacto del apacentamiento y entonces desarrollar guias para los niveles maximos de uso basadas en datos tales como los nuestros que relacionan la intensidad de apacentamiento con la respuesta de la pradera.</abstract><doi>10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0153:ROMMTG]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7424
ispartof Rangeland ecology & management, 2004-03, Vol.57 (2), p.153-160
issn 1550-7424
1551-5028
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19339068
source BioOne Complete
subjects Calamagrostis breweri
Carex filifolia
Deschampsia
Deschampsia caespitosa
title Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A06%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20mountain%20meadows%20to%20grazing%20by%20recreational%20pack%20stock&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=COLE,%20DAVID%20N.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057%5B0153:ROMMTG%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17421233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17421233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true