Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics

Many individual-based models of forest dynamics lack spatial complexity. Although, in certain cases, spatially simple models may not be substantially inferior to spatially complex models, advances in vegetation science indicate potential weaknesses, particularly the lack of consideration of propagul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of vegetation science 2004-12, Vol.15 (6), p.831-842
Hauptverfasser:	Busing, Richard T, Mailly, Daniel
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Canopy gap model canopy gaps Forest dynamics forest ecology Forest succession Landscape literature reviews Review s Simulation simulation models spatial distribution Spatial pattern tree mortality
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	842
container_issue	6
container_start_page	831
container_title	Journal of vegetation science
container_volume	15
creator	Busing, Richard T Mailly, Daniel
description	Many individual-based models of forest dynamics lack spatial complexity. Although, in certain cases, spatially simple models may not be substantially inferior to spatially complex models, advances in vegetation science indicate potential weaknesses, particularly the lack of consideration of propagule availability in horizontal space, and varying patch (or canopy gap) dimensions. Models with vertical and horizontal spatial complexity can address these issues, but, thus far, evidence that they outperform patch (or gap) models is limited. Comparison of projections from models that differ only in their spatial complexity is needed to address the effects of propagule availability in space, spatial pattern of canopy tree mortality, and spatial resolution.
doi_str_mv	10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0831:AISIMO]2.0.CO;2
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19334664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4096682</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4096682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b357t-ddee1164e787e2d211638d85f2f5881b97832645609eaae99fd60eaf0b9f72633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkNFKwzAUhosoOKdvINgrUbDbSdKmiV7NMedgsou5K5GQLsnI6JrZbIO9vSlVH8Cr88P5zs_hi6I-gh6iGesjBJBwTMgdBkjvAWUfwAh6HEzmk7fZJ-5Bbzh7widRJ-BpEnByGvLv1Xl04f0aAOWcok70PFAHWS21j20V-63cWVk-hKzswaq9LJNCeq3ijVO6LG21ip2Jjau138XqWMmNXfrL6MzI0uurn9mNFi-j9-FrMp2NJ8PBNClIlu8SpbRGiKY6Z7nGCodMmGKZwSZjDBU8ZwTTNKPAtZSac6MoaGmg4CbHlJBudNv2bmv3tQ8fiI31y_CWrLTbe4E4ISmlaQDHLbisnfe1NmJb242sjwKBaByKxoZobIjGoQgOReNQtA4FFiCGYYSm67Zp7Xeu_qtJgVPKmvVNuzbSCbmqrReLOQZEIAAM5zQQo5YorHOV_vcj37pMjos</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19334664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Busing, Richard T ; Mailly, Daniel</creator><contributor>Harcombe, P</contributor><creatorcontrib>Busing, Richard T ; Mailly, Daniel ; Harcombe, P</creatorcontrib><description>Many individual-based models of forest dynamics lack spatial complexity. Although, in certain cases, spatially simple models may not be substantially inferior to spatially complex models, advances in vegetation science indicate potential weaknesses, particularly the lack of consideration of propagule availability in horizontal space, and varying patch (or canopy gap) dimensions. Models with vertical and horizontal spatial complexity can address these issues, but, thus far, evidence that they outperform patch (or gap) models is limited. Comparison of projections from models that differ only in their spatial complexity is needed to address the effects of propagule availability in space, spatial pattern of canopy tree mortality, and spatial resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1100-9233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-1103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1104-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0831:AISIMO]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Opulus Press</publisher><subject>Canopy gap model ; canopy gaps ; Forest dynamics ; forest ecology ; Forest succession ; Landscape ; literature reviews ; Review ; s ; Simulation ; simulation models ; spatial distribution ; Spatial pattern ; tree mortality</subject><ispartof>Journal of vegetation science, 2004-12, Vol.15 (6), p.831-842</ispartof><rights>International Association of Vegetation Science</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 International Association for Vegetation Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b357t-ddee1164e787e2d211638d85f2f5881b97832645609eaae99fd60eaf0b9f72633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b357t-ddee1164e787e2d211638d85f2f5881b97832645609eaae99fd60eaf0b9f72633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4096682$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4096682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,27920,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Harcombe, P</contributor><creatorcontrib>Busing, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mailly, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics</title><title>Journal of vegetation science</title><description>Many individual-based models of forest dynamics lack spatial complexity. Although, in certain cases, spatially simple models may not be substantially inferior to spatially complex models, advances in vegetation science indicate potential weaknesses, particularly the lack of consideration of propagule availability in horizontal space, and varying patch (or canopy gap) dimensions. Models with vertical and horizontal spatial complexity can address these issues, but, thus far, evidence that they outperform patch (or gap) models is limited. Comparison of projections from models that differ only in their spatial complexity is needed to address the effects of propagule availability in space, spatial pattern of canopy tree mortality, and spatial resolution.</description><subject>Canopy gap model</subject><subject>canopy gaps</subject><subject>Forest dynamics</subject><subject>forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest succession</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>Spatial pattern</subject><subject>tree mortality</subject><issn>1100-9233</issn><issn>1654-1103</issn><issn>1104-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkNFKwzAUhosoOKdvINgrUbDbSdKmiV7NMedgsou5K5GQLsnI6JrZbIO9vSlVH8Cr88P5zs_hi6I-gh6iGesjBJBwTMgdBkjvAWUfwAh6HEzmk7fZJ-5Bbzh7widRJ-BpEnByGvLv1Xl04f0aAOWcok70PFAHWS21j20V-63cWVk-hKzswaq9LJNCeq3ijVO6LG21ip2Jjau138XqWMmNXfrL6MzI0uurn9mNFi-j9-FrMp2NJ8PBNClIlu8SpbRGiKY6Z7nGCodMmGKZwSZjDBU8ZwTTNKPAtZSac6MoaGmg4CbHlJBudNv2bmv3tQ8fiI31y_CWrLTbe4E4ISmlaQDHLbisnfe1NmJb242sjwKBaByKxoZobIjGoQgOReNQtA4FFiCGYYSm67Zp7Xeu_qtJgVPKmvVNuzbSCbmqrReLOQZEIAAM5zQQo5YorHOV_vcj37pMjos</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Busing, Richard T</creator><creator>Mailly, Daniel</creator><general>Opulus Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics</title><author>Busing, Richard T ; Mailly, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b357t-ddee1164e787e2d211638d85f2f5881b97832645609eaae99fd60eaf0b9f72633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Canopy gap model</topic><topic>canopy gaps</topic><topic>Forest dynamics</topic><topic>forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest succession</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>Spatial pattern</topic><topic>tree mortality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busing, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mailly, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busing, Richard T</au><au>Mailly, Daniel</au><au>Harcombe, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>831</spage><epage>842</epage><pages>831-842</pages><issn>1100-9233</issn><eissn>1654-1103</eissn><eissn>1104-7402</eissn><abstract>Many individual-based models of forest dynamics lack spatial complexity. Although, in certain cases, spatially simple models may not be substantially inferior to spatially complex models, advances in vegetation science indicate potential weaknesses, particularly the lack of consideration of propagule availability in horizontal space, and varying patch (or canopy gap) dimensions. Models with vertical and horizontal spatial complexity can address these issues, but, thus far, evidence that they outperform patch (or gap) models is limited. Comparison of projections from models that differ only in their spatial complexity is needed to address the effects of propagule availability in space, spatial pattern of canopy tree mortality, and spatial resolution.</abstract><pub>Opulus Press</pub><doi>10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0831:AISIMO]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1100-9233
ispartof	Journal of vegetation science, 2004-12, Vol.15 (6), p.831-842
issn	1100-9233 1654-1103 1104-7402
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19334664
source	JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects	Canopy gap model canopy gaps Forest dynamics forest ecology Forest succession Landscape literature reviews Review s Simulation simulation models spatial distribution Spatial pattern tree mortality
title	Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A31%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances%20in%20spatial,%20individual-based%20modelling%20of%20forest%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vegetation%20science&rft.au=Busing,%20Richard%20T&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=831&rft.epage=842&rft.pages=831-842&rft.issn=1100-9233&rft.eissn=1654-1103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015%5B0831:AISIMO%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4096682%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19334664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4096682&rfr_iscdi=true