ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES

We assessed salt marsh use by foraging egrets in coastal Rhode Island, USA. Two species [great egret (Ardea alba) and snowy egret (Egretta thula)] nest in mixed-species colonies on islands in Narragansett Bay and regularly forage in adjacent salt marshes. We surveyed 13 salt marshes approximately tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2006-06, Vol.26 (2), p.307-312
Hauptverfasser: Trocki, Carol Lynn, Paton, Peter W. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 2
container_start_page 307
container_title Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)
container_volume 26
creator Trocki, Carol Lynn
Paton, Peter W. C.
description We assessed salt marsh use by foraging egrets in coastal Rhode Island, USA. Two species [great egret (Ardea alba) and snowy egret (Egretta thula)] nest in mixed-species colonies on islands in Narragansett Bay and regularly forage in adjacent salt marshes. We surveyed 13 salt marshes approximately twice weekly during the breeding and post-breeding seasons in 2001 and 2002. Based on resource selection functions, foraging great and snowy egrets strongly preferred pools within salt marshes, while mosquito control ditches were rarely used. Foraging egrets were never detected in stands of common reed (Phragmites australis). The number of egrets using individual marshes varied considerably, although density estimates were far less variable. Salt marsh area was better at predicting the mean number of foraging egrets using a marsh than landscape-level parameters, such as distance to the nearest nesting colony or the total area of salt marsh within 5 km. Carefully designed salt marsh restoration projects could benefit local egret populations because it appears that foraging habitat availability may be a limiting factor. To ensure use by foraging egrets, salt marsh restoration designs should increase the availability of pool and open water habitat, reduce common reed, and modify deep ditches and channels to make them more accessible for foraging egrets.
doi_str_mv 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[307:AHSBFE]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19332537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2920489194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-6530036d8855db858a57834146927ca5fb2fbd2fec572fd9b01bb92c77ebb57a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkEFLwzAUgIMoOKf_ISCIHjqTlyZp9ZSVbCvUdSzdQURC07Uwmets3cF_b8vEg0dP7_C-9_H4EPIoGVEh4Z6AlB4HCrdAiLgD8cKIfFAzM57oVxiRUZQ-wgka0NBnngBfnKLB7805umjbN0KoAKAD9KyM0cbE8ymeqXGcqQwbnegoi9M5Hj_jSbpU036rp0udGRzPsVFJhp_U0sy0wR3_tEqyeJFobBYqi1WCTaQSbS7RWZVv2_LqZw7RaqKzaOYl6TTuCM_5xP_0BGeEMLEOAs7XLuBBzmXAfOqLEGSR88pB5dZQlQWXUK1DR6hzIRRSls5xmbMhujl69039cSjbT_u-aYtyu813ZX1oLQ0ZA85kB17_Ad_qQ7PrfrMQAvGDsA82RPpIFU3dtk1Z2X2zec-bL0uJ7fPbPqXtU9o-vwVhu_z2mN92axulFjpPdPS4TV3vyn9avgHMnoY9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920489194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Trocki, Carol Lynn ; Paton, Peter W. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trocki, Carol Lynn ; Paton, Peter W. C.</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed salt marsh use by foraging egrets in coastal Rhode Island, USA. Two species [great egret (Ardea alba) and snowy egret (Egretta thula)] nest in mixed-species colonies on islands in Narragansett Bay and regularly forage in adjacent salt marshes. We surveyed 13 salt marshes approximately twice weekly during the breeding and post-breeding seasons in 2001 and 2002. Based on resource selection functions, foraging great and snowy egrets strongly preferred pools within salt marshes, while mosquito control ditches were rarely used. Foraging egrets were never detected in stands of common reed (Phragmites australis). The number of egrets using individual marshes varied considerably, although density estimates were far less variable. Salt marsh area was better at predicting the mean number of foraging egrets using a marsh than landscape-level parameters, such as distance to the nearest nesting colony or the total area of salt marsh within 5 km. Carefully designed salt marsh restoration projects could benefit local egret populations because it appears that foraging habitat availability may be a limiting factor. To ensure use by foraging egrets, salt marsh restoration designs should increase the availability of pool and open water habitat, reduce common reed, and modify deep ditches and channels to make them more accessible for foraging egrets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[307:AHSBFE]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Ardea ; Availability ; Breeding seasons ; Colonies ; CONTENTS ; Ditches ; Egretta thula ; foraging ; Foraging habitats ; great egret ; Habitat availability ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Insect control ; Mosquitoes ; Nesting ; Phragmites australis ; resource selection ; Restoration ; salt marsh restoration ; Salt marshes ; snowy egret</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2006-06, Vol.26 (2), p.307-312</ispartof><rights>The Society of Wetland Scientists</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-6530036d8855db858a57834146927ca5fb2fbd2fec572fd9b01bb92c77ebb57a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-6530036d8855db858a57834146927ca5fb2fbd2fec572fd9b01bb92c77ebb57a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[307:AHSBFE]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920489194?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,26978,27924,27925,33744,33745,43805,52363,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trocki, Carol Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paton, Peter W. C.</creatorcontrib><title>ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>We assessed salt marsh use by foraging egrets in coastal Rhode Island, USA. Two species [great egret (Ardea alba) and snowy egret (Egretta thula)] nest in mixed-species colonies on islands in Narragansett Bay and regularly forage in adjacent salt marshes. We surveyed 13 salt marshes approximately twice weekly during the breeding and post-breeding seasons in 2001 and 2002. Based on resource selection functions, foraging great and snowy egrets strongly preferred pools within salt marshes, while mosquito control ditches were rarely used. Foraging egrets were never detected in stands of common reed (Phragmites australis). The number of egrets using individual marshes varied considerably, although density estimates were far less variable. Salt marsh area was better at predicting the mean number of foraging egrets using a marsh than landscape-level parameters, such as distance to the nearest nesting colony or the total area of salt marsh within 5 km. Carefully designed salt marsh restoration projects could benefit local egret populations because it appears that foraging habitat availability may be a limiting factor. To ensure use by foraging egrets, salt marsh restoration designs should increase the availability of pool and open water habitat, reduce common reed, and modify deep ditches and channels to make them more accessible for foraging egrets.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Ardea</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>CONTENTS</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Egretta thula</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>great egret</subject><subject>Habitat availability</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insect control</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>resource selection</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>salt marsh restoration</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>snowy egret</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkEFLwzAUgIMoOKf_ISCIHjqTlyZp9ZSVbCvUdSzdQURC07Uwmets3cF_b8vEg0dP7_C-9_H4EPIoGVEh4Z6AlB4HCrdAiLgD8cKIfFAzM57oVxiRUZQ-wgka0NBnngBfnKLB7805umjbN0KoAKAD9KyM0cbE8ymeqXGcqQwbnegoi9M5Hj_jSbpU036rp0udGRzPsVFJhp_U0sy0wR3_tEqyeJFobBYqi1WCTaQSbS7RWZVv2_LqZw7RaqKzaOYl6TTuCM_5xP_0BGeEMLEOAs7XLuBBzmXAfOqLEGSR88pB5dZQlQWXUK1DR6hzIRRSls5xmbMhujl69039cSjbT_u-aYtyu813ZX1oLQ0ZA85kB17_Ad_qQ7PrfrMQAvGDsA82RPpIFU3dtk1Z2X2zec-bL0uJ7fPbPqXtU9o-vwVhu_z2mN92axulFjpPdPS4TV3vyn9avgHMnoY9</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Trocki, Carol Lynn</creator><creator>Paton, Peter W. C.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES</title><author>Trocki, Carol Lynn ; Paton, Peter W. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-6530036d8855db858a57834146927ca5fb2fbd2fec572fd9b01bb92c77ebb57a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Ardea</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>CONTENTS</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Egretta thula</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>great egret</topic><topic>Habitat availability</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insect control</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>resource selection</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>salt marsh restoration</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>snowy egret</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trocki, Carol Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paton, Peter W. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trocki, Carol Lynn</au><au>Paton, Peter W. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>307-312</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>We assessed salt marsh use by foraging egrets in coastal Rhode Island, USA. Two species [great egret (Ardea alba) and snowy egret (Egretta thula)] nest in mixed-species colonies on islands in Narragansett Bay and regularly forage in adjacent salt marshes. We surveyed 13 salt marshes approximately twice weekly during the breeding and post-breeding seasons in 2001 and 2002. Based on resource selection functions, foraging great and snowy egrets strongly preferred pools within salt marshes, while mosquito control ditches were rarely used. Foraging egrets were never detected in stands of common reed (Phragmites australis). The number of egrets using individual marshes varied considerably, although density estimates were far less variable. Salt marsh area was better at predicting the mean number of foraging egrets using a marsh than landscape-level parameters, such as distance to the nearest nesting colony or the total area of salt marsh within 5 km. Carefully designed salt marsh restoration projects could benefit local egret populations because it appears that foraging habitat availability may be a limiting factor. To ensure use by foraging egrets, salt marsh restoration designs should increase the availability of pool and open water habitat, reduce common reed, and modify deep ditches and channels to make them more accessible for foraging egrets.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[307:AHSBFE]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-5212
ispartof Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2006-06, Vol.26 (2), p.307-312
issn 0277-5212
1943-6246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19332537
source SpringerNature Journals; BioOne Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Aquatic plants
Ardea
Availability
Breeding seasons
Colonies
CONTENTS
Ditches
Egretta thula
foraging
Foraging habitats
great egret
Habitat availability
Habitat selection
Habitats
Insect control
Mosquitoes
Nesting
Phragmites australis
resource selection
Restoration
salt marsh restoration
Salt marshes
snowy egret
title ASSESSING HABITAT SELECTION BY FORAGING EGRETS IN SALT MARSHES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ASSESSING%20HABITAT%20SELECTION%20BY%20FORAGING%20EGRETS%20IN%20SALT%20MARSHES%20AT%20MULTIPLE%20SPATIAL%20SCALES&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Trocki,%20Carol%20Lynn&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=307-312&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26%5B307:AHSBFE%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2920489194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920489194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true