Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic

To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey qu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35
Hauptverfasser: Andino, Juan J., Guduguntla, Vinay, Weizer, Alon, Roberts, William W., Wittmann, Daniela, Miller, David, Morgan, Todd M., Ellimoottil, Chad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue
container_start_page 31
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 110
creator Andino, Juan J.
Guduguntla, Vinay
Weizer, Alon
Roberts, William W.
Wittmann, Daniela
Miller, David
Morgan, Todd M.
Ellimoottil, Chad
description To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit. We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174). The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933230286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429517308737</els_id><sourcerecordid>1933230286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0JSo5etk6SJtmcREr9AKEebK8hzWZrynZTN7ti_70pW70Kw8wwvHnz5iF0TWBMgIi7zbhrQhXW-zEFIseQgsMJGhJOZaaU4qdoCKAgm1DFB-gixg0ACCHkORrQPJ8wKcUQzWffZutrX69x--Hw0lSdw6HES1-4kHL0bcRtwG-m9a5Ova-xqfG8a3f9BC96GXhaJRp7ic5KU0V3dawjtHicvU-fs9f508v04TWzTPA2ExJIOeHMFFKoCS1BMnv4gzFWlisnDKE5KEpLqpjJcxBcWkPlylhVCJPEj9Btz7trwmfnYqu3PlpXVaZ2oYuaKMYoA5qLBOU91DYhxsaVetf4rWn2moA-eKk3-uilPmjQkIJD2rs5nuhWW1f8bf2alwD3PcClR7-8a3S0yRLrCt842-oi-H9O_AAvOIcZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933230286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</creator><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit. We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174). The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28843776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Self Report ; Telemedicine ; Urologic Diseases ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0466-6830 ; 0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guduguntla, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizer, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit. We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174). The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0JSo5etk6SJtmcREr9AKEebK8hzWZrynZTN7ti_70pW70Kw8wwvHnz5iF0TWBMgIi7zbhrQhXW-zEFIseQgsMJGhJOZaaU4qdoCKAgm1DFB-gixg0ACCHkORrQPJ8wKcUQzWffZutrX69x--Hw0lSdw6HES1-4kHL0bcRtwG-m9a5Ova-xqfG8a3f9BC96GXhaJRp7ic5KU0V3dawjtHicvU-fs9f508v04TWzTPA2ExJIOeHMFFKoCS1BMnv4gzFWlisnDKE5KEpLqpjJcxBcWkPlylhVCJPEj9Btz7trwmfnYqu3PlpXVaZ2oYuaKMYoA5qLBOU91DYhxsaVetf4rWn2moA-eKk3-uilPmjQkIJD2rs5nuhWW1f8bf2alwD3PcClR7-8a3S0yRLrCt842-oi-H9O_AAvOIcZ</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Andino, Juan J.</creator><creator>Guduguntla, Vinay</creator><creator>Weizer, Alon</creator><creator>Roberts, William W.</creator><creator>Wittmann, Daniela</creator><creator>Miller, David</creator><creator>Morgan, Todd M.</creator><creator>Ellimoottil, Chad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-6830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><author>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guduguntla, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizer, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andino, Juan J.</au><au>Guduguntla, Vinay</au><au>Weizer, Alon</au><au>Roberts, William W.</au><au>Wittmann, Daniela</au><au>Miller, David</au><au>Morgan, Todd M.</au><au>Ellimoottil, Chad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>31-35</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit. We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174). The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28843776</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-6830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933230286
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Ambulatory Care
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Self Report
Telemedicine
Urologic Diseases
Young Adult
title Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20Value%20of%20Video%20Visits%20to%20Patients%20in%20an%20Outpatient%20Urology%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Andino,%20Juan%20J.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=31-35&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933230286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933230286&rft_id=info:pmid/28843776&rft_els_id=S0090429517308737&rfr_iscdi=true