Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic
To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic. We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey qu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Andino, Juan J. Guduguntla, Vinay Weizer, Alon Roberts, William W. Wittmann, Daniela Miller, David Morgan, Todd M. Ellimoottil, Chad |
description | To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic.
We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit.
We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174).
The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933230286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429517308737</els_id><sourcerecordid>1933230286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0JSo5etk6SJtmcREr9AKEebK8hzWZrynZTN7ti_70pW70Kw8wwvHnz5iF0TWBMgIi7zbhrQhXW-zEFIseQgsMJGhJOZaaU4qdoCKAgm1DFB-gixg0ACCHkORrQPJ8wKcUQzWffZutrX69x--Hw0lSdw6HES1-4kHL0bcRtwG-m9a5Ova-xqfG8a3f9BC96GXhaJRp7ic5KU0V3dawjtHicvU-fs9f508v04TWzTPA2ExJIOeHMFFKoCS1BMnv4gzFWlisnDKE5KEpLqpjJcxBcWkPlylhVCJPEj9Btz7trwmfnYqu3PlpXVaZ2oYuaKMYoA5qLBOU91DYhxsaVetf4rWn2moA-eKk3-uilPmjQkIJD2rs5nuhWW1f8bf2alwD3PcClR7-8a3S0yRLrCt842-oi-H9O_AAvOIcZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933230286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</creator><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic.
We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit.
We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174).
The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28843776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Self Report ; Telemedicine ; Urologic Diseases ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0466-6830 ; 0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guduguntla, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizer, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic.
We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit.
We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174).
The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaLYWv0JSo5etk6SJtmcREr9AKEebK8hzWZrynZTN7ti_70pW70Kw8wwvHnz5iF0TWBMgIi7zbhrQhXW-zEFIseQgsMJGhJOZaaU4qdoCKAgm1DFB-gixg0ACCHkORrQPJ8wKcUQzWffZutrX69x--Hw0lSdw6HES1-4kHL0bcRtwG-m9a5Ova-xqfG8a3f9BC96GXhaJRp7ic5KU0V3dawjtHicvU-fs9f508v04TWzTPA2ExJIOeHMFFKoCS1BMnv4gzFWlisnDKE5KEpLqpjJcxBcWkPlylhVCJPEj9Btz7trwmfnYqu3PlpXVaZ2oYuaKMYoA5qLBOU91DYhxsaVetf4rWn2moA-eKk3-uilPmjQkIJD2rs5nuhWW1f8bf2alwD3PcClR7-8a3S0yRLrCt842-oi-H9O_AAvOIcZ</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Andino, Juan J.</creator><creator>Guduguntla, Vinay</creator><creator>Weizer, Alon</creator><creator>Roberts, William W.</creator><creator>Wittmann, Daniela</creator><creator>Miller, David</creator><creator>Morgan, Todd M.</creator><creator>Ellimoottil, Chad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-6830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</title><author>Andino, Juan J. ; Guduguntla, Vinay ; Weizer, Alon ; Roberts, William W. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Miller, David ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Ellimoottil, Chad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6701f453ad76942f073c2017333ffbe6a1280922f293a880657ca27bac9d6a843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andino, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guduguntla, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizer, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, William W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellimoottil, Chad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andino, Juan J.</au><au>Guduguntla, Vinay</au><au>Weizer, Alon</au><au>Roberts, William W.</au><au>Wittmann, Daniela</au><au>Miller, David</au><au>Morgan, Todd M.</au><au>Ellimoottil, Chad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>31-35</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To examine the value that urologic patients place on video visits before the implementation of a telemedicine program at our institution's outpatient urology clinic.
We conducted an on-site survey at a tertiary medical center's outpatient urology clinic over a 3-month period. Our survey questions assessed patient access to technology needed for video visits, patients' perceptions about video visits, the amount patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits, and total time patients expect to spend during a standard clinic visit.
We completed 108 surveys of adult patients. Of the patients, 94% owned a device that could be used for a video visit. The median level of patient interest in video visits was reported as 72 out of 100 (interquartile range: 51.25; scale: 0-100,) with a statistically significant difference in interest level across different age groups (P = .022). The median amount patients reported they were willing to pay out-of-pocket for video visits was $20 (interquartile range: $39.25, max: $174).
The vast majority of patients in our outpatient urology clinic possess the technology necessary to engage in video visits. Patients are highly interested in video visits and report a willingness to share in the costs of these visits. Given that a portion of patients travel long distances for specialty clinic visits, video visits have the potential to substantially improve the patient experience.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28843776</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-6830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9715</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.31-35 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933230286 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Ambulatory Care Humans Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Prospective Studies Self Report Telemedicine Urologic Diseases Young Adult |
title | Examining the Value of Video Visits to Patients in an Outpatient Urology Clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20Value%20of%20Video%20Visits%20to%20Patients%20in%20an%20Outpatient%20Urology%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Andino,%20Juan%20J.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=31-35&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933230286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933230286&rft_id=info:pmid/28843776&rft_els_id=S0090429517308737&rfr_iscdi=true |