The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy

A case is made for why it may now be in the best interest of insurance companies to reimburse for marital therapy to treat marital distress. Relevant literature is reviewed with a considerable focus on the reasons that insurance companies would benefit from reimbursing marital therapy – the high cos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marital and family therapy 2018-07, Vol.44 (3), p.512-526
Hauptverfasser: Clawson, Robb E., Davis, Stephanie Y., Miller, Richard B., Webster, Tabitha N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 526
container_issue 3
container_start_page 512
container_title Journal of marital and family therapy
container_volume 44
creator Clawson, Robb E.
Davis, Stephanie Y.
Miller, Richard B.
Webster, Tabitha N.
description A case is made for why it may now be in the best interest of insurance companies to reimburse for marital therapy to treat marital distress. Relevant literature is reviewed with a considerable focus on the reasons that insurance companies would benefit from reimbursing marital therapy – the high costs of marital distress, the growing link between marital distress and a host of related physical and mental health problems, as well as the availability of empirically supported treatments for marital distress. This is followed by a focus on the major reasons insurance companies cite for not reimbursing marital therapy, along with a discussion of advances in several growing bodies of research to address these concerns. Main arguments include the direct medical offset costs of couple and family therapy (including for high utilizers of health insurance), and the fact that insurance companies already find it cost effective to reimburse for prevention of other health and psychological problems. This is followed by implications for practitioners and researchers.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jmft.12263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1932163702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1932163702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-5b670ee815d92a93e0364800e1cf988a6e42c7dc572afb9a2333efe2653dd7383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYx_EgipvTiy9ACl5E6Eyep03aoxSnk4kgE7yFtH2KHf0zkxXZu7ez04MHc8nlw5eHH2Pngk9F_25WdbGZCgCJB2wsVAg-l1wesjEXceAHCt5G7MS5FedcBnF0zEYQRYgQ4pjJ5Tt5iXHkFa315o3rrGky8l6orNPOOqqp2Xht4SVtt67I67k16-0pOypM5ehs_0_Y6-xumTz4i-f7eXK78DMMFfphKhUnikSYx2BiJI4yiDgnkRVxFBlJAWQqz0IFpkhjA4hIBYEMMc8VRjhhV0N3bduPjtxG16XLqKpMQ23ntIgRhETFoaeXf-iq7WzTX6eBKwCFEMheXQ8qs61zlgq9tmVt7FYLrndr6t2a-nvNHl_sk11aU_5Lf-brgRjAZ1nR9p-UfnyaLYfoF3J3fPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072273246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Clawson, Robb E. ; Davis, Stephanie Y. ; Miller, Richard B. ; Webster, Tabitha N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clawson, Robb E. ; Davis, Stephanie Y. ; Miller, Richard B. ; Webster, Tabitha N.</creatorcontrib><description>A case is made for why it may now be in the best interest of insurance companies to reimburse for marital therapy to treat marital distress. Relevant literature is reviewed with a considerable focus on the reasons that insurance companies would benefit from reimbursing marital therapy – the high costs of marital distress, the growing link between marital distress and a host of related physical and mental health problems, as well as the availability of empirically supported treatments for marital distress. This is followed by a focus on the major reasons insurance companies cite for not reimbursing marital therapy, along with a discussion of advances in several growing bodies of research to address these concerns. Main arguments include the direct medical offset costs of couple and family therapy (including for high utilizers of health insurance), and the fact that insurance companies already find it cost effective to reimburse for prevention of other health and psychological problems. This is followed by implications for practitioners and researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-472X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-0606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28833253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abnormal psychology ; Adults ; Alcohol ; Arthritis ; Behavior disorders ; Best interests ; Companies ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Couples ; Couples therapy ; Couples Therapy - economics ; Diabetes ; Divorce ; Families &amp; family life ; Family Conflict - economics ; Family therapy ; Health care expenditures ; Health insurance ; Health problems ; Health status ; Humans ; Insurance companies ; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement ; Marital Instability ; Marital Satisfaction ; Marital Therapy - economics ; Marriage ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental Health - economics ; Obesity ; Personal relationships ; Psychological distress ; Psychological problems ; Psychopathology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of marital and family therapy, 2018-07, Vol.44 (3), p.512-526</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy</rights><rights>2017 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-5b670ee815d92a93e0364800e1cf988a6e42c7dc572afb9a2333efe2653dd7383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-5b670ee815d92a93e0364800e1cf988a6e42c7dc572afb9a2333efe2653dd7383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6985-9783</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjmft.12263$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjmft.12263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clawson, Robb E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephanie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Tabitha N.</creatorcontrib><title>The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy</title><title>Journal of marital and family therapy</title><addtitle>J Marital Fam Ther</addtitle><description>A case is made for why it may now be in the best interest of insurance companies to reimburse for marital therapy to treat marital distress. Relevant literature is reviewed with a considerable focus on the reasons that insurance companies would benefit from reimbursing marital therapy – the high costs of marital distress, the growing link between marital distress and a host of related physical and mental health problems, as well as the availability of empirically supported treatments for marital distress. This is followed by a focus on the major reasons insurance companies cite for not reimbursing marital therapy, along with a discussion of advances in several growing bodies of research to address these concerns. Main arguments include the direct medical offset costs of couple and family therapy (including for high utilizers of health insurance), and the fact that insurance companies already find it cost effective to reimburse for prevention of other health and psychological problems. This is followed by implications for practitioners and researchers.</description><subject>Abnormal psychology</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Best interests</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Couples therapy</subject><subject>Couples Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family Conflict - economics</subject><subject>Family therapy</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance companies</subject><subject>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement</subject><subject>Marital Instability</subject><subject>Marital Satisfaction</subject><subject>Marital Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health - economics</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychological problems</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0194-472X</issn><issn>1752-0606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYx_EgipvTiy9ACl5E6Eyep03aoxSnk4kgE7yFtH2KHf0zkxXZu7ez04MHc8nlw5eHH2Pngk9F_25WdbGZCgCJB2wsVAg-l1wesjEXceAHCt5G7MS5FedcBnF0zEYQRYgQ4pjJ5Tt5iXHkFa315o3rrGky8l6orNPOOqqp2Xht4SVtt67I67k16-0pOypM5ehs_0_Y6-xumTz4i-f7eXK78DMMFfphKhUnikSYx2BiJI4yiDgnkRVxFBlJAWQqz0IFpkhjA4hIBYEMMc8VRjhhV0N3bduPjtxG16XLqKpMQ23ntIgRhETFoaeXf-iq7WzTX6eBKwCFEMheXQ8qs61zlgq9tmVt7FYLrndr6t2a-nvNHl_sk11aU_5Lf-brgRjAZ1nR9p-UfnyaLYfoF3J3fPM</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Clawson, Robb E.</creator><creator>Davis, Stephanie Y.</creator><creator>Miller, Richard B.</creator><creator>Webster, Tabitha N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-9783</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy</title><author>Clawson, Robb E. ; Davis, Stephanie Y. ; Miller, Richard B. ; Webster, Tabitha N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-5b670ee815d92a93e0364800e1cf988a6e42c7dc572afb9a2333efe2653dd7383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abnormal psychology</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Best interests</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Couples therapy</topic><topic>Couples Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family Conflict - economics</topic><topic>Family therapy</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance companies</topic><topic>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement</topic><topic>Marital Instability</topic><topic>Marital Satisfaction</topic><topic>Marital Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health - economics</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychological problems</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clawson, Robb E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephanie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Tabitha N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of marital and family therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clawson, Robb E.</au><au>Davis, Stephanie Y.</au><au>Miller, Richard B.</au><au>Webster, Tabitha N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marital and family therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Marital Fam Ther</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>512-526</pages><issn>0194-472X</issn><eissn>1752-0606</eissn><abstract>A case is made for why it may now be in the best interest of insurance companies to reimburse for marital therapy to treat marital distress. Relevant literature is reviewed with a considerable focus on the reasons that insurance companies would benefit from reimbursing marital therapy – the high costs of marital distress, the growing link between marital distress and a host of related physical and mental health problems, as well as the availability of empirically supported treatments for marital distress. This is followed by a focus on the major reasons insurance companies cite for not reimbursing marital therapy, along with a discussion of advances in several growing bodies of research to address these concerns. Main arguments include the direct medical offset costs of couple and family therapy (including for high utilizers of health insurance), and the fact that insurance companies already find it cost effective to reimburse for prevention of other health and psychological problems. This is followed by implications for practitioners and researchers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28833253</pmid><doi>10.1111/jmft.12263</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-9783</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-472X
ispartof Journal of marital and family therapy, 2018-07, Vol.44 (3), p.512-526
issn 0194-472X
1752-0606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1932163702
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Abnormal psychology
Adults
Alcohol
Arthritis
Behavior disorders
Best interests
Companies
Cost analysis
Costs
Couples
Couples therapy
Couples Therapy - economics
Diabetes
Divorce
Families & family life
Family Conflict - economics
Family therapy
Health care expenditures
Health insurance
Health problems
Health status
Humans
Insurance companies
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
Marital Instability
Marital Satisfaction
Marital Therapy - economics
Marriage
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental Health - economics
Obesity
Personal relationships
Psychological distress
Psychological problems
Psychopathology
Womens health
title The Case for Insurance Reimbursement of Couple Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A38%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Case%20for%20Insurance%20Reimbursement%20of%20Couple%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marital%20and%20family%20therapy&rft.au=Clawson,%20Robb%20E.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=512-526&rft.issn=0194-472X&rft.eissn=1752-0606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jmft.12263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932163702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072273246&rft_id=info:pmid/28833253&rfr_iscdi=true