Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis

The transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the most widely used method in the surgical treatment of the non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBT). Despite its popularity, the laser technique has been widely used in urology as an alternative, via the application of transurethral las...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in medical science 2017-12, Vol.32 (9), p.2005-2012
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Huan, Wang, Ning, Han, Shanfu, Male, Musa, Zhao, Chenming, Yao, Daqiang, Chen, Zhiqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2012
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2005
container_title Lasers in medical science
container_volume 32
creator Yang, Huan
Wang, Ning
Han, Shanfu
Male, Musa
Zhao, Chenming
Yao, Daqiang
Chen, Zhiqiang
description The transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the most widely used method in the surgical treatment of the non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBT). Despite its popularity, the laser technique has been widely used in urology as an alternative, via the application of transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumor. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and feasibility between transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Wed of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Medline. The search included studies up to the 1st of January 2017. The outcomes of interest that were used in order to assess the two techniques included operation time, catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, 24-month-recurrence rate, and the postoperative adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy. A total of 13 trials with 2012 participants were included, of which 975 and 1037 underwent transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the operation time between the two groups, although significant differences were reported for the variables catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, and 24-month-recurrence rate. In the mitomycin and epirubicin subgroups, no significant differences were observed in the laser enucleation and TURBT methods with regard to the 24-month-recurrence rate. The laser enucleation was superior to TURBT with regard to the parameters obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, catheterization time, hospitalization time, and 24-month-recurrence rate. Moreover, laser enucleation can offer a more accurate result of the tumor’s pathological stage and grade.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1931711759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1931711759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfe3b8ddd8bc00a05a555f323e1efe4d651a11b5cfb10b48c760896710894f103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhoM4ONfRH-BGAm7c1MlpmrbXnVz8ggE3Cu7CSXridOjHNScduD9j_vGkdBQR3SSQ87xvQh4hXoB6A0o1lwwKlC4UNEWpVVuYR2IHlTZFrarvj8VOlXVbtPsSzsVT5huVwRr0E3Fetq2GWsNO3B3m8Yix53mSc5DpmiSF0Hv0J4lTJwMh964f-nRa5wMyRUnT4gfC1G8hN2DX5eO0jHOUtxR5YZkiTrxEStcRBxmJyf-TfytRjpSwwAmHE_f8TJwFHJieP-wX4tuH918Pn4qrLx8_H95dFV43ZSpcIO3aruta55VCZdAYE3SpCShQ1dUGEMAZHxwoV7W-qVW7rxvIaxXyt12I11vvMc4_F-Jkx549DQNONC9sYa-hAWjMPqOv_kJv5iXm965UDU2loDSZgo3ycWaOFOwx9iPGkwVlV19282WzBrv6smvm5UPz4kbqfid-CcpAuQGcR9MPin9c_d_We8rgook</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1961740125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yang, Huan ; Wang, Ning ; Han, Shanfu ; Male, Musa ; Zhao, Chenming ; Yao, Daqiang ; Chen, Zhiqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huan ; Wang, Ning ; Han, Shanfu ; Male, Musa ; Zhao, Chenming ; Yao, Daqiang ; Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><description>The transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the most widely used method in the surgical treatment of the non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBT). Despite its popularity, the laser technique has been widely used in urology as an alternative, via the application of transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumor. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and feasibility between transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Wed of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Medline. The search included studies up to the 1st of January 2017. The outcomes of interest that were used in order to assess the two techniques included operation time, catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, 24-month-recurrence rate, and the postoperative adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy. A total of 13 trials with 2012 participants were included, of which 975 and 1037 underwent transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the operation time between the two groups, although significant differences were reported for the variables catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, and 24-month-recurrence rate. In the mitomycin and epirubicin subgroups, no significant differences were observed in the laser enucleation and TURBT methods with regard to the 24-month-recurrence rate. The laser enucleation was superior to TURBT with regard to the parameters obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, catheterization time, hospitalization time, and 24-month-recurrence rate. Moreover, laser enucleation can offer a more accurate result of the tumor’s pathological stage and grade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28831631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bladder ; Bladder cancer ; Cancer surgery ; Catheterization ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Dentistry ; Enucleation ; Epirubicin ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Irritation ; Laser surgery ; Laser Therapy ; Lasers ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Mitomycin ; Operative Time ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Perforation ; Photonics ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Quantum Optics ; Scientific papers ; Search engines ; Subgroups ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary bladder ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2017-12, Vol.32 (9), p.2005-2012</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Lasers in Medical Science is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfe3b8ddd8bc00a05a555f323e1efe4d651a11b5cfb10b48c760896710894f103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfe3b8ddd8bc00a05a555f323e1efe4d651a11b5cfb10b48c760896710894f103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Shanfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Male, Musa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chenming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the most widely used method in the surgical treatment of the non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBT). Despite its popularity, the laser technique has been widely used in urology as an alternative, via the application of transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumor. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and feasibility between transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Wed of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Medline. The search included studies up to the 1st of January 2017. The outcomes of interest that were used in order to assess the two techniques included operation time, catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, 24-month-recurrence rate, and the postoperative adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy. A total of 13 trials with 2012 participants were included, of which 975 and 1037 underwent transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the operation time between the two groups, although significant differences were reported for the variables catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, and 24-month-recurrence rate. In the mitomycin and epirubicin subgroups, no significant differences were observed in the laser enucleation and TURBT methods with regard to the 24-month-recurrence rate. The laser enucleation was superior to TURBT with regard to the parameters obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, catheterization time, hospitalization time, and 24-month-recurrence rate. Moreover, laser enucleation can offer a more accurate result of the tumor’s pathological stage and grade.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Enucleation</subject><subject>Epirubicin</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritation</subject><subject>Laser surgery</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mitomycin</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perforation</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhoM4ONfRH-BGAm7c1MlpmrbXnVz8ggE3Cu7CSXridOjHNScduD9j_vGkdBQR3SSQ87xvQh4hXoB6A0o1lwwKlC4UNEWpVVuYR2IHlTZFrarvj8VOlXVbtPsSzsVT5huVwRr0E3Fetq2GWsNO3B3m8Yix53mSc5DpmiSF0Hv0J4lTJwMh964f-nRa5wMyRUnT4gfC1G8hN2DX5eO0jHOUtxR5YZkiTrxEStcRBxmJyf-TfytRjpSwwAmHE_f8TJwFHJieP-wX4tuH918Pn4qrLx8_H95dFV43ZSpcIO3aruta55VCZdAYE3SpCShQ1dUGEMAZHxwoV7W-qVW7rxvIaxXyt12I11vvMc4_F-Jkx549DQNONC9sYa-hAWjMPqOv_kJv5iXm965UDU2loDSZgo3ycWaOFOwx9iPGkwVlV19282WzBrv6smvm5UPz4kbqfid-CcpAuQGcR9MPin9c_d_We8rgook</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Yang, Huan</creator><creator>Wang, Ning</creator><creator>Han, Shanfu</creator><creator>Male, Musa</creator><creator>Zhao, Chenming</creator><creator>Yao, Daqiang</creator><creator>Chen, Zhiqiang</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis</title><author>Yang, Huan ; Wang, Ning ; Han, Shanfu ; Male, Musa ; Zhao, Chenming ; Yao, Daqiang ; Chen, Zhiqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfe3b8ddd8bc00a05a555f323e1efe4d651a11b5cfb10b48c760896710894f103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Enucleation</topic><topic>Epirubicin</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritation</topic><topic>Laser surgery</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mitomycin</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perforation</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Shanfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Male, Musa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chenming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Daqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Huan</au><au>Wang, Ning</au><au>Han, Shanfu</au><au>Male, Musa</au><au>Zhao, Chenming</au><au>Yao, Daqiang</au><au>Chen, Zhiqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2005</spage><epage>2012</epage><pages>2005-2012</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>The transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the most widely used method in the surgical treatment of the non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBT). Despite its popularity, the laser technique has been widely used in urology as an alternative, via the application of transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumor. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and feasibility between transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Wed of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Medline. The search included studies up to the 1st of January 2017. The outcomes of interest that were used in order to assess the two techniques included operation time, catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, 24-month-recurrence rate, and the postoperative adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy. A total of 13 trials with 2012 participants were included, of which 975 and 1037 underwent transurethral laser enucleation and transurethral resection of bladder tumor, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the operation time between the two groups, although significant differences were reported for the variables catheterization time, hospitalization time, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, bladder irritation, and 24-month-recurrence rate. In the mitomycin and epirubicin subgroups, no significant differences were observed in the laser enucleation and TURBT methods with regard to the 24-month-recurrence rate. The laser enucleation was superior to TURBT with regard to the parameters obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, catheterization time, hospitalization time, and 24-month-recurrence rate. Moreover, laser enucleation can offer a more accurate result of the tumor’s pathological stage and grade.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>28831631</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-8921
ispartof Lasers in medical science, 2017-12, Vol.32 (9), p.2005-2012
issn 0268-8921
1435-604X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1931711759
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Bladder
Bladder cancer
Cancer surgery
Catheterization
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Dentistry
Enucleation
Epirubicin
Feasibility Studies
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Irritation
Laser surgery
Laser Therapy
Lasers
Length of Stay
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Middle Aged
Mitomycin
Operative Time
Optical Devices
Optics
Original Article
Perforation
Photonics
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Quantum Optics
Scientific papers
Search engines
Subgroups
Surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urinary bladder
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urology
title Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of laser enucleation of bladder tumor versus transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A00%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20efficacy%20and%20feasibility%20of%20laser%20enucleation%20of%20bladder%20tumor%20versus%20transurethral%20resection%20of%20bladder%20tumor:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Yang,%20Huan&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2005&rft.epage=2012&rft.pages=2005-2012&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-017-2308-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931711759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1961740125&rft_id=info:pmid/28831631&rfr_iscdi=true