Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variableslateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2017-11, Vol.31 (11), p.583-588
Hauptverfasser: Ciufo, David J, Zaruta, Douglas A, Lipof, Jason S, Judd, Kyle T, Gorczyca, John T, Ketz, John P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 588
container_issue 11
container_start_page 583
container_title Journal of orthopaedic trauma
container_volume 31
creator Ciufo, David J
Zaruta, Douglas A
Lipof, Jason S
Judd, Kyle T
Gorczyca, John T
Ketz, John P
description OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variableslateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance (TAD). DESIGN:Retrospective review. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority were female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION:Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade. RESULTS:A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (p< 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (>3mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction >5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, TAD >25mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (p=0.58) or fellowship training (p=0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (OR=8.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.4 to 27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR=4.3, CI=1.3 to 14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR=3.6, CI=1.0 to 13.0) were associated with fixation cutout. CONCLUSIONS:Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or non-modifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (non-modifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1931236624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1931236624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3561-2deaabbfcbaa0e4941d899b33c9e0ff21a1d1829e843bc304c3043a55380f3763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUguvdnMR9sll3M4FYYDmdclTU9pXNfUJGX4783YFPHCwCEEnvPmnAeha0omlMjp3f1qPSG_j8zoCRrSlNMxY5KeoiERkoxTzuUAXXj_HhlBGDtHAyYEm6aEDVH9avwGL5QO1nk8895qowKUeGdCjefQ1aqxWyj7plHuE78o0-B5H2wfsGlxqAGvHaiwhTZgW8WH1bVqAzij8ZPp8MLF6N6Bv0RnlWo8XB3vEXpbPKznT-Pl6vF5PluONU-zOHkJShVFpQulCCQyoaWQsuBcSyBVxaiiJRVMgkh4oTlJ9sVVmnJBKj7N-AjdHnI7Zz968CHfGq8hjt-C7X1OJaeMZxlLIpocUO2s9w6qvHNmG9fMKcn3jvPoOP_rOLbdHH_oi2jmp-lbagTEAdjZJprwm6bfgctrUE2o_8_-AtuIiPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931236624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ciufo, David J ; Zaruta, Douglas A ; Lipof, Jason S ; Judd, Kyle T ; Gorczyca, John T ; Ketz, John P</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciufo, David J ; Zaruta, Douglas A ; Lipof, Jason S ; Judd, Kyle T ; Gorczyca, John T ; Ketz, John P</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variableslateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance (TAD). DESIGN:Retrospective review. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority were female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION:Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade. RESULTS:A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (p&lt; 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (&gt;3mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction &gt;5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, TAD &gt;25mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (p=0.58) or fellowship training (p=0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (OR=8.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.4 to 27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR=4.3, CI=1.3 to 14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR=3.6, CI=1.0 to 13.0) were associated with fixation cutout. CONCLUSIONS:Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or non-modifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (non-modifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28827502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Nails ; Cohort Studies ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fracture Healing - physiology ; Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Pain Measurement ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2017-11, Vol.31 (11), p.583-588</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3561-2deaabbfcbaa0e4941d899b33c9e0ff21a1d1829e843bc304c3043a55380f3763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3561-2deaabbfcbaa0e4941d899b33c9e0ff21a1d1829e843bc304c3043a55380f3763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciufo, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaruta, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipof, Jason S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Kyle T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorczyca, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketz, John P</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variableslateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance (TAD). DESIGN:Retrospective review. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority were female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION:Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade. RESULTS:A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (p&lt; 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (&gt;3mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction &gt;5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, TAD &gt;25mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (p=0.58) or fellowship training (p=0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (OR=8.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.4 to 27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR=4.3, CI=1.3 to 14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR=3.6, CI=1.0 to 13.0) were associated with fixation cutout. CONCLUSIONS:Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or non-modifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (non-modifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic level III.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fracture Healing - physiology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUguvdnMR9sll3M4FYYDmdclTU9pXNfUJGX4783YFPHCwCEEnvPmnAeha0omlMjp3f1qPSG_j8zoCRrSlNMxY5KeoiERkoxTzuUAXXj_HhlBGDtHAyYEm6aEDVH9avwGL5QO1nk8895qowKUeGdCjefQ1aqxWyj7plHuE78o0-B5H2wfsGlxqAGvHaiwhTZgW8WH1bVqAzij8ZPp8MLF6N6Bv0RnlWo8XB3vEXpbPKznT-Pl6vF5PluONU-zOHkJShVFpQulCCQyoaWQsuBcSyBVxaiiJRVMgkh4oTlJ9sVVmnJBKj7N-AjdHnI7Zz968CHfGq8hjt-C7X1OJaeMZxlLIpocUO2s9w6qvHNmG9fMKcn3jvPoOP_rOLbdHH_oi2jmp-lbagTEAdjZJprwm6bfgctrUE2o_8_-AtuIiPc</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Ciufo, David J</creator><creator>Zaruta, Douglas A</creator><creator>Lipof, Jason S</creator><creator>Judd, Kyle T</creator><creator>Gorczyca, John T</creator><creator>Ketz, John P</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures</title><author>Ciufo, David J ; Zaruta, Douglas A ; Lipof, Jason S ; Judd, Kyle T ; Gorczyca, John T ; Ketz, John P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3561-2deaabbfcbaa0e4941d899b33c9e0ff21a1d1829e843bc304c3043a55380f3763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fracture Healing - physiology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciufo, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaruta, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipof, Jason S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Kyle T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorczyca, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketz, John P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciufo, David J</au><au>Zaruta, Douglas A</au><au>Lipof, Jason S</au><au>Judd, Kyle T</au><au>Gorczyca, John T</au><au>Ketz, John P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>588</epage><pages>583-588</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variableslateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance (TAD). DESIGN:Retrospective review. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority were female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION:Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade. RESULTS:A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (p&lt; 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (&gt;3mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction &gt;5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, TAD &gt;25mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (p=0.58) or fellowship training (p=0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (OR=8.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.4 to 27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR=4.3, CI=1.3 to 14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR=3.6, CI=1.0 to 13.0) were associated with fixation cutout. CONCLUSIONS:Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or non-modifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (non-modifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic level III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>28827502</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5339
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2017-11, Vol.31 (11), p.583-588
issn 0890-5339
1531-2291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1931236624
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Academic Medical Centers
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Nails
Cohort Studies
Equipment Design
Female
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Fracture Healing - physiology
Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Hip Fractures - surgery
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Pain Measurement
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
title Risk Factors Associated with Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A27%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Factors%20Associated%20with%20Cephalomedullary%20Nail%20Cutout%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Trochanteric%20Hip%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Ciufo,%20David%20J&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=588&rft.pages=583-588&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931236624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931236624&rft_id=info:pmid/28827502&rfr_iscdi=true