Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification
While access and exposure to green spaces has been shown to be beneficial for the health of urban residents, interventions focused on augmenting such access may also catalyse gentrification processes, also known as green gentrification. Drawing from the fields of public health, urban planning and en...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2017-11, Vol.71 (11), p.1118-1121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1118 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Cole, Helen V S Garcia Lamarca, Melisa Connolly, James J T Anguelovski, Isabelle |
description | While access and exposure to green spaces has been shown to be beneficial for the health of urban residents, interventions focused on augmenting such access may also catalyse gentrification processes, also known as green gentrification. Drawing from the fields of public health, urban planning and environmental justice, we argue that public health and epidemiology researchers should rely on a more dynamic model of community that accounts for the potential unintended social consequences of upstream health interventions. In our example of green gentrification, the health benefits of greening can only be fully understood relative to the social and political environments in which inequities persist. We point to two key questions regarding the health benefits of newly added green space: Who benefits in the short and long term from greening interventions in lower income or minority neighbourhoods undergoing processes of revitalisation? And, can green cities be both healthy and just? We propose the Green Gentrification and Health Equity model which provides a framework for understanding and testing whether gentrification associated with green space may modify the effect of exposure to green space on health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech-2017-209201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1930932048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26383998</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26383998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-2bc1ee643aeee1d12ada3991ba2d58eab6038cae61294d451539678aecf944ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoaTZp7rm0CHIptG40kvyhUwgh_YBALw30ZiR5di3Xa-9KMiH_feV4m0AvvWgE83tvRnqEnAP7DCCKyw5tm3EGZTpUqkdkBbJkGS9F9YqsGEiRMZb_OiYnIXQsXUuu3pBjXlWcq7Jckf21R7rxiAO1LjoMtEXdx_aR6qGhuJ9c1KbHK3o_7LT97YYNjS1Sj72ObhxC63bUYHyYDRblp4NdSDw-uWxwiN6tnX2SvCWv17oPeHaop-T-y-3Pm2_Z3Y-v32-u7zIjeRkzbiwgFlJoRIQGuG60UAqM5k1eoTYFE5XVWABXspE55EIVZaXRrpWURotT8mHx3flxP2GI9dYFi32vBxynUIMSTAnOZJXQi3_Qbpz8kLZLVA4SBLCZYgtl_RiCx3W9826r_WMNrJ7jqOc46jmOeokjSd4fjCezxeZZ8Pf_E_BuAboQR__SL0SVHjvP_Lj0zbb7_7g_12yeVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951413108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Cole, Helen V S ; Garcia Lamarca, Melisa ; Connolly, James J T ; Anguelovski, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Cole, Helen V S ; Garcia Lamarca, Melisa ; Connolly, James J T ; Anguelovski, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>While access and exposure to green spaces has been shown to be beneficial for the health of urban residents, interventions focused on augmenting such access may also catalyse gentrification processes, also known as green gentrification. Drawing from the fields of public health, urban planning and environmental justice, we argue that public health and epidemiology researchers should rely on a more dynamic model of community that accounts for the potential unintended social consequences of upstream health interventions. In our example of green gentrification, the health benefits of greening can only be fully understood relative to the social and political environments in which inequities persist. We point to two key questions regarding the health benefits of newly added green space: Who benefits in the short and long term from greening interventions in lower income or minority neighbourhoods undergoing processes of revitalisation? And, can green cities be both healthy and just? We propose the Green Gentrification and Health Equity model which provides a framework for understanding and testing whether gentrification associated with green space may modify the effect of exposure to green space on health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-209201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28822977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Cities ; City Planning ; Climate change ; Environmental Health - standards ; Environmental justice ; Environmental policy ; Epidemiology ; Essay ; Green infrastructure ; Greening ; Health care ; Health disparities ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - organization & administration ; Humans ; Intervention ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Neighborhoods ; Outdoor air quality ; Parks & recreation areas ; Political ecology ; Public Health ; Researchers ; Residence Characteristics ; Sustainable development ; United States ; Urban Health - standards ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2017-11, Vol.71 (11), p.1118-1121</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: 2017 © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-2bc1ee643aeee1d12ada3991ba2d58eab6038cae61294d451539678aecf944ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-2bc1ee643aeee1d12ada3991ba2d58eab6038cae61294d451539678aecf944ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0936-6810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26383998$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26383998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28822977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cole, Helen V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Lamarca, Melisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anguelovski, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>While access and exposure to green spaces has been shown to be beneficial for the health of urban residents, interventions focused on augmenting such access may also catalyse gentrification processes, also known as green gentrification. Drawing from the fields of public health, urban planning and environmental justice, we argue that public health and epidemiology researchers should rely on a more dynamic model of community that accounts for the potential unintended social consequences of upstream health interventions. In our example of green gentrification, the health benefits of greening can only be fully understood relative to the social and political environments in which inequities persist. We point to two key questions regarding the health benefits of newly added green space: Who benefits in the short and long term from greening interventions in lower income or minority neighbourhoods undergoing processes of revitalisation? And, can green cities be both healthy and just? We propose the Green Gentrification and Health Equity model which provides a framework for understanding and testing whether gentrification associated with green space may modify the effect of exposure to green space on health.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>City Planning</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Environmental Health - standards</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>Green infrastructure</subject><subject>Greening</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban Health - standards</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoaTZp7rm0CHIptG40kvyhUwgh_YBALw30ZiR5di3Xa-9KMiH_feV4m0AvvWgE83tvRnqEnAP7DCCKyw5tm3EGZTpUqkdkBbJkGS9F9YqsGEiRMZb_OiYnIXQsXUuu3pBjXlWcq7Jckf21R7rxiAO1LjoMtEXdx_aR6qGhuJ9c1KbHK3o_7LT97YYNjS1Sj72ObhxC63bUYHyYDRblp4NdSDw-uWxwiN6tnX2SvCWv17oPeHaop-T-y-3Pm2_Z3Y-v32-u7zIjeRkzbiwgFlJoRIQGuG60UAqM5k1eoTYFE5XVWABXspE55EIVZaXRrpWURotT8mHx3flxP2GI9dYFi32vBxynUIMSTAnOZJXQi3_Qbpz8kLZLVA4SBLCZYgtl_RiCx3W9826r_WMNrJ7jqOc46jmOeokjSd4fjCezxeZZ8Pf_E_BuAboQR__SL0SVHjvP_Lj0zbb7_7g_12yeVg</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Cole, Helen V S</creator><creator>Garcia Lamarca, Melisa</creator><creator>Connolly, James J T</creator><creator>Anguelovski, Isabelle</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-6810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification</title><author>Cole, Helen V S ; Garcia Lamarca, Melisa ; Connolly, James J T ; Anguelovski, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-2bc1ee643aeee1d12ada3991ba2d58eab6038cae61294d451539678aecf944ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>City Planning</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Environmental Health - standards</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>Green infrastructure</topic><topic>Greening</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban Health - standards</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cole, Helen V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Lamarca, Melisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anguelovski, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cole, Helen V S</au><au>Garcia Lamarca, Melisa</au><au>Connolly, James J T</au><au>Anguelovski, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1118</spage><epage>1121</epage><pages>1118-1121</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><abstract>While access and exposure to green spaces has been shown to be beneficial for the health of urban residents, interventions focused on augmenting such access may also catalyse gentrification processes, also known as green gentrification. Drawing from the fields of public health, urban planning and environmental justice, we argue that public health and epidemiology researchers should rely on a more dynamic model of community that accounts for the potential unintended social consequences of upstream health interventions. In our example of green gentrification, the health benefits of greening can only be fully understood relative to the social and political environments in which inequities persist. We point to two key questions regarding the health benefits of newly added green space: Who benefits in the short and long term from greening interventions in lower income or minority neighbourhoods undergoing processes of revitalisation? And, can green cities be both healthy and just? We propose the Green Gentrification and Health Equity model which provides a framework for understanding and testing whether gentrification associated with green space may modify the effect of exposure to green space on health.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>28822977</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech-2017-209201</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-6810</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2017-11, Vol.71 (11), p.1118-1121 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1930932048 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Air pollution Cities City Planning Climate change Environmental Health - standards Environmental justice Environmental policy Epidemiology Essay Green infrastructure Greening Health care Health disparities Health promotion Health Promotion - organization & administration Humans Intervention Minority & ethnic groups Neighborhoods Outdoor air quality Parks & recreation areas Political ecology Public Health Researchers Residence Characteristics Sustainable development United States Urban Health - standards Urban planning |
title | Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20green%20cities%20healthy%20and%20equitable?%20Unpacking%20the%20relationship%20between%20health,%20green%20space%20and%20gentrification&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Cole,%20Helen%20V%20S&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1118&rft.epage=1121&rft.pages=1118-1121&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech-2017-209201&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26383998%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951413108&rft_id=info:pmid/28822977&rft_jstor_id=26383998&rfr_iscdi=true |