Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty?
In the modern operating room (OR), traditional surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are viewed as effective in reducing airborne microbial populations. Intraoperative sampling of airborne particulates is rarely performed in the OR because of technical difficulties associ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2017-11, Vol.45 (11), p.1267-1272 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1272 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1267 |
| container_title | American journal of infection control |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Parvizi, Javad Barnes, Sue Shohat, Noam Edmiston, Charles E. |
| description | In the modern operating room (OR), traditional surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are viewed as effective in reducing airborne microbial populations. Intraoperative sampling of airborne particulates is rarely performed in the OR because of technical difficulties associated with sampling methodologies and a common belief that airborne contamination is infrequently associated with surgical site infections (SSIs). Recent studies suggest that viable airborne particulates are readily disseminated throughout the OR, placing patients at risk for postoperative SSI. In 2017, virtually all surgical disciplines are engaged in the implantation of selective biomedical devices, and these implants have been documented to be at high risk for intraoperative contamination. Approximately 1.2 million arthroplasties are performed annually in the United States, and that number is expected to increase to 3.8 million by the year 2030. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection is perceived to be low ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1930478955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655317308453</els_id><sourcerecordid>1930478955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6340bb30e0a546fa1a92f60686edf9a829edb1c3dc8f8ebaa6c5a7320970bb643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFP8AB-cglwY43ToKQUFWVUqkSFzhbE2fcTkjsxfZW6i_ib-JlC0cOlqXRe8_j9zH2RopaCqnfzzXMZOtGyK4WuhZN94xtZNt0lWoG_ZxthBx0pdtWnbHzlGYhxKB0-5KdNX0ve9UOG_bryj9QDH5Fn3lw3ELED_wmcco804o8Bx4RUsKU-Eo2hpFg4Tb4DCt5yBT80ZfvkYc9xjLwdzyGsHKgyCFx4JHSD-7A5hC5Kycd4h3ZkpIoIyfv0P6JIV9ey2U-ByrbQMz3MewXSPnx0yv2wsGS8PXTvWXfP199u_xS3X69vrm8uK2sanWutNqJcVQCBbQ77UDC0DgtdK9xcgP0zYDTKK2abO96HAG0baFTjRi64tM7tWXvTrn7GH4eMGWzUrK4LOAxHJKRgxK7rh9KqVvWnKSllJQiOrOPtEJ8NFKYIyAzmyMgcwRkhDYFUDG9fco_jCtO_yx_iRTBx5MAyy8fCKNJltBbnCiWnswU6H_5vwFBoqWv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930478955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Parvizi, Javad ; Barnes, Sue ; Shohat, Noam ; Edmiston, Charles E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Javad ; Barnes, Sue ; Shohat, Noam ; Edmiston, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><description>In the modern operating room (OR), traditional surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are viewed as effective in reducing airborne microbial populations. Intraoperative sampling of airborne particulates is rarely performed in the OR because of technical difficulties associated with sampling methodologies and a common belief that airborne contamination is infrequently associated with surgical site infections (SSIs). Recent studies suggest that viable airborne particulates are readily disseminated throughout the OR, placing patients at risk for postoperative SSI. In 2017, virtually all surgical disciplines are engaged in the implantation of selective biomedical devices, and these implants have been documented to be at high risk for intraoperative contamination. Approximately 1.2 million arthroplasties are performed annually in the United States, and that number is expected to increase to 3.8 million by the year 2030. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection is perceived to be low (<2.5%); however, the personal and fiscal morbidity is significant. Although the pharmaceutic and computer industries enforce stringent air quality standards on their manufacturing processes, there is currently no U.S. standard for acceptable air quality within the OR environment. This review documents the contribution of air contamination to the etiology of periprosthetic joint infection, and evidence for selective innovative strategies to reduce the risk of intraoperative microbial aerosols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28818359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology - standards ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects ; Device-related infection ; Humans ; Intraoperative contamination ; Microbial aerosols ; Operating room ; Operating Rooms - standards ; Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) ; Risk Factors ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Ventilation - methods ; Ventilation - standards</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2017-11, Vol.45 (11), p.1267-1272</ispartof><rights>2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6340bb30e0a546fa1a92f60686edf9a829edb1c3dc8f8ebaa6c5a7320970bb643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6340bb30e0a546fa1a92f60686edf9a829edb1c3dc8f8ebaa6c5a7320970bb643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28818359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shohat, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmiston, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><title>Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty?</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>In the modern operating room (OR), traditional surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are viewed as effective in reducing airborne microbial populations. Intraoperative sampling of airborne particulates is rarely performed in the OR because of technical difficulties associated with sampling methodologies and a common belief that airborne contamination is infrequently associated with surgical site infections (SSIs). Recent studies suggest that viable airborne particulates are readily disseminated throughout the OR, placing patients at risk for postoperative SSI. In 2017, virtually all surgical disciplines are engaged in the implantation of selective biomedical devices, and these implants have been documented to be at high risk for intraoperative contamination. Approximately 1.2 million arthroplasties are performed annually in the United States, and that number is expected to increase to 3.8 million by the year 2030. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection is perceived to be low (<2.5%); however, the personal and fiscal morbidity is significant. Although the pharmaceutic and computer industries enforce stringent air quality standards on their manufacturing processes, there is currently no U.S. standard for acceptable air quality within the OR environment. This review documents the contribution of air contamination to the etiology of periprosthetic joint infection, and evidence for selective innovative strategies to reduce the risk of intraoperative microbial aerosols.</description><subject>Air Microbiology - standards</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</subject><subject>Device-related infection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative contamination</subject><subject>Microbial aerosols</subject><subject>Operating room</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - standards</subject><subject>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ventilation - methods</subject><subject>Ventilation - standards</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFP8AB-cglwY43ToKQUFWVUqkSFzhbE2fcTkjsxfZW6i_ib-JlC0cOlqXRe8_j9zH2RopaCqnfzzXMZOtGyK4WuhZN94xtZNt0lWoG_ZxthBx0pdtWnbHzlGYhxKB0-5KdNX0ve9UOG_bryj9QDH5Fn3lw3ELED_wmcco804o8Bx4RUsKU-Eo2hpFg4Tb4DCt5yBT80ZfvkYc9xjLwdzyGsHKgyCFx4JHSD-7A5hC5Kycd4h3ZkpIoIyfv0P6JIV9ey2U-ByrbQMz3MewXSPnx0yv2wsGS8PXTvWXfP199u_xS3X69vrm8uK2sanWutNqJcVQCBbQ77UDC0DgtdK9xcgP0zYDTKK2abO96HAG0baFTjRi64tM7tWXvTrn7GH4eMGWzUrK4LOAxHJKRgxK7rh9KqVvWnKSllJQiOrOPtEJ8NFKYIyAzmyMgcwRkhDYFUDG9fco_jCtO_yx_iRTBx5MAyy8fCKNJltBbnCiWnswU6H_5vwFBoqWv</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Parvizi, Javad</creator><creator>Barnes, Sue</creator><creator>Shohat, Noam</creator><creator>Edmiston, Charles E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty?</title><author>Parvizi, Javad ; Barnes, Sue ; Shohat, Noam ; Edmiston, Charles E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6340bb30e0a546fa1a92f60686edf9a829edb1c3dc8f8ebaa6c5a7320970bb643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology - standards</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</topic><topic>Device-related infection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative contamination</topic><topic>Microbial aerosols</topic><topic>Operating room</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - standards</topic><topic>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ventilation - methods</topic><topic>Ventilation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shohat, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmiston, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parvizi, Javad</au><au>Barnes, Sue</au><au>Shohat, Noam</au><au>Edmiston, Charles E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1267</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1267-1272</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>In the modern operating room (OR), traditional surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are viewed as effective in reducing airborne microbial populations. Intraoperative sampling of airborne particulates is rarely performed in the OR because of technical difficulties associated with sampling methodologies and a common belief that airborne contamination is infrequently associated with surgical site infections (SSIs). Recent studies suggest that viable airborne particulates are readily disseminated throughout the OR, placing patients at risk for postoperative SSI. In 2017, virtually all surgical disciplines are engaged in the implantation of selective biomedical devices, and these implants have been documented to be at high risk for intraoperative contamination. Approximately 1.2 million arthroplasties are performed annually in the United States, and that number is expected to increase to 3.8 million by the year 2030. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection is perceived to be low (<2.5%); however, the personal and fiscal morbidity is significant. Although the pharmaceutic and computer industries enforce stringent air quality standards on their manufacturing processes, there is currently no U.S. standard for acceptable air quality within the OR environment. This review documents the contribution of air contamination to the etiology of periprosthetic joint infection, and evidence for selective innovative strategies to reduce the risk of intraoperative microbial aerosols.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28818359</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.027</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0196-6553 |
| ispartof | American journal of infection control, 2017-11, Vol.45 (11), p.1267-1272 |
| issn | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1930478955 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Air Microbiology - standards Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects Device-related infection Humans Intraoperative contamination Microbial aerosols Operating room Operating Rooms - standards Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) Risk Factors Surgical Wound Infection - etiology Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Ventilation - methods Ventilation - standards |
| title | Environment of care: Is it time to reassess microbial contamination of the operating room air as a risk factor for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environment%20of%20care:%20Is%20it%20time%20to%20reassess%20microbial%20contamination%20of%20the%20operating%20room%20air%20as%20a%20risk%20factor%20for%20surgical%20site%20infection%20in%20total%20joint%20arthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Parvizi,%20Javad&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1267-1272&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1930478955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930478955&rft_id=info:pmid/28818359&rft_els_id=S0196655317308453&rfr_iscdi=true |