Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits

Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be ir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International archives of occupational and environmental health 2006-05, Vol.79 (4), p.283-298
Hauptverfasser: ARTS, Josje H. E, DE HEER, Cees, WOUTERSEN, Ruud A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 4
container_start_page 283
container_title International archives of occupational and environmental health
container_volume 79
creator ARTS, Josje H. E
DE HEER, Cees
WOUTERSEN, Ruud A
description Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans when compared to experimental animals has brought much debate in the process of setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for such chemicals. In this paper it will be discussed as to how far subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels can be used to establish OELs. Data on respiratory irritation of four odorous irritants were retrieved from public literature and discussed, viz. acetone, formaldehyde, furfural and sulphur dioxide. Objective measures of irritation yielded results that differed from subjective evaluations. Important factors modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms include the perception of odour intensity, exposure history and the individual's bias to report irritation on the basis of his/her prejudice or knowledge of the compound. Subjective measures alone are less appropriate for establishing sensory irritation thresholds of odorous irritants and are, therefore, less suitable to establish OELs without supporting evidence. Objectively measured irritation in humans, the Alarie assay (an experimental animal test assessing the concentration that results in a 50% reduction of the breathing frequency) and repeated exposure studies in animals may be of help to study objective irritation. If subjective measurements are used to study sensory irritation, the study design should at least include: measurement of both incidence and severity determined at several concentrations, an appropriate (0 ppm) control condition, preferably a non-irritant odorant control exposure, validated questionnaires and correct concentration measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00420-005-0044-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2083518561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d85de483688b6a65516caa5f4f81350b8392a11e2dcece31d844a1db6bedb64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_AiQdBba9L56LQ3WXQVBrzoOaTTFc3Q3WlT6cU5-dfNOAMLHpJA5XmrQh5CXnD2ljPWvUPGZMsaxlRdUjb9I7LjUrQNb6V-THZMyHrLBb8i14gHxninO_GUXHHdGiG02pE_--TdRCEE8AVpXGj5CTQDrjG7kvKRlux8oe9rbYJ7t3igKVDchkMNxHuYjnQGh1uGkcacY3ElpoWGlClCKXH5QZP32_qvfJr0e00nmk5xjgWfkSfBTQjPL-cN-f7p47fbz83-692X2w_7xgvTlWY0agRphDZm0E4rxbV3TgUZDBeKDUb0reMc2tGDB8FHI6Xj46AHqJsM4oa8Ofddc_q1ARY7R_QwTW6BtKHlfdu3WokKvvoPPKQt15ej1XWUMkyoCvEz5HNCzBDsmuPs8tFyZk9q7FmNrWrsSY3ta-blpfE2zDA-JC4uKvD6AjisTkKunx3xgeuUUabq_Qu-Jpkl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613558035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>ARTS, Josje H. E ; DE HEER, Cees ; WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</creator><creatorcontrib>ARTS, Josje H. E ; DE HEER, Cees ; WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</creatorcontrib><description>Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans when compared to experimental animals has brought much debate in the process of setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for such chemicals. In this paper it will be discussed as to how far subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels can be used to establish OELs. Data on respiratory irritation of four odorous irritants were retrieved from public literature and discussed, viz. acetone, formaldehyde, furfural and sulphur dioxide. Objective measures of irritation yielded results that differed from subjective evaluations. Important factors modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms include the perception of odour intensity, exposure history and the individual's bias to report irritation on the basis of his/her prejudice or knowledge of the compound. Subjective measures alone are less appropriate for establishing sensory irritation thresholds of odorous irritants and are, therefore, less suitable to establish OELs without supporting evidence. Objectively measured irritation in humans, the Alarie assay (an experimental animal test assessing the concentration that results in a 50% reduction of the breathing frequency) and repeated exposure studies in animals may be of help to study objective irritation. If subjective measurements are used to study sensory irritation, the study design should at least include: measurement of both incidence and severity determined at several concentrations, an appropriate (0 ppm) control condition, preferably a non-irritant odorant control exposure, validated questionnaires and correct concentration measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00420-005-0044-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16283365</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAEHDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Exposure ; Gas, fumes ; Humans ; Irritants - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Occupational diseases ; Occupational Diseases - physiopathology ; Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Occupational health ; Odorants ; Odors ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory System - drug effects ; Respiratory System - injuries ; Respiratory tract ; Risk exposure ; Smell ; Sulfur dioxide ; Threshold Limit Values ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2006-05, Vol.79 (4), p.283-298</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d85de483688b6a65516caa5f4f81350b8392a11e2dcece31d844a1db6bedb64f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d85de483688b6a65516caa5f4f81350b8392a11e2dcece31d844a1db6bedb64f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17585814$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16283365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ARTS, Josje H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE HEER, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</creatorcontrib><title>Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits</title><title>International archives of occupational and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><description>Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans when compared to experimental animals has brought much debate in the process of setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for such chemicals. In this paper it will be discussed as to how far subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels can be used to establish OELs. Data on respiratory irritation of four odorous irritants were retrieved from public literature and discussed, viz. acetone, formaldehyde, furfural and sulphur dioxide. Objective measures of irritation yielded results that differed from subjective evaluations. Important factors modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms include the perception of odour intensity, exposure history and the individual's bias to report irritation on the basis of his/her prejudice or knowledge of the compound. Subjective measures alone are less appropriate for establishing sensory irritation thresholds of odorous irritants and are, therefore, less suitable to establish OELs without supporting evidence. Objectively measured irritation in humans, the Alarie assay (an experimental animal test assessing the concentration that results in a 50% reduction of the breathing frequency) and repeated exposure studies in animals may be of help to study objective irritation. If subjective measurements are used to study sensory irritation, the study design should at least include: measurement of both incidence and severity determined at several concentrations, an appropriate (0 ppm) control condition, preferably a non-irritant odorant control exposure, validated questionnaires and correct concentration measurements.</description><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Gas, fumes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational diseases</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory System - drug effects</subject><subject>Respiratory System - injuries</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Risk exposure</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><subject>Threshold Limit Values</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0340-0131</issn><issn>1432-1246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_AiQdBba9L56LQ3WXQVBrzoOaTTFc3Q3WlT6cU5-dfNOAMLHpJA5XmrQh5CXnD2ljPWvUPGZMsaxlRdUjb9I7LjUrQNb6V-THZMyHrLBb8i14gHxninO_GUXHHdGiG02pE_--TdRCEE8AVpXGj5CTQDrjG7kvKRlux8oe9rbYJ7t3igKVDchkMNxHuYjnQGh1uGkcacY3ElpoWGlClCKXH5QZP32_qvfJr0e00nmk5xjgWfkSfBTQjPL-cN-f7p47fbz83-692X2w_7xgvTlWY0agRphDZm0E4rxbV3TgUZDBeKDUb0reMc2tGDB8FHI6Xj46AHqJsM4oa8Ofddc_q1ARY7R_QwTW6BtKHlfdu3WokKvvoPPKQt15ej1XWUMkyoCvEz5HNCzBDsmuPs8tFyZk9q7FmNrWrsSY3ta-blpfE2zDA-JC4uKvD6AjisTkKunx3xgeuUUabq_Qu-Jpkl</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>ARTS, Josje H. E</creator><creator>DE HEER, Cees</creator><creator>WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits</title><author>ARTS, Josje H. E ; DE HEER, Cees ; WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d85de483688b6a65516caa5f4f81350b8392a11e2dcece31d844a1db6bedb64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Gas, fumes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational diseases</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory System - drug effects</topic><topic>Respiratory System - injuries</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Risk exposure</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><topic>Threshold Limit Values</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ARTS, Josje H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE HEER, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ARTS, Josje H. E</au><au>DE HEER, Cees</au><au>WOUTERSEN, Ruud A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits</atitle><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>283-298</pages><issn>0340-0131</issn><eissn>1432-1246</eissn><coden>IAEHDW</coden><abstract>Chemosensory effects of stimulation by a chemical can either be irritating (trigeminal stimulation) or odorous (olfactory stimulation) or both. For odorous irritants, a clear-cut distinction between odour and irritation is difficult to make. The differences in the lowest concentration found to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans when compared to experimental animals has brought much debate in the process of setting occupational exposure limits (OELs) for such chemicals. In this paper it will be discussed as to how far subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels can be used to establish OELs. Data on respiratory irritation of four odorous irritants were retrieved from public literature and discussed, viz. acetone, formaldehyde, furfural and sulphur dioxide. Objective measures of irritation yielded results that differed from subjective evaluations. Important factors modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms include the perception of odour intensity, exposure history and the individual's bias to report irritation on the basis of his/her prejudice or knowledge of the compound. Subjective measures alone are less appropriate for establishing sensory irritation thresholds of odorous irritants and are, therefore, less suitable to establish OELs without supporting evidence. Objectively measured irritation in humans, the Alarie assay (an experimental animal test assessing the concentration that results in a 50% reduction of the breathing frequency) and repeated exposure studies in animals may be of help to study objective irritation. If subjective measurements are used to study sensory irritation, the study design should at least include: measurement of both incidence and severity determined at several concentrations, an appropriate (0 ppm) control condition, preferably a non-irritant odorant control exposure, validated questionnaires and correct concentration measurements.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16283365</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00420-005-0044-9</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-0131
ispartof International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2006-05, Vol.79 (4), p.283-298
issn 0340-0131
1432-1246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292653
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
Exposure
Gas, fumes
Humans
Irritants - adverse effects
Medical sciences
Occupational diseases
Occupational Diseases - physiopathology
Occupational Diseases - prevention & control
Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
Occupational health
Odorants
Odors
Respiratory diseases
Respiratory System - drug effects
Respiratory System - injuries
Respiratory tract
Risk exposure
Smell
Sulfur dioxide
Threshold Limit Values
Toxicology
title Local effects in the respiratory tract : relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20effects%20in%20the%20respiratory%20tract%20:%20relevance%20of%20subjectively%20measured%20irritation%20for%20setting%20occupational%20exposure%20limits&rft.jtitle=International%20archives%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=ARTS,%20Josje%20H.%20E&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=283-298&rft.issn=0340-0131&rft.eissn=1432-1246&rft.coden=IAEHDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00420-005-0044-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2083518561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613558035&rft_id=info:pmid/16283365&rfr_iscdi=true