Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta
A key question of evolutionary importance is what factors influence who becomes dominant. Individual genetic variation has been found to be associated with several fitness traits, including behaviour. Could it also be a factor influencing social dominance? We investigated the association between soc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2006-03, Vol.59 (5), p.657-665 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 665 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 657 |
| container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Tiira, Katriina Laurila, Anssi Enberg, Katja Piironen, Jorma Aikio, Sami Ranta, Esa Primmer, Craig R. |
| description | A key question of evolutionary importance is what factors influence who becomes dominant. Individual genetic variation has been found to be associated with several fitness traits, including behaviour. Could it also be a factor influencing social dominance? We investigated the association between social status and the amount of intra-individual genetic variation in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Genetic variation was estimated using 12 microsatellite loci. Dominant individuals had higher mean heterozygosity than subordinates in populations with the longest hatchery background. Heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlations did not find any evidence of inbreeding; however, single-locus analysis revealed four loci that each individually differed significantly between dominant and subordinate fish, thus giving more support to local than general effect as the mechanism behind the observed association between genetic diversity and a fitness-associated trait. We did not find any significant relation between mean$d^{2}$and social status, or internal relatedness and social status. Our results suggest that individual genetic variation can influence dominance relations, but manifestation of this phenomenon may depend on the genetic background of the population. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-005-0094-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19291119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25063750</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25063750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bc43125cb53a0f3ebcb369945d433c6716ac5c0be99b46d0af0793315e8705753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1r3DAQhkVJIZs0PyCHggi0p7gZWR-2TiXN1xYCOWzaqxhr5USLV0olOWX76-NlQwo5DHOY530ZHkKOGXxjAM1ZBqiVrAC2o0XVfiAzJnhdQaPqPTIDLqCSQvB9cpDzCgAUa9sZ8ZeRXsa1DxhKpnN8dnTuHx5donNXXIr_Ng8x-7L5ThfRehzoomAZM8WwpDcuuOIt_Y3JY_ExUB_ojxT_Bnqf4lhO6QKHdaQljaXgJ_KxxyG7o9d9SH5dX91fzKvbu5ufF-e3leVSlqqzgrNa2k5yhJ67znZcaS3kUnBuVcMUWmmhc1p3Qi0Be2g050y6tgHZSH5Ivu56n1L8M7pczNpn64YBg4tjNkzXmjGmJ_DkHbiKYwrTb0YxwUC3rZogtoNsijkn15un5NeYNoaB2Zo3O_NmMm-25k07Zb68FmO2OPQJg_X5f7CRom4Zn7jPO26VS0xv91qC4o0E_gIDX4wX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614109886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Tiira, Katriina ; Laurila, Anssi ; Enberg, Katja ; Piironen, Jorma ; Aikio, Sami ; Ranta, Esa ; Primmer, Craig R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiira, Katriina ; Laurila, Anssi ; Enberg, Katja ; Piironen, Jorma ; Aikio, Sami ; Ranta, Esa ; Primmer, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><description>A key question of evolutionary importance is what factors influence who becomes dominant. Individual genetic variation has been found to be associated with several fitness traits, including behaviour. Could it also be a factor influencing social dominance? We investigated the association between social status and the amount of intra-individual genetic variation in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Genetic variation was estimated using 12 microsatellite loci. Dominant individuals had higher mean heterozygosity than subordinates in populations with the longest hatchery background. Heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlations did not find any evidence of inbreeding; however, single-locus analysis revealed four loci that each individually differed significantly between dominant and subordinate fish, thus giving more support to local than general effect as the mechanism behind the observed association between genetic diversity and a fitness-associated trait. We did not find any significant relation between mean$d^{2}$and social status, or internal relatedness and social status. Our results suggest that individual genetic variation can influence dominance relations, but manifestation of this phenomenon may depend on the genetic background of the population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0094-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agnatha and pisces ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fish ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic loci ; Genetic variation ; Inbreeding ; Microsatellites ; Population genetics ; Population mean ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Salmo trutta ; Salmon ; Social classes ; Trout ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2006-03, Vol.59 (5), p.657-665</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bc43125cb53a0f3ebcb369945d433c6716ac5c0be99b46d0af0793315e8705753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bc43125cb53a0f3ebcb369945d433c6716ac5c0be99b46d0af0793315e8705753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25063750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25063750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17542813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiira, Katriina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Anssi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enberg, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piironen, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aikio, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranta, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primmer, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>A key question of evolutionary importance is what factors influence who becomes dominant. Individual genetic variation has been found to be associated with several fitness traits, including behaviour. Could it also be a factor influencing social dominance? We investigated the association between social status and the amount of intra-individual genetic variation in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Genetic variation was estimated using 12 microsatellite loci. Dominant individuals had higher mean heterozygosity than subordinates in populations with the longest hatchery background. Heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlations did not find any evidence of inbreeding; however, single-locus analysis revealed four loci that each individually differed significantly between dominant and subordinate fish, thus giving more support to local than general effect as the mechanism behind the observed association between genetic diversity and a fitness-associated trait. We did not find any significant relation between mean$d^{2}$and social status, or internal relatedness and social status. Our results suggest that individual genetic variation can influence dominance relations, but manifestation of this phenomenon may depend on the genetic background of the population.</description><subject>Agnatha and pisces</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic loci</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population mean</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1r3DAQhkVJIZs0PyCHggi0p7gZWR-2TiXN1xYCOWzaqxhr5USLV0olOWX76-NlQwo5DHOY530ZHkKOGXxjAM1ZBqiVrAC2o0XVfiAzJnhdQaPqPTIDLqCSQvB9cpDzCgAUa9sZ8ZeRXsa1DxhKpnN8dnTuHx5donNXXIr_Ng8x-7L5ThfRehzoomAZM8WwpDcuuOIt_Y3JY_ExUB_ojxT_Bnqf4lhO6QKHdaQljaXgJ_KxxyG7o9d9SH5dX91fzKvbu5ufF-e3leVSlqqzgrNa2k5yhJ67znZcaS3kUnBuVcMUWmmhc1p3Qi0Be2g050y6tgHZSH5Ivu56n1L8M7pczNpn64YBg4tjNkzXmjGmJ_DkHbiKYwrTb0YxwUC3rZogtoNsijkn15un5NeYNoaB2Zo3O_NmMm-25k07Zb68FmO2OPQJg_X5f7CRom4Zn7jPO26VS0xv91qC4o0E_gIDX4wX</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Tiira, Katriina</creator><creator>Laurila, Anssi</creator><creator>Enberg, Katja</creator><creator>Piironen, Jorma</creator><creator>Aikio, Sami</creator><creator>Ranta, Esa</creator><creator>Primmer, Craig R.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta</title><author>Tiira, Katriina ; Laurila, Anssi ; Enberg, Katja ; Piironen, Jorma ; Aikio, Sami ; Ranta, Esa ; Primmer, Craig R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bc43125cb53a0f3ebcb369945d433c6716ac5c0be99b46d0af0793315e8705753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agnatha and pisces</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic loci</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population mean</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiira, Katriina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Anssi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enberg, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piironen, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aikio, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranta, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primmer, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiira, Katriina</au><au>Laurila, Anssi</au><au>Enberg, Katja</au><au>Piironen, Jorma</au><au>Aikio, Sami</au><au>Ranta, Esa</au><au>Primmer, Craig R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>657-665</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>A key question of evolutionary importance is what factors influence who becomes dominant. Individual genetic variation has been found to be associated with several fitness traits, including behaviour. Could it also be a factor influencing social dominance? We investigated the association between social status and the amount of intra-individual genetic variation in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Genetic variation was estimated using 12 microsatellite loci. Dominant individuals had higher mean heterozygosity than subordinates in populations with the longest hatchery background. Heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlations did not find any evidence of inbreeding; however, single-locus analysis revealed four loci that each individually differed significantly between dominant and subordinate fish, thus giving more support to local than general effect as the mechanism behind the observed association between genetic diversity and a fitness-associated trait. We did not find any significant relation between mean$d^{2}$and social status, or internal relatedness and social status. Our results suggest that individual genetic variation can influence dominance relations, but manifestation of this phenomenon may depend on the genetic background of the population.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-005-0094-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
| ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2006-03, Vol.59 (5), p.657-665 |
| issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19291119 |
| source | SpringerLink (Online service); Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Agnatha and pisces Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Fish Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic diversity Genetic loci Genetic variation Inbreeding Microsatellites Population genetics Population mean Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Salmo trutta Salmon Social classes Trout Vertebrata |
| title | Do Dominants Have Higher Heterozygosity? Social Status and Genetic Variation in Brown Trout, Salmo trutta |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Dominants%20Have%20Higher%20Heterozygosity?%20Social%20Status%20and%20Genetic%20Variation%20in%20Brown%20Trout,%20Salmo%20trutta&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Tiira,%20Katriina&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=657-665&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-005-0094-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25063750%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614109886&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25063750&rfr_iscdi=true |